Famitsu For Beginners 36
Via Kotaku, a post on the forums at the selectbutton site that may interest you. Famitsu is the gaming bible for a lot of people, but not all of us have the language skills required to follow it. Many more are confused by what's seen as 'buying review scores', a practice that's more about the realities of the magazine's role than about corruption. From the article: "What Famitsu is -- and you wouldn't know this unless you've held a heavy issue in your hand on a tired Friday morning -- is straightforward (if not entirely honest) PR in a pretty, meaty, high-quality bundle. It's an advertisement feast. If the western concepts of 'journalistic integrity' are distorted and twisted within its pages, they're done so very lovingly. Because, you see, that degree of over-thinking really doesn't exist here. You can cry 'viral!!!!!!!!!!!!' and 'TEH PAID!!!!!!!!!!' all you want at Famitsu's features and articles. However, you can't change that it's a hell of a thing to look at on the train on Friday morning, or at lunch on Friday afternoon; it provides stimulating topics of conversation (for geekos) over Friday dinner." So, as Kotaku's Luke Plunkett says '[This is] why we all ignored the scores they gave Sonic, but paid attention when games like Blue Dragon and Lost Planet won them over.'
Re: (Score:2)
In all seriousness though, the text in Famitsu isn't all that worthwhile anyways. The main reason to pick up Famitsu is to ogle at exclusive pretty pictures from games that won't be out for a while yet. Which I think may also be the main point of this story.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Which is better? (Score:5, Insightful)
With a few exceptions, you will notice that many magazines have a tendency to give higher reviews to games that have "invested" in several issues worth of full page advertizements.
the first one i guess (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
IMO they should drop all pretense and instead of reviews, have in-depth descriptions of games.
Hardly anyone believes reviews anymore anyway, and rely on fellow gamers' opinions on forums
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Are the results of your research available online? They're not? Oh.
Don't know about the validity. (Score:2)
Personally Famitsu has had decent ratings for a lot of games, however they tend to have higher then normal ratings, which means higher then IGN, which is higher then gamespot (though gamespot has little basis so it's not as good as IGN according to me) which is higher then
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
It is really no different than EGM in any way other than being a) physically bigger, and b) published more frequently. Their "journalistic standards" are no better or worse, their reviews no more or less bought and paid for. Which is to say the NY Times they ain't, but neither are they paid shills.
There's no real mea
Re: (Score:2)
NWN & NWN2 appeal to certain core demographics that can appreciate the game and the potential that lies within. the reviewer sits with the disc for a few hours and writes about what the disc presented across his monitor at t
Enlighten Me... (Score:4, Insightful)
So what is the news? Japan has paid for review magazine like the US (and rest of the world), but people expect this and don't complain?
Wow.
Re: (Score:2)
Here's your enlightenment (Score:2)
Heh.
Ahh yes... (Score:1)
In soviet russia... (Score:1)
So, basically... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
nononono (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Cosmo for games? (Score:3, Interesting)
Now maybe you WANT 250 pages of ads, but I doubt it.