Thailand Imposes Gamers Curfew 412
bg writes "How addicted can you be? According to this article, Thailand will install a curfew to "protect" their childern from the addiction from Gaming. "Game servers, both local and overseas, will be blocked from 10.00pm to 6.00am daily from July 15 to Sept 30, while Internet cafes will also have their hours curbed to those times". Under particular attack is Korean role-playing game Ragnarok, which was introduced to Thailand seven months ago."
Protect the Brothels (Score:4, Funny)
Sarcasm's wasted on you (Score:2)
I can't stand Ragnarok (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I can't stand Ragnarok (Score:2, Informative)
Re:I can't stand Ragnarok (Score:3, Funny)
Whatever makes the parents feel good (Score:5, Insightful)
Parents, watch your kids. Don't make the government do it for you, you won't like it.
This is not specific to Thailand either.
Re:Whatever makes the parents feel good (Score:2)
the Thai government acts only when facing real problem (not "Doom causes school shootings")
it introduce a partial limitations
it doesn't emphasise jailing people or suing them
it intends to evaluate the effectiveness of these particular measures after a few months.
Rhetorical question: in which country the government would probably attack an imaginary problem, ban computer games altogether, sue developers and jail players and make these measures permanent with only possible revision
Re:Whatever makes the capitalists feel good?? (Score:4, Insightful)
OK, good... now name one that's actually a good idea and has worked. What if I lived in Pakistan and wasn't a Muslim (or Buddist, or whatever) and WANTED to look at porn, but couldn't because the government regulated my internet traffic?
Never trust monopolists and capitalists to work for the good of you or your kids.The only values they understand are dollars and share-prices.
And NEVER trust the government, because they're the only group that can legally kill you and everyone you ever met "for the common good". I'd rather trust people concerned with money than people that could kill me for not trusting them... and get away with it. At least I agree that money is good. I definitely don't agree with killing me.
Re:Whatever makes the capitalists feel good?? (Score:2)
Move.
The government represents the people. If the government has decreed that "porn is bad, we must block it," then that is the equivalent of society saying that porn is bad. Over here, our government says "Marijuana is bad." To use your own analogy, what if you were a non-Christian living in the US and wanted to smoke Marijuana? What
Re:Whatever makes the capitalists feel good?? (Score:2)
You, my friend, are a democrat. I don't mean the political party. I mean the type of government. You believe that the majority of the people are right all of the time. I don't. Most of the people in this country think Hillary never knew of Bill's affairs. I'm more intelligent than that. People are stupid, and the government shouldn't repr
Re:Whatever makes the capitalists feel good?? (Score:2)
I call BS.
First of all, you seem to have a great deal of difficulty understanding that "The Government" and "The People" are one and the same. The Government isn't some mystical, magical group of people dropped off by aliens to govern us, THEY ARE US. They worked in bakeries before we elected them. They went to school with us. They live down the street from us. G
Re:Whatever makes the capitalists feel good?? (Score:2)
Step 1. Outlaw guns.
Step 2. Begin executions. Claim it's for "the common good".
Step 3. Outlaw elections.
Step 4. Kill anyone who opposes.
There are people that are working on Step 1 right now. God only knows what could happen between Steps 3 and 4, or afterwards. After they have your guns, there's not a damn thing you can do to stop them. You think you'll march on Washington
Re:Whatever makes the capitalists feel good?? (Score:2)
Re:Whatever makes the capitalists feel good?? (Score:2)
Good day.
Re:Whatever makes the capitalists feel good?? (Score:2)
A standard libertarian talking point that is provably false. If you don't pay your taxes the government probably won't catch on fo
Re:Whatever makes the capitalists feel good?? (Score:2)
No actually it doesn't, we are not all mindless drones. That's what seperates largely tollerant societies (such as midly Christian, Catholic, Shinto, Hindu (etc) societies) from intollerant ones (such as extremist Muslim nations).
What part of the idea of 'serpation of church and state' do you not understand?
Pakistani does not equal 'muslim', just as American does not equal 'Christian'.
I didn't know killing was one of the rights of the govt.
Wow, then you *are* comp
Re:Whatever makes the capitalists feel good?? (Score:2)
Just to nitpick: "extremist" Muslim nations equal "extremist" Catholic nations in intolerance. As a matter of fact Catholic countries and "mildly Christian" countries probably killed and destroyed more people and families than the Muslim ones. If my fears were to be bodycount dr
Re:Whatever makes the capitalists feel good?? (Score:2)
Oh I quite agree!
And obviously there are extremist Christians too and they are equally as problematic and dangerous (and worry me just as much), but I don't think in truth there is a real or large problem with extremist Christian countries (at least not at the moment....).
Christian and Catholic religions certainly have a much worse record historically in terms of invading butchering and looting. And - historical
Re:Whatever makes the capitalists feel good?? (Score:2)
Did it escape your notice that everyone else uses itallics to mark sections of text appropriately?
It's just tedious chore to work through your insane retoric without it, in fact, I don't think I can be bothered.
You are in need of several very serious clues.
And erm, why do you seem to think I'm an American? *boggle*
Define ".adult content" Re:Whatever makes the (Score:2)
The greasy haired, overweight 30 something, who has been living in his parents basement, slowly flips the page.
The first image that strikes his eyes is of a leggy blond, reclined on a lounger. Her hair glistens from a dip in the warm, inviting pool. Water droplets run down her long slim neck. Her hand rests casually on her supple thigh, mere inches away from that place to which he has never been. He
Re:Whatever makes the capitalists feel good?? (Score:2)
In Eastern societies, this decision is left to the govt. And normally, they do a good job of deciding.
Re:Whatever makes the capitalists feel good?? (Score:2)
What if you lived in an Eastern society, and the government decided that since profanity, and "adult content" can be found on Slashdot, then Slashdot was banned? What would you do? Protest without guns, because they had been banned? Revolt against their cannons? Sounds kinda like Tienamen Square to me.
Re:Whatever makes the capitalists feel good?? (Score:2)
I have no problem with a
I'd also recommend that if you don't want the responsibility of children, don't have them. Give them to someone who wants them.
What about adult gamers?
They're adults. L
Re:Whatever makes the capitalists feel good?? (Score:2)
It seems they wish to restrict "everyone", while saying it's for the "children".
Exactly. I was up last night until 11pm playing Star Wars: Galaxies, and I still got up and came to work. It's not my choice, exactly... I'd rather be sleeping, but I know that if I want to keep this job, and get paid, I had better show up.
Re:Whatever makes the capitalists feel good?? (Score:2, Funny)
Wait, corporations now own our children? Fuck, how long was I asleep for?
Re:Whatever makes the capitalists feel good?? (Score:2)
+5 funny
Re:Whatever makes the capitalists feel good?? (Score:3, Insightful)
But the simple act of not letting them play PC games after 10pm is another thing entirely. Thats as simple as not putting the machine in their bedroom.
Thai children have bedrooms? (Score:2)
Re:Whatever makes the capitalists feel good?? (Score:3, Insightful)
I really suppose you have a kid (I do, and can state my personal thoughts on this matter). There's very little chance of parental censorhip succeeding with kids - why? Bcos kids are kids, that's all. This is a matter where Western and Eastern thinking differs a lot - the value of state censorship.
I do have a kid, two in fact. And you can bet your dictator trodden ass that I MUCH prefer setting the limits for my children, than havi
Re:Whatever makes the capitalists feel good?? (Score:2)
And yet, brilliant thinkers, scientists, philosophers, politicians etc. have risen from the East. Why, every day in the US, there's some kind of revolt against Asians robbing 'intelligent' jobs from the West. Freedom is good in the hands of those who respect and value it - censorship tends to move people towards alternate avenues for enjoyment - and these are normally much better.
Please cite for me one, just one, "revolt" over Easterns taking jobs from Westerns
Re:Whatever makes the capitalists feel good?? (Score:2)
Sorry troll, but language on its own hardly rises to the level of "too violent". Bashing in heads with a baseball bat? Yes, that'd be "too violent". Using profanity to express one's vehement disagreement with dictatorial government? That's hardly even revolutionary.
most Easterners are peace loving, and wouldn't resort to violence or guns despite rising cos
Typical narrow minded view by (some) Westerners (Score:2)
Been to Bangkok recently? Things are changing very fast. Raids, arrests and trials are common place and the new mayor is doing a lot to clean the place up. Oh, and thinking about it, who are the customers? Mainly rich westerners who were brought up by good western parents with strict moral codes. And now they go off and exploit the worlds poor & young. Way to go.
more magazines and films a
Re:typical myopic view by "westerner" (Score:2, Flamebait)
are you deliberately suggesting that asians are somehow morally deficient and that caucasians are somehow morally superior, or is that an unfortunate byproduct of your particular points?
should win the award for most idiotic of the day. Scottkin didn't say anything about asians as a race nor did he say a word about caucasians and the west. Nor did it even suggest what you said. YOU SUGGESTED IT, thus revealing your paranoia on your own subject, and a predetermination to play a race card
Gaming Addiction (Score:2, Funny)
That certainly would be motivation to have a LAN installed and invite friends over for weeks at a time.
I guess they don't read slashdot (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:I guess they don't read slashdot (Score:2)
Re:I guess they don't read slashdot (Score:2)
I'm in agreement that games can be educational for kids but if they're imposing a curfew that kids can't play games between 10:00pm and 6:00am then they're probably playing way too much. Just like any other addiction, too much of a good thing isn't a better thing.
Granted, the curfew still sucks. I think it should be more up to the parents to tak
Changle (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Changle (Score:2)
Man, I thought the last story [slashdot.org] was bad, with its "muggles", "Gryffondors", etc.
Sigh (Score:2, Insightful)
Besides, I can't imagine that the number of "addicted" players is anything like what they're making it out to be.
Ouch... (Score:3, Interesting)
I believe they have a new ratings system for video games. It rates the games on the basis of the level of violence in the game. e.g. cartoon violence, fantasy violence, intense violence and sexual violence. This will come into effect from Sept. 15.
I wonder why Thai authorities could not do the same instead of imposing curfew.
Anyways, I don't think the curfew is gonna work. It never does! After all, the forbidden fruit is always the most desirable... and the best way to ensure that children do something is to disallow it!
Hopefully... (Score:5, Funny)
Hopefully it will prevent incidents like this [slashdot.org], when gamers apparently don't know when to stop.
Do you know what (Score:5, Funny)
I wish they would come around to my apartment and *enforce* this curfew on me, personally.
Games should have a playing limit; If you play for more than 24 hours, it enforces you to shower, shave and eat something. You would have to present fresh evidence that these tasks have been done before unlocking the next level.
It would be for my own good :/
There already is something that does this. (Score:3, Funny)
working hours (Score:2, Funny)
So? (Score:5, Interesting)
Just run a game server at port 80? Or if it requires more ports, tunnel them all through port 80 or use other common ports? (21, 23, 25, etc) This either renders the "curfew" useless or generates one helluva fun spastic reaction from Thai officials as they accidently ban the web.
Re:So? (Score:2)
Port 80? But that's for the Interweb.
UDP != TCP (Score:3, Informative)
-molo
Re:UDP != TCP (Score:3, Informative)
Halflife? UDP.
Starcraft? UDP.
Anything with a real-time pace is going to need to use UDP so that the whole stream doesn't block when one packet is dropped. By the time the packet would get resent, the information is no longer pertinent.
-molo
Asian parenting, the gaming phenomenon, etc (Score:5, Interesting)
I've been to Malaysian Net Cafes. Part of the reason parents are so worried about these places is because they often are havens for youth gang members, and still more often serve as venues for recruiting impressionable youths into the gangs.
Gaming addiction, while not so prevalent here, is quite common in the Far East. Kuala Lumpur has Net Cafes on every block, and enough children skip school or sneak out at night to play there that parents groups have demanded that something be done.
Many asian societies value strict adherence to the wishes of one's parents. These curfews have probably been implemented because parents feel extremely concerned that their children are defying family values (by disobeying their parents and playing games at all hours).
Parenting here (Score:5, Insightful)
Well here in Canada (and the US) parents don't feel they can simply order their children around either. But rather then expect law enforcement to do anything about it, they whine and bitch about freedom and rights.
Then schools and law enforcement try to cover the gap left by bad parenting, constantly overstepping reasonable bounds and cause more trouble. (I actually had a principal that gloated about how he was more powerful then a court, he didn't even need evidence to punish students)
Bad parenting exists everywhere, you have busy hardworking overworked parents, lazy parents, non existant parents.
Making laws to compensate isn't going to help, we need parents to get back to work.
(No, I'm not a parent. Yes I know it's hard, which is why I'm not a parent yet, I'm not ready.)
Re:Parenting here (Score:3, Insightful)
1) Passive Parenting
- Exposure of children to all media, regardless of content, with no explanations
- Laissez-faire attitudes, encouraging "expression" and "individuality"
2) See-No-Evil Parenting
- Shield children from "the evils of the world" - Strict enforcement of one's personal values on child
I believe both of these methods of parenting can lead to complications with children as the
Re:Parenting here (Score:3, Insightful)
Yes, but accountable and blame aren't fair.
There are excellent parents with terrible kids.
I also think that no person should ever be responsible for the actions of another. This garbage with jailing parents because their kids skip school is unacceptable.
You really can't force responsibility.
Re:Parenting here (Score:2)
You're absolutely correct: no person should be responsible for the actions of another. However, when we attempt to look at what brings about these actions, we often disregard the cold had truth, the fact that there are steps parents could have taken to prevent their children from taking these courses of action.
Ragnarök (Score:2)
Ragnarök is Ancient Nordic (sweden/norway/denmark/iceland - the language the Vikings were speaking) and is the name of "the end of the world" according to Aesir religion.
Re:Ragnarök (Score:2)
Look again: Ragnarök [ragnarok.co.kr]
Great! (Score:5, Insightful)
Similar thing in UK (Score:3, Interesting)
When television first starting being broadcast in the UK, there was no transmission perhaps an hour in the evening so that parents could put there children to bed.
Re:Similar thing in UK (Score:2)
I only get to play games after 10:00 PM! (Score:2, Insightful)
Outrageous (Score:5, Interesting)
But seriously. This sort of thing is serious, even although it is "only" happening in Thailand, because I can hear Blair, Bush et al having real live orgasms about the possibilities. You have to ask the question, "what next?" When they finally take the ashtrays off restaurant tables, the sugar bowl and the salt cellar will look furtuvely at one another and wonder how long they have left. Those in authority never stop with what they have. If they can successfully "solve" the "problem" of childhood addiction to computer games, then some new problem will take its place as "#1 menace to our youth" and will, in turn, be "solved" by an even more pointless and draconian law.
Since when has it become necessary to prevent adults from doing something that might be harmful for children just in case children might do it anyway? That is not the job of the government, it is the job of parents. The whole point of being an adult is that you alone are responsible for your actions and the consequences thereof. Since the dawn of time, the human race has practiced self-destructive behaviour
Governments have been nibbling away at our rights for a long time now. Every so often, though, they seem to bite off a huge chunk, chew it with their mouths open, and spit it in your face.
If we don't take up against this sort of thing right now it might be too late. The day is coming when every single decision that might have a hint of a consequence about it will have already been made for you. The world is turning evil, what with ID cards, CCTV cameras, embedded RFID chips, anonymous tip-off hotlines and suchlike. And you know what? Under that kind of a system, I really can't think of a single advantage to not being in prison.
Not a Precedent for the West (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Outrageous (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Outrageous (Score:2, Funny)
"Anything not good for you is bad, hence, illegal. Alcohol, caffeine, contact sports, meat . . . "
"Are you sh**ing me? "
"John Spartan, you are fined one credit for a violation of the verbal morality statute. "
"What the Hell is that? "
"John Spartan, you are fined one credit . . . "
"Bad language, child play, gasoline, uneducational toys, and
Some kill for gaming... some die for it (Score:3, Informative)
Kill [bbc.co.uk]
"One of the boys was seen on Chinese television telling police interrogators that he had started the fire in an act of revenge because staff at the cybercafe had refused to let him play computer games there."
Die [gamer.tv]
"A South Korean man died yesterday after playing computer games at an Internet cafe for 86 hours nonstop, reports the Associated Press."
I have no point, just an observation.
Hmm... (Score:2, Interesting)
Will cut gamer deaths for sure (Score:3, Interesting)
sounds like Thailand to me ... (Score:3, Interesting)
I have to admit wondering at the time what effect it would have for an entire nation to grow up playing a game like that. They would be well-versed in squad combat techniques, for a start
The rise of the Internet Speakeasy (Score:5, Insightful)
Gravity must not be screwing Thai players. (Score:2)
The first thing they did to gain users was make an open beta period where it was open for free. this is good, but considering that it was only 1 month and there was still bugs when they went to pay, most users didn't have much time in it to stay with it, not to mention now it has no way of attracting new users since there is no 30 day trial period as far as I can see. From open beta to retail, it went from
How is it different? (Score:2, Insightful)
You might tell me that computer games aren't damaging--hell we've all been playing them for ye
Re:How is it different? (Score:4, Insightful)
Anyway, when you prohibit something, it becomes a forbidden fruit. It's no longer just a drug, or just a game, but it's a way to rebel. So children forget about the risks, and just do it to piss off adults. If we were to accept that children have the right to decide for themselves, then they would be more inclined to accept advice, and make rational decisions. This is why DARE is a failure, children aren't stupid, they know what they are getting is propaganda. Think about the differences in alcohol use between american and european youth. For americans, alcohol is taboo and thus it is heavily abused by teenagers and college students. In europe binge drinking is not the problem it is here, because they have been exposed to alcohol and learned socially acceptable ways of using it.
A new troll (Score:2, Offtopic)
For when you get fragged:
Fucking stop camping or I'll call the cops on your ass!
Like this will work... (Score:2, Informative)
Thailand is the kind of place where I can go to Pantip Plaza and have my choice of five floors of pirated software for $2.50US/CD. When the police come to crack down, you throw a sheet over your stall - if you can't see it, apparently it's not there (with the aid of a bit of a kickback, of course). Get pulled over? Shell out a few hundred baht to compensate the off
Re:This is bad how? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:This is bad how? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Well OK, you have a point (Score:2, Insightful)
What if you don't have a 9-to-5 job but a 2(pm)-to-10(pm) job? All work and no play make Homer go something something....
Re:Not a bad idea at all (Score:5, Funny)
Placebo? Is that the art of convincing your enemy you hit him really without actually touching him?
Re:Not a bad idea at all (Score:2)
Also might I draw your attention to the thick nicotine cloud hovering above South-East Asia?
Re:Not a bad idea at all (Score:2)
Two hundred years ago, the US population was approximately 5 million. Now we have over 280 million people. We have about 55 times as many people, but only 3 times as many people die from cancer? That's an amazing accomplishment if your numbers are correct (which I doubt, but don't have the time to look up now).
Re:Not a bad idea at all (Score:2)
Re:Not a bad idea at all (Score:2)
Re:Not a bad idea at all (Score:2)
Re:good (Score:2)
Curfew can be good, if enforced by parents, not by government. If parents aren't able to monitor their children and check for actual signs of game abuse they can always enforce a time limit policy (such as "no computer except between 4 and 10 pm"), and that doesn't take that much time and effort, unless the children is very motivated (you must do this before actual addiction developes).
If, on the other side, the policy is enforced by the government, you can't discriminate between children, who would benef
Re:good (Score:2, Funny)
Shouldn't you be out on a ledge somewhere?
Good... Good?! (Score:2)
Come on now. Obviously, if you were so addicted to video games that you needed me
Re:good (Score:5, Insightful)
You're right. This is Flame Number One.
Growing up, I grappled with a gaming addiction. Going to school on three hours of sleep is not good for your education (despite what some articles might have you believe). In a perfect world, parents would be preventing their children from overloading on games. In reality, in these days of dual incomes and extracurricular activities, they aren't always able to, and it's a good thing that the government can step in and lend a hand.
I remember one time, back in the early 90's, I was playing too many video games and not doing my homework. I was still getting pretty good grades, mostly B's, but not the A's I was capable of. I was living only with my father, at the time, so there really wasn't anybody around for several hours a day to watch me (I was 12-13 at the time). My punishment was very limited video game access for 6 months, or until my grades improved. You know how my father accomplished that? He took my Super Nintendo to his workplace, put it in a box, and stuck it under his desk. It could have been in the car, at one of his friends' houses, or any number of a million other places. Was my father "special", or "lucky", or a "more talented" parent, or simply "more intelligent" than your parents? Probably. Maybe the easiest solution is for parents to be parents.
The alternative is medication (which is how I kicked the video game habit before I became the next Columbine), and that will just be more expensive to everyone in the long term.
Great idea. Let's just drug our children. After all, 6% of the children in this country actually have ADD, yet 17% (or more) are on Ritalin. We obviously need more drugs. While I'm on the subject, maybe you don't watch enough TV (because of your work schedule and all), but perhaps you've seen the commercials that try to drug all the adults now too? They're paid for by the company that produces Ritalin.
Curfews are cheap and effective.
What's cheap about it? Paying the government employees their union-decided wages to work minimal hours on doing the least-possible work? What's effective about a curfew? I was out all the time when I was a kid after the 10pm curfew that we had in our town. I walked past the police department at 2am, including officers and patrol cars (and I didn't look over the age of 12), and never once got taken home, or fined, or anything.
Another good approach might be to put a lower age limit on the use of Windows.
I'm not sticking up for Microsoft, but putting an age limit on software is insane. If my 3 year-old is intelligent enough to play Final Fantasy X, then damnit, he/she will play Final Fantasy X. Who's going to regulate and enforce that age? Microsoft? Then they'll be collecting more personal information about you, which I'm sure you'll love. The government? Oh wonderful. Another Total Information Awareness Act. Great idea.
You need to think out your arguments before you post... seriously. If your parents didn't want you playing games, they shouldn't have purchased the console for you. If you only had 3 hours of sleep every night, eventually, you'll fall over and sleep. It seems like it took you quite a few years, but you're mentally asleep now. Mission accomplished.
Re:good (Score:2)
Yea! now THERE'S a solution. What were you on? Adderol? Genius. Give all of our children prescription speed. Hey, if that doesn't work we can always step it up a notch to Desoxyn... A little meth never hurt anyone!
Re:good (Score:4, Insightful)
You know, I pretty much grew up on games. Heck, I still have my gaming addiction. I'm almost 33 now, and I haven't shot anyone. In fact, I don't even consider violence to be a solution to anything.
I also have a well paid job as a programmer. Somehow gaming didn't interfere with that education after all. (In fact, it was what got me interested in programming in the first place. And my father fully cooperated there, so by the time I was 14 I was already fluent in Z80 assembly.)
No medication was necessary, either. Go figure.
My father did insist though that I go to bed at 9 PM, no matter what. Maybe that's why I didn't go to school on 3 hours sleep.
If your parents just put you on drugs instead, well, no offense to you, but I hope your parents do take offense. Because they're retards. They're a prime example of what's wrong with society today, and what's the _real_ cause of stuff like Columbine happening.
The real problem is: people who don't want to deal with their kids. In some situations even to talk to them. They're so busy making a career and working 12 hour geek shifts to impress the PHB, that poor kids get at most 5 minutes a day of speaking to their parents.
And when said kids have a problem, the parent takes the easy way out. Just put the kid on drugs or insist that the government take care of that problem. Hey, it's easier than talking to the kid, right?
A lot of blowing stuff out of proportion is based on that lack of communication too. It's easier to make blanket statements about games, than to talk to the kid and find out exactly what games does he play.
It's downright retarded to put for example FPS gaming in the same pot as, for example, puzzle games. You tell me how some kid growing on logic games is going to be the next serial killer. No, really. I'm all ears. He's going to get the idea of shooting people with a shotgun... from a game which doesn't even have shotguns anywhere?
Yet people will still make these blanket statements anyway and expect the government to do their work for them. It's easier than actually talking to their children. Or than, you know, actually trying to influence the kid's choice of games.
So here's an idea: if you're going to put your carreer in first place, and the kids only in 10'th place (after watching football, beer, watching news, and everything else) on your list of priorities... you shouldn't have kids in the first place. Wear a condom. They're cheap. Or take a pill. Have an abortion. Whatever.
But don't just bring a poor kid into this world and then treat it like it's some unwanted rat in the basement.
Re:good (Score:2)
Don't say the *nixen don't have addictive games...
Re:Interesting record (Score:2)
Anybody who thinks this is "protecting" ANY kids has obviously never heard of corrupt cops, or read any Philip K. Dick (who explored the ability of a gov't to use a "drug war" to eliminate political dissenters). Kids in Singapore are only "safe" now, as long as they don't disagree with the gov't or piss off the wrong policeman.
Interesting poin
Re:Interesting record (Score:4, Interesting)
Police also tend to get weird ideas, like the undesirable person might not be dealing drugs, but we don't like his kind here anyway. Lets say he's a drug dealer (blam).
To me, this sounds like a human rights disaster waiting to happen, and I hope Singapore gets itself out of the mess before it blows up in their face. I don't think you'll find due process "ball-less" when you get wrongly accuesed by some overzealous cop listening to some guy pleading for his life and fingering everybody he knows as a drug dealer. Yes. The government knows the best forms of entertainment for you. Thinking for yourself is bad. Pick up government novel GN-23562 for your daily entertainment stipend today. Interestingly enough, a lot of those fast food places used to close between 10 and 12. Maybe the kids will turn to drugs once they take away the gaming? I don't know. I do know that the games weren't hurting anybody (the vast majority of the time at any rate), I don't know what they're going to do instead though. This is a bit of FUD, but it really does reflect my uncertainty about the upcoming situation.
Re:Interesting record (Score:2)
Drugs don't do ANY damage to ANYONE? (Score:2)
Unless you overdose.
Or are negligent becuase you're high or strung out (whilst driving, etc.)
Or have to steal to feed your habit.
Or are blackmailed by someone who threatens to tell your boss about your coke addiction.
Or get poisoned by a bad fix.
Or catch HIV or another nasty illness from sharing a dirty needle with another addict.
Or are ripped off by your dealer.
Or are hurt because you found yourself in the wrong place at the w
Re:Drugs don't do ANY damage to ANYONE? (Score:2)
Overdosing is caused by inconsistant product due to it's illegality and lack of regulation.
Or are negligent becuase you're high or strung out (whilst driving, etc.)
Impared driving under the influence is wrong be it from alcohol, drugs, or lack of sleep.
Or have to steal to feed your habit.
Stealing is only an issue because the prices of drugs are enormously inflated by Prohibition.
Or are blackmailed by someone who threatens to tell your boss about your coke addiction. The only sti
Re:Drugs don't do ANY damage to ANYONE? (Score:2)
The rest of your points have been refuted by others(good job guys) so I won't go into them. I just wanted to point out a study which shows shows how legalizing a hard drug, heroin in this case, can dramatically reduce problems associated with it.
In the UK heroin addicts were maintained on heroin. It was found that these addicts committe
Re:Interesting record (Score:2)
And Singapore's wouldn't be any more convincing: I saw a TV show while I was there which was pushing their local anti-drug propaganda and it was just hilariously inept by Western standards... or would have been, if they weren't killing people over it.
Singapore has got to be one of the most boring places I've ever visited, so I wouldn't be surpri
Re:The fool-proof method.. (Score:2)
Huh??? I don't see how that logically follows. There is far, far more "educational software" available for Windows platforms than are available for Linux. Why did you presume that Microsoft giving away cheap Windows/Office licenses to undercut a Linux package equates to them promoting gaming? L
Re:The fool-proof method.. (Score:2)
Okay now, what I'm hypothesising is this: Folks who get exposed to Linux generally think more, and better. Reasons:
1. GNU / Linux is more programmable, flexible and 'experimental'. It's what a kid likes - lots of things to learn, and lots to experiment.
2. MSware, OTOH is 'closed' proprietary and controlled. Kids hate all of the above. Some years back, I taught kids a few MSDOS commands - and
Re:The fool-proof method.. (Score:2)
Sorry.
You made good points, but you seem to have restricted your idea of "learning" to "programming a computer." While I agree that Linux offers more/easier/cheaper opportunities to manipulate the computer itself than Windows does, I on the other hand believe that the vast majority of children "learning" on a computer will be doing so at a much higher level. That is, using Encarta to research book reports, or playing math games or a typing tutor. Very few kids