Female Playboy Game Designer Takes 'High Road' 45
Thanks to Warcry.com for its three-part interview with Playboy: The Mansion lead developer Brenda Brathwaite. She discusses the Sims-like gameplay of the multi-platform title in development at Cyberlore, arguing: "I think I have an advantage as a heterosexual woman in that Playboy just wasn't part of my past: I was able to approach it from a brand-new angle... I can flip through those magazines and not have it effect me in the same way that it would clearly affect a heterosexual male." She concludes: "We go through and take a comparatively high road with this game, and show you a little of what it takes to build the Playboy empire, and what has happened historically. That was the challenge."
If ever there was one game... (Score:5, Interesting)
Smart move putting a woman in charge. Actually gives me hope.
So long as there's a still a "threesome in a hot tub" feature:)
Re:If ever there was one game... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:If ever there was one game... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:If ever there was one game... (Score:1)
Re:If ever there was one game... (Score:1)
Re:a matter of credibility (Score:1)
If you read the interview carefully, you'll notice that she's 9 months pregnant with twins.
You've got one twisted imagination, my friend.
here goes my Karma... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:here goes my Karma... (Score:3, Insightful)
yeah, my emotions arfe uncontrollable (Score:3, Insightful)
Good to know that she thinks that it is impossible for me to dispassionately look at pornographic images. Jeesh.
That must be why the porn industry is run by gay guys and hetro women !
Re:yeah, my emotions arfe uncontrollable (Score:1, Insightful)
Hmm (Score:1, Flamebait)
Re:Hmm (Score:5, Insightful)
Different Perspective... uh huh (Score:4, Funny)
I don't play it for the nude scenes... really...
Unaffected? (Score:4, Insightful)
Right, women can handle magazine images and models much better then men. Really, they won't think their breasts are too small, thighs too fat, stomach not toned enough. No way, it's not like it might help them along the path to an eating disorder or anything. Yup, most women sure aren't effected by the pictures...
Re:Unaffected? (Score:5, Interesting)
> much better then men. Really, they won't think
> their breasts are too small, thighs too fat,
> stomach not toned enough.
There are quite a few women in this country (US) whose thighs really are too fat and whose stomach has never even heard the word "tone". Being obese and out of shape is much worse for your health than being underweight.
> No way, it's not like it might help them along
> the path to an eating disorder or anything.
Eating disorders are not caused by wanting to lose weight, but by not knowing how to do it. There should be considerably more emphasis on exercise and less on removing fat from your diet (because eating fat does not make you fat, calories make you fat, and you can eat a lot more carbohydrate calories than fat calories)
> Yup, most women sure aren't effected by the pictures...
But they should be. Yes, I know you are being sarcastic, but it is far better for women (and men, for that matter) to have a trim and fit body for a goal than to be "content" with all those jiggling extra pounds.
Re:Unaffected? (Score:3, Insightful)
I've always found it strange and a bit sad that women seem to put up even more unobtainable goals for themselves than men even want them to.
Playboy isn't whats turning women into anorexics, its Cosmo.
Re:Unaffected? (Score:2)
If a kid has a low self-esteem, you don't scream at him "HEY YOU LITTLE FUCKER LEARN TO LO
Re:Unaffected? (Score:1)
Re:Unaffected? (Score:1)
Re:Unaffected? (Score:2)
That's actually untrue. Until you get to the stage of being morbidly obese (~300+ pounds) it is healthier to be overweight than underweight.
Eating disorders are not caused by wanting to lose weight, but by not knowing how to do it.
Actually, an *eating disorder* really has nothing to do with losing weight. The person with the eating disorder thinks that it does, but that's really just a symptom of a different problem. For
Re:Unaffected? (Score:2)
If you ever had any intrest in wondering why an 80 pound girl would feel fat, I would suggest taking a look at a book called "Wasted" by Marya Hornbacher [amazon.com]. It's an autobiography that details her very destructive life as an anoretic and bulimic. It skips out on the clinical approach, and has a very hard hitting, personal description of the disea
Re:Unaffected? (Score:1)
Re:Unaffected? (Score:2)
Uhhh... Read that again. She didn't say "I can flip through those magazines and not have it effect me at all." She said that it didn't effect her like it does straight men in our society. A lot of straight men flip through a Playboy, get an erection and summarily dismiss said erection. Or, are you saying that when straight guys look at a Playboy they are thinking about their stoma
Re:Unaffected? (Score:1)
Re:Literacy (Score:2)
I can flip through those magazines and not have it effect me
I can flip through those magazines and not have it effect me in the same way
See the difference?
Here, we'll try it in context so you can see how much these words matter:
I can flip through those magazines and not have it effect me that it would clearly affect a heterosexual male.
Notice how without them it isn't even a sentence?
And here's a simplified exam
Re:Literacy (Score:2)
I found it slightly offensive that she thought men were unable to look at nude photos objectivly without over focusing on the women. I guess I just wanted to show that you can over generalize how women look at photos of models too.
Who Runs the Business (Score:2)
A number of years ago after pop started to retire to the bedroom in his smoking jacket with a couple of bunnies one third his age, his daughter Christi started running the Playboy empire.
Too easy.... (Score:3, Interesting)
She discusses the Sims-like gameplay of the multi-platform title in development at Cyberlore, arguing: "I think I have an advantage as a heterosexual woman in that Playboy just wasn't part of my past: I was able to approach it from a brand-new angle... I can flip through those magazines and not have it effect me in the same way that it would clearly affect a heterosexual male." She concludes: "We go through and take a comparatively high road with this game, and show you a little of what it takes to build the Playboy empire, and what has happened historically. That was the challenge."
Duh. I'll tell you what it takes to build the Playboy empire -- a lot of affected heterosexual males flipping through those magazines. That's why this game is going to stink -- you have to know your customer.
Not knowing your customer has to hurt (Score:2)
That's why Hef could build the Playboy empire, and Christine could revitalize it with a new (but not radical) perspective. It wouldn't have worked the other way 'round.
Re:Too easy.... (Score:2)
Article has nothing on game and a bio on the woman (Score:5, Insightful)
Actually I could care less about how Play Boy attempts to build a game. Before I ever read Play Boy, I thought that it would be 90% pictures of nude women. I was wrong it was more like 5-10% pictures of nude women. The other 90%-95% was filled with interviews, articles, and ads.
Let's face it, Play Boy, is a main stream product that is designed with pleasing the wife and/or girl friend in mind.
She thinks that being a woman gives her an edge because she wouldn't be turned on where most straight men would. I personally think that the folks that would be turned on would get over it if not the first day then in the first week. There is nothing sacred about the female body that makes it turn men on every time.
Two things... (Score:2)
High road my Aunt Fanny's Brass Dentures.
Great way to ruin a game (Score:2)
Re:Great way to ruin a game (Score:2)
Now there are games that shouldn't have nude dancing women contortionists on every screen, but if's a playboy game there damn well better be or it's a flop.
Re:Great way to ruin a game (Score:2)
I wouldn't have even considered buying it ordinarily, but this is a top-flight designer we're talking about here. I just might get it now.
But only for the articles!
Re:Great way to ruin a game (Score:2)
Ha! (Score:2)