Midway's Slugfest, Ballers Inappropriate For Kids? 89
Thanks to ABC News for its article discussing controversy over the content of Midway's officially licensed baseball and basketball videogames, as the story explains: "Nine-year-old Stephane Safar likes to play MLB Slugfest, a video game rated 'E', that is, for everyone 6 years old and older... But then he played it in front of his mother Amy, and what she saw went well beyond real-life baseball, as players punched and kicked each other during the course of the game." Amy explains: "Does he know that that's not really how Barry Bonds acts out on the field? Does he know that Nomar [Garciaparra] can't punch somebody?" Midway's NBA Ballers also comes in for criticism, with Kimberly Thompson of the Harvard School of Public Health complaining: "I think the message that kids take away from NBA Ballers is, it's all about money... Women are objects in this game."
Ballers (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Ballers (Score:5, Insightful)
Anyway, since when does the fact that something really happens justify its inclusion in entertainment? Saying it happens in real life is a non sequitur.
Further, the things you speak of are not endorsed by (e.g.) the NBA, but the NBA does endorse this game.
And besides.. IT IS A FUCKING GAME.
A game that is rated E for Everyone, and contains prostitution. This is really more about the rating of the game than anything else. If it were rated M for Mature (not that I think it deserves such a rating), there would be far less of an outcry.
Personally, I think the ESRB has a big gap between T and M. M is a bit of a stigma and implies explicit content, whereas IMO suggestivity, as exists in Ballers, is not appropriate for T and not explicit enough to warrant an M. Regardless, an E rating for this game is just stupid.
Re:Ballers (Score:3, Insightful)
Exactly! It's even called NBA Ballers, for crying out loud... what do you expect?
Re:Ballers (Score:4, Funny)
Ballers wasn't our favorite choice, but we couldn't get management to agree to "Shootin' in the Hood."
Re:Ballers (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Ballers (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Ballers (Score:2)
Re:Ballers (Score:1)
PLEASE mod this up as Funny! =)
Re:Ballers (Score:1)
Re:Ballers (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Ballers (Score:4, Insightful)
The E-for-everybody rating overrides this statement. Video games and television shows are not rated the same way. For a fight to happen in a video game, it has to be put in. A fight during a sporting event, however, cannot be prevented.
"So what, do they want the game to be a lie and pretend that these sports franchises are wholesome and goodnatured? "
Games are meant to be fun, not to be true reflections of what they're recreating.
"And besides.. IT IS A FUCKING GAME."
Normally I'd agree. However, if they're rated as E-for-everybody, they really should respect that as well as they can. The last thing video games need right now is attempts at heavy handed legislation due to complaints that the ratings system isn't an effective babysitter.
Re:Ballers (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Ballers (Score:2)
Re:Ballers (Score:2)
Re:Ballers (Score:2)
Yet, you did, on their behalf. I am wondering why you did, if your company would not wish you to. Is this question unfair?
The developers may well personally object to his slander however.
I think you don't know what "slander" means. I slandered no one. You libeled West.
Re:Ballers (Score:2)
Hey, don't tell me that. I was just reporting what ESPN reported, and then someone from Midway started calling West a liar.
Re:Ballers (Score:2)
Re:Ballers (Score:2)
Huh? So you don't know what libel means, either?
The usage was correct: Slander means he (Jerry) lied about the developers' work, saying something negative.
No, he didn't lie about the developers' work. He -- if it is as you say -- lied about the circumstances of his lack of inclusion. He criticized the developers' work (i.e., the content of the game), but didn't say anything false about . He just gave his opinion.
And your libel is that you called him a liar.
Re:Ballers (Score:2)
Re:Ballers (Score:2)
Is this like in Fight Night 2004, where you "buy" women who act as your valets? In that case, you're not buying the women, you're buying their services.
Rob (Not those kinds of services)
Re:Ballers (Score:2)
(I'm kidding, don't hurt me)
Hrm.... (Score:5, Insightful)
What the heck, I suppose I'll take a Karma hit for this...
I guess I must have missed something. With all of the endorsement deals, players being paid so much that only one team can afford to pay them, tales of sexual conquest (a-la Wilt Chamberlain), and the inconsistent enforcement of the rules, isn't this an accurate representation of the NBA?
I quit being interested in the NBA as players like Dennis Rodman became more and more common. I miss the general good-natured playing of Larry Bird, Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, Michael Jordan and Magic Johnson. Bring back that level of sportsmanship and finess and I might change my opinion.
Re:Hrm.... (Score:4, Funny)
What's wrong with being sexy?
Re:Hrm.... (Score:1)
Nigel Tufnel: We don't literally say it.
David St. Hubbins: No, we don't say it.
Nigel Tufnel: We don't really, actually mean it.
David St. Hubbins: No, we don't believe it either, but...
Nigel Tufnel: But we're not racists.
David St. Hubbins: But that message should be clear.
Ganked from IMDB.
Re:Hrm.... (Score:3, Insightful)
I never meant to imply that they were squeaky clean. Sorry if it sounded that way. I suppose a little explaination is in order.
I couldn't care less what kind of racial comments Bird is making; he's entitled to his opinion, as is everybody else. I haven't heard any of the racial comments he made, so I don't know much about them. In all the time he played, I can't recall a single racially-based incident on the court. It's a non-issue for me.
Likewise with Kareem. Who the hell cares if he hung out with Hugh H
Re:Hrm.... (Score:3, Interesting)
The word is not racial, it is racist. Racial means "of or pertaining to race." Saying Michael Jordan is black is racial. Saying black people suck is racist. Racial is neutral, racist is negative.
FWIW, Bird made no racist comments. He said that basketball is a black man's game, and blacks are -- in regard to basketball -- better athletes. That's not racist, that's being minimally observant.
Re:Hrm.... (Score:3, Insightful)
You are correct that the word is not "racial". The parent poster used it, so I responded directly to his comment; next time, I'll be sure to quote from the parent message as I just noticed that it was posted by an AC, so not everybody will see it.
And, knowing the quote now, I'd say Bird's comment was, in fact, racial in nature. :)
Re:Hrm.... (Score:2)
Re:Hrm.... (Score:2)
Re:Hrm.... (Score:1)
Thanks for the clairfication.
I had quit watching basketball quite a while before the incident and only heard about it via late night sports news. I thought I remembered catching a glimpse of the incident, but I must be mistaken.
I'm curious what you consider the second to be?
Re:Hrm.... (Score:2)
a-HA! (Score:3, Funny)
Tell that to my black eye!!! Damn that Garciaparra...
Oh, and, how does Barry Bonds act out on the field, if you would be kind enough to explain?
Re:a-HA! (Score:1)
The question I want to have answered is do we allow this, or do we have the ultra-realistic game where Barry Bonds, Jason Giambi, and Mark McGwire take their steroids before the game? "Yes, Johnnie, if you want to be successful, you must find as many ways to cheat without getting caught. After all, if you get caught cheating, the problem was that you got caught." I think
Re:a-HA! (Score:1)
It will, however, allow you to listen to simulated talk-radio shows after each game. If one of your star players had a big home-run, you get to listen to fat slobs with no knowledge of weight-training - or even exercise in general -pontificate about the use of steriods in sports and freely slander any athlete they feel like.
Message (Score:5, Funny)
Whereas in real life, they do it for the love, plus a small stipend for meals and cab fare.
Nomar might not hit people.... (Score:2)
knows how to handle himself.
well... (Score:1)
Re:well... (Score:4, Interesting)
There was a story a couple of weeks ago about lightning strikes. Somebody in that thread described a friend of his wife's dying due to a strike. I play UT2004 a LOT. The lightning gun is my favorite weapon. Sniping with it was fun as heck for me. (still is! just haven't had time to play...) Despite finding so much pleasure in shooting video game sprites with lightning, reading the "A friend of my wife's was killed by lightning" really jolted me. I found that heart breaking. I have to ask: How desensitizing can games be if I react like that to somebody dying?
I'm at a point now where I don't even think 'scientific proof' will convince me that video game violence is dangerous.
Well... (Score:5, Funny)
That only proves they used good encapsulation.
That's your problem (Score:3, Interesting)
If you don't think that the game is appropriate for your kid, don't buy it. Professional sports is a scummy business... maybe kids wouldn't be affected by the portrayal of athletes if we didn't program them to idolize athletes.
Re:That's your problem (Score:2)
At the risk of re-stating what has been said numerous times in this thread, the problem isn't with the game itself, but with the ESRB rating of "E". As a parent who grew up with technology, I use these ratings as a benchmark for what my child can play. The rating is the first factor I consider when I decide if the game is "appropriate for my kid". From what I read in the FA, there are numerous things in these games that should hav
Re:That's your problem (Score:1)
Next time your kid wants to buy a game, do your lil' research on google, and you get a much better personal rating for yourself.
Re:That's your problem (Score:1)
Then they are shocked when they see the actual game play.
Parents should make an effort though to know what they are buying. Especially in this day and age when any game is $50! My rule is if I don't know, I don't buy it.
As to your point about accuracy, you are right, sports can be a scummy biz.
wait... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:wait... (Score:2)
Of course, the parents here -- who complained about the content of the games after their kids have been playing them for some time -- have been negligient. That's without question.
Anyone who lets there 10 year old kid play a game they have never even seen before shouldnt have them
Absolutely. But does that negate the responsibility of the ESRB to grant reasonable ratings? If so, what's the point of havi
Re:wait... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:wait... (Score:2)
Please understand my criticism before you respond to it.
Re:wait... (Score:1)
You are saying that making money and then spending it in a game makes it unsuitable for
children.
I dont think it is out of line to disagree with that point of view. In fact, I would think most people would disagree with that.
Re:wait... (Score:2)
OK, so you don't understand it either. Cheers!
Re:wait... (Score:1)
Here is my understanding:
You have a game (NBA Ballers) in which your performance nets you currency. That currency allows one to buy homes/cars/"posse" - which is all secondary to the game.
You then state that (disregarding the off-base prostitution remarks):
That kind of selfish, materialistic bullshit is NOT appropriate for everyone
If this isn't your intention, then state it more clearly.
Re:wait... (Score:2)
I honestly wish I could give a damn about what you think enough to bother spelling it out for you.
Re:wait... (Score:1)
Re:wait... (Score:2)
Re:wait... (Score:1)
Well, at least you are being mature about it.
Heaven forbid you take the time to clarify an argument to your audience, since you deemed that argument worthy enough to post in public.
How silly of me to assume so.
Re:wait... (Score:1)
Re:wait... (Score:3, Insightful)
Since I assume you don't have kids, let me answer your question: You don't know shit.
As a parent, I *do* use the rating system to determine what's appropriate, that's the whole reason the ESRB system is there.
Anyone who lets there 10 year old kid play a game they have never even seen before shouldnt have them
Yeah, that's great. I have no problem knowing the contents of each and every game I get for my kid. The probelm is is that he has four grand
Re:wait... (Score:1)
Re:wait... (Score:1)
Last I checked there were demo discs that contain serveral game demos given out free at stores, and ocationaly in the mail if you register your console. And last I checked there were places to rent most if not all of games currently on store shelves.
And as for those given as presents, you can play it yourself to look at it's content before giving your kid the ok to play it.
Re:wait... (Score:2)
Re:wait... (Score:2)
Re:wait... (Score:2)
Barry Bonds? (Score:3, Informative)
Barry Bonds is not in the MLBPA (MLB Players Assoc). Therefore, he is not "bought" along with all the other players when EA buys the rights. In fact, in one game (MVP Baseball?), instead of buying Bonds in addition to the MLBPA, they made a charachter with Bond's exact stats, and he's some white guy on the Giants with some generic name. It's the biggest rip-off since "Mr. Dream" was the double of Mike Tyson in "Mike Tyson's Punch-Out" in all ways except he was just some no-name with Mike's former abilities :)
Re:Barry Bonds? (Score:1)
On that note, don't you think it would be awesome if they re-released Tecmo Superbowl for GBA with modern teams, players, etc?
Re:Barry Bonds? (Score:1)
Easy to explain,. (Score:2)
If it detects a boob or two is rated A+ (until a bribe by the publisher is collected)
If it detects any red liquid or "pooty mouth" language is rated M (Mario was rated M for "magma" until a big N cheque was collected)
If any guns are detected is rated T
Anything else is rated E.
So is easy to spot why the system didnt detected prostitution. Now all we have to do is to tell the developers to get the girls topless and offer a handy cheque to the ESRB
Now if only they were parametrically polymorphic (Score:2)
How convenient, I'm an object-oriented programmer. ;)
Disgusted (Score:2)
Since when is a watchdog group or a rating on a box by a censor board better than my judgement for my child? When you take the advice or the opini