Jack Thompson Decides He's In GTA IV 230
gzerphey writes "Outspoken anti-games lawyer Jack Thompson has decided that a representation of a 2nd amendment lawyer in GTA IV is a mocking version of him. He has declared that if the representation is not removed he will attempt to block the release of the game. Excerpt from GamePolitics: 'The showcasing play of the game to Game Informer revealed that the first killing mission of the hero of the game, Niko, is to kill a certain lawyer. When Niko comes into this lawyer's office, having used subterfuge to do so, Niko pulls a gun on the lawyer who says, that the firm supports the second amendment and that 'Guns don't kill people. Video games do.'"
I thought parody was OK? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:I thought parody was OK? (Score:5, Funny)
QUICK! TO THE BANNEDWAGON!
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Actually far from being a parody, I'd say this is a small victory for reality. The fact that Jack has recognized a nasty lawyer videogame character as himself, obviously indicates that he's finally realized that he's an asshole who everyone would like to kill.
Re:I thought parody was OK? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I thought parody was OK? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I thought parody was OK? (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
No! Keep the box closed... (Score:5, Funny)
Which is good because we'd get the satisfaction that he's in the box, but we don't know that he's dead so we can still ridicule him for being a moron.
Re:I thought parody was OK? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I thought parody was OK? (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
There's a new quark color "maroon", is that good enough?
Or maybe the next level of subparticles will be named after foods, and he can have "macaroon".
Re:I thought parody was OK? (Score:5, Funny)
There, fixed that for ya.
Does Take Two employ Jack Thompson? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Does Take Two employ Jack Thompson? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:I thought parody was OK? (Score:5, Informative)
Larry Flynt won an important Supreme Court decision on February 24, 1988,[6] after having been sued by Jerry Falwell in 1983 over an offensive ad parody in Hustler that featured Falwell. The ad suggested that Falwell's first sexual encounter was with his mother in an out-house. Falwell sued Flynt citing emotional distress caused by the ad but lost in court. The decision clarified that public figures cannot recover damages for "intentional infliction of emotional distress" based on parodies.
Source:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Flynt [wikipedia.org]
A parody is a parody....
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Parody is protected speech (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Parody is protected speech (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Parody is protected speech (Score:4, Funny)
Which is aptly mimicked in the video game, isn't it?
People like him are so grotesque that their parodies look too much like the real thing...
Re:Parody is protected speech (Score:4, Interesting)
Yes, I know
Re:Parody is protected speech (Score:5, Funny)
what's next... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:what's next... (Score:5, Funny)
I'm in the Game Too! (Score:5, Funny)
Can I join you in this suit, Jack? Perhaps a class action lawsuit? I'll meet you in your office tomorrow at noon using methods of subterfuge
What was your address again? "The magical man, from Happy Land, who lives in a gumdrop house on Lolly Pop Lane?" It's so very hard to remember when you're all over the road.
P.S. I hope the president has gotten back to you about your appeal [slashdot.org] to him. Your entertainment is endless & I highly value it, it would be a shame to have men in clean white suits censoring your communications to the outside world. Truly, it would.
It'll be an adventure! (Score:4, Funny)
-Rick
Re: (Score:2)
So, I watched the video, and... (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Parody is still a right, yes? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Personally that one liner made me crack up laughing. I pray they keep that in the game. I'll be standing in line to buy it if so.
Re:Parody is still a right, yes? (Score:4, Interesting)
I've heard the lawyer's name is revealed later in the game as Tom Jackson.
plonk zonk (Score:5, Funny)
I hope you are, Zonk.
What the... (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Hypocrite? Jack? Nawwwww....surely you Jest! I mean...minors can get into R rated movies all the time or obtain pR0n from the internet or go to school where bullying is a rampant problem. But them damn video games...that's what's driving today's youth to crime.
Re: (Score:2)
Did someone say molotov cocktail?
Enough already. (Score:5, Insightful)
I must admit that the in game parody sound good though. But still, not newsworthy.
Re: (Score:2)
I disagree, how else would I know where I can go to put some lead into a retarded "thinkofthechildren" publicity whore lawyer?
Re:Enough already. (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Oh come on, now! What would publicity give him, nothing. In fact I'm thoroughly convinced he's paid by the game industry to advertise games such as GTA.
Who woulda noticed GTA IV is coming out? But now we pretty sure have. And it has a version of him inside! Sweet!
In my book, Thompson is the canonical example of how to make great viral advertising.
Re:Enough already. (Score:5, Interesting)
As for the actual argument, I think we all know that Jacky was going to try and stop GTA IV's release already, no matter what cases are currently centered around him (wasn't there a case to stop him from preventing GTA IV's release?) This is nothing more than a silly excuse for him to continue his attacks on video games, now only is the lawyer not clearly Jack Thompson (he's a person who thinks video games are evil, and happens to be a lawyer...I can think of half a dozen people who fit that mold. It's only Jack Thompson if, A: The person looks exactly like Jacky and quotes him or something, or B: The person playing the game thinks the best RL example is Jacky.) but even if he was parody is legal so Jack wouldn't even have a case then.
No, this is nothing more than an attempt to gain some publicity (I'm sure at least some of the big papers will play up how the gamers are getting their revenge somehow or something like that) and give him an excuse to try and stop the game's release beyond his tired old 'videogames are evil' routine.
Anyone else find it amusing that Jack Thompson seems to think a lawyer who says 'Guns don't kill people, Videogames do' is him? Kinda gives a little insight into what he thinks about the matter now doesn't it...
Re: (Score:2)
Yes and no. If Jack were able to convince a court that he is not a public persona, then Jack could sue successfully.
However, since he has made himself a public persona, usage of his likeness for parody is within the law as long as it does not create a danger to him. His paranoia and fearmongering would likely lead him to believe that this is the case.
At any rate, one of his goals is to draw attention to the violent content in video
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
This is one area where Mr. Thompson and the game publishers have the same motive. Since fake violence can be very fun, advertising its presence is like advertising the game. And hey, everyone wins.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
If Take Two complies... (Score:3, Insightful)
I'm starting to think Jack Thompson was created by the industry to help sales. Every game this guy rails against becomes a top seller.
Bully... (Score:5, Funny)
Jack made me buy it.
Re: (Score:2)
Reminiscint... (Score:5, Funny)
Hmmm... maybe if I could kill him in Disneyland, that would be even better!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
wait... (Score:5, Funny)
Why fight it, this is the best form of advertising (Score:4, Interesting)
It's like slashdot's "friend/foe" system. I probably have more foes than friends, but I appreciate both equally, and might even have more appreciation for those who consider me their foes than their friends. If someone rates me a foe, it definitely gives SOME people an interest in "who is this guy that is so hated" moreso than "who is this guy with so many friends." When people trackback to my blog posts with aggressive posts against my opinion, it also brings in a new market of readers to peruse my topics of discussion -- people who likely will HATE my opinion, but in some cases end up jumping over to my side.
While I don't think Thompson will gain many friends because of the parody, he might get quite a bit of traffic for those who are unfamiliar with his opinion, and this is still positive traffic for him as he can then say "Look at how many gamers are looking up my opinion -- I must be right!"
I would never, EVER go against anyone who attributes me in jest, parody or ridicule, even if they're pushing libel or slander (especially if they're pushing libel or slander). All marketing and traffic is positive in some way. The more hated you are, the more popular you become, even if that popularity is towards the negative. Look at people like Hitler and Stalin -- they are STILL talked about, even though their legacy is horrific and detested by most people. To me, that's proof that polarization is a key factor in building fame or infamy for those who want it.
Maybe it's a sociopathic attitude, but it's still truth in my book.
Re:Why fight it, this is the best form of advertis (Score:3, Insightful)
Did you just imply that you would be perfectly happy to be remembered in the same vain as Hitler or Stalin ?
Re: (Score:2)
Definitely not, but I am just comparing how some people who have sociopathic tendencies should want any sort of coverage in order to be promoted as an "expert" in their given industry. Hitler and Stalin were, in the long run, experts in the industry of death -- but I can't say they're worse than the current experts in the industry of death to become more powerful.
For those who want to be experts in t
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Why fight it, this is the best form of advertis (Score:2)
Fans v Freaks: 622 v 276.
This is what a boring day of work gets you. Take that. It's ripe for the taking. Oh yea, so so fresh. God I'm so bored...
Easy (Score:5, Interesting)
Imagine the interviews. Jack Thompson claims the lawyer is him, then the camera cuts to you: No, it's me. Look at this screenshot. Here's a signed affidavit saying it's me!
Pity I'm not a lawyer, I'd go for it.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
The guy deserves a little slice of immortality.
Re:Pity? (Score:4, Informative)
--
Q: Why don't sharks attack lawyers?
A: Professional Courtesy.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
That's an interesting combination of comment and sig.
It's obviously not a reference to Thompson. (Score:4, Insightful)
Previous Settlement (Score:4, Informative)
Or, is Thompson on the payroll now and just bringing more publicity to the title? Hmmm?
Re:Previous Settlement (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Jack Thompson is batshit crazy, and little things like the law, restraining orders, and previous failed lawsuits couldn't prevent him from smashing everything he sees with the one hammer he has.
Precedents (Score:5, Insightful)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hustler_Magazine_v._Falwell [wikipedia.org]
Re:Precedents (Score:5, Funny)
Carly Simon (Score:5, Funny)
Didn't he dare them to? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Didn't he dare them to? (Score:4, Informative)
Of course that compelled Wacky Jacky to send a fax to the local police department asking for assistance in halting the nefarious activities of the two web comics.
The whole story here [wikipedia.org]
Game Informer (Score:3, Funny)
it can't be him (Score:4, Funny)
(actually, I have no clue. But that'd be pretty cool)
Re: (Score:2)
Welcome to the USA (Score:4, Interesting)
In general, you've made statements and filed lawsuits that show that you are either A: woefully ignorant of the law, or B: intentionally misrepresenting the law for your own benefit. Either way, you are an extremely shitty lawyer.
P.S. Don't try to sue me for libel. The preceding is a statement of fact.
it's a good thing... (Score:3, Funny)
Be glad, Jack.. (Score:5, Funny)
There would be a 10 minutes hidden scene where the Tom Jackson character is repeatedly raped by an enormous number of large farm animals.
The he'd be forced into oral copulation with filthy homeless guys who have genital sores as yet unidentified by science.
And it would just go downhill from there.
Finally, Dexter would show up and end Tom's pain.
The plan worked (Score:2)
This story is progressing nicely across the net. Thank you for taking the bait and supplying us with the free advertisement. We couldn't have bought this much coverage for a million dollars.
Sincerely,
Take Two Entertainment
'Guns don't kill people. Video games do.' (Score:4, Funny)
A Modest Video Game Proposal anyone? (Score:5, Insightful)
Jack Thompson proposes [wikipedia.org] a video game where a CEO of New York-based "Take This" called Paula Eibel gets murdered for creating violent videogames. Lawyers who work at "Blank Stare" are also massacred. Paul Eibel was the CEO of Take Two at the time, and their headquarters is in New York, as is Blank Rome, the legal firm that they employ.
Jack's stuff is parody (his claim), but GTAIV is a death threat?
Please.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Or am I the only person who played that?
In the original proposal it was murder, not battle (Score:3, Interesting)
I don't know if I'd call it 'getting murdered'. I mean, she does have a huge chaingun that she aggressively defends herself with, not to mention all those kids hitting you. Or am I the only person who played that?
Ah, I remember now. But in his "Modest Video Game Proposal", he doesn't mention Eibel defending herself(himself), only that your job was to take her(him) out. So while the game creator turned it into a boss fight, in Jack's original proposal, he calls for Paul Eibel's (or a female parody of) murder.
Re: (Score:2)
I wonder how close that is to reality? Probably closer than JT is on a daily basis.
I think it would be even funnier... (Score:2, Insightful)
Ooh Now There's an Idea (Score:2)
Rockstar and Sony take note...
Wait a minute... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Other than that, bitching that he's being parodied is fair game.
This should really get his goat (Score:2)
Seriously (Score:2)
Someone take a shot at him... (Score:3, Funny)
As far as I can see it, its win/win for all parties...
Definition of Jack Thompson (Score:4, Funny)
Jack's Secret Plan... (Score:3, Funny)
1) Create "Legal Fiction" that video games cause people to be violent.
2) Fail repeatedly to convince the courts of same.
3) Start "loosing it".
4) Start playing video games.
5) Kill my old high school rival in a GTA re-enactment.
6) Call myself as an expert witness for the defense during my murder trial.
7) Profit??
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
He's construing it as a threat on his life.
The great part about this is that once the game is released, if he doesn't get killed by some impressionable little tyke, he'll look like even more of a fool, and if he does... well, at least he'll be less annoying.