Halo 2 Only on Vista 524
iLogiK writes "Halo 2 will be available for PC, but only in Windows Vista. From the announcement: 'Halo 2 the game that redefined first-person combat and multiplayer action for millions of gamers worldwide, is set to explode onto PCs exclusively for Windows Vista. Halo 2 for Windows Vista will be developed by a dedicated Microsoft Game Studios team in partnership with Bungie Studios.'" That's one way to force upgrades. I thought just not releasing patches for the microsoft-worm-of-the-week would be enough ;)
Comment removed (Score:5, Funny)
Comment removed (Score:5, Funny)
Bootable Halo "Tech" DVD (Score:5, Insightful)
I honestly wouldn't be surprised if someone made a DVD ISO of a nice, bootable Windows Vista install, stripped out to the bare essentials like those various tech/maintenance CDs, complete with a functioning copy of the game ready to run. If they did it right then it'd not need to do much more than use the HD for swap and for save games.
Has Microsoft managed to finally get all of of the Windows 2000 holdouts to switch to XP yet? I know that they're business customers mainly, but if they're having trouble with them then I don't see them having a lot more success with Vista in the business environment either. 3/4 of the computers at my employer still run Windows 98 or 95...
Re:Bootable Halo "Tech" DVD (Score:3, Insightful)
Hell no. I use Win2k on my home machines (the ones that aren't running various free OSes). Why would I want to upgrade? All Windows XP has to offer me is Cleartype and SP2, and all SP2 has to offer me is a handful of security cushions that might possibly be valuable only if I were a clueless n00b. IE7 might interest me... if I wasn't perfectly happy with the combination of Firefox and Opera.
I might upgrade to Vi
Re:Bootable Halo "Tech" DVD (Score:5, Informative)
I'm an Ubuntu person myself... but when I have to use Windows (I.E. my clients), XP really isn't that bad (once you turn off all the crap). You just have to know where to turn it off. It's still 2k underneath!
Re:Bootable Halo "Tech" DVD (Score:4, Informative)
Start->Run 'msconfig'
Go to 'Services' tab
Un-check 'themes'
Save it and choose whether or not to re-start.
Blue stuff will be gone.
Re:I predict... (Score:4, Insightful)
They are using Halo 2 to make more users switch to Vista (and to upgrade hardware). I expect more and more games and other apps are going to be for Vista only.
You have an excellent sig btw...
I'll take that bet (Score:5, Insightful)
Wanna bet?
Halo was a decent enough FPS, but nothing spectacular. It looks like Halo 2 is the same. I'd consider buying it if it were available for my system, but I'm not going to spend my time and money upgrading my hardware and risking a whole new OS just to play one game.
If Microsoft restrict their games pointlessly to running on Vista, that just means their competitors in the gaming markets have a free run over everyone still using XP or earlier. I'll bet there are a lot more people like me than there are mad keen types who will buy the latest and greatest graphics card and upgrading their whole system just for one title that's worth a few hours of gameplay.
Re:I predict... (Score:4, Funny)
Wait... (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Wait... (Score:2)
Well, considering that hardware desktop acceleration is a fundamental change to UI behavior, I would say that yeah, we'll probably only see it in Vista. There's also non-essential service auto-unloading when you start a game, another Vista bullet point which I assume is attached to DX10 as well.
Re:Wait... (Score:5, Insightful)
Vista requires a certain level of 3d graphic card & cpu power... by limiting Halo 2's release to Vista, MS doesn't have to code the game to run on older hardware.
In short, they get to program for a more predictable hardware environment.
Or you could just boot Linux onto your Xbox 1, run windows Vista through an emulation, then play Halo 2.
Re:Wait... (Score:3, Funny)
You are kidding right? Right?
Re:Wait... (Score:3, Informative)
Well that's just dumb. For starters, Microsoft always lie about the minimum requirements for their operating systems so if you upgraded you may find it sucks worse performance wise than it did before. And secondly games always say what their requirements are right there on the box. If Halo 2 says it needs some high end machine then that's wha
Re:Wait... (Score:2)
Is Vista such a tough sell that Microsoft has to enforce arbitrary restrictions to get people to use it? Totally lame. Why would I want a resource-sucking OS with twice the hardware requirements of its previous version when I'm trying to run a lean, mean game machine?
I think Vista will be the Windows s
Yes, it does (Score:3, Informative)
Not only that, Direct3d 10 requires DirectX 10 capable hardware, non of which is currently available.
Re:Wait... (Score:5, Insightful)
It's going to be called Windows Graphics Framework (WGF). WGF will be released in Vista, and will not be backported.
WGF = What was going to be DX10 + Avalon + OpenGL Emulation + Other Goop
I do expect that Transgaming will implement it for Linux; soon Linux will be a very viable gaming platform.
I guess I'll just stick to Worms (Score:2, Funny)
What incentive? (Score:5, Insightful)
Cost to play Halo 2 on Windows Vista: A lot more than $200.00
Can't see this being any sort of incentive. Heck, I can't even see a big market for it.
Re:What incentive? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:What incentive? (Score:2)
Re:What incentive? (Score:2)
Re:What incentive? (Score:4, Funny)
Meh (Score:2)
I Doubt This Will Be Vista's Killer App (Score:2, Insightful)
I seriously doubt that one single game is going to convince very many people to go through the expense of switching to another version of Windows, and upgrading their hardware.
Re:I Doubt This Will Be Vista's Killer App (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:I Doubt This Will Be Vista's Killer App (Score:2)
Well... (Score:2)
...now we know Vista sales aren't going to flop too badly, since some of the top games will only run on it. I remember something similar with Windows 95, in which new games in 1995 were released exclusively for Windows 95.
Still, I wonder if the Vista requirement for Halo 2 is because of technologies only available in Vista, or because of an artificial requirement.
Cool (Score:2, Funny)
Hype, nothing else (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Hype, nothing else (Score:2)
1 Week (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:1 Week (Score:2)
Re:1 Week (Score:3, Interesting)
Sorry, but BFD. (Score:2, Redundant)
Let's face facts. Those who must play Halo 2 either already have an XBox 360 or plan on getting one. I played the original Halo port for the PC and I was unimpressed. The graphics were quite nice; the story was interesting; but compared to the plethora of first-person shooters, I did not think that Halo was all that great. And from what I've been reading, most PC people believe the same. I understand that a game like Halo was somewhat of a revolutio
Re:Sorry, but BFD. (Score:2)
Halo 2 came out for the XBox a long time ago. I've already seen ads for Halo3.
Are they on crack? (Score:2)
Maybe the Vista version will actually have an ending... Doesn't matter, I'm not going to buy Vista, and I'm definitely not going to buy Halo2 a second time, they lost my money to Epic and id (and Valve if I'm feeling masochistic).
Halo and Halo 2 were fun, but the campaign was WAY too short (kinda makes sense when you find out that Halo 2 was supposed to be part of Halo...).
I wish Bungie would come home! (Score:3)
Re:I wish Bungie would come home! (Score:5, Funny)
FOR SALE
Re:Priceless! Somebody post a screenshot. (Score:3, Informative)
Software reasons? (Score:3, Informative)
I remember reading that the 360 and Vista share similar software in the graphics system. In other words, MS was going to a "write once, play everywhere (that's from MS)" architecture so developers wouldn't have to do a lot of converting. It sounds like this is fallout from that, not some evil marketing plot to make people buy Vista to play a game.
Re:Software reasons? (Score:5, Informative)
Only Vista? (Score:2)
We will find a way.
Marketing, marketing (Score:3)
Expect more Vista only over the next year, you ain't seen nothing yet.
Not to worry.... (Score:5, Funny)
:-)
I'm not wanting to flame but... (Score:2)
By the time Halo 2 for Vista comes out it'll be old and outdated. Unreal Tournament 2007 will already be out. And who knows, by the time Vista comes out with Halo 2, Unreal Tournament 2010 might already be out.
Windows only? Shame on you, Bungie! (Score:2)
So what gives, Bungie? You started out as a Mac game company, with tremendous loyalty from your customer base and promised to never forget us. I mean, a Windows *first* release is understandable, but to go Win-exclusive? I guess the lure of big money was too strong to resist. Like everyone's mom used to say "you're judged by the friends you keep." I would add "...and the ones you throw away."
So long Bungie, we hard
Re:Windows only? Shame on you, Bungie! (Score:2)
DRM (Score:2)
I loved Halo one the PC, and refuse to use console controls for playing an FPS. I tried Halo 2 on xbox and the controller was pretty much unusable. All of the Halo fans who want to play on windows will have to lock in to DRM.
And I've already decided I won't be using Vista, so I guess I won't be playing Halo 2. No big loss since from what I hear (and from the hour or so I played it) it's more like Halo 1.5.
Since I'm also boycotting starforce [glop.org], I probably won
That solves that. (Score:2)
Vista on Wine (Score:3, Interesting)
Truely, I found that my soundcard driver and various other thing would hard-lock my system in XP... very annoying when you're in the middle of a game. Most of the windows games I run play nicely on Wine/Cedega, some even better (as in the case of my laptop, where the video driver will not update in windows).
If Cedega gains more support for newer games, all the more reason for me to stick with it and/or linux. XP is bad enough, I certainly wouldn't want to upgrade to vista just to play a few newer games.
You mean there won't be a Linux port?!?! (Score:2)
Hint: Funny/Sarcasm (Got a feeling some mods might go for Insightful)
I'm not going to Vista, I swear (Score:2, Insightful)
95 > 98 > ME > 2k > XP
I *swear* I'm not going to Vista. I *swear* it! I'll keep using XP until it's time to buy a new PC, then I'll buy a Mac.
Stephen
Re:I'm not going to Vista, I swear (Score:3, Interesting)
I have my concerns that Vista is going to be the next ME. I seriously doubt it, but I wouldn't put it past the boys at Redmond to hand us another debacle. So, I'm going to wait 6 months before I even consider upgrading.
I'm not buying a Mac, though. I like my games too much
Re:I'm not going to Vista, I swear (Score:5, Funny)
Speech fails me.
Explode, eh? (Score:2)
With Windows, "explode" takes on a whole new meaning...
a-holes (Score:3, Insightful)
Bah (Score:2)
Halo redefines the FPS clone...? (Score:5, Insightful)
I always thought anyone who really found the Halo's to be truely revolutionary has never played an FPS on a computer -- there really wasn't anything unique about the game. The rendering engine was at best on par with other games of its time, and the control was less than average (I'm a keyboard and mouse guy). Story isn't terribly important when it comes to player vs player. So if it can only be played on Vista, why does anyone really care? It's an old game that wasn't anything special to begin with.
Re:Halo redefines the FPS clone...? (Score:3, Interesting)
STEAM PLAYER NUMBER STATISTICS
This page last updated: 2:00pm PST (22:00 GMT), February 09 2006 Average unique users per month: 2,625,878
Game Current Players Current Servers Player Minutes / Month
Counter-Strike 105,554 54,018 4.760 billion
Counter-Strike: Source 49,241 27,577 1.378 billion
Off Xboxconnect, showed 10,000 players for a day.
btw, those CS stats where for current players online, not a total for a day.
ummm, no (Score:2)
Wasn't Starseige Tribes the first FPS that "redefined" multiplayer gaming?
About the only chance MS has of getting me to buy an Xbox, is if I can get it modded to run MythTV for free.
Talk about false advertising. (Score:4, Interesting)
nice one xbox.com (Score:4, Funny)
I think we've all learned what to expect from a year-late ports of mediocre games.
and what exactly is it that halo2 will require that xp can't provide? is the engine more demanding than doom3 or source?
thanks for selling out, again, bungie...
My theory... (Score:5, Insightful)
XBox Live on Windows Vista (Score:4, Interesting)
Notice, btw, how they're reinforcing their overall position by leveraging their two platforms in tandem. When some people say cross-platform they're thinking Windows/Mac/Linux. When other people say cross-platform, they're thinking PC/Console. Microsoft is creating an enticing proposition for the content developers.
That's nothing... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Why even bother? (Score:5, Informative)
Not true, I had to up to XP to play EQ2
Re:Why even bother? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Why even bother? (Score:2)
Re:Why even bother? (Score:2)
Well you can stil telnet to play a game of nethack at nethack.alt.org or even use java and go here [alt.org] to play a game.
Re:Why even bother? (Score:5, Insightful)
Well if you upgraded OSes just to play one game, you are a nerd, and/or pirated the OS. A common mistake a nerd/pirate makes here is thinking the average consumer is anything like one. Nobody in all seriousness is gonna upgrade OSes to play a game.
Re:Why even bother? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Why even bother? (Score:3, Interesting)
According to this page [eq2online.com], not unless you were using Windows 95. EQ II supports 98/2000/ME/XP. And if you were running Windows 95 in 2004, WHAT DID YOU EXPECT?
And I laugh at some of these new games that "require" Windows XP...funny, they run on Windows 2000 fine. I'm playing Battlefield 2 (XP only), and Fable: the Lost Chapters (XP only) with no more issues than any of the XP users are experiencing.
Me, I just swore to avoid Windows XP because it doesn't offer much over
Re:Why even bother? (Score:5, Interesting)
Actually this is a sad myth in the Windows world, a lot did change with WindowsXP, stuff that would be important to almost everyuser, and from your level of knowledge especially you.
Things from several fairly big performance, but also stability changes are in WindowsXP, and were worth the upgrade, sorry that you didn't ever move over. However at this point, I agree you should just wait for Vista if XP would cost you to upgrade in the meantime.
However for people that think XP is only Win2K with crayon buttons, do a bit of reading, there are things that would surprised a lot of people.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/01/12/XP
http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/driver/kernel/xp_ke
Win2k was a massive milestone in the Windows world, so XP got overlooked, and this is where you will note a lot of things that the 'average' journalist just don't get or didn't understand well enough to report on. Also remember than WindowsXP is basically the newer Windows 2003 Server code base, (as long as you have SP2 installed).
PS To add to the above thread about Halo2 being used to FORCE users to upgrade to Vista, that is about insane. If that was MS's intent then the WPF and all the other Vista technologies they are making available for XP would not be available for XP users. Why would Microsoft bother?
Secondly, Bungie is the developer of Halo2, they actually make the decisions on the platform and graphics requirements, Microsoft doesn't micro manage their work.
So all the people with the conspiracies need to get a life.
Take Care,
TheNetAvenger
Re:Why even bother? (Score:5, Insightful)
Why is everyone so up-in-arms about the DRM in Vista? I havn't been impressed with the DRM-protected offerings in 2000/XP, so it's not like I'll be missing out on much.
I don't plan on watching HD-DVDs on my PC, or for-pay HD movies, so the requirement of HDMI for full-resolution doesn't affect me. I've seen what HD looks like on my 19" monitor, and it is not that impressive. I did play DVDs on my computer back in the 90s, but this was back when standalone players cost much more than DVD-ROM drives. I have no desire to reprchase my entire DVD collection just to get a marginal quality improvement.
Please keep in mind, NON-DRM VIDEO WILL NOT BE AFFECTED BY THIS REQUIREMENT. I can still look forward to downloading all the free xvid HD rips I want, and play them back on VLC at full resolution...should I be so inclined.
I don't plan on watching HDTV on this box. I don't plan on listening to DRM-encumbered formats like DVD Audio or SACD on this PC. I don't plan on doing anything remotely attached to DRM.
So, pray tell, could you point out where the DRM in Windows Vista actually affects me?
Re:Why even bother? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Why even bother? (Score:3, Interesting)
Did you read a word I said? I'm BOYCOTTING DRM, not the OS it is attached to.
You don't magically feed the DRM machine by buying the OS. You feed the DRM machine by purchasing DRM-infested videos and music and playing them on the OS in question. Since I don't plan on feeding the DRM machine, I feel good about the upgrade.
Look at it this way: if nobody BUYS HD-DVD movies, and therefore nobody PLAYS HD-DVD movies on Vista, then nobody will experience the DRM.
Be reasonable: you can have th
Re:Why even bother? (Score:3, Interesting)
It doesn't matter if you aren't planning to use it, because you're still part
Yeah, but (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Why even bother? (Score:5, Interesting)
Anyone gonna release a 'compatibility patch' for H2 after it comes out? :)
Re:Why even bother? (Score:2)
I'd still rather play FPSes on the PC. Better graphics, better controls. It's a crying shame there's no way to natively connect a keyboard and mouse for gaming on the 360-- it would have been spectacular to have everybody choose the controllers they want. I have nothing against playing with the contr
Re:Why even bother? (Score:3, Informative)
That's one of the big reasons that MS isn't supporting the mouse for the 360...PC gamers would dominate the online play while console-only gamers with their gamepads would be wondering how the other guy moves so fast (and probably screaming H
Re:Why even bother? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Why even bother? (Score:5, Informative)
What happens right now is that if you dont have a hardware accelerated driver for OpenGL installed, windows will use a 100% software OpenGL implementation (which implements pretty much no extentions or recent GL features).
On Vista, the software implementation will be replaced with an implementation that implements more of the core GL features and extentions but does it on top of Direct3D.
In both cases, if you install the drivers from NVIDIA or ATI or whoever, you will still get full hardware accelerated OpenGL with all the extentions your vendor has chosen to provide. But, on Vista, using that will disable some of the 3D Accelerated Aeroglass UI crap.
Even more to the point, the display vendors say it should be possible to build a driver that can handle both the Aeroglass UI AND OpenGL at the same time.
Re:Why even bother? (Score:2, Interesting)
Also note that Gamespy stats [gamespy.com] show that Halo is still being played by lots of people on PCs. Good games sell for a long time.
Re:Why even bother? (Score:2)
Re:Why even bother? (Score:5, Insightful)
Halo 2 is already old. By the time it is actually released on PC (relatively) few people will care.
Re:Why even bother? (Score:5, Insightful)
Second I would like to know exactly what Halo brought to the gaming market that "redefined first-person combat and multiplayer action..." Other than awesome marketing.
Re:Why even bother? (Score:5, Funny)
Limited turn speeds, large rings which don't affect gameplay, and duh.. Master Chief.
But really, for the first 30 minutes of the game, I thought those little aliens were on my side. I mean, they looked cute and harmless, they made cute little noises, and since they weren't shooting me, I thought they were providing cover fire for.
Re:Why even bother? (Score:5, Insightful)
Had this conversation with a couple friends of mine and I think we finally hit on something. We're all approaching 30. We cut our teeth on Wolfenstein 3D, and stepped up to Doom and all that. How many nights were we up all night deathmatching? Too many to count. Doom was the greatest game of all time for us. We couldn't stop thinking about what we could do in that game and what would be possible if this or that would change and what maps were being made and wouldn't it be cool if there were a mod that did "x".
And that is our frame of reference. Quake brought us into three dimensions and from there on out it's been incremental improvements. To us, Halo is just more of the same.
But then you get a new generation of kids. The same basic stuff appeals to them now that appealed to us back then. Now they have an xbox and live (which makes the whole deathmatch thing much easier than anything on the ps2 or the gcn) and they absolutely love running around shooting their friends and getting shot by their friends and swearing like sailors and ta-da... you've got the new thing.
If you could strap them into a chair and force them to play through the same evolution of experience my age group has had, they'd see it's nothing new. But that's not going to happen and to them Halo is the most amazing game experience ever.
And then you've got people that are my age that just didn't give two shits about computers when my friends and I were playing Doom. Now they have an xbox and it's an entirely new experience for them as well.
Is it an experience I'm interested in? Hell, no. The level design is generally lacking and I don't find the balance of weapons and such to be all that attractive. But I don't stand there and complain and wonder why this game is so popular. It's the first time that lots of the current gaming audience has encountered such a thing. Of course they're impressed.
Re:Why even bother? (Score:3, Insightful)
I'm in exactly the same situation to you, although in my case I must admit to being naive to the facts at first. I heard all about how Halo was up there with sliced bread, and remember it being one of the first games I picked up for my xbox. From start to finish I was wondering what the hell I was missing. I actually kept playing just in case I was going to suddenly be awed by whatever people went on about. The few small sections with the flyi
Here is how it redefined first person shooters (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Why even bother? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Why even bother? (Score:5, Funny)
What do you mean... didn't you read the article? This is the game that redefined first-person combat and multiplayer action for millions of gamers worldwide! How much better can you get??
Re:Why even bother? (Score:3, Insightful)
"Whats the point of this?"
The point of everything that Microsoft (and most companies) does is to make money.
"First off, anyone who wanted Halo 2 has it for Xbox."
The long-delayed arrival of the original Halo on the Windows platform was a big deal. It did pretty good business. A similar argument -- "anybody who wants Halo already has it for XBox" -- would not have proved accurate.
"Secondly, Halo isn't that good a game- it got a big name as a great Xbox game because Xbox had jack shit else to p
Re:Vertical monopoly (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:There are three types of windows users... (Score:2)
I always fitted at least 2 of the above criteria (one of mine and one from the parent), not necessarily in that order and not necessarily the same at all times.
Re:My Gaming Rig Is Windows Anyway (Score:2)
And updated to an HDCP compatable monitor so your output isn't artifically blurred in the process?
I don't know about you, but I can't afford a new monitor and a new copy of Windows just so I can do the same shit I've been doing with Windows 2000 and XP (lets face facts, there are no important functional differences between the two, except that one is still supported and the other isn't) just so I can have DRM and a two year old mediocr
Re:My Gaming Rig Is Windows Anyway (Score:5, Informative)
If you want to watch any commercial video that is "hi-def" in full resolution, you must have an HDCP-compliant monitor. No exceptions.
If you do not have an HDCP-compliant monitor, you are at the mercy of whoever created the video. If they are generous, then they will instruct the codec to downsample the video to at least DVD-quality, if not lower. If they are assholes, they will flat-out prevent the video from playing.
These limitations are absolutely 0% technical.
It seems stupid, but it's all part of plugging every single hole they can find. It works together with the "Trusted Computing" requirements (encrypted and obscured I/O and memory) that are continually on the verge of being brought into force.
Re:In other news (Score:2)