PS2 Class Action Lawsuit Against DVD Player 73
Thanks to an anonymous reader for pointing us to this class action lawsuit against Sony regarding the Playstation 2's DVD player. You can fill in a form on the page to be informed of 'material developments' and assist the case, which alleges that the PS2's "..DVD player component suffers from a number of defects that prevents it from playing a wide-variety of DVD movies." Unfortunately, it seems the lawyers forgot to change the page title, which still reads 'Palm M130 Class Action Home Page'. Uhm, whoops.
Re:Don't buy it then. (Score:1)
IANAL, but that's at least false advertisement and they should be punished (and at least fix the defective components free-of-charge).
Re:Don't buy it then. (Score:2)
Re:Don't buy it then. (Score:2)
For what I've read, the problem is the second one(I can be wrong). In that case, Sony IS responsible for this.
Otherwise, I guess the case would have no merit.
Re:Don't buy it then. (Score:1)
Re:Don't buy it then. (Score:2)
Too late. My Mr. Fusion needs some servicing.
Re:Don't buy it then. (Score:2)
If I were the plaintiffs, I'd want some serious reduction of lawyer compensation on the boiler-plate documents. There's no way a law firm should earn millions for search/replace...especially when it's not even done right.
Re:Don't buy it then. (Score:2)
Re:Gack... (Score:1)
Re:Gack... (Score:3, Interesting)
I wonder if lawyers get spam with "make money fast, do a class action suit against
Sleazy Lawyers? Sleazy Sony! A class action lawsuit wouldn't be possible if people weren't irritated at being lied to.
Other suit (Score:5, Interesting)
I really was going to rely on my PS2 as my primary DVD player, but this caused me to have to get a different one (an X-box).
Re:Other suit (Score:1)
You should never use a DVD player in a video game console to serve the role of a real dvd player. It's a decent idea for a dvd player in your kid's bedroom, or as a device to bring with you on vacation though.
Re:Other suit (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Other suit (Score:3, Funny)
sheesh. how do you people make it across the street without getting run over?
;-)
Re:Other suit (Score:1)
Re:Other suit (Score:4, Insightful)
The problem occured because Sony didn't put enough energy into developing it or testing it as a DVD Player. It's hard to justify putting that much energy into that aspect of the unit when the primary (and profitable) purpose is to play games. It was inevitable that it'd be half-assed at best.
It's an unwritten law: the more your game console does besides play games, the less successful it will be. The Phillips CD-I pops into mind. It wanted to be a game machine and a movie player, but didn't exactly excel at either. As a game unit, it didn't have a very good controller, nor did it have the graphics hardware to do anything particularly interesting. It couldn't even scroll images without it being choppy. As a movie player, it was kind of cool because this was before DVDs. Unfortunately, the movies were roughly VHS quality and you had to swap discs, at least the audio was really good on it.
So yes, the PS2 was supposed to 'do the same thing' as a DVD player, but they didn't focus it on that, and the consumer got burnt. Fortunately for most consumes, DVD players are cheap enough (even considered a household item) so a lot of people just didn't care.
Re:Other suit (Score:4, Insightful)
Even if you meant it could have been more successful without any but the first ability, I still dont' believe your statement. The PS2 is the most successful console in the past several years and three years on it is still selling like hotcakes compared to the competition. None of the above secondary abilities (DVD, PSX compatibility, Linux distro) have necessarily made it sell any better (although DVD and PSX were important to me, and others) but they certainly haven't hurt it either.
Re:Other suit (Score:1, Redundant)
Apples are not the same as oranges. I'll explain why. The PS2 can be used as a console for playing PS2 and PSX games. PSX compatiblity is for gaming and as such does not contradict what I said.
As a DVD Player, as I've already mentioned, the PS2 suffers. The time and money put into making that work would have been better spent making the system a better machine. The graphics on the PS2 looked blurry compared to the Dreamcast simply beca
Re:Other suit (Score:2)
Re:Other suit (Score:1)
Video quality isn't as good as dedicated device.
Audio quality (normally) isn't as good as dedicated device.
Controls sucks.
Configuation options are poor.
Menu handling is poor.
Limited featureset.
Etc.
A video game console isn't a dedicated piece of AV equipement. If you arn't expecting that kind of quality, a game console's built in DVD player is probably just fine, but I sure wouldn't want it as a part of my home theater setup...
Remote possibility (Score:5, Funny)
Um, you're supposed to sue the company, not individual products.
Re:Remote possibility (Score:1)
I bet Nintendo's smiling right now. (Score:5, Interesting)
Nintendo made a pretty strong stand with the GameCube that a game machine should only be a game machine. Gotta admit, they had a point. The GameCube was $100 cheaper than the PS2 or XBOX, plus it was considerably smaller. From what I gather from this story, the DVD player on the PS2 wasn't exactly a stellar. For the cost of a DVD Player and a GameCube, you could get a Playstation 2 that wasn't exactly stellar at either. I realize that the PS2 has games people like, however at launch Dreamcast games were looking better because of a nasty little bottleneck the Playstation 2 has.
Well I've drifted away from the point a bit. When making a game system, focus on making it play games. Not everybody is happy to spend $300 on a game system.
Yet on XBOX... (Score:3, Interesting)
I used to use my PS2 to play DVD's. I never had a 'remote' for it though, I justed used the joystick. That wasn't the greatest. But the XBOX DVD/Remote combo worked really well. It's my primary DVD player, you get the AC3 out, as well as HDTV if your TV can handle it. All that other jazz. I'm sure the offset the cost of testing and perfecting the DVD playback capability by
Re:Yet on XBOX... (Score:2)
You *do* know that the PS2 has an optical out, right? Sure it doesn't decode Dolby Digital and/or DTS, but it will put out an AC3 digital signal that your receiver will decode.
Re:Yet on XBOX... (Score:2)
Re:Yet on XBOX... (Score:1)
Actually, you don't get HDTV, the DVD playback is limited to 480i, no better then, well anything that outputs 480 lines. It's not even fsking progressive 480, it's interlaced. It says so right on the back of the package.
And, yes, I do have a Widescreen HDTV. I also happen to be using the X-box as the DVD player on it, but simply because our other DVD player doesn't have progressive scan either.
Re:I bet Nintendo's smiling right now. (Score:2)
I remember reading that the launch PS2s were sold at a nasty loss. They cost nearly $500 to make. Ouch.
Re:I bet Nintendo's smiling right now. (Score:1)
Take it as you will.
DeanT
Re:I bet Nintendo's smiling right now. (Score:2)
Yes, I've seen that site, but I don't think he's right. I read a magazine article back when the PS2 was launched (I think it was Next Generation, but my memory's fuzzy about it...) that broke down the costs of the system. Not only did it cost just under $500 to make, but the launch titles were not selling very well in Japan. People were buying the system because it could play DVD's, and players were expensive there. Sony needed to sell 2 games
Re:I bet Nintendo's smiling right now. (Score:1)
Disclaimer: I own a PS2, use it as a DVD player, and like it just fine.
Cheers,
DeanT
Never had a problem (Score:1)
Re:Never had a problem (Score:1)
Re:Never had a problem (Score:2)
Are "normal" people this technologically unsavvy? (Score:1)
"26. A DVD is the same size and thickness as a CD, approximately 4.72 inches in diameter and about as thick as a penny."
"28. Compared to a VHS (which plays on a VCR), the DVD (which plays on a DVD Player) offers consumers significant advantages as a format for playing studio released movies at home."
"29. The video and audio quality of DVD is significantly better than VHS.
Re:Are "normal" people this technologically unsavv (Score:2)
It's a breakthrough to do something that had been done many times previously? The only radical thing Sony did with the PS1 was to not include a disc activity light.
Re:Are "normal" people this technologically unsavv (Score:2)
If putting your games on CD isn't a breakthrough when a console does it, perhaps you could explain why the N64 did so poorly, compared to said PS1?
Here's a hint: one of the advertising campagins for Final Fantasy VII said something like 'Somebody take those cartridge guys out back and given them a cigarette.'
Re:Are "normal" people this technologically unsavv (Score:2)
The N64 didn't do poorly. It did quite well. Being beat by PS1 isn't the same as doing poorly.
As for the PS1, I'll happily concede that it's CD-ROM choice did help in it's success. However, I doubt we'll agree on the reasoning. The PS1 had a shitload of games. (Mostly shit games, so it really was a shitlaod) The cost of entering the PS1 game world was ve
Re:Are "normal" people this technologically unsavv (Score:2)
For further education, find the book "Game Over: Press Start To Continue."
To make a game for the Nintendo/Super Nintendo, and to a lesser extent the N64, you had to buy a batch of carts from Nintendo. Therefore, if you overestimated your sales, you were stuck with carts; underestimate, and you had to wait several months(!) for the big N to make you some more. Carts were expensive. Oh, and for the Nintendo, at least, big N limited you to five titles per year.
Now, the PS1; cds are dirt cheap to make.
Re:Are "normal" people this technologically unsavv (Score:2)
Fair point. I think you make sense, but I'm not willing to concede for the simple reason that they're not the first to do it. PCs have an even lower barrier to entry (even in the PS1 days) and were quite successful with CD-ROM titles. Heck, people could put out games for free without any media at all, simply usi
Re:Are "normal" people this technologically unsavv (Score:4, Interesting)
You know, his honor might not be a GTA fan. In fact, he may not even own a PS1, let alone a PS2.
If you'd like a ruling based on the technological merits, you'd better let people explain them.
Not to mention that some parents (I know this scenario is hard to imagine, but stay with me on this) may buy consoles for their kids; these people may have no idea what they do (some of them may have professional and/or personal lives) but they need to understand the issues before becoming part of this class action lawsuit.
Launch day PS2 and my old PSX (Score:5, Interesting)
I stood in line on launch day, 26 October 2000, and got my PS2 at a local Best Buy. Ever since that day, it has traveled four times on trips to visit the in-laws (12 hours away, by car) and over to a friends' apartment several dozen times, always travelling in a padded case. It has always been used standing in the upright position. I have completed several PS2 games and even some PS1 games during that time. I've watched dozens of movies on it.
I've never had a problem playing a game. Well, ok, I did once, but that turned out to be a dirty disc and once cleaned it played without problems.
I've only had trouble with two movies that I can think of. One of them was Jurassic Park 3 [imdb.com] and the other was The Mexican [imdb.com]. Everything else has worked flawlessly, to my knowledge. The glitches have always been at the layer change. One or both of these might have been before I go the updated DVD drivers with my Sony-made remote control.
Others have had trouble with PS2 consoles. Many also had trouble with PSX consoles. Back then, I suspect much of that was because the machines were put on carpet and didn't have adequate ventilation. I always put my PSX on a hard surface, like a large book or a shelf, and never had trouble with it, after four years of heavy use. I wouldn't be surprised if many of the problems with PS2 consoles you read about on USENET and so forth were from habits similar to those that caused problems with PSX machines.
I've had good luck with my systems, using a little care. Others have had trouble. Perhaps it is Sony's problem, but I've seen more than enough games and hardware that were obviously abused to think that much of the problem could well lie with the consumers. Is there a link to data that shows that it's Sony's problem and not the consumers? Something like "here's a list of movies tried with a just-out-of-the-box PS2. See how they don't play?"
I sure hope my luck holds.
Re:Launch day PS2 and my old PSX (Score:1)
Re:Launch day PS2 and my old PSX (Score:1)
Sorry about the formatting (Score:1)
My apologies, won't happen again.
Re:Launch day PS2 and my old PSX (Score:1)
Imagine if Sony sold a dedicated DVD player that couldn't play a major movie correctly, then stated that it was easy to fix if you bought an updated remote.
Note that I didn't get all torqued off when this happened to me; it annoyed the crap out of me, but I knew I was eventually going to get a better DVD play
Re:Launch day PS2 and my old PSX (Score:1)
Re:Lawyers SUCK. (Score:2)
Lawyers couldn't get people to jump onto the class-action lawsuit bandwagon if they didn't have a point.
Re:Lawyers SUCK. (Score:2)
Yeah but judging from your recent posts it's safe to say you're not the type of person who puts a lot of thought into the decision making process.
"...queercakes."
Queercakes? Heh. Are you implying that I'm attractive to you? I mean I'm flattered and all, but I'll stay with my girlfriend.
I don't see what the big deal is (Score:1)
At anyrate, aren't all the games themselves DVD discs too? I can understand people getting miffed over having to pay
Re:I don't see what the big deal is (Score:1)
1: The DVD Movie player isn't as compatible with DVD movies as it should be.
Personally, I never had a problem with it, except for one disc, and even then, a lot of other players did the same thing. After installing the update, even this disc played with no problems. Yeah, the PS2 had problems with layer switches, but then again, so did a lot of players circa 2000. Again the upgrade helped a lot.
2: The DVD mechanism itself is defective, resulting in a $120 repair charge fo
Only Disc problems I have ever had (Score:2)
The other problem has been several PS1 discs - Finaly Fantasy 8, Resident Evil 2 - they don't recognise the disc. Not that it matters I still have my old school playstation and it's more than capable of handling these.
Re:Only Disc problems I have ever had (Score:2)
i'd have to think that perhaps there's other issues than the dvd that didn't quite play right.
ok, ok, i've shamelessly ripped a few PPG DVD's to vcd for the little monsters too.
Hmmm... I just used google to fix mine. (Score:4, Informative)
Much easier than lawsuits...
However, I do see the point of the lawsuit, considering that apparently Sony's position on this is that you should send or take your unit in for service, costing you around $100-$120...
Sony should just fess up and fix them for free when people have these problems, since it seems to be a widespread enough problem and not just "isolated incidents"...
Re:Hmmm... I just used google to fix mine. (Score:1)
Unfortunatly this was too late for me...oh well.
Re:Hmmm... I just used google to fix mine. (Score:1)
Uk ps2 (Score:2)
Re:Uk ps2 (Score:1)
Mine's fine... (Score:2)
But then, I wasn't an early adopter.
Never had a problem reading anything with my PS2. (Score:1)
Ive had another one for about 9 months or so. I have the sony dvd remote (dont use the updated drivers, because my model already has them built in. Most of the newer ones do, if you RTFM and check), and this is the primary DVD player of the house. I use the optical output for audio, the svideo f
Webmaster needs to be slapped (Score:1)
woah, it works now... (Score:1)
huzzah!
i kinda feel like kramer when he used that balm during his coffee lawsuit.