


Rubik's Cube Record Broken 41
martinX writes "The Courier Mail has a story about a San Fran software developer who spins the cube faster than anyone else on the planet: 20 seconds to solve Rubik's Cube. I didn't think anyone still played with them." The winner, Dan Knights, said "It's sort of a dream come true", and credited Jessica Fridrich's cube-solving method as the key to winning, leaving the originator of the method in second place at the World Rubik's Cube Championships in Toronto at the weekend.
Video? (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:Video? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Video? (Score:1)
Obligitory Lego URL (Score:4, Interesting)
20 seconds??????? (Score:4, Funny)
By peeling and re-applying the stickers.
Re:20 seconds??????? (Score:1)
It was quite fun to see folks accustomed to solving the cube stop suddenly and start scratching their heads.
I think I saw him... (Score:3, Funny)
Little did I know I was passing by my chance to meet a world champion. I just hope he doesn't let it go to his head and end up screwed up like Mike Tyson or Todd Marinovich.
Re:I think I saw him... (Score:1)
*By one I mean several hundred**
**The reverse is applicable to all gag products
Re: (Score:2)
Re:An even bigger challenge! (Score:2)
Re:An even bigger challenge! (Score:1)
Re:An even bigger challenge! (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Solve times (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Solve times (Score:2)
Factoids - (Score:2)
Learning to solve the cube via the top-middle-bottom method takes about a half hour, and anyone who's done this 10 or 15 times will be able to spot an odd configuration (unsolveable) as soon as they reach bottom (about half way through solve).
Re:Solve times (Score:3, Interesting)
Sub-3 minute times aren't too hard with a little practice. I have "The Simple Solution to Rubik's Cube" [ebay.com] (not my auction, just the first link to the book I found).
As you can see from the picture, it's barely a book--more of a pamphlet. There aren't more than a couple dozen algorithms in the whole thing, and I don't think more than 8 or 10 possible positions you have to look for at any one stage.
The plan here is to get you solving the puzzle by minimizing the number of cubes you're positioning at once
Re:Solve times (Score:1)
Actually, the proof (informal) of that is quite easy - it starts solved (when you buy it), and to scramble you rotate the faces, so to solve you simply reverse the moves you did to scramble. If you start flipping corners or edges (an odd number of flips) then it becomes unsolvable, however.
Re:Solve times (Score:2)
Reversing motions is one way to solve it. However that is not (nessicarly) the optimal way to solve it. Often there is a different sequence that can be followed to solve the thing. If I've been trying to solve it for a while there is sure to be a better way.
Re:Solve times (Score:1)
Re:Solve times (Score:2)
True speed cubers memorize algorithms fo
Re:Solve times (Score:2)
Just goes to show that there must be better algorithms out there.
Word (Score:1)
initial state of cube? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:initial state of cube? (Score:5, Informative)
Scrambling:
In all portions of the championship, puzzles will be scrambled using random moves generated by computer. The same sequences of random moves will be applied to the puzzle of each competitor to ensure each competitor will be starting with the same random puzzle state. This same method of scrambling will be used during the averages or best of 3 ?- type portions of competition. These random moves will be applied by independent jury-members.
The number of random moves depends on the puzzle. See the below example for explanation.
Rubiks 3x3x3: 25 moves
Rubiks 4x4x4, 40 moves
Rubiks 5x5x5, other: 60 moves etc
But what I REALLY want to know is, how the hell do you solve a cube while blindfolded? Seriously, there are three categories of blindfolded competitions.
Re:initial state of cube? (Score:3, Informative)
If i'm not mistaken, the fastest for a pre-examined cube is something like 9 secs.
Re:initial state of cube? (Score:3, Interesting)
So, 25 random moves is at least 4 that are redundant, ie, don't add to the complexity of the puzzle.
I think this is a real problem (Score:3, Informative)
It's also pointless to standardize the number of turns used in randomization. Beyond a trivial number of turns (say, about 10 - maybe 15 for a pro), the cube is randomized enough that you'll be "starting from
Re:I think this is a real problem (Score:1)
I am forshamed (Score:3, Interesting)
Just a question of time and monkeys (Score:2, Funny)
I started reading the algorithm (Score:2)
damn miss post! (Score:1)
Not a World Record (Score:2)
It's not a new world record, it's simply a new championship winner. The world record is still 16.53 seconds.
Well, now I feel stupid... (Score:2)
And to think that I was never able to finish much more than two sides of the cube... ah well, I was 10, and the 'net wasn't around then. It was probably more fun that way, really.