China Puts Hold on Net Cafe Construction This Year 26
With government concerns about online gaming growing steadily in China, Beijing has put in place a ban on the opening of new internet cafes for the rest of the year. GigaGamez reports on the country's move, which is largely seen as a response to some high-profile deaths from unhealthily dedicated gamers. From the article: "Honestly [this] shouldn't be that big of a deal if you consider that the Chinese government has already estimated that 113,000 Internet cafes already exist. Add this to the already bizarre limitation of World of Warcraft play time and you have some very unhappy gamers." Update: 03/08 14:52 GMT by Z : GamePolitics has the word that virtual currencies are also to be restricted, in an effort to ensure that the yuan is kept secure.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
Well.. (Score:3, Insightful)
change to WoW economy (Score:3)
The Fed had better act quickly.
Wireless Grids (Score:2)
OK maybe they have and it works well and that's why we haven't heard about it.
Democracy vs Dictorator ship (Score:3)
That would be like setting of a flair signalling that you are doing something the goverment disapproves off.
Your silly attitude is pampered by living in the free west. A program called freenet suffers from that too. Its latest version attempts to sit on a darknet.
Yeah, that works. In the free west where NOBODY (we know off so far) gives a shit about wich ports traffic is going across or wether they can read it.
For the chinese goverment it would be trivial to just report any traffic that does not go over
Dangerous compared to what (Score:2)
NOT a response to deaths from gamers (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Anyway, this doesn't limit people who do Internet on their home computers, or who text people on their cell phones.
Re: (Score:1, Flamebait)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I think the point was that it's not because people are dying. China doesn't give one tenth of one shit if a gamer dies. In fact the powers-that-be are probably overjoyed every time, because there goes one more computer-savvy motherfucker that won't be challenging the social order.
The point which I thought was made fairly clearly in the prior comment (amazingly clearly for slashdot) is that closing the internet cafes is really about controlling access to information. You can't be anonymous at home...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
On one hand you might say it's like closing the barn door after the horses have escaped. On the other hand, not doing it is like telling someone it's okay to stab you because you've already been shot. Of course, that's a pretty ludicrous comparison when what we're talking about is censorship, fascism, and control, but it still illustrates the point better than any othe
Re: (Score:2)
You go to any of a million street vendors or stores (and I'm guessing 1,000,000 is not too far off from the correct number) and pick up a prepaid China Mobile card. When you want more, you go back and buy a recharge. The only way it is tracable is if they track the SIM card through triangulation. However, Internet cafes record the ID of every person, assign them to a specific computer, and track the time in and
Re: (Score:2)
So I guess the Chinese don't have Fake ID technology then, eh?
Maybe we should send some teenagers over there to provide it to them.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, it's not like here where kids are expected to pass fake IDs all the time and the bartenders look the other way (unless it's Bush Jr.'s girls). Forging government documents is actually treated like a crime in some countries, so it isn't worth it.
Re: (Score:2)
well (Score:1)
A 26 year old, 330 pound, guy from China died after playing online games for 7 days nearly non stop over the Chinese new year said his parents.
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/165207/y
Re: (Score:2)
Good articles in Harpers and the Washington Post (Score:2)
The Post article is a little less behind the scenes, but it does detail how China is pretty much treating Internet Addiction along the same lines as heroin and alcohol addictions.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/artic le/2007/02/21/AR2007022102094.html [washingtonpost.com]