Water Cooling an Xbox 360 213
An anonymous reader writes "HardOCP has done it once again. They have an article running down the process of water cooling an Xbox 360, and with surprising effectiveness and remarkable styling." From the article: "We had plans to water cool an Xbox 360 for over a year now. Little did we know that not only will this water cooling project be more fun than the original, but it may even be practical. Imagine that. With reports of heat related issues and a heat sink that can get almost too hot to touch after marathon gaming sessions, the Xbox 360 water cooling project now had a sense of purpose. We bought a retail Xbox 360 specifically for this project. The minute we got it back to the [H] labs we tore into it and, with a little help from the fine folks at Koolance, we have put together a water cooling solution that will handle anything the Xbox 360 can throw at it and literally knock your socks off." Actual implimentation with hand-holding. Hexus.net was discussing a kit to do this a few days ago.
Some other crazy ideas (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Some other crazy ideas (Score:2)
Re:Some other crazy ideas (Score:2)
The problem of swapping discs has yet to be resolved though.
Cooling (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Cooling (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Cooling (Score:4, Insightful)
Typical Slashdot piss-on-Microsoft attitude. Microsoft likely had no part in designing the power brick; for one, they don't have the expertise to design an active-PFC swtiched-mode high-wattage power supply.
Now, we can certainly fault Microsoft for not testing their vendor's product sufficently, but the fact is that 95% of XBOX 360s are chugging along perfectly fine.
Re:Cooling (Score:5, Insightful)
Typical Microsoft-fanboyism.
The moment Microsoft puts any component into a box that has the label "Microsoft" on it, they are responsible.
Yeah, I know, for the typical "it's not Microsoft's fault" - apologist, reponsibility is a strange and alien concept.
But essentially it comes down to this:
It doesn't matter wether Microsoft had a part in designing the power brick.
They are responsible to make sure the thing works. Yes, that means if some supplier screwed up it's still Microsoft's repsonsibility to do some minimal quality control so that the broken units don't get shipped.
Re:Cooling (Score:2)
However, my post stands - while you can fault Microsoft for shipping a poor PSU, the grandparent's point that Microsoft can't be trusted because they cannot design a power supply is simply incorrect. If
sad (Score:4, Informative)
Re:sad (Score:4, Insightful)
You can and you don't. Seriously, don't believe everything you read (including this, I guess).
Pre-emptive Dupe Joke? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Pre-emptive Dupe Joke? (Score:3, Insightful)
Today XBox cooling, tomorrow, WMD (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Today XBox cooling, tomorrow, WMD (Score:2)
sigh.... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:sigh.... (Score:3, Insightful)
"Four years ago next month we built the world's first water cooled Xbox. At the time, a lot of people asked us why we would want to water cool an Xbox, mostly because they didn't understand the motivation behind it. The fact of the matter was that the standard heat sink on the 700MHz Intel processor would barely get hot under normal use and surely didn'
Re:sigh.... (Score:5, Insightful)
then you go on to qualify your it just works statement by saying you have to put the power supply in a "good" place...
This is a piece of consumer electronics. Do you consider a DVD player to be broken if you have to lay the cables in just the right way?
What about a TV? Heck even a computer, switch, or router? I can't believe you're defending the xbox 360. Having to pay attention to where cables/exhaust fans are located on a piece of consumer electronics is unacceptable.
Re:sigh.... (Score:2)
I think some people got some defective units which MS is fixing. They are doing more than I've seen any other consumer electronic company do by overnighting boxes and paying shipping both ways.
As for other devices... Most modern computers can't be put in a closed
Re:sigh.... (Score:2)
Re:sigh.... (Score:2, Insightful)
Exhaust clearance is something that people who own component audio systems have had in the back of their mind for a couple dozen years now. Just because you haven't heard of it doesn't mean it's a new phenominon.
If you find yourself worked up into a frothing tizzy over the fact that you can't hide your power supply under your oven while you're baking shit and expect proper operation, you have no right to own a console.
Word.
Re:sigh.... (Score:2)
Does a DVD player have 500+ million logic transistors? A high-clocked triple-core PowerPC CPU and a high-clocked ATI GPU?
High-end computers use lots of power. They have for some time now. You would never put a high-end gaming PC in an enclosed space.
The XBOX 360 manual makes it abundantly clear that the system needs ventilation. Certainly, some of the problems have been caus
rings a bell (Score:2)
Now, does this rings a bell to you?
Re:rings a bell (Score:2)
Re:rings a bell (Score:2)
What if you lay a audio cables next to a florescent light, run them parallel to AC lines, or run the across the floor on top of the carpet. Each example in this list has varying amounts of static which but include what to avoid in order to run it the "right" way. I can assure you that putting the boxes in the right place will not negate the effect of the static from poor placement of the cables. You would be better to do it "right" instead of looking a
Re:sigh.... (Score:2)
Anything can be slightly
it just works *FOR NOW* (Score:3, Informative)
XBOX360 is an awesome gaming platform, but it's pretty clear that the first version is doing poorly power- and cooling-wise.
Re:it just works *FOR NOW* (Score:3, Informative)
Re:it just works *FOR NOW* (Score:2)
With stock Xbox 360 cooling, after an hour of Quake 4, the back of the motherboard temperature was 150.8F ( 66C ).
The temperatures on the electronic components themselves is higher than that (most notably CPU and GPU, but other components also create heat)
It looks like XBox360 is designed at the limit of all components (even the power brick) and one small "issue" can put it over the edge. (And "issue" can mean anything from user error to dust collecting)
Re:sigh.... (Score:4, Funny)
Welcome to slashdot, you must be new here.
Re:sigh.... (Score:2)
40 lashes with a dictionary (Score:5, Funny)
I fail to see how a water cooling system would do any sock-knocking. I guess they don't actually know what the word literally means (hint: it isn't a superlative nor does it simply add emphasis).
You've obviously never had an Xbox360 fall on you. (Score:5, Funny)
It ripped my flesh to the bone, knocked my sock off, broke my big toe and killed my cat.
damn you Microsoft
DAMN YOU
Re:You've obviously never had an Xbox360 fall on y (Score:2)
>>It ripped my flesh to the bone, knocked my sock off, broke my big toe and killed my cat.
This spells doom for Micro$oft, doom Doom DOOM dOOm!!! As soon as the public is aware that the XBox360 is causing severe lascerations, minor fractures and feline fatalities it's the end of the road for Micro$oft.
Don't buy the marketing hype that it's a large scale release of a complex consumer product, the occaisonal dead cat is expected and unavoidable, and that these are all var
Re:40 lashes with a dictionary (Score:2)
Re:40 lashes with a dictionary (Score:3, Funny)
Re:40 lashes with a dictionary (Score:2)
Sounds like those people who complain about using the word "really." They conveniently forget about the word "very", which comes from the same root as Latin veritas, "truth", and its English derivatives (e.g., verify).
Very, really, truly, literally (according to the meaning in the words), honestly, indeed (= in deed), etc. all mean rougly the same thing: in actuality. The difference is how acceptable they are when used as an intensifier.
And at le
Re:40 lashes with a dictionary (Score:2)
"Dude, it was so funny I literally shit my pants!"
"Well, what did you do?"
"What do you mean, dude? I was laughing..."
"I mean, what did you do with your shitty pants?"
"No, dude, I didn't REALLY shit my pants, I LITERALLY shit my pants!"
Re:40 lashes with a dictionary (Score:2)
At least, I hope the OP meant that. I suppose it is possible that the water cooling kit could explode extravagantly.
Re:40 lashes with a dictionary (Score:2)
http://www.answers.com/literally&r=67 [answers.com]
http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/literally [m-w.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Re:40 lashes with a dictionary (Score:2)
http://www.answers.com/literally&r=67 [answers.com]
http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/literally [m-w.com]
Re:40 lashes with a dictionary (Score:2)
http://www.answers.com/literally&r=67 [answers.com]
http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/literally [m-w.com]
Re:40 lashes with a dictionary (Score:2)
Re:40 lashes with a dictionary (Score:3, Insightful)
Prescriptionist? WTF are you talking about? When you preface a figure of speech with "literally", what you're saying is "(figure of speech) occurred, and I don't mean that as a figure of speech". Nobody's fucking socks got knocked off, so "literally" is the wrong fucking word.
They: the writer, editor, webmaster, etc.; essentially the collective group of people who had the opportunity-- nay, the
Re:40 lashes with a dictionary (Score:2)
That's what it *used to* mean. These days it's just emphasis.
Re:40 lashes with a dictionary (Score:4, Interesting)
If what you're doing doesn't qualify as such, then I don't know what does.
I'm not saying that usage of the word "literally" is wrong because the dictionary says it is. I'm saying it's wrong because it's opposite of the common usage. Point is, the entire value of language is its commonality. Traditional prescriptivism is railing against uses of "ain't" not in place of "am not", or the splitting of infinitives. "Incorrect" usages like that do not cause ambiguity, they're simply nitpicks by absolutists.
Using the word "literally" to add emphasis is common usage,
Hogwash. It's a common error, but common usage is still primarily the correct way.
and given that you understood clearly the intent of the author, it seems that it was an adequate choice of words.
Just because an error is common doesn't make it not an error. My recognition of the error doesn't make it not an error. There is a descriptive definition of the word as we, the english speaking public, use it, and it isn't for emphasis. See, "descriptivists" can be as bad as prescriptivists when they defend every illiterate dumbfuck's utter misuse of a word. "Literally knock your socks off" is an easy one to spot as wrong because there does not exist anything that literally knocks off socks. But what if they said "literally burning down the house", intending it as emphasis? Pretty fucking ambiguous. It's fucking wrong because "literally" has a specific common usage that doesn't just vanish because some crackhead with a web site doesn't know how the rest of us use it.
And if I'm not mistaken, we use the American punctuation rules on slashdot, so put those commas back behind those quotation marks.
I use "programming" punctuation rules, i.e. if the fragment quoted didn't have punctuation originally, then the period at the end of my sentence has no business weaseling its way into that character string as it's part of MY words, not THEIRS. It doesn't matter, though. The important thing is that no meaning is lost.
I probably haven't convinced you, but at least I hope you see that prescription is ultimately a waste of time.
Oh, indeed I accept that trying to stem the tide of illiteracy is pointless.
I just don't agree that I'm being prescriptive.
Re:40 lashes with a dictionary (Score:2)
And saying "Where you at?" is also common these days. Would you do that in any professional communication?
What it comes down to is that not every use of a word is a correct one. Yes this is "prescriptionist". I suppose a good term to use here is "vulgar". I think it describes certain things that are considered to be "common usage" fairly well.
And if I'm not mistaken, we use the American punctuation rules on slashdot, so put those commas b
Re:40 lashes with a dictionary (Score:2)
Bad Design (Score:2, Insightful)
People say Apple users blindly ignore any and all flaws with Apple products, but Apple users have nothing on XBox fanboys. The thing could spew out radioactive mist and they'd still be forgiving Mic
Re:Bad Design (Score:2)
*Literally* Knock My Socks Off, eh? (Score:4, Insightful)
*grumblegrumble*
Aww... (Score:4, Funny)
I just love touching the heatsink after a good session of gaming, and now I can't with the Xbox 360; I gotta get this product now!
Re:Aww... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Aww... (Score:2, Funny)
Cooling the wrong components? (Score:4, Informative)
But hey, if you'd rather spend ~180 on a water cooling system instead of not stuffing the power block deep inside a cabinet, more power to you.
Something interesting: (Score:2)
This seems a bit scary to me. The processors really get that hot, then shooting the exhaust fluid from one over the other isn't going to do as much good as they might expect.
Still, awsome bit of home engineering.
Re:Something interesting: (Score:2)
Re:Something interesting: (Score:2, Insightful)
Water Cooled from the start (Score:2)
Re:Water Cooled from the start (Score:2)
Not to mention some Cray supercomputers which were, IIRC, literally submersed in some kind of coolant.
Re:Water Cooled from the start (Score:2)
Re:Water Cooled from the start (Score:2)
Re:Water Cooled from the start (Score:2)
Unless you mean that someone did it as a project. But the stock Dreamcast had no watercooling.
Re:Water Cooled from the start (Score:2)
But there's plenty of mentions of it to be found via Google - for instance [twistedmonkey.net].
Interestingly there is some confusion on whether the early models were water-cooled and Sega switched to air-cooling later, or the other way around.
(Btw, I admit the evidence above is hardly empiric
Re:Water Cooled from the start (Score:2)
http://features.teamxbox.com/xbox/1145/The-Xbox-3
Koolance Commercial (Score:4, Interesting)
literally (Score:2)
Thanks, but I prefer cooling systems that do not explode or otherwise interact with the users clothing in a violent manner.
Though, I must admit, a device that can disrobe the user does have potential for porn.....
HardOCP knocks my socks off, literally (Score:2, Funny)
Even the geeks are lawyers now (Score:3, Interesting)
From the site:
If "it goes without saying," why say it at all?
Re:Even the geeks are lawyers now (Score:2)
Re:Even the geeks are lawyers now (Score:2)
because frivolous lawsuits are as American as apple pie, that's why. Five lines will save you years of headache, not all of us can afford to reply to emails the same way Anakata [thepiratebay.org] does...
Re:Even the geeks are lawyers now (Score:2)
"If "it goes without saying," why say it at all?"
Likewise, "within close proximity." The word proximity means "The state, quality, sense, or fact of being near or next; closeness."
SWEET (Score:2, Funny)
Re:SWEET (Score:2)
http://richfiles.solarbotics.net/Turbo.html [solarbotics.net]
I'm not sure you'd want to overclock your watch...
What exactly is it 'throwing?' (Score:2)
Armchair engineering (Score:4, Insightful)
If 'almost too hot to touch' is below the specs for the processor's operating temperature range...it doesn't matter how hot it feels to the user.
It never ceases to amaze me how people with no training will second-guess the basic competency of others with degrees in their field. Yes, the power supply gets too hot if placed on a rug...but that doesn't mean the xbox itself isn't designed properly. Probably just means that they didn't do a lot of testing in people's homes with the bricks on rugs and such; from what I understand, the problem is pretty rare even if you don't "cool" the brick.
I also love the egotistical "we drive 'em hard" implied in the "marathon gaming" bits- as if they're HARDCORE users who STRESS the xbox beyond its limits. I guarantee Microsoft had units running benchmarks/game demos for WEEKS at a time doing burn-in...
Re:Armchair engineering (Score:2)
Processors will undergo electromigration much more rapidly, and electrolytic capacitors will dry out. Both will significantly shorten the life of a console.
Re:Armchair engineering (Score:3, Interesting)
First, I have to mention the obvious. The heatsink is going to be COOLER than the processor itself. (That's the whole reason it works as a heat sink.) If the heatsink is below the maximum temp for the processor it doesn't actually mean you're safe. Without knowing the thermal resistances for everything, you simply cannot say whether you're safe or not. Especi [intel.com]
Does it include... (Score:3, Funny)
Silocon chips altogether. (Score:2, Interesting)
They way I see it silicon chip technology is hitting a wall. The wall is heat.
Back in the day, chips like these processors today would be dreams. It's amazing how certain dreams never succeed and amazing things never dreamt become reality. The Internet was not dreamt, but it has come. The flying car does not exist in the practically and computer chips are doing nightmarish speeds. The same happens with large cities.
Most cities are not designed to become large. the result is extremely tight roads and impra
Water Cooler VS. Refrigerator w/ holes in the door (Score:2)
Two GPU-180-L06 video/GPU water blocks (link)
One HX-360 radiator (link)
One Control Board (link)
One 120mm fan (link)
One LED display panel (link)
12ft of 3/8" hose
Standard 110v to 12v wall adapter
Now one has to consider if the time spent building and the cost of these materials could be more cheaply and easily reproduced by buying a compact refrigerator and drilling holes in it for the wiring?
You would just need a drill and one of these: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0009WNP [amazon.com]
Re:Water Cooler VS. Refrigerator w/ holes in the d (Score:2, Insightful)
Liquid cooling should provide less noise (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Liquid cooling should provide less noise (Score:2, Insightful)
Language, it's a virus... (Score:2)
(socks not withstanding)
I need to switch jobs.. (Score:2)
Lazy, you guys are. (Score:2)
Why? (Score:2)
The only part of the Xbox360 that overheats is the power brick. The console itself does not overheat.
I'll show you water-cooling (Score:2)
Re:Gee... (Score:2)
Re:I don't get it... (Score:2)
"Four years ago next month we built the world's first water cooled Xbox. At the time, a lot of people asked us why we would want to water cool an Xbox, mostly because they didn't understand the motivation behind it. The fact of the matter was that the standard heat sink on the 700MHz Intel processor would barely get hot under normal use and surely didn't warrant the performance offered by a custom water c
I read the article... (Score:2)
Re:I don't get it... (Score:3, Interesting)
1) For people who already bought an XBox 360 and cannot wait for MS to "fix the problem"
2) It's a cool thing to do.
3) Third parties can see that watercooling an XBox 360 is possible and will release kits that people can use.
But yes in a perfect world MS should fix the problem, it's not 100% guaranteed that they will though. Power to the people.
Re:I don't get it... (Score:2)
'nuff said, yo
Re:I don't get it... (Score:2)
Um...actually... (Score:2, Funny)
Sure it gets hot...its a goddam supercomputer in a breadbox.
It will eat disks if you wobble it while its on, but with the rotational velocity of that disk at howevermany rpms its spin
Re:For the love of... (Score:2)
Fanboys for any system, for any sort, have no right to complain about other fanboys.
Re:Other version of water cooling (Score:2)
Re:you are fucking kidding right? (Score:2, Funny)