Sony Announces "Qore" Playstation Bundle 82
Sony Computer Entertainment America has announced a new subscription-based, multimedia, Playstation bundle that promises to feature developer interviews, game previews, demos, betas, and add-ons all delivered in high definition. Supposedly hitting the streets on June 5th, "Qore," seems an awful lot like paying to get more advertising. Hopefully the playable gems make this (admittedly cheap) service worth it.
I don't understand why it's bad (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1, Funny)
Re:I don't understand why it's bad (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:1, Funny)
Re:I don't understand why it's bad (Score:5, Insightful)
Not surprised with the uninformative summary though. This is basically a digital subscription to a multimedia version of a PlayStation Magazine. It's a more convenient, and slightly cheaper, alternative for those who love picking up gaming mags. No grand scheme of villany here, just a giant company changing their business model to reflect the changes in technology and consumer expectations.
Which if I recall correctly is something people here are usually begging for.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:1, Redundant)
I hate it when people do things like that.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Odd. (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Odd. (Score:4, Insightful)
So yes, its limited to the PS3. Its basically an electronic version of a "dead tree" PlayStation Magazine.
Personally I'm pretty excited about the idea of an "old style idea" (PlayStation Magazine) being adapted to a new media (made for on-line, Downloadable, Pay on-line, Automatically downloaded as soon as its available each month).
Re: (Score:2)
Ownership (Score:3, Insightful)
I spend a lot more of my time and money playing classic games than new ones, I have 30 year old consoles that work flawlessly today. I just hope emulators for the current generation of systems get really good really quick.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
To be fair, it makes very no business sense to keep the old services going when a) they're not driving new sales, and b) customers continue to buy sony crap even after being burned several times.
Re: (Score:2)
Just a nitpick, but the Sony blog says its $24.99 for 13 episodes.
Not sure if there is one planned "Holiday Special" or something, or they are just including the starting and ending month in the year.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Well
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Ownership (Score:4, Insightful)
I believe things are just going to get worse once the majority are convinced it's more "convenient" to just subscribe for movies, games, music and such instead of buying a hard copy. By then there won't be any alternatives to getting your fix of media except their "approved" subscription providers of content delivery services. Cause once they don't get their periodic payments they simply lock you out and only option you've got is pay to restore the subscription (of course there will be a re-activation fee). Then they'll start to decide on what content you'll get. Say they figure it's cheaper and easier just to provide music that is nothing more but remixes of past decade's music and not release anything unqiue or new until they feel they've squeezed every last penny possible out of it.
There's quite many different views to be taken on this whole subscription based media content and the reality is that they simply want to have complete control over their products and ultimately you as to what you've got access to, when, how, and limited iterations of playback without further payments.
Maybe I shouldn't post such dark discussions as they could be used as blueprints of world conquest by the entertainment industry.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
I have to say (Score:2)
No one cares.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
I was talking about his whining opinion, not subscription services themselves.
Are you always in a rush to be wrong and look retarded by responding to something you don't understand like you did here? Because you sound very moronic spouting off on something without having the slightest idea what the fuck you're actually responding to.
Re: (Score:1)
erm... no. I was not talking about the services themselves but people's feelings towards them.
At no point did I state that subscription services *aren't* trustworthy, merely that people may believe they're not to be trusted for whatever reason.
So the question is: "Are *you* always in a rush to be wrong and look retarded by responding to something you don't understand...?"
Don't be so quick to assume what people mean...
Wow you're a fucking reatrd (Score:2)
I didn't claim YOU were talking about ANYTHING, so once again you look like an idiot.
Nope. And since I didn't do that in this case either, what the fuck are you running your dicksucker about?\
You mean like you did in this very post?
How fuck
Re:Ownership (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
I'm a lot more concerned about my XBLA games. Most of
Note to Sony (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Also, I hate to spoil your flaming, but it seems highly likely that the PS3 will be the best-selling high-def console of the current generation. It'll also likely be the only profitable high-def console this generation. What definition of "fail" are you using, exactly?
Re: (Score:2)
I'd phrase it differently though. I'd call it "My mommy bought me a 360".
Re: (Score:2)
That's a bit like when the New York Times Bestseller List redefined itself to exclude Harry Potter books.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Even funnier, after they created a "children's bestseller" list (so they could continue to use the adult's bestseller list as a marketing tool), the publishers of kid's books got ticked that the Potter books dominated that list, and shortly thereafter the NYT created another list, this time for "children's bestselling serials." That way, they could put Harry Potter in its own little corner, where it wouldn't embarrass the rest of the publishing world with its success.
Sony doesn't get it (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Looking around the playstation network, I saw 70 games available for download for the PS3. I have no idea if that compares to the Wii's download library, but it does exist.
(BTW, I own neither a PS3 nor a Wii.)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Most of their "old partners" would rather sell remakes at full price rather than the original games for a $10 download. Square-Enix, for example, has made it quite clear that you'll never see any old games with the words "Final Fantasy" or "Dragon Quest" in the title on any download service; they'd rather sell you Tactics as a $40 PSP game, or Origins as two separate $30 titles. Konami's SotN see
Re: (Score:1)
Should be mentioned that only applies to OLD games, they do release NEW games for download services like FF Crystal Chronicles: My Life as a King for the Wii (the one notorious for the huge amounts of "horse armor" you can buy).
I'm not seeing the phrase "Mega Man" anywhere near the Virtual Console
Megaman 1 and 2 are released on the VC.
Re: (Score:2)
Which I did. After all, I was responding to "Where's the PlayStation 1 back catalog?"
"Megaman 1 and 2 are released on the VC."
Only in the PAL regions, it seems.
Re: (Score:1)
Hm, I'd guess that's because none of the compilation discs were released here...
Doesn't Sony get it? (Score:1)
What the Quck (Score:5, Insightful)
If I'm interpreting this announcement correctly, this is pretty much the same thing as the "Nintendo Channel" that launched on Wii a couple of weeks ago, except all the advertorial content is in High Definition. And you have to pay for it.
Who qares?
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:1)
Half the time I can't tell if I'm getting a demo or a film preview or what... Now if you'll excuse me, I smell fanboi on the way... *dons asbestos undies* There we go. Nice and snug!
Does this mean the 80GB PS3 is finally back? (Score:1, Interesting)
Reads the article.
Oh, damn, not that kind of bundle. This is just a subscription service to receive trailers for $3/month on your PS3 over your already-existing broadband connection.
OK, not just trailers, you also get "exclusive downloadable content" but without any, say, details, I don't see why I'd want it. (Until I know that it won't be stupid things like "the character you already have, but with a green jacket" I'd rather not spend $3.)
Of course, I'm not going
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Qore? (Score:2)
It's about time... (Score:3, Funny)
Way to fight back (Score:2)
-Bean
Veronica Belmont (Score:1, Funny)
Esq.
Re: (Score:2)