NBC Merger Leaves VU Games, Blizzard, Sierra In Cold 35
Thanks to Reuters for their report that Vivendi Universal Games has still not found a buyer, with indication that, despite much confusion, "The video game unit is not a part of the newly-created NBC Universal, and Vivendi has signaled its intention to hold on to the division." VU Games is also the parent company of both Sierra and Blizzard, but although "...industry insiders have questioned why Vivendi would want to retain ownership considering its divestiture of other entertainment assets", VU Games will stay as it is for now, since "...sources in the banking and games-publishing industries have said the sale bogged down over price, with Vivendi asking on the order of $800 million."
Why buy? (Score:2)
Re:Why buy? (Score:2, Interesting)
Worth $800m? Not sure about that. It all depends on the sales and profits. Obviously the other game companies either don't have the cash to do the deal, or don't think it's worth that much to them.
Re:Why buy? (Score:1)
Half-Life?
Counter-Strike?
Half-Life 2?
Team Fortress 2?
There are some surefire hits right there...
Re:Why buy? (Score:2, Interesting)
Counter-Strike - $0, was available as a free download, the commercial version was mainly a loss-leader to improve sales of Half-Life.
Half-Life 2 - $0, is not out. In a post-Halo world, things are a little different.
Team Fortress 2 - $0. Was due in 2000, then 2001, then 2002, then I stopped caring about it. The idea of a Team Fortress sequel now seems quaint and outdated after Battlefield 1942 and Planetside. I think they've missed the win
Re:Why buy? (Score:1)
Umm, no one from the Starcraft team left Blizzard. All the people that left were from Blizzard NORTH, which produces the Diablo series.
Re:Why buy? (Score:3, Informative)
Correction, first due out 2nd quarter 1998 according to TF1's birthday mode. By 2000 most people gave up hope, although seeing the sourcecode to it shows they are atleast working on it. (For anyone that doesnt know, HalfLife2's sourcecode leaked out
Re:Why buy? (Score:1)
No, Vivendi does not own Valve. Valve published Half-Life through a Vivendi-owned company called Sierra, but Valve itself is privately owned and funded (mostly by Gabe Newell). They are not a public company, nor are they owned by anyone other than themselves.
Leaves VU, Blizzard, Sierra in Cold (Score:1)
Re:Sigh... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Sigh... (Score:2)
Re:Sigh... (Score:2)
And... shut upa yo' face!
Re:Sigh... (Score:2)
Offtopic, yes. But my UID is higher than your's and I probably have way less than 2,000 karma points. I've submitted about 5 stories and have had one accepted. That would seem to disprove your theory. Slashdot gets a lot of story submissions. Even good ones will fall through the cracks a lot methinks. With more edito
Sierra? So What (Score:3, Informative)
But those days are long past. Now all they do is bug-ridden knockoffs of whatever was popular 2 years ago.
Re:Sierra? So What (Score:2)
Re:Sierra? So What (Score:1)
Re:Sierra? So What (Score:2)
Re:Sierra? So What (Score:2)
Together we must unite (Score:1)
Who's with me?!
Re:Together we must unite (Score:1)
Re:Together we must unite (Score:1)
Sure you could release Warcraft into the open source pool, but what would be the return on the original investment? 1337ness?
Does it matter? (Score:2)
I will sell VU Games for... (Score:2, Insightful)
Uh.. I don't think so. At 800 million asking price, assuming they make $25 back per copy of a game sold (assuming retailer markup, cost of duplication brings the retail price to $50 total), they would have to sell, what.. 32 million games?
To sell 32 million games, you'd have to make 10 titles that sell over 3 million each - they would take over 30 years to make assuming 3 years each (or 15 if they do 2 in parallel).
AND I've not included the cost
Re:I will sell VU Games for... (Score:2)
also, Is this 800 million for Sierra AND Blizzard?
Doesn't Sierra publish, for example, Half Life (8 million copies), and Homeworld and such?
these aren't exactly slouches
I think SK should buy in for "national interest" (Score:1)
Ah.. (Score:2)
Microsoft (Score:1)
Since I'm a console gamer, and I do own a PC, I think a microsoft purchase would have nice potential. It'll be a major plus to microsoft.
Link [gamemarketwatch.com]