US Air Force To Suffer From PS3 Update 349
tlhIngan writes "The US Air Force, having purchased PS3s for supercomputing research, is now the latest victim of Sony's removal of the Install Other OS feature. It turns out that while their PS3s don't need the firmware update, it will be impossible to replace PS3s that fail. PS3s with the Other OS feature are no longer produced since the Slim was introduced, so replacements will have to come from the existing stock of used PS3s. However, as most gamers have probably updated their PS3s, that used stock is no longer suitable for the USAF's research. In addition, smaller educational clusters using PS3s will share the same fate — unable to replace machines that die in their clusters."
In related news, Sony has been hit with two more lawsuits over this issue.
Sony is a terrorist organization (Score:5, Insightful)
Bomb them to hell if they don't bring back this feature, vital for national security.
Re:Sony is a terrorist organization (Score:5, Funny)
Benjamin Franklin said it best. "Anyone who would trade money for something produced by Sony deserves neither, and will lose both."
Re:Sony is a terrorist organization (Score:4, Insightful)
To sell a product with a promise of certain features, and then to act as if it is your own and disable everything you don't want the real owner to have. Disabling the otherOS feature was totally unnecessary. It was just some kind of cruel bullshit, limiting your freedoms on a device that belongs to you. That is the modern way.
Buy a kindle? Have YOUR PAID FOR books removed at amazons will.
Buy a PS3 for clustering? Have your PAID FOR CLUSTER disabled, unrepairable, and suddenly worth its weight in crap as soon as the machines start to die off.
Buy an apple product? well, might as well put your head in a plaster garbage bag and die, they own everything that touches the screen of that device, hell, likely they even own the device, just 'licence' it out to you in some peculiar way.
If sony's terms of service said something about taking away features at their own will, it is not a valid part of the contract. Here in america, we have laws that prevent mega-corporations from making insanely complicated contracts and inserting clauses about how they own your soul and can harvest your body parts whenever they please. This modern pattern of bullshit is why I avoid buying anything that follows that pattern. Unfortunately every day there are fewer options. And soon enough they will all be gone.
Re:Sony is a terrorist organization (Score:4, Insightful)
"Here in america, we have laws that prevent mega-corporations from making insanely complicated contracts and inserting clauses about how they own your soul and can harvest your body parts whenever they please. This modern pattern of bullshit is why I avoid buying anything that follows that pattern."
--- === ---
So,... you have no credit cards, don't own a house or a car either, as far as I can tell, because all these things have insanely complicated contracts that the banks can change willy-nilly if they please.
I'd also have to say that you don't own a cell-phone either, as most phone contracts are bigger than the phone book. And I'll bet you don't have cable-TV either. Or Health Insurance.
In fact, here in America, almost everything comes with an insanely complicated contract that grants all kinds of rights to the giant-mega-corp, and almost nothing to you. And you're paying them for that priviledge. Ain't capitalism grand?
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
So,... you have no credit cards, don't own a house or a car either, as far as I can tell, because all these things have insanely complicated contracts that the banks can change willy-nilly if they please.
I'd also have to say that you don't own a cell-phone either, as most phone contracts are bigger than the phone book. And I'll bet you don't have cable-TV either. Or Health Insurance.
In fact, here in America, almost everything comes with an insanely complicated contract that grants all kinds of rights to the giant-mega-corp, and almost nothing to you. And you're paying them for that priviledge. Ain't capitalism grand?
To be fair it isn't ALL that bad. I'm not the GP, but I live a similar life style (or try to)
Credit cards: nope (Debit though, through a checking account used just for that purpose)
Own a house: nope, though that one is a downside IMHO. I rent a house now.
Own a car: Yes, I've owned all my cars. Never had a bank loan to do so however thankfully.
Cell Phone: Only lately did I go with an at&t contract (I was prepaid prior to that, which has a 30 day contract, so any evil changes can not possibly last pa
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
This is why I have no qualms about stealing from corporations..... they have no qualms about stealing from us. They do it daily - it's part of their business plan. They even lobby Congress for the right to steal from the People's Treasury.
Re:Sony is a terrorist organization (Score:4, Funny)
This was their plan all along.
It's payback for Hiroshima.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
This was their plan all along.
It's payback for Hiroshima.
Someone better tell them that it was Cow and Chicken that's been responsible for Hiroshima all along.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Sony is a terrorist organization (Score:5, Insightful)
How about this:
Ban them forever from selling to the US Gov.
You know, the whole "fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me"
Re:Sony is a terrorist organization (Score:5, Funny)
No, no. You have it all wrong. Here's the actual quote:
There's an old saying in Tennessee -- I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee -- that says, fool me once, shame on -- [pauses] - shame on you. Fool me -- You can't get fooled again. - George Bush, September 17, 2002.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
You know, this is often trotted out as an indictment of Bush but I think he actually made a very narrow escape from something much worse. Can you imagine what people would have done with a clip of Bush saying "Shame on me"?
Whenever I see him saying what he did say, I kind of imagine a smart adviser's voice screaming through his earpiece "DONT SAY 'SHAME ON ME'. DO NOT SAY 'SHAME ON ME'!".
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
That's one boss...
(puts on sunglasses)
...that won't fool us again.
YEAAAAAAAAHHHHH!
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
I don't think the government buys anything from Sony, other than a few consumer electronics for conference room. Most of the time the government purchases from dedicated contractors like Lockheed, Northrop, Raytheon, et cetera.
BTW:
A number of those contractors have discovered that dicking with the U.S. Military (example: employees mischarging time) leads to serious consequences. Like millions of dollars in fines. I hope the USAF makes an example of Sony and drags them through the court system, for their
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
COTS = COST (Score:5, Insightful)
There's been a big push in recent years to move to "COTS" (Commercial Off The Shelf) solutions in the government - the military in particular. And while this may be find for things like holsters, backpacks, and office chairs, I think this highlights for EVERYONE, not just bright young aquisitions officers, that sometimes taking COTS technology and using it for your highly specific and critical application is not the best choice. Unfortunately, sometimes (sometimes!) big, expensive, and proprietary in-house solutions really are the best.
(heh. captcha is 'acquire')
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Levenshtein disagrees.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
I don't agree. On my project it was a lot cheaper to use the existing Windows NT 4 OS than to develop our own from scratch. It was also cheaper to buy mass-produced parts for a few pennies, rather than build our own for around $1000 each. It also saved space - instead of a giant box we used the latest tech to shrink the unit down to a small cube.
Re:COTS = COST (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:COTS = COST (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
But those are expensive, defeating the purpose of using PS3s in the first place. They could have gone to IBM and bulk ordered a pile of CELL equipped blade servers but its cheaper to buy the PS3 which Sony, like every other console manufacturer, sells below cost and make up the difference with game sales.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Devkits can run unsigned code - retail PS3s cannot (except in Other OS mode). Having just a few won't help you.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You do realise that they could have used a small number of developer kits to port a custom Linux install to the PS3, sign it and deploy it and then be in the same position?
Uh, no. Sony signs titles. Sony would never sign a Linux install. They'd have to use all developer's units, and that brings you up closer to the cost of doing it with PC add-in boards. Titles produced with the dev system can only be run on the dev system until blessed by Sony. This was true in the PS1 and PS2, too, so I don't know where you got this wild-ass idea.
Re:COTS = COST (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:COTS = COST (Score:5, Informative)
[...] but its cheaper to buy the PS3 which Sony, like every other console manufacturer, sells below cost and make up the difference with game sales.
USAF buys literally tons of loss-leading PS3s but no games? I think you just hit on why Sony doesn't care about the problem the Air Force faces now.
Re: (Score:2)
That's beside the point. It's certainly not ILLEGAL (or even unethical IMHO) to buy a product the manufacturer is selling at a loss. If it doesn't work out for them then that's their short sightedness.
The question is whether or not they can legally pull back that functionality. Maybe, maybe not, but I can guarantee you, if a pissed off USAF researcher presents his case then the standard "Only pirates use it anyways." defense simply isn't going to work this time.
Re: (Score:2)
Not sure that the GameOS would support the necessary software stack, such as MPI.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
There was no need to assume Sony would pull a stunt like this. After all, you can't buy a PS3 with otherOS support. Why? Selling at a loss? Hardly. Sont were more than happy to sell the PS3 as a blu-ray player and there are a hell of a lot more of them as players only than there are research clusters. Piracy? There is no piracy, Geohot got a memory dump, or so he claimed. He's failed to deliver an exploit, data, code, examples, he's only shown a very fake looking video. Sony dropped otherOS from the slim, s
Re:COTS = COST (Score:5, Insightful)
Not really. It should highlight the fact that you should always require a second source for any off the shelf products that you're buying. If you go for a single-vendor solution, you are totally at the mercy of their whims, when it comes to pricing and availability. A big in-house proprietary system would have cost more, in this case, than simply buying twice as many PS/3s as they required. The Cell is now starting to look dated, and by the time they actually need to replace this system they could just throw it away and build a new one based on whatever the latest GPGPU design is at the time.
Do you really think that replacement nodes in a big SGI machine cost less than a couple of PS/3s? Or that the price doesn't shoot up rapidly once SGI moves on to the next design? Or that there's a large second-hand market for them?
Re:COTS = COST (Score:5, Insightful)
Outsourcing is good, focus on core business, buy-not-build, standardise, 80-20 solutions... all of these make sense, but I am dealing too often with the mess made by people turning these good pieces of advise into thoughtless mantras and moronic MBA one-liners, as a replacement for thoughtful and informed decision making. A lot of todays leadership doesn't want to make decisions; they look for rules to make their decisions for them.
Re:COTS = COST (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
And a lesson for the consumer: no matter what you're told about super-computer nonsense, the product is just a games console, and will always just be a games console in Sony's eyes.
Re: (Score:2)
Or they could have gone with nVidia/ATI or something similar
Or Cell PCI-X boards for PC (IIRC there are some)
Retroactive crippling of hw should be illegal (Score:5, Interesting)
There's been a big push in recent years to move to "COTS" (Commercial Off The Shelf) solutions in the government - the military in particular. And while this may be find for things like holsters, backpacks, and office chairs, I think this highlights for EVERYONE, not just bright young aquisitions officers, that sometimes taking COTS technology and using it for your highly specific and critical application is not the best choice. Unfortunately, sometimes (sometimes!) big, expensive, and proprietary in-house solutions really are the best.
No, what it drives home is that, when you purchase a piece of hardware, it belongs to you, and no vendor should have the legal right to modify what you have purchased without your consent, nor to coerce consent for modifications that reduce or cripple the capabilities of something you have purchased.
Maybe now that military and commercial interests are being impacted, we can get the barest modicum of consumer protection to outlaw this shit (and similar, retroactive software modifications as well, such as Steve Jobs foists upon his hapless iPhone slaves ... it all eventually amounts to the same thing, and puts a lot more than the military at risk).
I know for our trading platforms we would never tolerate this kind of thing from a vendor (and Apple has lost out on this on more than one occasion for exactly this reason). I'm amazed the military hasn't come down on Sony like a ton of bricks -- a large investment bank certainly would have.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm amazed the military hasn't come down on Sony like a ton of bricks -- a large investment bank certainly would have.
What recourse does the Air force have? Sony didn't reach into their data center and push the update to their cluster. From the Air Forces perspective, all Sony has done is modify their product so that future purchases will not fill their needs. All the Air Force can do is to not make future purchases of PS3's, which is something that they probably have no plans of doing in bulk anyway (except of course as the TFA states to replace dead units).
Sony is probably burning a bridge with the USAF, it was prob
Re:Retroactive crippling of hw should be illegal (Score:5, Insightful)
They HAVE done something evil.
They produced a product (the fat PS3) and included (and advertised) the OtherOS feature and its ability to run Linux.
They then removed that function.
If a car maker sold you a car with a satnav built into the in-car entertainment system and advertised that the car came with a satnav and then proceeded to remove the satnav function when you took it into the dealer for a service, you would have every right to be angry at the car maker for removing this feature.
Re:Retroactive crippling of hw should be illegal (Score:5, Insightful)
The firmware update issue does not apply here - the USAF's issues are not related to a firmware update, they are related to Sony no longer selling new PS3's with the feature advertised on older models.
So in *this* case they have not done anything 'evil'. Sony's promise of a feature to you with regard to your old purchase does not stand with regard to a new purchase. Now, I agree that they have completely fucked up with regard to teh firmware update killing already purchased features, but thats not at issue here.
Re:Retroactive crippling of hw should be illegal (Score:5, Insightful)
As such, they're not so concerned over not being able to buy new parts (many places cannot buy new parts for their existing systems), but maintaining existing ones.
Actually, you're right and wrong. Prior to this problem there was a ready supply of spare parts: Used fat PS3s. Now Sony has changed the functionality of those systems; the majority will have been updated. Now the used consoles are not workable spare parts. To return to the car analogy, it's like you bought a car which was advertised as being the best off-road vehicle on the market, if you just upgraded to monster truck wheels and tires. The dealer then finds out that people are using 4x4 vehicles to get to a magical land where vehicle accessories are cheaper than those sold by the dealer; in fact, they have accessories that make the vehicle useful for more purposes, so that the users are less compelled to buy another vehicle. So the dealer institutes a policy that whenever a vehicle is brought in to the dealer, they remove the front axle and the transfer case, and it becomes a 2WD vehicle; the user is simply lied to, and told that this change is necessary to make the vehicle safe, or perhaps to improve road safety. Now you're stuck with these gigantic wheels on a 2WD vehicle, and you look like an idiot driving down the road with 'em. They can be removed, but it's going to take additional labor, and you're going to have to put the original wheels back on. Unfortunately, in this car, you have to rebuild the entire car and replace all the fluids when you replace the wheels so now you have to do the oil, coolant, trans fluid...
The analogy is clear: At least some people purchased the PS3 specifically because of the promise of being able to run Linux. Sony claims that Linux enables game piracy, but this is false; it enables movie piracy. So for an unrelated reason, Sony is disabling this functionality; all the while lying to the users. Users with a Linux partition still have the partition but cannot boot it. In order to reclaim the space (which is now simply an impediment) users must format the entire disk and redownload content, reinstall games, et cetera. And finally, if you are complaining about it, people will think you're an idiot, because you should have known better.
Sony is evil, and must be destroyed. Stop buying their shit! And especially, stop making excuses for them. They don't deserve it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I think you are absolutely correct. That "sometimes" is something that people miss out on. Program keep in mind that each application requires its own careful consideration. I work on a program that uses a lot of different hardware, which is a mix of COTS and in-house tech. It is a BIG selling point that our program makes use of COTS hardware. It can make the initial design and development a bear, but once you have software and systems in place to integrate the various pieces of hardware it offers some
Re: (Score:2)
COTS != EOL != availability.
Going to COTS is in general a good thing, but any respectable company will focus on End of Life, Availability and MTBF when going for COTS. Those are not mutual exclusive.
Seems management approving the PS3 solution without having a solid contract with Sony should be fired on the spot.
Re: (Score:2)
Well. The point is simpler, no matter who you are and for what purpose you buy:
Either you have a contract which include the option to buy identical replacement parts with your supplier or not. Either you have a support contract for a certain feature guaranteeing this feature to you for some time or not. Either your feature is important enough for you supplier to make it a problem for his reputation or not (And honestly: in my view this does not damage Sony reputation significantly. In the main-stream all Li
And suddenly PS3 sales drop by 80%? (Score:2, Interesting)
What, the USAF was the only buyer of PS3s, and now suddenly that they can't use them, nobody wants them... the market will be flooded with $0.10 used PS3s nobody can actually use for anything useful.
not necessarily impossible (Score:5, Insightful)
Unless they, y'know, get directly in touch with Sony and tell them what they're trying to do. I'm sure in a case like this that something can be worked out. Instead of actual reporting and checking up on the situation, we instead get people using words like "impossible". There are many things that happen every single day that fall into this same category of "impossible", and yet they happen...
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Well they have the bargaining power (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
the problem is that area of japan has a rather large number of embassies in the same area
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Not a problem. US missiles have a highly accurate targeting system. Its calculations are powered by a cluster of PS3s.
All this backlash will mean one thing (Score:2)
Re:All this backlash will mean one thing (Score:5, Insightful)
I don't care about that and I doubt many others do either. What I do care about is that Sony is getting the recognition it deserves on this matter. You simply cannot do this to consumers and expect to get away with it. Sony is building a history of such behaviors including lobbying for law that excludes them from prosecution when accessing computers across the internet searching for infringing copyrighted content, the installation of their rootkits and this removal of features debacle. While people continue to chant "well, don't buy from Sony!" I have to say I am glad to see that more and more people are taking notice and are saying the same thing -- Don't buy from Sony!
Law suits and criminal charges aren't enough to stop Sony. People have to stop buying from Sony to make Sony care. I'm just one guy... I won't buy another VAIO, another Walkman, another Clie', another camcorder, another TV, a PS(X), another DVD or CD with Sony/BMG on the label. Nothing. Not another penny. And the more attention this draws, during a time when people are still a bit more cautious and thoughtful where they spend their pennies than ever before, more people will be joining me in my boycott of anything Sony.
And this message isn't just for Sony. It is a message for any other company out there who would try the same thing.
Re: (Score:2)
I won't buy another VAIO
Personally I recently refrained from buying a $2k+ Sony projector due to their behaviour. It probably performed a bit better than my second choice, but buy from Sony and you get screwed one way or another. The company is not getting another cent from me.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
You think the backlash is going to cause Sony to not put the capability of using Linux on the next gen of Playstations?
News flash - once Sony decided to remove the option from devices that already had it installed, they committed themselves to not having Linux boot as an option on any of their future PS models. There's no way in hell you can use that as a marketing point when everyone knows that Sony can revoke it any time they feel like it and there's not a damn thing you as a customer can do about it.
If
Opportunity? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
The problem isn't that the ps3s are getting upgraded, they're not connected. The problem is that any node that needs replacement will end up with a newer unusable FW when bought or repaired.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
really?
if the options are
1) buy PS3 for $500 each and completely void the warantee
2) buy some other cell computer for $5000 with support
then - in the context that they know this system works already, I don't see how they could do anything other than buy the PS3s and get some extra ones for backup.
[numbers for illustrative purposes only, I can't be bothered to check what a ps3 costs]
Re: (Score:2)
We also checked out both options for our lab at the university. At that time (3 years back), a PS3 was EUR 600. The only way to get a "cell computer" was via IBM blades. The cheapest blade chassis *without any blade* cost $17,000. I don't remember the price of the individual blades. At that price point, I'm not sure whether using the Cell architecture is still price-efficient (which is presumably the reason why they went with it in the first place; at least it won't be because of how easy it is to program).
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
We also checked out both options for our lab at the university. At that time (3 years back), a PS3 was EUR 600. The only way to get a "cell computer" was via IBM blades.
That's odd. Mercury Computer has had a "cell accelerator board" for $8K since the last quarter of 2006. Basically its a cell processor in a PCIe slot.
Second generation is here: http://www.mc.com/products/boards/accelerator_board2.aspx [mc.com]
Maybe they had export problems with it, although they announced it at a singapore trade show.
Comment removed (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Pretty sure the USAF is exempt from the DMCA for purposes of interoperability.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, I see: "When the President^W USAF does it, that means it is not illegal [youtube.com]", right?
[citation needed]
Re:Oops! (Score:4, Informative)
[Citation]
17 U.S.C. 1201(e) (1998)
Exception for Law Enforcement and Intelligence Activities. The DMCA permits circumvention for any lawfully authorized investigative, protective, or intelligence activity by or at the direction of a federal, state, or local law enforcement agency, or of an intelligence agency of the United States.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, facts? You can use them to prove anything that's even remotely true.
[loc.gov]
Re: (Score:2)
Comment removed (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
xbox 360 is x86 based right? cell processor rips x86 a new one for the types of computations being performed by the AF. They could make the API as nice as they want, it'll still underperform.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No as someone already posted it is not. It uses Power. I believe three cores each supporting two threads but I could be wrong on that.
Odds are that they are only using the Power cores to feed the GPU and using the GPU to do the heavy lifting.
Honestly that would be a benifit of using the dev kit for the PS3 as well. They would have access to not just the cores but also the GPU.
This was already an issue (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Personally I think it was a dick move to not include it on the slim models without putting it very clearly on the packaging that it was a crippled machine, and not a real PS3.
I don't mean to be rude, but I think you might need to adjust your definition of crippled. It is still a 'real' PS3, still plays Blu-Rays, PS3 games, connects to PSN, etc. They removed a theoretically popular feature that very few people actually took advantage, and that posed a mild security/piracy risk to Sony. They didn't send killbots out to peoples homes to force the update. They simply stopped offering this completely extraneous feature, and stopped supporting it.
For what its worth, I agree that
My Sony Rip van Winkle story (Score:4, Insightful)
In the 90's, when I needed any electronic stuff, I used to look at Sony first. I bought most of my stuff from them, never had any problems, and was always satisfied with the product. Call it the highest level of brand loyalty and customer satisfaction.
Then I fell asleep. I woke up about ten years later.
The Sony I knew then, was suddenly very, very different. Now, Sony will be the last on my list, when I need to make another electronic purchase. I really feel that Sony doesn't give a damn anymore about product quality and customer satisfaction.
Sony rootkiting your PC? Maybe I am still asleep, and having a nightmare . . .
Re: (Score:2)
Agreed, root kiting is a nightmare. I expect superusers to have the balls to engage me in melee directly.
Re:My Sony Rip van Winkle story (Score:5, Insightful)
The product quality from Sony still is top notch, it is their dreaded, we know better than you attitude. Example, buy a Sony car radio, excellent built quality, top notch production, but then you pull the key, it makes three annoying beeps loud as hell, to remind you to take off the front plate.
No there is no way to turn that off unless you build a bypass circuit to the speakers or let an amplifier do that.
Number one complaint about Sony card radios for the last 10 years, Sony knows this, are they going to change anything? No!
Same goes for Vayo notebooks, you have to get the drivers from sony, if the driver is faulty and the manufacturer has offered a different driver, which fixes it
you are not allowed to use it (there are hacks though), and Sony often does not deliver the driver anymore because that line of notebooks is discontinued.
It is their we know better than you attitude why I personally have Sony at the bottom of my hardware purchase list nowadays.
Others have shoddier hardware but the support and attided is what influences me to 80% on my purchases. For the same reason HTC has become
bottom provider, my next phone will be an official Google supported one, instead of going for the hardwarewise better HTC model.
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe you are, since the rootkit issue happened in 2005 and was born of the Sony BMG division, and the subsequent litigation sorted that out then too. The electronics division, the computer entertainment division and the computing devices divisions are in many ways entirely separate in how they go about their business.
I'm not saying Sony are angels or that there's no cross-divisional chatter by any means, but to tar the whole company with that broad a brush is hardly considering present circumstances. I'll
What Suffering? (Score:3, Insightful)
"Sony's decision had no immediate impact on the cluster; for obvious reasons, the PS3s are not hooked into the PlayStation Network and don't need Sony's firmware updates. But what happens when a PS3 dies or needs repair? Tough luck."
The PS3 stopped supporting linux installations when they introduced the PS3 slim and stopped making the original one. Why is this even news?
Re: (Score:2)
Exactly! Cripes. When Sony stopped making consoles that had this feature, THEN it was an issue for the Air Force. The recent update doesn't change anything at all for them, unless they also want to play games on those consoles. (They don't.)
Serves them right. (Score:2, Troll)
what about folding? (Score:3, Informative)
makes ya wonder what will happen to the Folding@Home client stats [stanford.edu] as PS3s die off and aren't replaced.
And who suffers in the end? Sick kids.
Oh, will someone think of the children!
Re:what about folding? (Score:4, Informative)
All sales are negotiable (Score:2)
Idea (Score:5, Funny)
Put the old firmware back (Score:2)
You'd have to do this at the hardware level. Are there any JTAG pads on the board? If not, clipping onto the firmware flash chip with the appropriate tool may be necessary. That, or some means to prevent the existing firmware from loading while loading a substitute into RAM, which will then reload the firmware flash.
First to figure this out might get a little military contract :-)
The Onion right again (Score:5, Funny)
USAF to Sony: (Score:2, Funny)
Failure to comprehend (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Obvious outcome (Score:5, Informative)
Had their algorithm not suited Cell, the PS3 would have been an absurd choice. Since it did, though, it was actually pretty sensible(barring Sony's hard-to-predict action).
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Unless you program your application specifically to use the SPEs, PS3 Linux is basically just not-especially-fast PPC
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Using PS3s for anything, especially non-gaming research applications seemed like a really bad idea in the first place. A game console is nothing but an overpriced, crippled computer. Sure, the multi-core cell processor might be great for some things, but I doubt that they couldn't have found something better for the same price.
You need to follow Mr. Peabody into the way-back machine to understand why they used PS3s. At the time it offered dramatically more flops per dollar than anything else. Flops are what you really need for all serious simulation, and the more precision, the better. It's only recently that you could get halfway decent double-precision flop rates with GPGPU computing. And even today, you'll need at least a $100 video card to push any significant number of them, plus a PC with a PCIEx16 slot. There has probably
Re: (Score:2)
Why no spaces?
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
The original post had spaces, but they were removed by Sony in a firmware update.
Re: (Score:2)
Interesting....I hadn't seen this.
I'll make sure to do more research in future before opening my mouth ;-)
OT: what parts? (Score:2)
Heck, I can't even get parts for my 1&1/2 year old mountain bike. Fortunately I bought it at REI and they'll let me return it for a full refund and then I can buy a new bike. REI FTW.
Just curious. I have had problems sourcing pads for Hayes Sole brakes. Apart from that I am okay so far.
Re: (Score:2)
They can't get the rear suspension bushings.
The center pivot bushings have -- or had -- ball bearings in them. Totally destroyed. I'd say they were way under spec'ed. Actually I'm not sure why they ever had ball bearings to begin with. I suspect solid brass or bronze would have worked just fine and held up a lot better. I could get a set machined I suppose, but if REI will give me full refund for their inability to get $50 worth of replacement parts, who am I to argue.
And that's not the only thing that fail
Re: (Score:2)
First, your argument is crap. Case in point: I've been using Windows desktop since Windows 3.1 and I've never had a virus on my personal Windows machines. That means *nothing*. It's like saying "I haven't died yet, so I must be immortal". Please don't spread bollocks about viruses and operating systems - I'm a Linux nut but that's just a way to lie to people about Linux's real security - the design. You can still get Linux or MacOS viruses the same as anyone else if you do the same stupid things on any