Linux, OS X Ports For Star Wars: Battlefront? 21
Ant writes "LinuxGames has an interview that mentions Linux and Mac OS X ports for Star Wars: Battlefront game client. Wow." The answer here is carefully and ambiguously phrased, but at least Linux and Mac OS X ports are not ruled out.
Don't get your hopes up... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Don't get your hopes up... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Don't get your hopes up... (Score:2)
I tended to obsess over games like that back then, I spent all that time before I realized the only reason I could do that was the demo was really easy. The full game was probably a lot more complex, too bad I didn't have any money.
Re:Don't get your hopes up... (Score:1)
Pod Racing is sorta a bad subject for a game. The whole point is that you're moving so fast that you must steer around obstacles before they even come into view- so it's all track memorization, nothing more.
(It also wouldn't be an entertaining race to watch from the stands!)
Re:Don't get your hopes up... (Score:2, Insightful)
Unless they have altered the renderer a lot, there's not reason not to port it as well...
Re:Don't get your hopes up... (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:Don't get your hopes up... (Score:1)
But yeah it seems Republic Commando is the one using the Unreal engine.
Even if you do port it... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Even if you do port it... (Score:4, Interesting)
Don't get your expectations too high. Not like Linux/OSX represents a huge piece of the gaming pie, so to speak. I know this isn't going to be a popular opinion around here, but the PC-based Linux users out there who also really like playing games would have a much easier life if they got a copy of XP to dual boot with. The upside to this approach is that you would have instant access to a huge library of game demos to try out. Like the game? No prob. You have XP installed. You won't have to deal with worrying about Linux ports or support.
Re:Even if you do port it... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Even if you do port it... (Score:3, Insightful)
Ugh, no, that wouldn't be my first choice. The stability alone would be painful. XP's got some memeory management stuff that makes it far more stable than 98. It may
Re:Even if you do port it... (Score:2, Insightful)
If you're dual-booting to run one single game, memory corruption is unlikely to be a real bother. (... "Windows98 makes an excellent gaming platform for 90 minutes at a time"
For some games, win98 can be quite a bit faster. Some of its graphics functions are faster, and of course it leaves more RAM free than XP. But, DirectX 9 probably won't install on it, and that's the real killer.
Re:Even if you do port it... (Score:2)
A Disturbance In The Force (Score:5, Funny)
Buy it ! (Score:4, Insightful)
will buy those, rather than pirate it. Anything else than Windows and the console market are really just a niche, so buying it can hopefully
show that a port it worth it.
I've always bought... (Score:3, Interesting)
Perhaps it's sort of a collection-hobby for me. I can't say its got me far or even significantly affected the way that games are considered for Linux ports.
The main problem I've found is that the game-houses don't always know if which O/S you are running the client on
Re:I've always bought... (Score:3, Funny)
So you're out what? $50?
The problem... (Score:2)
As it stands...it will be hard for me to vote with my wallet.