Phantom Releases, Retracts Game List, Debut Rated 69
Thanks to GameSpot for its story noting that Infinium Labs has released, then quickly retracted a list of game for its Phantom PC-based 'console' shortly following its CES debut. The story notes: "The list featured over 500 titles from 60-plus companies", and the page's new notice, which replaces the old list (Google cache), "urged visitors to return to the site to see a list of games 'pending developer/publisher approval,' which indicates some of the companies on the list [which include Atari and Take Two] may have asked Infinium to remove it." 1UP has also debuted a preview of the Phantom, taken from impressions of a working unit at CES, in which the console is described as "promising and grounded in reality" (though a second editor is " not yet convinced.")
I could have sworn this was vaporware! (Score:3, Funny)
Re:I could have sworn this was vaporware! (Score:2, Funny)
"Infinium Labs Inc, onwer of the upcomming Phantom Gaming Service, is proud to annoucne that on January 6, 2004, Infinium Labs Inc. has acquired Infinium Labs Inc. in a merger. In such, Infinium Labs has acquired the rights to the Phantom Gaming Service. Infinium Labs Inc has no other material operations except those acquired in the merger with Ininium Labs Inc."
Sorry, but I'm still not convinced. Also, all of the developers that they mentioned (I
Interesting... (Score:1)
I'm even more hesitant to trust them after a few things like that.
Re:Interesting... (Score:2, Informative)
A) Army Men is listed, which is a game from about five years ago.
B) 3D0 went bankrupt last year.
It's just a random bunch of games listed. A load of them are extremely old (Might and Magic I anyone?). Complete fiction.
Re:I could have sworn this was vaporware! (Score:1)
Re:I could have sworn this was vaporware! (Score:1)
Somehow, I'm not sure that helps us to determine anything substantial about the system.
Re:I could have sworn this was vaporware! (Score:1)
Re:I could have sworn this was vaporware! (Score:3, Funny)
-when tycho and gabe make fun of a console.
Here, it might exists.
-when tycho and gabe stop making fun of the console right after some advertisements for it appear on their site.
Here, you know, it's for real.
That's kinda funny (ok, not really)... (Score:1)
Less believable with every story (Score:3, Interesting)
So far they have promised announcements, demos etc etc etc and they have failed to deliver on all of them, since the final product will be rated on the quality of the content and their management of it, they have to sort out their operating practices to have any hope of succeeding, and thats not even taking into account the competition they have...
Re:Less believable with every story (Score:1)
However, I do think the Phantom is being put out by people who have no idea what they are doing, and it's doomed to failure. It's not to hard to throw a PC in a box, and put together a couple graphical menus. The hard part is getting people to buy into it... and I don't think they'll be able to do that.
Re:Less believable with every story (Score:2)
These guys have something to show and tell, and that is what buyers/investors want.
Vaporware this is not.
I wish them success.
likely not a hoax. may still be a scam. (Score:3, Insightful)
It isn't necessarily a hoax per se, no-one is going to be pointing and laughing.
Rather it's more like a scam. An attempt to use the overly hungry and journalistically naive hardcore gaming media to push their non-existant product with big promises. Promise the moon, mock up some renders, build up the buzz, sell. Who cares if the product never materializes? the money sure did.
Quite frankly what would it take Infinium to
I'm not sure about you guys... (Score:1, Funny)
Woozha!
Re:I'm not sure about you guys... (Score:2)
Am I the only one who noticed... (Score:1)
I bet this is how dogs see. (Score:5, Informative)
I hate to be one of those people who just posts a link to a relevant comic, but I'm REAL bored at work right now, and I've already read FARK...
Oh this is old news (Score:1)
Couple years from now, you'll get another article saying Phantom coming with newer hardware specs. This thing is the biggest april fools joke.
Re:Oh this is old news (Score:1)
One giant logic hole in the pricing... (Score:5, Insightful)
In short: You don't have to constantly replace and upgrade your PC anymore! You play your phantom forever!
Except, of course, that PC games scale up and up as the years go by, demanding newer and more powerful hardware... while the Phantom remains a single closed box you can't upgrade at all. The best you can do is buy a 'Phantom 2' or whatever they'll call it in 2008, just like you'd buy a PS3, X-Box Next, or Gamecube Part Deux.
How exactly does that make this a bargain when the only advantage -- a closed, upgradeless PC -- is its primary disadvantage for the types of games you're gonna play? All you're doing is buying a low-cost PC and then constantly paying monthlies for the honor of using it, then repeating the cycle every few years as usual.
If I'm wrong, please, tell me I'm wrong and why; I would like to see something like this succeed, I just don't see this particular example working...
Re:One giant logic hole in the pricing... (Score:2)
On the other hand, Ivan Sulic seems to be a reputable reporter. Rarely do I see a review from him that doesn't seem genuine. So I'd be willing to believe that it did run okay. Whether they were giving him the runa
Re:One giant logic hole in the pricing... (Score:1)
Re:One giant logic hole in the pricing... (Score:2)
No dice; earlier interviews were bragging about how the case is 'tamper proof' and glued shut. They don't want you monkeying with the innards of the thing because of the marketing pitch of having foolproof digital rights management -- at best there'd have to be add-on parts that slide and lock into place like the PS2 network adapter and hard drive. And those traditionally bomb in the console market.
Re:One giant logic hole in the pricing... (Score:1)
Those funky butterfly-head screws on the Sega Megadrive didn't keep me out. Glue sure as heck won't. I bet ten bucks this thing gets modded faster than it gets bought.
Re:One giant logic hole in the pricing... (Score:1)
There are ways of making fairly secure physical devices. Banks use them in some of their encryption modules that they don't want people trying to get keys out of. I mean, even the ol' lever on the inside of cable boxes kept most people from rechipping their boxes. There are at least more sophisticated ways than using proprietary screws any
Hmmm... (Score:1)
All content streams from a central server farm maintained by Infinium Labs.
Well, we all know how well corporate IT systems handle large loads. I can see it now...on Friday night you'll NEVER be able to download any games you want to play.
Re:Hmmm... (Score:2)
Re:Hmmm... (Score:2)
Re:Hmmm... (Score:1)
Re:Hmmm... (Score:1)
YAOC (Score:5, Interesting)
Prediction: This gets most of its money through hotels and related outfits. Also will look much like the movie (with adult stuff) menus from said hotels.
-Sean
Re:YAOC (Score:3, Insightful)
The average person who'd buy this would already be paying broadband, cost of games. So, after the initial purchase cost (which, as noted, is significantly less than buying a new gaming PC), there's really only a $10 monthly cost - not bad.
Re:YAOC (Score:1)
Maybe those weird porno games that are so popular in Japan will finally find a market niche in the US.
Re:YAOC (Score:2)
This is how I see it.... (Score:1, Interesting)
If the company goes bankrupt you dismantle the box and you got yourself a new hd, a geforce fx, an atlhon 3200 and a kick ass sound card for the price of the video card.
If they can make online games fly, as you said, I'll buy it.
This only makes me more suspicious of the Phantom (Score:4, Insightful)
It makes me suspicious that they got some of the game-names wrong (for example, they attribute Capcom with a "Mega Man X Legends", which does not even exist, although it's quite possibly a typo of 'Mega Man Legends', which was ported to PC around 1998), and even credited the wrong companies with games (an outfit called 'Div Games Studios' is listed as supplying Mega Man X, but that game is a part of Capcom's flagship Mega Man property). Oh yeah, and some of the companies that were listed no longer exist (some haven't for years, some went bankrupt not-so-long-ago), and others are listed several times - note that many of Take Two's various names are in that list, and Disney is listed as both 'Disney' and 'Disney Interactive'. The presence of editions of some software dated as far back as 2000 is also quite bizarre.
The whole list reads like they skimmed through a few lists of games-by-{whoever} on GameFAQs or someplace similar, and shoved it all into one document (and forgot to name it - it was called Untitled Document when it was first up).
(And isn't it odd that nobody has said they have dev-kits for the Phantom, considering when dev-kits arrive for existent new consoles, you tend to hear about it on gaming news sites?)
Incidentally, I've seen quite a few of the listed titles available for purchase on TryGames.com [trygames.com] - isn't it curious that TryGames.com's try-and-buy-online service for PCs is so similar to the much-touted broadband-content-delivery-system that the modified-Win-XP (IIRC) based Phantom will supposedly have?
In closing, it just seems to me like it's more a case of "these big-name-big-developer games will run on our modified PC-like box", as opposed to "these developers are making games on our machine"...
Re:This only makes me more suspicious of the Phant (Score:1)
Gamespot Pics... (Score:3, Interesting)
Plus I'm thinking this thing will have a DOS/Windows wrapper so you can drop it PC games and have it work...that's why there's so many games on that list that are so old. Hmmm. I still won't buy the piece of shit, I just find it slightly interesting following this thing travel downward in a spiral likened to that of a toilet flushing...
Re:Gamespot Pics... (Score:1)
Those aren't rivets, they are "secure" screws.. the kind the phone company uses on payphone panels. You can buy the bits though.. I have them.
Re:Gamespot Pics... (Score:2)
Re:Gamespot Pics... (Score:2)
The last time I modified my computer to add USB ports. They probably bought off-the-shelf motherboard to rear-panel usb adaptors, cut out some holes, and stuck them on the back. They stuck on everything else that way.
that power plug is INSANE looking.
It makes one wonder if the power adaptor is external... There is no way that thing would require 14 lines in if it wasn't doing some divying of current on the o
"Cable Modem"? (Score:1, Insightful)
I don't get it - I thought cable internet provider's signals and boxes were proprietary, but had an ethernet port on the back that you connected to. Your computer never sees the raw cable connection and is still able to transmit & receive.. so why would this device need it?
Also: On the grounds that the more insane the better, that's a bitchin' power socket. It'll probably only run you about a trillion doll
Re:"Cable Modem"? (Score:1)
They also show screenshots of games who's developers have explicitly said they were not developing for the Phantom ("at this time"), and touted it being able to do much more than it ever will be equipped for. I can remember how much they said the X-box could be expected to do, and it doesn't do half of it. Cable systems are supposed to be proprietary, so if they stick the modem insid
Re:"Cable Modem"? (Score:2)
I don't get it - I thought cable internet provider's signals and boxes were proprietary, but had an ethernet port on the back that you connected to. Your computer never sees the raw cable connection and is still able to transmit & receive.. so why would this device need it?
Almost all cable modems use the DOCIS 1.1 standard these days, so just about any cable modem can be used with any cable ISP. The big
Re:"Cable Modem"? (Score:1)
Re:"Cable Modem"? (Score:2)
It apparently has not only the capability to support an inbuilt cable modem, but an inbuilt DSL modem and a WiFi card. Check it out here [infiniumlabs.com] for the 'official' (heheh) specs.
Note that all three of these are listed as optional components, so I guess you don't get them if you don't need them. Also interesting is that it apparently runs a modified WinXP kernel on an Athlon 3200+ and uses a nVidia nv36 DX9 compliant GPU.
The fact that it's potentially only a PC might be why no one has any dev kits yet... or it c
what the phantom really is (Score:1)
I think where all the bad opinions about the phantom are coming from are just how disorganized the company has been with its execution of the product, which to me makes it seem like some of those st
Why is everybody convinced is not vapor? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Why is everybody convinced is not vapor? (Score:2)
That is, until recently, people believed that the company never intended to produce anything, ever. Now people believe that the company intends on producing something, though whether they will actually complete the product is still in the air.
Obviously Fraudulent (Score:2)
A coax connector labeled "cable modem"? Do these guys even know how a cable modem works? Sure, techinically they could build a cable modem into the unit, but there's a lot of reasons why that would be really stupid.
Their business model makes no sense. If the Phantom actually contains the hardware they claim, they'll
Re:Obviously Fraudulent (Score:1)
Cable Companies will eat this up. They need to provide more content and have been doing it through crappy games played via a remote(well, charter has, anyway).
Sell devices to Cable Co. Cable Co happily rents you a box and a subscription for something like $50/month. If it's real, I expect that's how it's going to work.
Funny feeling (Score:1)
No Megaman 3? (Score:1)
Oh Man, Hilarity About to Ensue! (Score:3, Interesting)
Oh yeah. We "people" may have enough consoles and a powerful PC, but whenver a new console comes out, we always buy it [216.239.41.104]. I forgot.
Quote from the article (Score:1)
Looks like a scam to me (Score:2)
Inviting a couple of journalists who spell "through" "threw" to a private showing of your device doesn't exactly inspire confidence. Did the author even get a chance to play a game on this system, or was he just watching things happen and assuming it was real?
I am also *very* suspicious of the alleged content distribution model. At first, the big gimmick was supposed t
And the final evidence that it's fake! (Score:2)
If that's the case, then they have spent zero time working on the prototype, since I could build a PC of those specs to fit in th