Censoring Maniac Mansion for the NES 82
Via Destructoid, an article at the personal site of Douglas Crockford, a gent who worked with LucasArts during the NES days. He takes a look at the silly amount of content censored to get the game Maniac Mansion acceptable for Nintendo and the Nintendo Entertainment System. "'Well, Mommy, I'm worried! He hasn't eaten in 5 years. / YEAH, SO!!! / and he's been bringing those bodies, and he carries those bodies to the basement at night.' [sic] This was from Weird Ed's dialogue with his mother, Nurse Edna, in which Ed tries to get his mother to recognize the terrible things that have happened to his father over the past 20 years. What was Nintendo's problem with the dialogue? ... In fact, Nintendo's interpretation of the speech was that Dr. Fred was a cannibal, that he was eating the bodies. That was never our intention, so we changed Ed's speech to 'He hasn't slept in 5 years,' which helps to explain why Dr. Fred is never seen in his bedroom. But even if we had intended that Dr. Fred was a cannibal, what's the harm? He would have been one under the influence of the evil purple meteor. The game recognizes that it is bad, and your mission is to rescue him from this unhappy state. Who would be offended?"
Anyone know a good way to defrost a hamster? (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Kids who put hamsters in microwaves back in my century get taken away from their parents and put into care. So DON'T DO IT.
Re: (Score:2)
One episode, I was thrilled when TV Guide said that the Edisons get three unexpected visitors in the night.
Turns out the three visitors were the sandman, the tooth fairy, and mister friggin coffee.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Quantum canned Habitat after the pilot test in order to recover space on the mainframe for AOL 1.0.
Uh, yeah! (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Uh, yeah! (Score:5, Funny)
Drive-by joke (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Layne
Great read. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
They gave up around the SNES days. The event most people point to is Mortal Kombat. The Genesis version had blood, the SNES didn't (or it was green). The Genesis version sold much better because it was more faithful. They started to relax things.
It's quite clean Nintendo doesn't do that (for the most part) any more. Resident Evil 0/1/4 (Cube, Wii), Conquer's Bad Fur Day (N64), Red Steel (Wii), Manhunt 2 (Wii) and others show that they are willing to put up with violence and such.
Things were a little diffe
Re: (Score:2)
Nintendo still does the game production. Nintendo will never release a system where they don't, as that's where their money and power comes from.
Re: (Score:1)
They gave up around the SNES days. The event most people point to is Mortal Kombat. The Genesis version had blood, the SNES didn't (or it was green). The Genesis version sold much better because it was more faithful. They started to relax things.
The blood was actually non-existent in the SNES version. It was replaced by grey 'sweat'. Also, some of the fatalities were toned down, most notably Sub-zero's.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Things were a little different back then. Stamping a DVD is much cheaper than burning ROMs. Nintendo doesn't produce the games for you like they used to, so even if they wanted to censor things they would have a harder time today since they aren't the gatekeeper.
Nintendo licenses the products that come for the wii. If they don't like your game, you don't get a license. It wasn't because Nintendo stamped the games, it was because Nintendo controlled licensing. They are still the gate keepers because unlicensed products aren't as widely distributed. Normally through some deals with large retail chains. IE. "if you don't sell unlicensed items we'll sell you Wii's 5% cheaper" or "Sorry, I have no shipments for you this week, but I think we might if you stop selling it
Re: (Score:1)
I have to agree, though, censorship on Wii seems to be much more in the hands of the ESRB than Nintendo these days. If Manhunt 2 "Uncensored" had received an M-Rating I'm sure it'd be in stores right now, and probably selling more copies as well.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, first they would have to restore their lost sanity
Re: (Score:2)
At one time, M-rated content was banned (Score:2)
Um hi Manhunt 2? The only reason it was not released on the Wii was it got a AO rating, the M version WAS released on the Wii.
In the NES era and the first half of the Super NES era, Nintendo did not allow content on its consoles that would have been rated M had the ESRB existed. It had to be T or cleaner, or go release it for the C64 instead. Look through the U.S. Virtual Console list [wikipedia.org]: all NES games are E, and all Super NES games are E, E10+, or T.
Mortal Kombat's main competitor at the time was Street Fighter II Turbo, rated T. I'll guess that the original Mortal Kombat for Super NES was T material, given that the Sega Genes
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Nintendo hasn't imposed any of these censorship standards on third party developers ever since the ESRB came into existence. Take say, Mortal Kombat II as an example. That was released uncensored on the SNES. It completely clobbered the Genesis version in sales, unlike the first Mortal Kombat game.
That reminds me, the other Mortal Kombat game, Armageddon was also released on the Wii, and I hardly think that is censored at all.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
The issue with an AO rating is a different issue compared to what was done back then.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
At any rate, if it was about money, they'd make more by allowing AO titles. Certainly adult DVDs didn't prevent DVD players from becoming popular; in fact, quite the other way around. Why would it hurt a console, especially one with the same controls as a DVD player?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Furthermore, mature gaming is still a big target. That's why there are FPSes on Wii too. When the kids are sleeping, daddy raids the baddies.
Re: (Score:2)
Prime example (Score:3, Insightful)
But times have changed and now you can strangle people with a choking acting thanks to them!
Old news (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Old news (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:1, Redundant)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Important thing to note, Nintendo AMERICA (Score:3, Informative)
This isn't Nintendo Japan, this is Nintendo United States of America. The article briefly mentions it, Nintendo of America NOA.
This is an important difference, this story is nothing new, and if you are willing too google a bit you can easily find other examples of NOA censoring games. INCLUDING N games, Nintendo of America EVEN censored Nintendo games from japan. http://www.filibustercartoons.com/Nintendo.php [filibustercartoons.com] (google NOA censoring) for instance shows several games in their original japanese release and the censored US release.
It is a US thing. Although the rest of the world seems eager to catch up. Remember kids, nudity is bad, violence against those who are different is good, as long as you don't say it out loud.
Re: (Score:1)
I had the censored Maniac Mansion and the censored Castlevania.
Re: (Score:2)
Except for the physical lack of blood it is pretty violent.
I play the first few and now I am a mass murderer.
What is the non-censored version like?
Re:Important thing to note, Nintendo AMERICA (Score:5, Informative)
You couldn't have characters drinking alcohol. If a character went into a bar, they weren't allowed to drink alcohol or order alcoholic drinks.
Characters couldn't pray. They had to 'meditate'. Churches weren't allowed, but 'Temples' were.
You couldn't tell a player to 'kill' anything. Assassinate, terminate, destroy, and defeat were all ok, but not 'kill'.
You couldn't show blood splats. One game I worked on had tiny characters that when they fought had little tiny red clouds near them to show them fighting. We had to change it to yellow dust clouds. Of course when Street Fighter came out that had blood splats, but they were allowed to, while we weren't.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Interesting choice... (Score:5, Funny)
Anyone else find the censored dialog funnier? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Point 2: A lot of the humor was about inuendo and ambiguity. So, dialog that promoted that fits quite well with the game.
Layne
Nintendo's prerogative. (Score:4, Insightful)
What I do have a problem with, however, is when the government starts deciding what should be censored. It's like the Fairness Doctrine. A lot of people are pushing it in an attempt to control conservative talk radio. That's all well and good, but the irony is that the doctrine came about originally during the anti-communist movement and then actually used against liberal talk shows. So this cuts both ways. You can't say you're for free speech provided it only suits your own opinions and desires. The last thing we need is more government control.
I have the right to dictate what I'm exposed to in my own house in the same way Nintendo can dictate the content for their consoles. Even if I agree that the extent to which Nintendo of America went to clean up their games was absolutely ridiculous. Although, I can't really say it business.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
PC's do. Unfortunately, the PC games are now experiencing the same scrutiny console games have traditionally faced. Nevertheless, the last time I checked you can do or say anything you want with your PC. You can even find something to suit any gaming need if you dig enough. So I don't really see where freedom of speech is being hindered.
Now, if you want to make money exercising freedom of
Are PCs TV-connected? (Score:2)