Gen Con Reveals New World Of Warcraft Details 28
Thanks to RPGDot for pointing to a Battle.net forum post revealing a wealth of new detail regarding Blizzard's upcoming PC MMO title World Of Warcraft. WoW Stratics also has screenshots and brief comments on Blizzard's showing at Gen Con in Los Angeles, including comments that "Blizzard has one thing completely, undeniably wrong: they simply don't know the definition of 'alpha'. Both Anarchy Online and WWII Online were less polished and complete three months after release than WoW is right now." WoW is due out later in 2004, with a closed Beta early next year, and PlanetWarcraft also has some hands-on impressions.
Game stability clear after a convention? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Game stability clear after a convention? (Score:1)
The companies prior track record would lead many to believe they're going to do this right.
I just wish they'd start the bastarding beta already:) I WANT IN!:)
Re:Game stability clear after a convention? (Score:3, Funny)
You just don't realize how crappy Anarchy Online and WWII Online were when they first started. :)
In seriousness, you probably can't tell the stability and the testers probably were only shown things that were guaranteed to work. However, at least it appears fun and things work as intended.
Re:Game stability clear after a convention? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Game stability clear after a convention? (Score:1)
nVidia's Dawn ?! (Score:2)
Screenshot 11 [stratics.com]
Re:nVidia's Dawn ?! (Score:2, Informative)
Alpha (Score:4, Insightful)
On the other hand it's the majority of other MMORPG developers that don't know the meaning of alpha, or beta, or 'stable' for that matter.
Final Fantasy XI was such a breath of fresh air - I know it's been released in Japan for over a year now, but to have it released in the rest of the world with a stable launch was excellent. I'm now spoiled by it, and look forward to a smooth Blizzard launch. Lineage 2 is also looking promising, considering it's been released in Korea for a year now.
If only other developers (and publishers - they are the true criminals here) would take some time out and stop chasing the almight buck, thinking if they don't release soon they won't meet their monetary target. Here's a clue: releasing too early won't get you there either.
Re:Alpha (Score:2)
The original comment was a joke. Laugh.
Re:Alpha (Score:1)
It the type of comment that game 'journalists' usually write in an effort to hype up a game and show a love for a company.
It's the same thing as saying an athlete doesn't know the meaning of 'quit'. That comment isn't a joke, but flattery.
Alpha? I think they know. (Score:2)
Or at least it should be.
Games that have gone into release without testing systems in 'Beta' (*cough*horizons*cough*ac2*cough*) do not know the meaning of the different phases.
WoW might wow me (Score:1)
Re:WoW might wow me (Score:2, Interesting)
Chock full of goodness (Score:3)
Toss into the mix that I'll be able to play this on my PowerBook, and I might have to go back on my "never pay a monthly fee" attitude.
Re:Chock full of goodness (Score:2)
I salivate for this game, and I am not even a big MMORPG gamer. PSO is the closest thing I have to an online RPG obession.
Blizzard is the master of the hype machine, but they are also terrific game designers. What they lack in innovation they more than make up for in refinement.
That's an easy one (Score:3, Insightful)