Famicom Mini Series 2 Reviewed Following Series 1 U.S. Debut 30
Thanks to 1UP for its reviews of the second batch of Famicom Mini (NES Classic) series for Game Boy Advance, since "Japanese gamers... are already enjoying their second batch of remakes", following this week's release of eight of the portable conversions from the NES in the States. Intriguing second-batch picks from the almost-complete review set include Ghosts 'N Goblins ("The return of the game that made masochism fun"), Balloon Fight ("Has a simple, universal appeal"), and Adventure Island ("...may well be the most fun you'll ever have running in a straight line from left to right"), and a stuttering IGN has also started coverage of Series 2.
games i miss/want (Score:1)
the gba has some great rpg's so why not include the best ones out there
Re:games i miss/want (Score:4, Interesting)
Dragon Warrior I & II [gamerankings.com] were released a while back, as was Dragon Warrior III [gamerankings.com]. Final Fantasy has already had some stints on the GB/GBC/GBA, but the first two are on their way [gamespot.com] to coming to the GBA as well (albeit, in Japan first)
I don't think we'll see vanilla versions released like the recent releases from Nintendo, due to licensing issues.
Did you miss E3? (Score:4, Informative)
This has been reported everywhere, both in Japanese and English! How'd you miss out?
Don't forget also River City Ransom EX, Virtua Fighter Quest, RE 4, the Mega Man collections for GBA and GCN, and Shinning Force coming to the GBA! It's not the horrible Shinning Soul dungeon crawler
Re:Did you miss E3? (Score:1, Funny)
Willy: You've got the Shinning, lad!
Bart: Don't you mean "Shining"?
Willy: Ach, you want to get sued?
Re:Did you miss E3? (Score:2)
If you can't spend 40$ CDN on a game.. (Score:2)
Seriously, though, then you have even less reason to not rebuy repackaged childhood memories. It beats the piss out of importing a Wondarswan and apropos cartridge!
Why rip? (Score:5, Insightful)
It's an exact port of a game I paid for a long time ago, I don't want to pay for it again!
You can get Mario Bros. for free because it comes with Mario Advance ( this is justified ).
They didn't soup up the graphics and sound.
Listen. I think that Nintendo re-releasing its old NES games for the GBA is the best thing ever. And the fact that they are kind enough to sell them for cheap instead of full GBA price is even better. Not 5 years ago I was complaining that they were trying to shut down all the emu and rom sites because there was no other way to play those games if you couldn't find a working NES. Nintendo has made good and re-released their old games and in a portable fashion. Remember, the GBA goes places. Before now there was no way to play Zelda 1 in your car. Sure it might be the exact same game as back in the 80's. And sure I might be paying for the same game 3 times in my life. But there is nothing I wanted more than the ability to play Mario 3 and Zelda 1 in my car, and I have that ability now.
There is a demand by people like me for the nostalgia to be revived and the old games to be released again in true form. Nintendo is the only company willing to supply and I salute them. You might think its stupid or a waste of money, but that's because the nostalgia is lost on you. It amazes me every day that people not 3 years younger than I grew up with only Playstation. They don't know what gaming really is and their Zelda 1 was Final Fantasy 7. When square re-releases that feature film + leveling treadmill for the PSP you wont see anyone bitching.
Re:Why rip? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Why rip? (Score:1, Insightful)
The fact is, nobody HAS to buy this stuff. Not all of it, and not any of it. But if anybody can market these things at $20, it's Nintendo. You think if Konami could have gotten away with selling a straight unenhanced GBA port of Yie Ar Kung Fu at $20 in 2004, separate of inclusion from a compilation cart, they wouldn't?
Anyhow, I'm grabbing the full set eventually, along with a NES GBA SP.
Re:Why rip? (Score:1)
Some people just can't see the bright side (Score:3, Interesting)
That said, I picked up zelda for my SP yesterday, and it's great finally being able to play it again legally, and with proper handles. But why, I ask, why did Nintendo include the slowdown when 7 or so enemies are on screen? The GBA is capable of
What do you mean by proper handles? (Score:2)
Re:Why rip? (Score:2)
Re:Why rip? (Score:5, Insightful)
I want to like these, I really do. The original Legend of Zelda is still one of the greatest video games ever made.
But I already have Zelda 1 on the Gamecube, as part of the four-game collectors' disk they made available to people who bought enough other Nintendo games. (For me, they were Mario & Luigi Superstar Saga and Mario Kart Double Dash.)
As noted on the linked-to sites, Mario Bros. is available as an eCard set, as an extra in Animal Crossing and, in a graphically-upgraded version, in *five* other GBA games. Super Mario Bros. has been remade several times.
Also consider that the original ROM sizes of these games were so miniscule that the entire game, plus an NES emulator, could be quickly sent over the pipe from Animal Crossing, and fit entirely in the GBA's built-in RAM.
In short, while some of the games are really cool, $20 is too much for only ONE ancient NES game. And few of the games are worth shelling out *any* money for. If all these games were available on *one* GBA card, which given their miniscule memory footprints could have easily been done, then maybe. As it is... no.
There is only one exception. A gamer who never got to play the original Zelda might be better served getting this than playing it on the Gamecube compilation (or the secret Animal Crossing item made available with a cheat device) for one reason: it'll probably come with a full manual. Zelda is a game that needs its manual. The booklet that came with the Zelda retrospective disk gave it two scant pages! Not a smart way to introduce gamers to one of the highlights of your company's history....
Re:Why rip? (Score:2)
Re:Why rip? (Score:3, Insightful)
Of course no one's making me buy it. But if they had put a little more effort into it, I might consider it.
Re:Why rip? (Score:2)
I don't have the collectors disk. (Score:2)
Your argument gets a little sympathy with me. Again, a perfect port is off the table given the screen size, so it would be nice to bump the product up a little, such as removing the slowdown. One area I think they could have really cleaned up on with this release was to include a third,
Re:I don't have the collectors disk. (Score:2)
The original Zelda, if I remember correctly, came on a one megabit cartridge. That's 128k in which to squeeze 128 overworld screens and 18 dungeons.
Because of the morbidly restricted ROM size they had to resort to a large number of tricks to squeeze the large game area into memory. That explains some of the weirdness with the overworld layout, instead of being an array of tile information, each screen is actually
Re:Why rip? (Score:1)
Re:Why rip? (Score:2)
Another reason one might want to pick up one of the later emulated versions of Zelda (on whatever system) even if one already owns the cartridge: by this time, the batteries on the old games are probably all dead.
Re:Why rip? (Score:2)
Huh? The only company? How so? I personally have gotten quite a bit of enjoyment out of Midway Arcade Treasures Volume 1. Same price as one of these new Nintendo GBA ports. 25 or so games, many of them undisputed classics (Rampart, Defender, Super Sprint, Robotron 2040, Spyhunter, Joust and its sequel, Gauntlet, etc.). Nin
Dr. Mario (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Dr. Mario (Score:3, Informative)
If you want the multiplayer support, go for the Classic NES version, as it's the only one with it. If it doesn't matter to you, go with Wario Ware instead.
Re:Dr. Mario (Score:1)