Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
First Person Shooters (Games)

Doom 3 Expansion in the Works 58

Posted by Zonk from the building-on-a-succesful-franchise-is-new-to-me dept.
mog007 writes "It looks like id Software is in the process of making an expansion for Doom 3."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Doom 3 Expansion in the Works More

Doom 3 Expansion in the Works

Comments Filter:

  • Seriously? (Score:4, Funny)

    by HaloZero ( 610207 ) <protodekaNO@SPAMgmail.com> on Monday October 25, 2004 @11:35AM (#10621771) Homepage
    Crap, that means I have to shift it into high gear and actually beat the first one, now. Will the expansion also cost 60$US?
  • **BA-BOOOM**

    Nice press release.

  • Half Life was more cinematic (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Oddly_Drac ( 625066 ) on Monday October 25, 2004 @11:35AM (#10621777)
    "DOOM 3 defines first-person cinematic action"

    Actually, my vote goes to Half-Life.

    • Pfft. (Score:5, Insightful)

      by oGMo ( 379 ) on Monday October 25, 2004 @12:10PM (#10622132)
      DOOM 3 defines first-person cinematic action"
      Actually, my vote goes to Half-Life.

      Actually, my vote goes to Doom 1. Why? Because nothing has changed significantly since then.

      The only game that has gone beyond the basic "run down the hallways and shoot things" is Metroid Prime, but that's an adventure not a shooter so let's not compare apples and oranges.

      In fact, most FPS's have taken a step backward since Doom 1. In Doom, the levels were well-architected, had you coming back to areas, and were littered with excellent secret areas. Today, it's "run through area, shoot things, go to next area, repeat". Pretty sad.

      • I disagree about cinematic action, but surely Doom 1 is the best first person game ever made. Suberb level design and atmosphere, and truly fast-paced action with LOTS of enemies. I never expected Doom 3 to be as good, it's just eye candy to me. Nothing comes close to Doom 1 and 2.

      • Re:Pfft. (Score:3, Insightful)

        by chrish ( 4714 )
        You've never seen Thief: The Dark Project or its sequals then, have you?

        • Re:Pfft. (Score:2)

          by oGMo ( 379 )

          Actually, true, I forgot about Thief. I haven't seen it first-hand, but from what I've heard, I'd put it in the same group as Metroid Prime... adventure. (That's not a bad thing. That's a good thing. Adventures are far grander things than mere shooters.)

          On the other hand (and there are always a few other hands to be on, depending on your home planet), this did say cinematic action, not necessarily shooter. I don't think Thief had enough impact to define this genre, though, so I stick by my Doom vote,

      • What about System Shock, its more like an RPG type adventure, focusing on story line and character development than running and gunning.
      • "The only game that has gone beyond the basic "run down the hallways and shoot things""

        You missed the Dam in HL? The alien world? (which was reminiscent of 'Jet Set Willy', but I'm showing my age) The trash compactor?

        Another thing you might want to consider is when both games were released.

        Given both of those things, I suspect you're trolling to get more people to buy Nintendo...

        " In Doom, the levels were well-architected"

        Well-designed, architect isn't a bloody verb.

        "but that's an adventure
    • Actually, my vote goes to system shock(s).
    • Half-Life is an awesome game and one of my favorites... but come on. There is no way in hell it can compare to John Carmack's work. Doom defined the first person shooting genre and Doom 3 just keeps it going fresh.
    • I just played Half-life for the first time due to comments like yours. I have to say Doom3 is far more cinematic and, frankly, fun. I think I must have missed the point in time when Half-Life was revolutionary. I can imagine it was incredible at the time, but really, it aint that great anymore.
      • "I have to say Doom3 is far more cinematic and, frankly, fun."

        Six years between the games; but you'll notice that the scene setting leading to the 'disaster' on base was identical to the Half-Life one; believe me that was groundbreaking at the time when Quake II was repeating the formula of Doom I.

        I never did get hold of the Thief series or System Shock, so I can't comment on those...I'm resisting playing them now because I suspect I've been spoiled by 'Deus Ex'. I'm hoping that HL2 hasn't lost the st
        • I never did get hold of the Thief series or System Shock, so I can't comment on those...I'm resisting playing them now because I suspect I've been spoiled by 'Deus Ex'.

          The Thief series is excellent. Please support intelligent games by buying them, that will increase the chances of another game of Deus Ex quality being made. At least download the demo.

  • Wow! (Score:4, Funny)

    by aWalrus ( 239802 ) <sergio@@@overcaffeinated...net> on Monday October 25, 2004 @11:43AM (#10621859) Homepage Journal
    Will they put an actual game in there this time?

    Sorry, cheap shot, couldn't resist.

  • Improved gameplay (Score:5, Insightful)

    by rzei ( 622725 ) on Monday October 25, 2004 @11:45AM (#10621875)

    I guess it was too much to expect from a press release or what ever, but I still hoped to find something which would had been a hint that id has read some comments of their dull doom 3.

    I'm not saying that I won't play it, nor am I not saying that many wont buy the expansion set but I'm saying that many wont enjoy playing it.

    I'm hoping they'd come up with something more than:

    1. Enter a room
    2. Kill the first monster
    3. Turn around, kill the second monster
    4. Go through the room, looking for supplies
    5. Kill the third monster in front of the medkit
    6. Jump to 1.

    Hoping for everyone's sake, please id use more of the potential of doom3 and concept of scary game.

    • Re:Improved gameplay (Score:3, Insightful)

      by T-Ranger ( 10520 )

      Well, this game has cut screens and at least a vague plot. Kinda like porn that way.

      I dont understand id. Their game engines rock, no doubt, but the games are kinda sucky. In Doom 3 there is exactly one decision to make (send or dont send the message), but that decision has exactly zero effect on anything else, except for a cut screen. There should be multiple paths, NPCs that actually do something. Choices from level 1 should effect level n, for all values of n.

      Beh. Its only a matter of time before someo

      • Sounds like you would love Deus Ex.
      • Actually there is another choice. In the alpha labs, whether to use the E?? (forgot the letters) system or to use the bridge. Very small decision.

        Also, there's a point where you see a scientist in a chamber, and you can either kill him or rescue him. If you rescue him, you can follow him into a room with a PDA that has information that lets you get the BFG. So there's a somewhat larger decision.

  • Hmmmm... (Score:5, Funny)

    by Hank Reardon ( 534417 ) on Monday October 25, 2004 @11:45AM (#10621880) Homepage Journal

    Will this one use light?

  • Are there any plans for Doom 4 on horizon? Any screenshots of pre-alpha concept art etc.? Even though I rarely have time to play games these days, I always track the unbelievable evolution of id games. I remember when Wolfenstein 3D completely amazed me. Then Doom likewise. Then I've heard that Quake was going to be so much better than Doom, as Doom was better than Wolfenstein. Of course I didn't believe it, but when I saw it, it turned out to be true. Those games essentially created market for consumer 3D

    • Re:Doom 4 (Score:3, Funny)

      by Anonymous Coward

      Are there any plans for Doom 4 on horizon? Any screenshots of pre-alpha concept art etc.?

      Yep. A preliminary screenshot of Doom 4 can be found here [tribalcog.com].

      Keep in mind, this is just an early rendition.

    • It's curious that you ask about Doom 4. The next logical step is Quake IV, for which there are already screenshots available

  • RFE: MP Autodownload (Score:5, Insightful)

    by DrunkenTerror ( 561616 ) * on Monday October 25, 2004 @11:59AM (#10622021) Homepage Journal
    The one feature I wish they'd add is auto-downloading of maps from MP servers. I love id, but the fact that it doesn't even tell you the FILENAME you're missing when you try to connect to a server is really harsh. I'm hoping the next patch will fix this.

    Please, id. Please. This is the one thing really holding back MP player-base expansion. We've been playing the same 5 maps for 3 months now, cause it's such a pain in the ass for clients to use new maps.
    • "tar file" and have the console list the url for a week or two before the switch.
    • This is the one thing really holding back MP player-base expansion.
      Oh! so they improved the mp browser, the maps, the framerate, the weapons and the gameplay?
      I wasnt aware, I might try again.
    • My guess was they didn't want to compete with quake4 , at least not in multiplayer.
      Then I found out quake4 probably won't be out 'till 2006 :-/

      Anyway, there surely will be a mod that addresses this shortcoming soon..

  • Move on Carmack. (Score:3, Interesting)

    by JavaLord ( 680960 ) on Monday October 25, 2004 @11:59AM (#10622022) Journal
    I'd really like to see Carmack and the doom team move on to a totally different project. Carmack always wanted to do a "metaverse" type game. I think a MMO from those guys would be interesting at this point.

    • Re:Move on Carmack. (Score:3, Insightful)

      by desau ( 539417 )
      beh.. MMO is a waste of time.
      I'll never, ever pay a monthly subscription fee to play a game.
    • I agree. I've been saying this for years. They have great talent, and did the FPS thing... I'd like to see them try a RTS or RPG or try and break into something never-been-done before.

      But no, they have to sell out and go with "what works". Blah.

      I'm no longer impressed.
    • I don't know about an MMO, but after playing Doom 3, I couldn't understand why id went through all the trouble to come up with a great new engine, only to use it with a very mediocre story line. Maybe they should put some money into R&D and story line. I didn't see any reason to come out with another Doom game, the first two were plotless for the most part. Atleast the first Doom was the first of its kind. Doom 3 is just another high graphic FPS game. Graphics do not make a game fun.

      I was very dis
    • You can't develop a MMO with such a small team. Sure, they could do all the engineering, but the amount of content to develop is way out of id's scope. Not cause they're not good, but as some point you just need a lot of people to produce all that content.

  • But will it... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by MMaestro ( 585010 ) on Monday October 25, 2004 @12:40PM (#10622414)
    have online co-op? Based on the original Doom 3, having two people gun down some of the monsters might be too easy, but if the game engine can support large numbers of enemies at a time then I say get it in there.
  • This pales in comparison to Unreal Tournament 2004 and Counter Strike:Source. Having spent $50 on Doom3 I am not too psyched about this expansion.
  • Make 20-30 pitch-black dark rooms. Populate with monsters. Release to public.

    What a stupid concept
  • Please tell me that's a working title. Or something. Resurrection of Evil of sounds like something out of the Bush Cabinet. The terrorists are coming back.. and this time, they're pissed!

  • Rumour I heard... (Score:3, Funny)

    by Sentry21 ( 8183 ) on Monday October 25, 2004 @06:34PM (#10626491) Journal
    I heard they're going to take advantage of the amazing dynamic lighting system in the game by adding lights. I can't wait!

    --Dan
  • I was interested in the extent to which Doom 3's sales arc has followed a blockbuster movie's; even more so than most big releases (in either media) Doom 3 effectively "bought its opening weekend" with massive publicity, enjoyed about two weeks of strong sales, then dropped off significantly as word of mouth spread. Kinda like "Van Helsing" (movie) and so many others. This expansion seems like more of the same. Contrast, for example, Vice City, which had the same pre-release hype but managed to last. I wo
  • They have this great fancy dynamic lighting engine with all these cool effects...

    But they make the whole game so DARK that you cant even SEE their engine at work.

    The origonal doom was good because some areas were dark but mostly it was light with outdoor areas, rooms full of brightly lit computer gear, even the pools of acid were brightly lit.

Slashdot Top Deals

In practice, failures in system development, like unemployment in Russia, happens a lot despite official propaganda to the contrary. -- Paul Licker

Close