Germans Pursuing Kiddie Porn In Second Life 408
Several readers sent in links to the BBC, which has picked up news of a German investigation into child pornography in Second Life. A German TV station captured images of two avatars, an apparent adult and an apparent child, involved in sexual activity. The station also said they had infiltrated a ring trading real-world child porn in SL. SL creator Linden Labs is cooperating fully with the investigation, they write on their official blog: "Our investigations revealed the users behind these avatars to be a 54-year-old man and a 27-year-old woman. Both were immediately banned from Second Life." The German prosecutor's office hasn't responded to Linden's offer of help in identifying the real-world traders.
Just goes to show (Score:2)
Counterstrike? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Counterstrike? (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
"Mr Schader was asked to pay to attend meetings where virtual and real child pornography was being shown."
Ahem, note word 'real'
"Members of this group also offered to put him in touch with traders of real child pornography."
Nasty, lock 'em up forever.
"The investigation also uncovered so called "age play" groups that revolve around the abuse of virtual children."
Nasty, but not a crime, I would have thought, but no:
"Under Germany law possession of "virtual" child pornography is punishable by up to
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
All this statistics show
The study (Score:4, Insightful)
It is not really surprising that there is a correlation between people who think it is fun to attempt to chock the interviewer by admitting their use of pornography, and people that who think it is fun to attempt to chock the interviewer by condoning rape. Nor that there is a correlation between people who find they need to lie about their use of pornography to appear more moral than they are, and people who find they need to get tough on rape for similar reasons. Even if all the answers were truthful (unlikely given the subject), it would be surprising if people who had little trouble with rape would see pornography as wrong.
The study mostly seems like a pseudo-rational crutch for people who oppose pornography for other reasons.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Where do you draw the line on moral standards?
The first prison sentences were on par with murder sentences for first time offenders. I'd say murder is worse than rape. Having the sentences the same would certainly encourage murdering someone to avoid being convicted of rape.
A LOT of men are getting out of rape charges lately after spending long terms in prison. We made rape such a horrible crime that women
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Actually according to official US Federal crime statistics, the youth violent crime rate has gone MASSIVELY DOWN in the last twenty-odd years.
The "increase in youth violence" is a straw man being held up by social crusader causes, and an illusion being created by media coverage. Every once in a while the mass media latches onto and hypes up the latest shocking event. Out of a country of 300 million people there's some nutcase or some evil-fuck somewhere doing so
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Personally- I think that porn does corrupt people'
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
The reason he cited a 20-30 year old study was because it was virtually the only study ever to come up with the results he wants to hear and to quote.
Zillmann and Jennings Bryant, the authors of the study, are a pair of crusaders for a cause. Their results are what are known as "irreproducible". Other legitimate researchers have tried repeating the work and did NOT come up with the same results. In other words t
Re:Counterstrike? (Score:4, Insightful)
Wait, German porn viewers play SL? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Wait, German porn viewers play SL? (Score:4, Informative)
Mods? (Score:3, Funny)
Thought crimes? (Score:5, Interesting)
Has anyone considered that allowing someone to 'role play' or 'express' their desires, no matter how taboo, in a virtual world, might lessen real-world activity? Any studies on this?
I mean how many people satisfy themselves with porn rather than engage in risky real life behavior?
Maybe these 'sickos' can get their satisfaction on a virtual world?
It seems like a lot of the 'oddballs' are the ones who come from a background of extreme sexual repression. A virtual outlet could eliminate that repression.
Re:Thought crimes? (Score:5, Interesting)
Pornography in Japan really doesn't have many limits except simply the censoring of genetalia. While fringe, there is easily available and obtained media of simulated rape, public exposure & sexual activity, sexualized streaking. In the fiction world there are lots of animated and printed works that very obviously depict additional rape, child sex (consentual and non), incest, disfiguring and nonconsentual S&M and human bondage. Hell, just look through Somethingawful's articles on hentai games and you'll see japanese interactive games that let you live out fantasies of banging your younger underage sister. And another one where you literally stalk and rape victims from a train.
And yet, Japan enjoys the lowest rates of sex crimes of all 1st world countries. I'd say the ability for an individual to safely vicariously explore deeper and more sinister fictional sexual practices (as defined by society-at-large) definitely prevents a significant number of real crimes with real victims.
I don't know anyone sexually abused as a child, but I'd be willing to wager that if the abuse could have been prevented by the perp getting his jollies off with a few drawn pictures of his fantasy instead, they'd definitely go for it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Thought crimes? (Score:5, Insightful)
While certainly a valid point, I think this is hardly definitive. Like the gun-control debate, comparing crime statistics across nations is notoriously prone to confirmation bias. There are too many legal, cultural, economic, and social differences to really compare results in one nation with results in another. I do know, for example, that many people feel sexism is rife in Japan and that women are objectified to a much greater degree than in the US. Compared with other studies about porn, this would strengthen the old idea that porn leads to desensitization and objectification of women. The actual incidence of violent sexual crime, however, could very well not show an easily observable statistical change.
This is precisely how the connection between smoking and cancer was combated for so many years. The incidence of cancer is so low that it's easy to construct studies which reflect no statistical increase. It's similar to the lag in acceptance of global warming.
What we do know, however, is that pornography's impact on those who view it is considered so detrimental that you can't get randomized, control-group studies approved and that those studies which were randomized and controlled (and led to the conclusion that it was too detrimental to ethically get people to watch porn) found statistically significant connections between exposure to porn and a lower support of women's rights, a declining importance of marriage, and laxer attitude towards rape punishment.
Re: (Score:2)
I figure the best way to keep things from getting settled is to tie the hands of researchers.
Re: (Score:2)
I do know that all human trials have to be approved by college ethics boards, but I don't know if they have a united governing board or how the decisions compare at different colleges. However I'm fairly certain that since the study in question (and I'm really sorry I don't have the citation off the top of my head) no randomized por
Re:Thought crimes? (Score:5, Informative)
IANAPBISPAU (I am not a psychologist but I studied psychology at university.) Pretty much all universities have their own ethics committee whose job it is to come up with very pedantic rules for how any experiments should be done so that no-one is hurt or distressed. Getting permission from these groups can be incredibly difficult and they will often hold up grad students' research for months.
Going another level up, the APA (American Psychology Association) is the dominant body with regard to psychology (around the world, not just in the USA). They have an ethics committee [apa.org] which set a best practice policy on what other ethics committees should think about.
While I agree that it would be nice to be able to study anything without having to worry about the ethics, the can lead to interesting, yet morally flawed experiments such as the Stanford Prison experiment [wikipedia.org] or the Milgram experiment [wikipedia.org], which were informative, but quite traumatic for participants. As a rule psychologists don't like to leave people more messed up than when they got them, so they tend to view overly cautious ethics committees as a necessary annoyance.
Re: (Score:2)
What we do know, however, is that pornography's impact on those who view it is considered so detrimental that you can't get randomized, control-group studies approved and that those studies which were randomized and controlled (and led to the conclusion that it was too detrimental to ethically get people to watch porn) found statistically significant connections between exposure to porn and a lower support of women's rights, a declining importance of marriage, and laxer attitude towards rape punishment.
You lost me when you got to your last paragraph. This seems very prudish and perhaps the 'ethicist' who objected to any/all studies was a 'theologian'. Any links to these studies?
Re: (Score:2)
It was because there were observable, harmful impacts of watching porn and has nothing to do with theology. It's the same reason you can't do randomized studies in which you ask people to smoke: we know smoking is harmful.
I will try to find a link to the study. I have full citation at home, but I'm at work now. This may be it:
Zi
Re:Thought crimes? (Score:4, Interesting)
It can't be said whether this has any correlation to relief, or lack of, afforded by video games. It may be that grabby types don't play those games, or it may be that it encourages them. Germany, however, has traditionally employed censorship before (if ever) conducting research to substantiate it.
Japan and Denmark (Score:5, Informative)
The traditional example is Denmark, where there was a statistically significant decrease in rapes after the legalization of pornography. That statistic actually helped getting pornography legalized in other countries, not always with the same effect (so it might have been a fluke).
Re: (Score:2)
The real question is, which was playing the child and who was the adult?
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
I agree that Japan is a good example, but they also have a different view on sex.
Back in the late 90s they had a crazy (still do in some ways) for the school girl look. Many teenage school girls started having side jobs as prostitutes. It got so bad that Prime Minister of Japan made some comments about the practice.
As far as I know it just quieted down on its own. There was no country wide busts.
Contrast that with America...
I Disagree (Score:3, Interesting)
I am going to go out on a limb here and suggest that there exists a third class of reaction that a person can have to a subject outside of "interest in engaging in" and "outright repulsion by". The third reaction would be "enjoy fantasizing/pretending about".
Of course, I don't have to tell you that 99.999%
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
All that says to me is that they don't bother reporting it. I recall a news story where it is quite common for young girls on the subways to be sexually abused. So much so that some girls actually use it as blackmail on the attacker because they know they+friends will be attacked.
There is also the concept of what they consider child abuse. Again I had seen news reports from Japan of Japanese mums fluffing their sons so they
Sex crimes in Japan are bad. (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
There's a bigger one: the U.S. And probably most of Europe.
The Internet has made porn available fairly freely and discreetly where it wasn't available before. Name your perversion: a quick google search will turn up lots of hits. And any Geek Squad member or other computer repair person knows that a great number of people, who never would have read anything more extreme than Playboy before, have porn collections and pretty bizarre stuff.
Have we
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
here is the problem. People who abuse children will do both...via pictures and in real life. Some people may only want to pretend there pediophiles. Considering the nature of the crime, should you ignore when people pretend to be pediophiles?
Murder is also a pretty nasty crime. Presumably you're not only against all violent video games, but believe that all players of such games should be investigated?
How about we stop trying to criminalize thought and let the police focus their limited resources on actual crimes?
Re: (Score:2)
There's an interesting and amusing documentary called "I am a sex addict."
Not to spoil the ending, but the guy eventually goes to a sex addict support group for men, and they all agree that indulging in their fetishes only made the problem worse--made it easier to go one step further.
Regardless, I don't think child porn should b
Re: (Score:2)
Not to spoil the ending, but the guy eventually goes to a sex addict support group for men, and they all agree that indulging in their fetishes only made the problem worse--made it easier to go one step further.
But I wonder if this is more a result of certain people having addictive predispositions. I am sure there are people who engage in many things in moderation. Not all pot smokers are addicts, not all alcohol drinkers are addicts, not all WoW players are addicts, not all people who work out are addicts.
I think there is a group of people out there with impulse control issues. I wonder if they are really outliers. For those personalities, yes, any engagement makes things worse.
Re: (Score:2)
This may be controversial, but... (Score:5, Insightful)
The question ultimately becomes: Can fantasy involving only digital, or make-believe characters, be illegal?
If the answer is yes, I find that to be extremely disturbing in an Orwellian sense. While I find the concept of finding children sexually appealing to be personally abhorrent, I'm not sure the law extends (or should extend) into virtual roleplaying between consenting adults.
My two cents.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
As for "roleplaying fantasy", I never understood why people do this kind of thing on a company's public servers. People don't generally engage in this kind of activity in public -- why do it in a game with many players?
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
I disagree w/ that law, and in the US virtual kiddie pr0n is lawful (I believe it was upheld under a first amendment argument).
Re: (Score:2)
If the answer is yes, I find that to be extremely disturbing in an Orwellian sense.
I consider this perspective sympathetic, but superficial and alarmist. Among the "though crimes" that currently seem rather uncontroversial I propose as an example: conspiracy to commit murder. Really if you are planning to kill someone, have you harmed anyone? Even if your intentions are genuine, they exist purely i
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Counterstrike isn't a useful trainer, but games like Area 51, Virtua Cop, and other light gun games are. No link handy right now, but "some guy" (helpful I know) who had never fired real guns before went to the range with his video game skills and managed to do DRAMATICALLY better than people who had never fired video gam
Re: (Score:2)
just curious.. do you find the concept of finding cars or guns sexually appealing abhorrent as well?
how about shoes?
how about members of the same sex?
how about seeing pretty girls murdered or kidnapped by gorillas?
in any event.. the or
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
And this is very sad. Pedophiles are the great boogeymen of our age, but when it comes down to it, pedophilia is just another kink, albeit one that cannot be indulged in for real. The rise of virtual child pornography should be great news: pedophiles can finally indulge the
Pursuing Kiddie Porn (Score:4, Funny)
Did anyone else read this as... (Score:2)
Those Germans are sick bastards.
Re: (Score:2)
"Dude, what the fuck is wrong with German people?"
You mean those sheep in Second Life are real??!!? (Score:2, Funny)
Aren't they both consenting adults? (Score:2, Interesting)
I'm certainly not condoning the activity, but I have to ask...
If an adult who appears to be a child chooses to be photographed naked, that is perfectly legal. So why is an adult who looks like a kid online different?
Re:Aren't they both consenting adults? (Score:5, Informative)
In Germany photographs/videos of adults who look like children performing sexual activities are considered child porn.
Don't know about other countries.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
How does that work? A person's age is a documented fact. How do you determine in an objective way if someone looks like a child?
I've got a weird mental image of naked 18 year-olds parading through a courtroom of stern-looking German judges requesting permision to be in pornography. (Nein, das ist nicht gut! You're only a B-cup. Come back when you've gotten some implants.)
Re: (Score:2)
Had to be said...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The original law was overturned by the Supreme Court for that reason. It's since been passed again with the usual Miller "do it first and then we'll decide whether or not to ruin your life forever, but this isn't at all prior restraint" Test clause to cover cases with "literary merit".
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
actually in may places that is NOT legal.
In fact, if you go someplace to have that developed, they are obligated to notify the authorities.
In the US, that is.
Morality Plays (Score:5, Insightful)
Do they arrest people in Germany for the love scenes in Shakespeare's _Romeo and Juliet_ between two underage kids, but played by adults?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
FWIW, sex above the legal age is not "underage" anywhere, by definition.
Re: (Score:2)
This is similar to how many states laws work here in the U.S. Age of consent is generally 16-18, but there are often other ages where other rules apply. E.g. in some states if you are within 3 years of age of your partner, and your partner is over 16, then even though your partner is below the age of consent it is not considered statutory rape.
So there you go:
Beyond logic (Score:4, Insightful)
We have 27 year old and 54 year old adults faking sex with avatars, one of which looked like a child. There's no child porn here. Even if they shot movies of their "act" and distributed it around, this is not child porn. There's no abused child. People apparently have forgotten why child porn is bad in the first place.
You can come up with all made-up reasons "but it can motivate people watching it to abuse children".. Right, if anything you see motivates you to replicate it, we have to bad 90% of the potentially violent or sexual content out there.
Just like talking about target shootout at work isn't terrorism, animation of avatars by adult people isn't child abuse.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Beyond logic (Score:4, Insightful)
you seem to forget that pedophiles are mentally disordered people. They get affected by what they see in different ways than you and me. You might compare that to an alcoholic seeing someone drinking at a bar vs. a non-alcoholic watching it.
Additionally, they are not sued for abusing children. They shared material showing child abusing. This also includes animated child abuse. US law isn't quite different at this point, or why would you think that nude games are rated only for adults? No real sex here too.
You're a nice example of what I'm talking about. Guess what: serial killers are also mentally disordered people.
What's with all the criminal murder investigation serials? We should be up to the neck full of serial killers by now.
You're trying to justify this non-sense by inventing reasons that don't exist.
They shared material showing child abusing.
The "child" was a 27 year old woman that clicked "OK" to participate in 3D figure animation in a virtual world. Where's the abused child? What if the "apparent child" was just an adult that looked like a child.. Oh wait, it WAS!
Let's ban midgets from having sex then. Especially if they look like "apparent children".
This also includes animated child abuse.
Think about it: if I doodle myself cutting a doodle representing you, in pieces, did I just commit an illegal depiction of a murder in cold blood? Do I have to be sent to jail or banned from somewhere because of it?
Which are depictions of "virtual" child porn are a sudden exception to all this? Do you even realize why?
We're just used to violence, we could watch hours and hours of movies with incredibly detailed and cruel murders, but most people are grossed out by child porn. So the natural reaction is to ban every possible depiction, because people are grossed out. Well, let me tell you: gross things aren't illegal, when noone is harmed, and there's no victim. They're just gross, that's all.
Maybe they should have disclaimers so kids don't see them, and should bear warnings, but they simply not illegal.
Another thing is, currently we're replicating Macartism in a way that demonstrates people don't learn from history at all. Are you afraid that if you support someone's freedom to *draw* child porn, someone could consider you're a pedophile?
Isn't this a big part of why people react so violently against all this. If we don't, we're "one of them" right?
Let me tell you: no, you're not. The gap between thinking or drawing a crime, and committing the crime is huge, don't let the current situation fool you that they're the same.
Re: (Score:2)
And you gotta be. Since I know where you live. And I'm coming for you. And I'll animate me killing you in 3DSMax and give you a CD of it.
Coming up next (Score:5, Funny)
Banning midget sex (as they look like kids). You'll have to be this high to have sex.
Banning sex with stupid individuals (they act like kids). You'll have to be this smart to have sex.
Banning sex with people dressed like kids. strict outlines of what "dressed like adult" will be written in a law.
Banning sex with people who said something that could suggest they pretend to be a child or pretend their mate is a child, or think about something child-related during sex.
Banning videos pictures of adults looking at a kid, smiling or something else that could suggest the drawn indivial could have had eventually potentially thoughts about sex.
Banning adults from touching kids, or people that look like kids, and talking about kids if they saw or did something sexual in the last 24 hours.
Cartman (Score:2)
My Sig (Score:2)
Time out, Slashdot, and RTFA (Score:4, Informative)
A major component of this news story was not just that it was virtual child pornography, but that *there was real child pornography also in the mix*. If you haven't played Second Life, you must understand that it is possible to do anything with images in SL. Wallpaper a building. Send it via the equivalent of a Private Message--a "notecard." Wrap it around a 3D object so that it can walk and talk.
A few weeks ago, there was an alarmist article that alleged terrorists might use Second Life to conduct virtual training sessions. It was ludicrous, and still is, to think that terrorist cells, who obviously value anonymity, would use an open and unprotected medium such as Second Life to conduct covert activity.
On the other hand, quite a few of these "ageplayers" feel that they are doing nothing wrong. And while I certainly don't begrudge anyone their sexual fetishes, and acknowledge that in the U.S. (unlike much of the rest of the world) virtual child pornography is legal, I think it is important to note that we're not talking about what you or I would consider "ageplay" in the real world.
Some people have compared this to dressing up your girlfriend like a schoolgirl while you play principal. While it is analogous, it is not by any means comparable to the actual content at hand.
After the Second Life Herald conducted a widely circulated interview with the operator of Jailbait, a couple SL griefers and I went into the sim to try to figure out exactly how we could fuck with it. It was difficult to enter--a highly protected area. When we finally got in, it was somewhat shocking, even by SL standards. There were apparently prepubuscent avatars screaming and crying in baby talk as they were tortured by older figures. There were "adoption agencies", so that the ageplayers--and yes, I will go out on a limb here and say "pedophiles"--could add a pinch of incest to the mix.
The ageplaying in Second Life is *on another level*.
Sure, none of that stuff is unheard of on the Internet.
But on the Internet, it is generally limited to dark, unknown, secret corners: password protected forums, underground Usenet groups, anonymous image boards.
Contrast this to Second Life, which is experienced as an open, freely accessible world, where one can walk around and see anything as it exists. No effort is needed to find these things--they can be found through mere wandering. It is experientially different, even if qualitatively similar, to the most depraved shit the Internet has to offer.
What is worth noting, in my opinion, is not whether or not this is thought crime or harming anyone or worthy of legal action. There are different traditions of jurisprudence--or, to use a term coined by the jurist Jeffrey Rosen, "jurisprurience"--that govern different areas, and we are unlikely to reconcile international obscenity laws when our own are so obfuscated.
Rather, it is interesting to note the widespread media and political reaction to the seedier side of Second Life, which is nothing new, but whose presence was glossed over or ignored in the initial rush to adopt virtual worlds technology based on media hyperbole.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
To some extent, this is like
Re: (Score:2)
Another useful question:
Linden Lab is attempting to claim common carrier status in order to avoid legal prosecution. They say they are providing a communications service.
However, if they begin to actively censor content based on content alo
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
No, it is predicated on the assumption that people are innocent until proven guilty, and that thought crimes are an Orwellian horror.
I'm alternately amused and horrified by how easily people are willing to throw others in jail without due process and clamp down on free speech that they disagree with.
Re: (Score:2)
I do not feel qualified to defend or decry America's relatively puritan sexual mores. Nor do I think Internet-based obscenity is punishable by law.
At the same time, I'm not sure I feel comfortable further normalizing pedophilia. Many academics argue that events in Second Life, for a variety of reasons, are experienced as "real". I'm not sure I want to g
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Since this is SL we're talking about... (Score:3, Funny)
But then Linden Labs would lose 90 percent of their revenue...
Re: (Score:2)
Hakim Bey was right (Score:2)
Given that pedophiles exist, and the urge is hard to suppress, shouldn't we welcome that they do their stuff in a virtual world, instead of the real one? Right now, aside from claims by the German authorities, there is no evid
ERROR IN reprod(m,f) (Score:5, Funny)
To: God
RE: Error found in reprod(m,f)
I found a threading issue with reprod(m,f). Someone set the priority way too high and it's creating a system-wide slowdown that's eating up a lot of resources. I'm thinking of de-prioritizing it to spend more resources in power management instead. Also, invoking reprod(m,m) and reprod(f,f) appears to halt other parts of the system inexplicably.
Please tackle these issues ASAP. They've apparently been around for a while, but since after fixing a lot of other stuff, they seem to be more of an issue.
Sincerely,
Humanity
Re:Anyone surprised it began in Germany? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Anyone surprised it began in Germany? (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm as horrified as anyone by real child abuse and pornography, but virtual one? Age-play? That's just dumb. If anything, it might be possible to identify whether the people acting out their fantasies have either engaged in real child abuse or have been victims of it. But to criminalize virtual role-playing is indeed a complete thought crime.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
However, while I agree with the vast majority of your points, I feel the need to point out that there is a VERY large difference between attraction to "not-quite-18/barely 18" and pedophilia. Biologically speaking, as soon as someone enters puberty, attraction starts. Society teaches us that we are not to start having sex at this point due to biological/sociological complications, but i
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
There is a precedent in porn midgets in school girl uniforms. On a similar note, an exasperated judge in our metro a couple years ago dismissed a case and read the prosecution the riot act, "No, he does _not_ have to prove that the girls in his porn _were_ adults. YOU have to prove they were _not_."
I trace "thought crime porn" to the late Andrea Dworkin -- of the fat and ugly lesbian manhating branch of feminism. One of our metro cities called her in some years
RTFA (Score:3, Informative)
Members of this group also offered to put him in touch with traders of real child pornography.
Re:Anyone surprised it began in Germany? (Score:4, Insightful)
The police need to get out of our sex lives. Linden labs isn't fooling anyone, Secondlife is for virtual sex...
Re:Anyone surprised it began in Germany? (Score:5, Insightful)
The entirety of the problem lies in the fact that RL child pornography was being displayed and/or sold to other people via Second Life. When this occurs it is a crime. The fact it is happening in SL doesnt mean it is any different from someone selling them on a web page.
Honestly? I'm not suprised it is happening in SL. Considering it is a place where you go to fulfill your fantasies in a virtual life (IE. house, car, good looking outfits, seems some sickos added kiddie porn to that list).
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
And if there were, each one would contradict the last one (based on the prejudice of the researcher) and everybody would ignore the results of the studies and base their opinions on their own hysterical over-emotional prejudices (as always).
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Seriously, do you buy that argument? Thats the same argument they use for war on drugs, war on terror..
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Mr Schader was asked to pay to attend meetings where virtual and real child pornography was being shown.
Members of this group also offered to put him in touch with traders of real child pornography.
The investigation also uncovered so called "age play" groups that revolve around the abuse of virtual children.
So, it looks like there were three issues:
That last one is nonsense, and the first is shaky but maybe defensible as a crime (only because you have no wa
Re: (Score:2)
Anyone surprised it began in Germany?
Actually, yes.
Germany is far more liberal when it comes to sex than the US, for example. Exposed nipples aren't exactly early afternoon TV, but you can see them easily enough in the evening and if a few shots were sent during the afternoon, very few people would complain.
Also, "think of the chiiildren" is a less often used argument over here. It happens, but it's not standard.
I would have expected the US to be on the forefront here. After all, they do jail kids for playing "doctor" with each other (famous
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Janet Jackson had , what was it, a thousand complaints? big whoop. The fact that it was the most re-watched piece of video in TiVos history indicats that Americans would LIKE to see more nipples.
I sure would, and I thin it would go a long way to removing this breast fixation we have.
A breast fixation I share...mmm breasts. But quite frankly I would like my chioldren to grow up without that baggage.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
according to TFA, both of them were also swapping actual CP images, along with others.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Back in the day, men took wives who were, what, 14-16? Where was the OMGKIDDIEPORN crowd then?
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I say that drawing a psychological line is the wrong approach. Punish real world transgressions, not thought-crimes.
As for the little girls "sluttin' it up" in the local mall, yeah, I notice that. Makes me sick too, but I don't blame the kids. It's really the parents and the media. More the parents, because they ultimately have the greatest degree of influence on their children
Yeah, but if the parents start saying "You can't wear that!", then litt
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
What's really interesting is that gaming is such a huge market there that many developers bend over backwards (or is it bending over forwards?) to modify their games exclusively for Germany. This is a huge undertaking as it requires creat
Re: (Score:2)