Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Media Government Entertainment Games Politics

Games As The Mainstream Media's Demon 39

1up has an editorial up exploring the biased nature of mainstream media gaming coverage, especially in light of the recent Hot Coffee scandal. From the article: "...Are CBS, Donny Deutsch, and Ed Bradley actually informing their viewers--or just inflaming their fears in a culture already on edge? Many, certainly many in the videogame industry, believe it's the latter. There's no shortage of gaming coverage, but it seems that what's out there, outside of enthusiast coverage, focuses disproportionately on certain kinds of games or on partial information that does no justice to the industry's successes. "
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Games As The Mainstream Media's Demon

Comments Filter:
  • by melikamp ( 631205 ) on Saturday September 03, 2005 @08:28PM (#13473788) Homepage Journal
    In other news: Slashdot has an article covering a gaming site's editorial covering the game coverage in press.
  • Mmm Hmm (Score:5, Interesting)

    by NanoGator ( 522640 ) on Saturday September 03, 2005 @08:34PM (#13473805) Homepage Journal
    "...Are CBS, Donny Deutsch, and Ed Bradley actually informing their viewers--or just inflaming their fears in a culture already on edge?"

    It'd sure be interesting if these dudes would say "Here are games we approve of!", as opposed to just bla bla bla'ing about how games they've never played are evil.
    • as opposed to just bla bla bla'ing about how games they've never played are evil.

      Isn't that what they do about everything? Very little news is actually "eyewitness" any more. If you put it in a court of law it'd be labeled as hearsay. But then again, we get what we deserve. When was the last time most people contacted their local news organizations when they know that something is false? I'll send an email, but I suspect that I'm in the minority.

      • Isn't that what they do about everything? Very little news is actually "eyewitness" any more. If you put it in a court of law it'd be labeled as hearsay. But then again, we get what we deserve. When was the last time most people contacted their local news organizations when they know that something is false? I'll send an email, but I suspect that I'm in the minority.


        IF I did so, I'd not be able to do anything else. I see articles about aquantances who I know are drug dealers and they describes as "innocent
    • Re:Mmm Hmm (Score:2, Insightful)

      by Trepalium ( 109107 )
      That will never happen. This is just a variation of the "rock and roll is the devil's music" [wfmu.org] story. Read up on the crackpot theories screamed about on the news at the time about music, and you'll find an awful lot of similarities to the modern crackpot theories about games.

      I have no idea how to deal with these clearly irrational people. It's generally impossible to reason with them, and even if you do manage to get through to one of them, there's always another crackpot willing to take up the torch in f

  • Just watch... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Lally Singh ( 3427 ) on Saturday September 03, 2005 @08:43PM (#13473829) Journal
    As soon as the media conglomerates start buying up game companies, everyone's going to STFU about video game violence.
  • If it bleeds, it leads.

    Just another form of sensationalism for the media to latch onto. Nothing new, really. Check out the book The Culture of Fear [amazon.com] for a better treatment than my half assed drunken post.

  • by ZosX ( 517789 ) <zosxavius@gTIGERmail.com minus cat> on Saturday September 03, 2005 @08:51PM (#13473860) Homepage
    Don't believe the hype!

    If only more people would subscribe to that, the media would put a whole lot less spin on the "news".
  • by Thedeviluno ( 903528 ) on Saturday September 03, 2005 @09:02PM (#13473896) Homepage
    What about the real Gaming Demons? The ones that tell me to do bad things and hurt people...you know when you play the game backwards....
  • OH NO! Seriously, after watching the eleven o'clock news for a month, and seeing FIVE stories about stripperobics, on the same channel, within that period, I lost anything resembling respect for todays news services.
  • Parents need something to blame.

    Unfortunately, Satanic Panic is rather old, and nobody plays D&D anymore, so we are left with video games.

    • Re:Obviously... (Score:3, Interesting)

      I don't know if people realize how messed up parents are nowadays.

      I was at a well off neighborhood mall with this Italian friend with fairly tanned dark skin. He's got a beard, mustache, and a mario nose.

      The mall was tight on parking space, we pulled into this space right before this other family did. The father of that family was obviously pissed that we got to the space first.

      He got out of the car, banged on our car window while holding these 5 year old kids in his hands. To my Italian friend, he yelle
  • by Landshark17 ( 807664 ) on Saturday September 03, 2005 @10:38PM (#13474218)
    I was pretty sick of hearing about how games were corrupting people, so I wrote the following letter to the editor. It ran in the Bergen Rocord a few weeks ago.

    "I'm 18 years old, I'm going to college in the fall, I volunteer twice a week, and I play a lot of computer games. I hold in my hands a copy of Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas which I received as a present before the pornographic content debacle. In the past few weeks there has been much attention paid to games and their content by the media, and as one who plays a lot of games, I'd just like to share my thoughts on the matter of content and the rating system.

    A woman is suing Rockstar Games (the publisher of San Andreas) for misleading her into thinking that the game was an appropriate present for her 14 year-old grandson. I have the game right here, let's see how she was deceived. On the front there is a big black "M" and it says "Mature 17+." On the back, next to another big black "M" there is a more detailed explanation which reads, "Blood and Gore, Intense Violence, Strong Language, Strong Sexual Content, Use of Drugs" That seems pretty honest and unambiguous to me, not deceptive at all.

    According to an article in Computer Gaming World, the Entertainment Software Review Board, ESRB for short, does not actually play the games it rates. ESRB is given videos of a games most extreme content and bases its rating on that. Knowing this, it's easy to see how something like San Andreas' pornographic content slipped by, and how other objectionable content could be slipped by. ESRB needs to start playing games. Until they do, things will slip through, if for no other reason than some people want to push the envelope and test the system - it's the class clown mentality. ESRB needs to play games, and they need to play them more than once. They need to release detailed reports on the content of every game they rate. Until they do things will slip, people will be mad, and they will call for Congress to hold hearings on how the gaming industry is corrupting children.

    I think that rating games is a good idea, even if the current system is flawed. I think being able to look at a box and see what kind of content is in a game is a good idea, I think that before parents allow their kids to play games, they need to know what's in the game. If you think that your child is too young to be handle a game's content, don't let them play it. Get involved, teach your kids what's right and what's wrong, what's educational and what's just entertainment. That's what my parents did, and while I play games that turn the stomachs of Joe Lieberman, Jack Thompson, and Hillary Clinton, I've never gotten so much as a parking ticket.

    People are outraged, absolutely. But we don't need Congressional hearings over whether games are corrupting our youth. We need parents to teach their kids values and the difference between reality and entertainment, and ESRB needs to be more comprehensive in its ratings. My final thought is this: Without following instructions posted on the Internet, San Andreas still has graphic violence, gangs, drug use, corrupt cops, and crime galore. We knew about that, it's right there on the box. What does it say about our priorities and our values when we allow all that, but are incensed and call for Congressional hearings when we find out somebody hid a little sex in there?"
    • The current ESRB rating is flawed? Please tell me, how is it flawed? And how could the ESRB playing the game more than once before rating it even change anything (specially in the case of San Andreas).

      I finished the game and I didn't see any "hot coffee" in the whole game. Granted, I didn't install the patch to enable it (which was released after the game was rated and released).
      How could the ESRB make their ratings more comprehesive? Do the need to include graphical examples of what they mean with "Intense
      • The current ESRB rating is flawed? Please tell me, how is it flawed?

        The greatest flaw is that the ESRB isn't as trustable as it should be - while GTA:SA content can still slip through even when the rating system is fixed, most people think that the rating is based on the number of red pixels.

        I have a copy of Descent Freespace - rated 'E'. I also have a copy of Descent 2 and Descent 3 - both rated 'T'. They're both just as violent - there's no reason for these two games to have a rating descrepancy.

        Nex

    • by miyako ( 632510 ) <miyako AT gmail DOT com> on Sunday September 04, 2005 @03:07PM (#13478744) Homepage Journal
      you know, this actually make me think about something. If the ESRB is just given a video with the most extreme content in the game, which I would assume is not all that long, in order to rate the game, why not have the companies who want to sell games provide the retailers with a copy of this video.
      The retailer could have a small kiosk that could allow parents to walk up and scan a game and see a video of the content in the game to help them decide if it is or is not appropriate for their children.
      It really seems like a somewhat simple and elegant solution to helping parents know what's in a game. It would also probably work in the favor of game companies as well. I know more than a few 17-18 year olds who would be more likely to buy a game if they could scan it and see the extreme amount of gore/sex in the games.
    • by Anonymous Coward
      At the end you ask a question which I imagine you mean rhetorically to reinforce your point. However, if you truly ask the question "What does it say about our priorities...when we find out somebody hid a little sex in there?" the answers lead to some interesting conclusions.

      It says we are a society that thinks corruption of justice, excessive drug use, every crime a human can commit, prostitution, and mass murder are acceptable topics for a fourteen year old (as per the woman in your letter) to consider an
    • Yep, same old story all over again, parents like to shift the blame to everyone except for themselves. Why ? To hide their own incompetence.
  • by Daniel Wood ( 531906 ) on Sunday September 04, 2005 @12:59AM (#13474798) Homepage Journal
    People love to watch bad news, dunno why, probably the same reason I like to blow shit up.

    Video games, they can easily put a bad spin on because there are so many clueless people.

    Iraq, they can easily put a bad spin on because there are so many clueless people. Not saying things aren't bad, but when is the last time the mainstream media ran more than the occasional story of the GOOD our troops do in Iraq? I'm in a privilaged position of working with people who did serve in Iraq. Sure there are stories of ambushed, and other screwed up things, but I get to hear the good things we do and that the Iraqi people do.

    I wonder if there was any mainstream press coverage of the Iraqi village who went vigilanti and fucked some terrorists up themselves, nah, too much to hope for.
  • The next big thing (Score:5, Informative)

    by Kelson ( 129150 ) * on Sunday September 04, 2005 @01:15AM (#13474858) Homepage Journal
    It happened with comic books. Now it's happening with games. Ultimately, some new form of entertainment will come along that will attract the eyes of moral crusaders, and the game industry will spend less time in the spotlight.

    Less time, sure... but it won't escape entirely for quite a while. You could replace every instance of "video game" with "comci book" (and change the examples to match) and you'd still have a largely factual article. Neil Gaiman [neilgaiman.com] made a great comment a few weeks ago about how mainstream coverage of comics books alternates between "Wham! Bam! Comics have grown up!" (which is 20-year old news) and "OMG! This comic book not meant for kids has material unsuitable for kids in it!"

    There's an advocacy organization, the Comic Book Legal Defense Fund [cbldf.org], that works to raise awareness and raise funds to help defend comic book authors, artists, retailers etc. from attacks against freedom of expression. Retailers have been arrested for selling adult comics to adults. Artists and publishers get sued for parodies. It doesn't get as much covereage as video games anymore, but what coverage it gets is still as biased as it was in the 1950s.
  • by Frodo Crockett ( 861942 ) on Sunday September 04, 2005 @03:17AM (#13475342)
    Media bias is probably only rooted in ignorance and a desire to "make news" rather than report the facts, but have you considered that console videogames are in direct competition with broadcast and cable television? For people that only have one set, they can either watch TV or little Billy can play his videogames. I cannot claim that this is why the media likes to demonize games (it's not--they aren't that smart), but it is an interesting way of looking at the situation.
    • by Anonymous Coward
      It is a bit worse than that. You can take a story that reads neutral and read it either way to make up for your own personal bias.

      For example saw a story on Bush visiting huricane victims. He was walking around shaking hands handing out food. Walking up to people and saying 'hey you get anything to eat yet?'. Yet some people spin this as an ignorant boob, other spin this exact same story as a great leader. Yet it was neither. It was a dude walking around saying 'hey go get something to eat its free!'.
    • Don't underestimate them. They really are that smart. These aren't machines working for them, these are people. People like you.
    • Hmm.. well I havent seen it that way but you are probably right, actually I think that explains a lot of things. And yes TV, dvd, movies and games are actually competitive as mediums.

      You also have to realize that game companies themselves use the bad publicity. I remember an interview with American Mcgee a while ago in which he mentioned he used the controversial themes because young adults (teens) were naturally attracted to censored and taboo themes and that was their target market, of course he didnt use
      • He (American Mcgee) is 100% correct. Nothing will make a kid want somthing more than telling him/her they can't have it. Oh, and tell them it's bad for them too... then they really won't want it.
  • Not Suprising (Score:5, Insightful)

    by miyako ( 632510 ) <miyako AT gmail DOT com> on Sunday September 04, 2005 @04:21AM (#13475511) Homepage Journal
    I've personally never found the media's reaction to video games to be suprising at all. Video Games are basically in direct competition with Television for the time and attention of people. The Info-tainment industry wants to play up video games as being bad because they don't want people to grow up getting their daily dose of sex and violence from GTA 237: Let's Kill Some People; they want them to get it from Channel $X News and The $City Times.
    Media companies are no more going to sing the praises of video games than Coca Cola is going to come out and say "You know, we like coke, and a lot of other people like coke, but if you like pepsi then that's A-OK with us".
    Of course, the reason why this isn't going to work in the long run is that overly dramatic FUD is only entertaining if you don't realize that it's overly dramatic FUD (at least in the case of info-tainment). Most people I think, or at least most of the Gen-X and Gen-Yers have played enough video games to realize that this is FUD, and so they get bored with it- so they stop with the news and pick up video games instead.
  • "Videogames can teach you all kinds of ways to kill. You can pick someone off with a high-powered rifle, reach into a human chest and rip out a beating heart, or turn someone into a chicken." --Cleveland Plain Dealer

    Because god knows, I see a lot of stuff on the news about how punks have turned a old lady into a chicken and how the latest school violence involved a child reaching into a teacher's chest and ripping out a beating heart.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 04, 2005 @11:20AM (#13477394)
    There are two sides to every story and neither the Mainstream Media nor the Gaming Advocates really represent the true situation.

    The facts are that gaming media, like most other forms of media, has contraversial games which push the limits of what is generally acceptable; these contraversial games are then demonized by 'crusaders' and by the media. The reality of the situation is that there is a type of symbiotic relationship between the crusaders and the developers.

    If you compare the average quality, and quantity of high quality, 'Mature' games to 'Everyone' and 'Teen' games you will notice that there are far less good 'Mature' games and in general they're of lower quality at a similar sales level. Now what certain game developers are doing is taking a pretty crappy game and pushing the boundries with their content to sell more units (think Manhunt); this content then enrages crusaders who then get the media involved and since the game is 'Uber-Mature' it sells really well to insecure 14 year olds (and 14 year olds at heart). If the crusaders (and the Media) ignored this games, the games wouldn't sell well on their own merit, and for the most part the 'Plague of Damaging videogames' would dry up.

    Now, I personally suspect that this will only continue for a short period of time longer. Much like with Rap Music and Horror movies, Violent Videogames will only continue to be press worthy for a short period of time longer (probably less than 5 years). After that it won't matter if you produce a game a where you're a 5 year old, with a passion for guns, that shoots cops it won't make the news. Thus the contraversial game will no longer have the free press to cover up for it's poor game mechanics.
    • In other words, a select few game companies are really trolling for attention. They actually _like_ to generate a good scandal, because of the free publicity. You can get hours and hours and all TV channels, without paying a cent.

      E.g., see the recent scandal about shooting cops in games, and how every channel conveniently had side-by-side screenshots and photos of dead police officer. Long before the game was even released. Sorry, that kind of thing almost screams "PR stunt".

      That's what PR companies do: get
  • Some people are trying to show that there is a postive side to gaming as well = http://www.videogamesarenotevil.com/ [videogamesarenotevil.com]
  • *Cough*Evils of Dungeons & Dragons *cough8 http://members.tripod.com/~limsk/pulling.htm [tripod.com] [The Pulling report, about 80's D&D hysteria> No matter what, something will always be society's villain. Jazz music, comic books, rock music, D&D, video games. I suggest wait, and the blame will pass to... Golf?

It's a naive, domestic operating system without any breeding, but I think you'll be amused by its presumption.

Working...