Human Pac Man 174
erined writes ""Human Pac Man" is a project of the Mixed Reality Lab of the National University of Singapore. Players don back pack computers, VR gloves, and 'mixed reality' goggles which overlay virtual cookies--shown as floating spheres--on a first person view of the real world. Aided by a helper who can view the entire game board, players realize their pacman fantisies as they physically move around in a wide-area setting eating cookies and avoiding monsters."
Next game please! (Score:5, Interesting)
Human Pac Man is cool but I want Human Doom, Human Thief and Human System Shock. Looking up at a ~6m tall cyberdemon would cause instant soiling of the gitch. No idea how things like rope arrows would work in Thief... and the monkeys in SS2, scary stuff...
That would be leet.
Re:Next game please! (Score:1)
Re:Next game please! (Score:5, Interesting)
Still, I'm really happy that they've gotten this far with the technology. When I last heard it was only done in small rooms.
The only thing is that you have to realize your limitations - you can do anything that doesn't alter the location of the player, or move the real-world walls around.
So, to do Doom and Quake, its fine - its just that the player has to walk to the respawn point to respawn (the mechanics of this would be tricky to make gameplay good).
IMHO, Unreal Tournament CTF would be the best. Interesting weapons, the game is designed for the slower pace of real-life, and its an all around solid FPS. No cloaking or X-Loc tho.
Re:Next game please! (Score:2, Interesting)
VR FPS & invisibility (Score:5, Interesting)
Actually, if you did immersive VR instead of mere augmentation, you could simply 'erase' an invisible player from other players views of the arena.
You'd have to have a cutoff - like you become visible if you're within five feet or so to avoid running into 'invisible' people. I also imagine you'd want the VR walls to line up pretty closely with the real ones to avoid toe-stubbing.
Re:VR FPS & invisibility (Score:1)
Re:VR FPS & invisibility (Score:2)
Re:VR FPS & invisibility (Score:1)
Re:VR FPS & invisibility (Score:1)
People have been sued because someone slipped on ice while exiting a window after robbing their house.
There's always some poor idiot out there looking for some reason to call in their "if we don't win we won't charge a fee" lawyer.
Re:VR FPS & invisibility (Score:2)
Sueing does not mean winning though. SCO is sueing IBM for example.
We can sue people because it is generaly understood that not every grievance is criminal.
If a waiver is bulletproof you will not win the case. It will be a matter of a paper that ypou signed saying you took responsibility for any harm coming to you and therefore the company owes you nothing.
Re:VR FPS & invisibility (Score:1)
Re:VR FPS (Score:2)
I have no idea what it would cost, but it would blow LaserQuest away if you could actually get it to work for 20 players at a time
Re:Next game please! (Score:2)
Re:Next game please! (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Next game please! (Score:3, Funny)
Better than ON (Score:1)
Problem with paintball: (Score:2)
Re:Next game please! (Score:1)
Re:Next game please! (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Next game please! (Score:5, Interesting)
Centipede would have the potential to scare the crap out of you though; imagine a giant centipede snaking down the street towards you as you fire manically...
how 'bout human quake (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Next game please! (Score:4, Interesting)
The movies have been updated since I last looked, and I didn't immediately see one of my favorites where an inexperienced player dons the headset, walks close to an in-game ledge, and literally falls down when his character does. Quite immersive, apparently. :)
Grand Theft Auto (Score:2)
Re:Next game please! (Score:1)
Video Games Don't Affect Kids (Score:1)
Oh wait...
Re:Next game please! (Score:1)
Re:Next game please! (Score:1)
Wait a minute (Score:1)
Re:Next game please! [ARQUAKE] (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Next game please! (Score:1)
Hmm..... (Score:5, Funny)
Is this before or after the men in white coats take them away?
Re:Hmm..... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Hmm..... (Score:1)
around the cube farm. I asked them later what was that about and they said "Packman"
Re:Hmm..... (Score:1)
virtual light (Score:5, Interesting)
has a pair of glasses that show information on real world things floating above them, quite cool and maybe something we'll see someday as well(for everyday use).
though.. imagine huge virtual ads blocking your glasses, i just hope they run some system that would allow custom code to block them.
Re:virtual light (Score:1)
It's a good book.
Re:virtual light (Score:2, Interesting)
OT: There ought to be a law... (Score:2, Offtopic)
This post brought to you, in part, by ADCO Advertising Agency. "Bringing Your Ideas to the World." (tm)
Re:OT: There ought to be a law... (Score:5, Informative)
http://adbusters.org/campaigns/bnd/
Re:OT: There ought to be a law... (Score:1)
Ah, adbusters...nicely odd.
Re:OT: There ought to be a law... (Score:2)
http://adbusters.org/campaigns/bnd/
Oh great... and I went out and bought a whole crapload of stuff because I never heard about this. Maybe they need to advertise buy nothing day a whole lot more. Billboards, TV commercials, radio...
Re:OT: There ought to be a law... (Score:1)
Re:virtual light (Score:2)
Better yet, imagine a nice system that blocked real world ads - through the glasses you just get nice black empty billboards.
Of course, how you'd manage that is up for questioning - you have to identify ads somehow (fine, have an image database and some bayesian system to predict similar ads), and then you have to be able to tell an add when you look at it from a variety of
Re:virtual light (Score:2)
Or even better have your glasses replace the advert with the picture of your choice.
Imagine hanging out on Picadilly Circus / Times Square, viewing your favourite jpegs on the huge billboards.
Re:virtual light (Score:2)
I have. Many times. Peaceful bliss... :)
In order for it to work seemlessly, the "image proxy for the eye(s)" would have to see exactly what the eye sees, which probably means that a camera external to the eye - such as on your glasses rims - wouldn't be accurate enough. It would also have to be combined with another eye-tracking camera that looks back at your eyeball to figure out in which direction you were looking in. Jitter and overlay alignment proble
also Snowcrash (Score:1)
Contextual data via the metaverse for anything or anyone in view is displayed in a hud.
I think the addicts of this tech were called "ghouls".
Re:virtual light (Score:4, Informative)
I dunno. Maybe to equal out all the times that SF authors invented stuff and didn't get credit for it.
Blue screen technology, like your local weatherman uses -- say thank you to Murray Leinster.
He got screwed on that one.
X Person (Score:5, Interesting)
It would be kind of weird playing 3rd person in VR no?
Re:X Person (Score:2)
As the saying goes (Score:4, Funny)
Oh, hang on...
Re:As the saying goes (Score:3, Informative)
Re:As the saying goes (Score:2)
First steps (Score:2)
Simon
Re:First steps (Score:2)
Re:First steps (Score:5, Informative)
Of course, it's much easier to harmlessly disperse the energy from a recoil than from the impact.
Re:First steps (Score:1)
People who work in American post offices have been recreating Commando at work. However, they've not felt the need for nerdy goggles.
Leisure Suit Larry (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Leisure Suit Larry (Score:1)
Re:Leisure Suit Larry (Score:1)
Sounds like I'm already living it.
Some PacMan fantisies (sic) ... (Score:5, Funny)
... are best left unrealised [penny-arcade.com]
Re:Some PacMan fantisies (sic) ... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Some PacMan fantisies (sic) ... (Score:2)
Does that happen at the end?
Rush Limbaugh == Pac-Man (Score:2)
In light of Rush's public problems, someone with a bit too much time on his hands decided to create his own version of human Pac-Man. It features Rush as the enternally-gobbling big-mouth trying to swallow pills (shaped like Oxycontin, of course), and being chased by bug-eyed Donovan McNabbs!
Go to this site [ejectbush.com] and press enter to start. Send the link to your friends!
Before I get modded down by all the conservatives out there, let me give you a little advice: quit trying to defend Rush and let him fry for h
maybe we need a better game for this (Score:5, Funny)
"operator"
"I need a tunnel out of here, quick, and not to the other side of the board"
Re:maybe we need a better game for this (Score:1)
I see dead people... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:I see dead people... (Score:1, Redundant)
john candy (Score:2, Funny)
Re:john candy (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:john candy (Score:2)
Robert "Kryten" Llewellyn investigated this in the BBC's Hollywood Science [open2.net]:
I can't really remember the show but I think they
Re:john candy (Score:1)
Re:john candy (Score:5, Funny)
Yeah, I just finished playing Human Pac-Man. Didn't need no VR either. Just run around a table with four turkeys, four bowls of garlic mashed potatoes, two bowls cranberries, and pack in 240 bread crumbs! w00t!
(I almost got the 1600-point turkey, but instead it defeated me. Now I know why Pac-Man shrivels up and withers away like that. Tryptophan coma, dude.)
I'm betting that... (Score:2)
How about getting too close to reality? (Score:1)
Re:How about getting too close to reality? (Score:1)
Re:How about getting too close to reality? (Score:1)
Personally I try to AVOID that when I'm playing Quake.
Hmmm... (Score:3, Funny)
(Albeit on a somewhat larger scale...)
Re:Hmmm... (Score:1)
I seem to recall a game called "Midi maze" back in the days of the Atari STs and Amigas. It was some type of multiplayer PacMan clone played through their linked midi ports.
Hrm.. (Score:1)
Well, just one more step towards making totally immersive VR game play...Doom and Half Life would be so l33t..Hell, just running around shooting headcrabs and soldiers would be fun enough..
Another cool thing would be, though extremely far off, VR lives...Just imagine: The Sims VR, or There VR....Schweet...
Re:Hrm.. (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Hrm.. (Score:1)
The sound of ./ (Score:4, Funny)
Beancounter PacMan? (Score:3, Funny)
hmm (Score:2)
They've been doing this since the 80's. (Score:2)
I tried this out last summer. (Score:5, Funny)
Human Pac-Man? They've done this at Burning Man (Score:2, Interesting)
Eat dots in 1st person perspective view... (Score:2, Informative)
A friend and I wrote a 1st person perspective view Pacman-like game back in 1982-1983.
While the Human PacMan site is slashdotted, you can sate your appetite for dots by playing 3-Demon [dosgamesarchive.com]. -Rick
Human Leisure Suit Larry (Score:1)
Oblig Simpsons... (Score:3, Funny)
This has already existed... (Score:4, Informative)
But people already have this! (Score:1)
How is this different from any modern electro-dance setting? People already eat lots of power-cookes (ecstasy pills) while avoiding the monsters (the big fat guys that can't seem to take a step without slamming into someone)
Yes but the real question is.... (Score:1, Funny)
Solitaire (Score:3, Funny)
"eating cookies and avoiding monsters" (Score:2, Funny)
Re:i'd like to see (Score:2, Informative)
Re:mod poor AC up (Score:1, Informative)
1. Say that it's actually Google cache of the original article.
2. Make it a link. [216.239.37.104]
Re:gotta be said (Score:1)
Re:Umm...slashdotted with only 18 comments, wot? (Score:1)
Re:Umm...slashdotted with only 18 comments, wot? (Score:1)