Nintendo Warns MMO Company Over Trademark Issues 86
Gamasutra.com (news now registration free) has word that MMOG developer Webzen has received a friendly letter from Nintendo discussing the similarities screenshots of their upcoming game have with The Legend of Zelda: Wind Waker. The developer states that this is a coincidence resulting from the cell shades style of their game, and the particular hair and clothes show in published media. From the article: "a spokesperson from developer Webzen claims that the hero of the game does not have any fixed image, and is created by the player to be their avatar in the game world." Heads up courtesy your friendly neighborhood simoniker.
I was going to say Nintendo is full of it, (Score:1, Funny)
Re:I was going to say Nintendo is full of it, (Score:1)
Cut/paste (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Cut/paste (Score:2)
If your gonna release some screenshots of a game where you can have thousands of different characters, why release some where they guy looks just like link?
Re:Cut/paste (Score:1)
Re:Cut/paste (Score:2)
I think... (Score:4, Funny)
Make Him Spunky (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:My first Slashdot Simpsons reference (Score:2)
Myers: No, no, no! He was supposed to have attitude.
Silverman: Um... wh-what do you mean, exactly?
Myers: Oh, you know, attitude, attitude! Uh... sunglasses!
Lady: Could we put him in more of a "hip-hop" context?
Krusty: Forget context, he's gotta be a surfer. Give me a nice shmear of surfer.
Lady: I feel we should Rasta-fy him by... 10 percent or so.
[the resulting dog i
Re:Make Him Spunky (Score:3, Insightful)
And welcome to the Missing the Point Club! As a black person myself, I think I know a bit about standing up for what you believe in. I do that everyday. As for Webzen, the character does look too much like Link. Ever seen the Sho Yu Weenie episode of Harvey Birdman?
Re:NO NIGGERS ALLOWED (Score:1)
This is dumb. You cannot say a character "should" become public domain since you've decided Nintendo made enough money off of him. THat's not even an opinion, that's just false. Disney will fight you over this with Mickey Mouse. Do you think they've made enough money with him too? If Link ever does become public domain, it could only happen about 70 years AFTER Shigeru Miyamoto bites the dust a
Re:Make Him Spunky (Score:1)
Wow! (Score:5, Insightful)
But then I loaded the page and saw the screenshot.
The Big N has a point.
That shot could easly pass as something directly out of WW.
Re:Wow! (Score:4, Interesting)
I don't think the Big N has any point here. Really. Hair is different, cloaths are different, no green zelda outfit. Have you ever seen Link in anything but green?
Sorry, last I checked nintendo did not have a trademark on all cell shaded wasp characters.
Re:Wow! (Score:2)
Actually, yes [google.com]
Re:Wow! (Score:2)
Re:Wow! (Score:4, Informative)
In the Wind Waker, link is in a light blue outfit without a hat the entire game when you play it a second time on hard mode.
so... Yes
Re:Wow! (Score:5, Informative)
here's another screenshot: http://games.tom.com/images/2005/wlgame/0218/002/
Re:Wow! (Score:2)
Have you ever seen Link in anything but green?
It's pedantic, but in Ocarina Of Time Link can also wear fetching Red and Blue costumes in his adult form, as well as the Wind Waker example someone else mentioned...
But I do think this games designers have taken a quite bit of inspiration from Wind Waker, at least in the graphical style. Having a vaguely Linkish character in your promo shots isn't likely to dissuade people from that notion. They could've tried to be a bit more original and disguise some of
Re:Wow! (Score:1)
Re:Wow! (Score:2)
There was that obscure "The Legend of Zelda" game on the Nintendo Entertainment System where Link spent a good portion of the game either blue or red depending on his ring color.
Re:Wow! (Score:2)
Friendly Copyright Infringement (Score:1)
It seems to me that this is more of a style infringement than an actual copying of ideas.
Re:Friendly Copyright Infringement (Score:5, Informative)
Trademark! Trademark! Trademark!
If people didn't talk in generics like "IP" all the time, maybe people would figure out the difference.
It's not the same thing as copyright, and the law *requires* that Nintendo do stuff like this to keep their trademark. Trademark law can include things like trade dress, which is what protects things like the shape of a Coke bottle, or the exterior look of McDonald's resturants.
Re:Friendly Copyright Infringement (Score:2)
Um. (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm not saying that this is or isn't a copyright infringement, but one small screenshot is hardly representitave of their work on the game as a whole, nor is the game complete.... I'm guessing that Nintendo's letter will simply protect their right to complain in the future while making the Wiki development team think about a some changes in the artwork. The style and technology lend a bit to the art effect, but short of seeing a "Jaunty Green Outfit(TM)" or a "Breeze Baton(not tm)", I'm betting that the company is smart enough to change the art such that there's no infringement by the time the final product comes out.
Re:Um. (Score:2)
Re:Um. (Score:1)
Re:Um. (Score:1)
If there are 10's of 1000's of looks the developer really should make the caracter look different and release new shots.
Very similar, I'd say. (Score:1)
Re:Very similar, I'd say. (Score:3, Funny)
I hope this gets stamped out (Score:4, Insightful)
It is inevitable with MMOs increasing the ways players can customize their characters people are going to make them look like a super hero, or another video game character.
I know this is a terrible analogy but Ford and GM don't get sued for what their customers do after purchasing a car. On the service side of things my phone company doesn't get sued if I use the phone to conduct illegal activities. Why is the creator of the game responsible for the actions of their customers?
Re:I hope this gets stamped out (Score:3, Informative)
This is not the case of a character that some random user created that happens to look like Link. This is the developer making promotional material to hype its game that is 10 months from beta testing that happens to look just like Link.
Re:I hope this gets stamped out (Score:5, Insightful)
I understand your point of the vendor not being liable for infringing after-market modifications and uses, but in this case, these shots are coming from those making and selling the game. To use your car analogy, it's like GM advertising their Corvette as easily modified to look like a Mustang and featuring such a modification in their press material.
Re:I hope this gets stamped out (Score:1)
Re:I hope this gets stamped out (Score:2)
Re:Modified the screenshot (Score:2)
Re:Modified the screenshot (Score:2)
Wiki (Score:2)
Re:Wiki (Score:3, Interesting)
Doesn't matter. They can't advertise the game looking like WW. For the purposes of marketing/advertising, they cannot infringe.
Re:Wiki (Score:2)
Meet me halfway: Make the joke funny!
It's All Over (Score:5, Funny)
Nintendo: "You may have stolen our main character Link, but stealing our homosexual Frenchman who flys around on a balloon has gone too far! He is our Jar Jar Binks of the Zelda series, not yours!"
Re:It's All Over (Score:2)
Conflicting points of view? (Score:3, Interesting)
--We also have to consider that if you make a cel-shaded farmland scene, it will probably look like a cel-shaded farmland scene in another game. Just like how a red-haired chibi-anime girl looks a hell of a lot like every other red-haired chibi-anime girl.
--The *NAME* of the game is Wiki. No, the puff of air will not stay right there the entire game. It's a promo shot, so they stuffed the game's title into the scene... and since they wouldn't want to override any of the aesthetics, the bottom-right corner was the best spot for it. Coincidence of design, not an attempt at deception.
--That being said, Webzen could very well have done their avatar with some other design options, and shifted the scene camera around to put their logo into another spot.
Yeah, it's a screenshot that looks similar. Deal with it. I think this is an instance of an overzealous lawyer (What, an overzealous lawyer from Nintendo? That'd be like Apple suing their fans for discussing gossip... wait... right.)
Yeah. It's kind of like that.
Re:Conflicting points of view? (Score:5, Interesting)
On the other hand, maybe they should release screenshots that don't look like they belong to Wind Waker. Then they wouldn't be infringing on trademarks or confusing people into thinking it's Wind Waker instead of Wiki.
"Yeah, it's a screenshot that looks similar. Deal with it."
They are. They sent a letter instead of a lawsuit.
" I think this is an instance of an overzealous lawyer"
I think this is an isntance of an overzealous attempt to assume lawyers only represent evil intentions.
Re:Conflicting points of view? (Score:2)
Re:Conflicting points of view? (Score:2, Informative)
ehh - not quite (Score:1)
Character branding is simply a marketing manuvuer that is now becoming obsolete because with graphical community online games such as MMORPGs, people don't have to depend on the releases of a particular image of an alter-ego to live out their imagination. Say you see yourself as Wolverine or Link or Mario. The
Prior Art, Prior Art! (Score:2)
Re:ehh - not quite (Score:1)
Higher Res Screen Shots (Score:5, Informative)
When I originally saw those shots last week, it occurred to me that the design looked vaguely familiar. I didn't initially even connect it to Zelda, but taking another look, I think there could be serious trouble, especially if this one design is to be used as a "spokescharacter" for the game. Check out the direct comparison [dreamwiz.com]. (In Korean.) Looks like the offending shots were right out of the press release. Here's another article [gamemeca.com] (in Korean) with side-by-side comparisons of the images... including the little puff of wind in the title.
And, if you'd like to take a look at some of the other upcoming releases promoted during Webzen 's Feb. 15 conference, all of which seem to be MMORPGs of different themes, look at this Japanese article [4gamer.net]. (Writer Kim Dong Wook regularly covers new games from Korea.)
Customer Confusion (Score:1, Informative)
In other news... (Score:2)
Three points (Score:5, Insightful)
2. The letter, I don't think it was a cease-and-desist, just a warning. Nintendo's lawyers aren't actually *that* overzealous concerning matters not related to people making illegal copies of their games. It'd be nice if they were more enlightened in regard to some of their older, forgotten properties, but large corporations are not particularly known for their Buddha natures.
3. Dudes, the game's called Wiki! Has anyone asked Ward Cunningham about this?
Samurai Jack (Score:2)
Which itself seemed copied from the Samurai Jack cartoon. Check out the first episode, with Jack as a little kid - his face is the s
Nintendo afraid of MMORPGs (Score:2, Interesting)
Nintendo fought against Graal, who was at the time making a very Zelda-esque MMORPG (clearly derivative). And yet, Zelda classic (Single player, and also clearly derivative) is alive and thriving...
Re:Nintendo afraid of MMORPGs (Score:2)
As for non MMORPGs not being shutdown: OoT2D (a 2D, overhead, ala LTTP version of Ocarina of Time) received a cease-and-desist from Nintendo.
Re:Nintendo afraid of MMORPGs (Score:2)
Pika? (Score:2, Funny)
I mean, Nintendo clearly owns #FFFF00.
So Nintendo owns all 3D manga? (Score:2)
Cel shading (Score:1)
YES if its the same Cel shading! (Score:2)
Not correct. The actual problem is that they are using the EXACT same Type of cell shading the EXACT same proportions on the eyes/mouth, the same proportions in the hairstyles and even the same COLOR PALETTE. there are hundreds perhaps thousands of ways to do cell shading and anime but these guys are using EXACTLY the same one! (example at hand: check the style
Slashdot Editors need to learn what trademarks are (Score:1)
In this case, there is a copyright dispute, since Nintendo is alleging that the graphics and artwork (creative content) resemble Zelda very closely.
If they h
[OT] (Score:2)