Intellivision 25-In-1 TV Game Debuts 36
Thanks to the Gaming-Age forum regulars for pointing to an MCV UK article showing a forthcoming Intellivision-licensed 'TV game', similar in style to the 10-in-1 Atari joystick we covered a few months back. This joystick (looking nothing like the original Intellivision controller - will there be problems with a lack of buttons?), will be launching in the UK next month. Choices will include joysticks with both 10-in-1 and 25-in-1 flavors of officially licensed, built-in Intellivision games, and according to the article, "..titles include Star Strike, Night Stalker, Space Armada, Astrosmash, Sub Hunt, Thundercastle and Pinball, amongst others."
Ahh, sweet memories (Score:2, Interesting)
Everybody said it had an edge over the Atari on the tech side. Still, nobody else bought it. I loved the system, but had to envy those VCS 2600 cart swapping folks at school.
Years later, this reminds me of things like VHS and Video 2000 VCR systems here in Europe.
Besides, nothing could beat Sub Hunt in my book back then.
May the better one win...
Re:Ahh, sweet memories (Score:2)
Astrosmash was one of my favourites, which is strange because the background would change colour depending on the level you were at. I believe the same was true of Night Stalker (a game I really sucked at, f
Why did I not get an Atari 2600 like everyone else (Score:1)
Besides, I soon had an Atari, the all powerful Atari 800 computer!!! (In some ways I had a really great childhood.)
If you're not familiar with the intellivision (Score:5, Informative)
Intellivision Control (Score:1)
Thank god! that controller must have been the worst thing ever developed. I never had an intellivision (my friend did) but more importantly I never 'wanted' one and it was because of two things
1) The colecovision, better games and an atari emulator
2) That controller!
Re:Intellivision Control (Score:3, Interesting)
Yes, there were plenty of other good games out for intellivision (night stalker, astrosmash, AD&D, Tron series, talkies, etc) but if you were to compare the big three back then (Atari 2600, ColecoVision and Intellivision), the Intellivision was definately the best for sports games. I still love their baseball and f
Re:Intellivision Control (Score:1)
No way! The worst controller ever had to be for the 5200---it never really did work for longer than a week or so. I bet I used an entire roll of aluminum foil to fix mine up. And what genius decides to make a non-self-entering control stick?
However, my vote for the worst feeling controller was the 7800...If you grip the bottom of the controller to hit both buttons, eventually your hand *will* cramp from stretching the muscle between your thu
Re:Intellivision Control (Score:1)
As a child (parents still have it packed up somewhere) I had an Intellivision master I , close to 30 games, the Intellivoice, and the entertainment computer system that plugged into the cartridge slot. We even had a cassette tape that plugged into the "computer". Never had a problem with any of that. The controllers on the other hand.
I can't remember how many times the controllers were "fixed" by my dad. Eventually he was able to get Intellivison to sen
Re:Don't Be Raggin' on the Inty Controller (Score:1)
INTV had a 2600 adaptor too (Score:2)
The INTV did indeed have an "atari emulator" as well... look around on eBay and I'm sure you'll find a few of them.
And I completely agree about the controllers. I'd play my INTV much more often if it had normal joysticks. There's also the fact that the stupid spiral phone cords on them don't reach very far, so you almost have to hold the system in your lap. The only system with worse controllers in my opinion was the 5200... mostly because those thin
Re:INTV had a 2600 adaptor too (Score:1)
I ment to write : 1) The colecovision, better games and also had an atari emulator
ColecoVision!!! (Score:1)
Come on, Smurfs, you know you want it!!!
Re:ColecoVision!!! (Score:1)
Re:ColecoVision!!! (Score:1)
I was on 14th st. in NYC the other day... (Score:2)
Re:I was on 14th st. in NYC the other day... (Score:1)
As for the 200+ games, well, it's kind of misleading. Okay, seriously misleading. Most of the games were variants of a few core games, like Super Mario Bros. and Adventure Island. The the variations were stupid. Like the graphic of Mario would be slightly modifed
Re:I was on 14th st. in NYC the other day... (Score:2)
Re:I was on 14th st. in NYC the other day... (Score:1)
Huh? (Score:2)
huh? (Score:1)
when, in 1986??
according to intellivisionlives.com, sega and nintendo had NOTHING to do with its eventual crushing. If anyone, mattel beat the pee out of it with the colecovision.
Re:huh? (Score:2)
Oddly enough, Coleco owned the Colecovision. The Intellisivison was, on the other hand, a Mattell product.
Re:huh? (Score:1)
The point is sega and nintendo were just twinklings in their daddy's eyes when Intellivision fell off the map. The article was a little misleading I thought.
old systems new software? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:old systems new software? (Score:2)
What would be really kew is classic consoles with a compactflash reader. Copy every game ever made to an 8 MB card (if you can still find them), then do something clever with page switching or whatever to read and run the relevant title, probably after displaying
Re:old systems new software? (Score:2)
Re:old systems new software? (Score:2)
Delete all those pirate multi-carts that contain copies of other titles in different combinations. If you're still over 512MB delete unofficial graphics hacks (like nekkid super mario bros). Do you really translations to German? Do you need the partial translations if the full translation is available? Etc etc. On the other hand, you probably didn't count hobbyist RPG translations typically not included in the goodtools list and available only
i wonder.. (Score:2)
Re:i wonder.. (Score:1)
"Watch out for flack"
good old intellivision.. (Score:2)
Stupid me, I threw all of the boxes away to save space. I never really understood why they did the controllers like they did though, the overlays were a pain to keep track of, and most games only used directions and a couple of buttons for other stuff.. Atari really was a better system in terms of useability.
Bad choice of games? (Score:2)
But I guess inclusion of most of those is unlikely due to licensing problems. They would need to pay to use the AD&D name... Dragonfire and Demon Attack wer
What's the interest? (Score:2)
I never had an Intellivision, but my cousin did, so I played quite a bit. In the early 90s or so, a friend of mine was going through his attic and found his Intellivision, so we plugged it in and played Major League Baseball [intellivisionlives.com]. The game was atrocious--there are no fly balls, so you can't catch the
Re:What's the interest? (Score:1)
Re:What's the interest? (Score:1)
> The outfielders moved in unison
Are you sure you didn't confuse this w/ Atari 2600 baseball? On the Inty, you used the keypad to select an outfielder in order to move it. Only one moved at a time. Once a player had the ball, you pushed the corresponding keypad button to throw it to another position.
Later, they released World Championship Baseball [intellivisionlives.com], which added fly balls, sliding into base, and probably a couple other things.
They also had World Series Baseball [intellivisionlives.com] for their later computer add-on. You