
No PS3 Surprises at CES 35
Gamespot reports that, while CES has had loads of interesting news to give up about many technological trends, the next next-gen console was suprisingly quiet at the event. For the most part the Sony Keynote talked high definition this and 'new media' that. From the article: "However, it was only when Stringer whipped out a PSP that gamers' ears perked up. Stringer used the handheld to show off LocationFree, Sony's Internet-enabled video system, which streams video to multiple TVs, PCs, or PSPs wirelessly or over the Web. To demonstrate, Stringer showed a live East Coast TV broadcast being played onto the PSP via a nearby Wi-Fi hotspot."
Why am I not surprised (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Why am I not surprised (Score:1, Interesting)
Just not for gaming
Re:Why am I not surprised (Score:3, Insightful)
Although it may sound arrogant at first, knowing how hard it is to invade the portable market with Nintendo there with a tight grip, having a "media machine" may turn out to be a blessing for Sony. If they can't compete in games, focus on other stuff.
Re:Why am I not surprised (Score:2)
3D redone (Score:2)
Mario64, while definitely setting historical precedent in terms of 3D, is not the only way to do 3D. It's great for some games, but after replaying Symphony of the Night, I'm quickly missing the sidescrollers of yore. Things that don't necessarily require even one analog stick.
As for actual games... co
Re:Why am I not surprised (Score:1)
Re:Why am I not surprised (Score:2)
PSP != Media device (Score:1)
Even their lineup (and arguably current games-to-movie ratio) reflects this mentality. The number of PSP games were/are much higher than the nu
Re:Why am I not surprised (Score:2)
Just give me some affordable and/or free games, dangit!
Re:Why am I not surprised (Score:2)
Re:Why am I not surprised (Score:2)
please correct me if i am mistaken, but currently there is no handheld on the market that has the ability to push 3d graphics, playback widescreen video, and has a wide variety of games and developers onboard to create top notch games on the level of the psp.
the ds has the "innovation" of a touch screen for games, and thats opening up a whole new path. [the one nintendo is taking as they laugh their way to the bank] however
Re:Why am I not surprised (Score:1)
Everyone disses sony. Look back a whiel ago and read all of the posts about how the PS2 would never catch on. Seriously, go dredge some forums. Guess what
The console was quiet? (Score:2)
Is it quieter than the PS2?
Disappointing, but not a big surprise anyway (Score:3, Informative)
It's a fairly good bet, I'd imagine, that something will be shown off at E3 given the amount of floor space they've reserved. But who knows.
Re:Disappointing, but not a big surprise anyway (Score:2)
Yes, but they said the PS3 would be out "Spring 2006".. which isn't going to happen since E3 isn't until May, and I doubt they're going to launch it without showing it off first.
If the PS3 was really going to come out in the spring, it would've been playable at CES.
As it is, this hints that the $1000 Blue-ray players are really causing problems for Sony's PS3 plans. I wouldn't be suprised to see
Re:Disappointing, but not a big surprise anyway (Score:2)
being the major backer of the technology, they can offer it at cost. they do not have to pay extra royalties for including it in the console. they can also request the blu-ray tech consortium to offer them a discount in order to push what could be one of the major weapons to get a large blu-ray user adoption.
Re:Disappointing, but not a big surprise anyway (Score:2)
My how we forget. Some very high-end DVD players were $700, but I had a $150 DVD player *before* the PS2 came out.
DVD players were out for 3 years before the PS2 dropped. Blu-ray players will have been out for half a year or so when the PS3 comes out.
Re:Disappointing, but not a big surprise anyway (Score:2)
there are still tons of dvd players that cost well above what the ps2 costs. there isnt really a direct correlation.
PSP Yawn.... (Score:1)
There dont seem to be many that catch my eye or I dont want to upgrade my firmware. And there is no way I am buying movies for that thing.
I still dont think we will see PS3 in North America untill sometime 2007.
no show (Score:2, Troll)
Poor marketing strategy nonetheless. The only market Sony is worried about right now are families that will buy EITHER the 360 or the PS3. (Many people will buy both or just the PS3, those sales are already final). The longer PS3 waits the fewer families who will purchase just 1 will wait.
Re:no show (Score:1)
Don't misunderstand me; I see all of the features that the 360 and PS3 are going to have. I'm just not interested.
1. Music player = CD/Ipod/ect
2. Online gaming = PC
3. Movie player = I bought a DVD player for $50, I'll do the same for the next dominant format.
I do play Halo
Re:no show (Score:1)
Re:no show (Score:1)
Re:no show (Score:3, Informative)
$300 is still a chunk of change, but I wish my $1500 computer had 3x 3.2ghz processors and that monster of a video card.
Re:no show (Score:2)
Really? (Score:1)
Re:no show (Score:1)
The only market Sony is worried about right now are families that will buy EITHER the 360 or the PS3
You missed something (Score:3, Informative)
With a ton of X360 articles about every little detail before, during, and after launch, I have to wonder. Especially when it wasn't even mentioned as a side note that over 4000 devkits have shipped [ign.com] so far. Even IGN got this one. Not a large piece of news, perhaps, but it demonstrates lots of stuff is going on behind the scenes.
Re:You missed something (Score:1)
Re:You missed something (Score:2)