Tracking the Harm Games Do 118
Every so often, video games are accused of causing all sorts of negative behavior in children, teens, and adults. These accusations are typically predicated on statistics that sound much more damning than they actually are. In that vein, gaming website Rock, Paper, Shotgun did their own tongue-in-cheek statistical analysis, complete with pretty charts and graphs. Quoting:
"As part of my research I thought to compare the sales of each GTA game with what the divorce rate must have been when each came out. As you can see each new GTA game has been directly correlated with an increase in divorces. ... An often ignored statistic (and you have to ask why it’s being ignored by the games media, don’t you?) is the sheer volume of PC games being released. We’ve all noticed the British population is abandoning the church, turning instead toward shopping, DVDs and knife crime. But few have thought to check for a connection between PC sales and the numbers of people attending their local Church Of England church on a Sunday. When you look at the data there’s little doubt left that as the publishers continue to release more and more PC games each year, our nation’s faith is being increasingly eroded. And at what cost? If only a graph could tell us that."
Re: (Score:2)
Apparently you never used one of the old Atari joysticks.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
I thought I was *the one*...
Thank you sir, you keep just on going..
I can finally quit. The weight on my shoulders has been too much.. Now I can finally wear some pants, walk in the park.. read a bit.. play with the children of my siblings... be in public (I felt so misunderstood, nobody would understand how I was saving them!) and finally let my chafing wounds heal..
I CAN LIVE AGAIN! Thank you kind sir.
Re: (Score:2)
With all that rubbing, it's no wonder the Earth is warming. I'm surprised your willy doesn't burst into flames.
Re: (Score:2)
Hello Captain Redundant!
I masturbated myself today
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
I can't imagine the UK with a president.
Unfortunately I can. Just say "President Blair", "President Brown" and "President Cameron".
It makes you see the point of the monarchy.
Re: (Score:2)
I've never been able to figure out why anyone would want a king either
Go ask the Catholics and their Pope.
Re: (Score:2)
Why would they know? Pope, king, completely different concepts! /sarcasm
Re: (Score:2)
Of course. There is only one king, but the Vatican has two popes per square kilometer!
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Although I've never been able to figure out why anyone would want a king either, maybe there is some relation.
MORTICIAN: Who's that then?
CUSTOMER: I don't know.
MORTICIAN: Must be a king.
CUSTOMER: Why?
MORTICIAN: He hasn't got shit all over him.
That's incentive enough for me.
Re: (Score:2)
> why anyone would feel loyal to, or even want to attend, a church
It's because they're human beings. Human beings believe whatever the hell their parents do (by default). Muslims have Muslim kids, Hindus have Hindu kids, Catholics have catholic kids.
On and off for a couple decades, right after Henry made the new church there were various burnings and hangings, the type of thing that got you to go to the church you're told to go to (nobody wants to burn). I also think Queen Liz was about as popula
Re: (Score:2)
My family are all Catholic, I have been an agnostic (verging on atheist), and am now a Christian again. My wife's parents are Buddhist, she is Anglican. Her father's family are mostly Christians, as are two of her sisters. MY mother's ancestors were probably Eastern Orthodox Christians.
I know some Buddhists whose parents were Christians.
It may be common for people to follow their ancestors religion (or lack thereof), but it is hardly invariable. Most people also follow their parents politics, and lots of th
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Yeah the CoE broke off from from the RC Church under Henry VIII, but it was really under Elizabeth I that it became a separate church. She made a lot of changes and made it a protestant church, with priests allowed to marry, the removal of confessions and indulgences, etc. So the reasons for the CoE is the same reason for the reformation in the rest of europe, with a bit of nationalism thrown into the mix (it is called the Church of _England_ after all).
The reason for having a King? In feudal times, the mos
It's also pretty common (Score:2)
If you look, there are more than a few countries who have a head of government separate from the chief of state. The head of government actually runs the government, as the name implies, and is the chief of the executive branch. The chief of state is the figurehead, the chief diplomat as it were. The particulars vary nation to nation (in some cases the chief of state has more power) but the general idea is quite common. While the US is not unique in having a single person serve as both the head of governmen
Re: (Score:2)
For example some people in the US are now bitching over how Obama didn't make an appearance at some boy scout meeting. This is the sort of thing you have a king or queen for.
No, this is the sort of thing people just need to get the fuck over.
Re: (Score:2)
I've often wondered why anyone would feel loyal to, or even want to attend, a church
Probably to avoid eternal damnation.
Re: (Score:2)
What makes it any different than the Church being run by the Pope in Rome, who sent many Christians to their death in fruitless crusades to Jerusalem?
It's easy to claim that the Church of England isn't a real religion when you look at the entirety of King Henry the 8ths character, but then you can't just turn a blind eye to everything the Catholic Church has done and claim it's all that holier.
All the different sects that form just show the power of human rationalizing. We pick and choose what lessons are m
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
King Henry believed (or claimed that he did) that his beliefs were morally and ethically correct - closer to God than that of the Church.
And as a side note, being able to trace lineage doesn't make the Catholic Church any more "credible" than the Church of England. I mean I could probably trace my family tree back far enough to find someone who committed a crime but that doesn't make me a criminal.
Re: (Score:2)
Grand Theft Auto Causes Marriages To Break Down (Score:4, Funny)
An analyst reported that the effect was attributed to husbands drinking too much Hot Coffee.
Eh (Score:4, Informative)
There is actual research on the subject [umich.edu], if you are interested.
Here's the abstract:
Numerous studies have shown that exposure to media violence increases aggression, though the mechanisms of this effect have remained elusive. One theory posits that repeated exposure to media violence desensitizes viewers to real world violence, increasing aggression by blunting aversive reactions to violence and removing normal inhibitions against aggression. Theoretically, violence desensitization should be reflected in the amplitude of the P300 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP), which has been associated with activation of the aversive motivational system. In the current study, violent images elicited reduced P300 amplitudes among violent, as compared to nonviolent video game players. Additionally, this reduced brain response predicted increased aggressive behavior in a later task. Moreover, these effects held after controlling for individual differences in trait aggressiveness. These data are the first to link media violence exposure and aggressive behavior to brain processes hypothetically associated with desensitization.
Doesn't seem so far fetched.
Problem is it is all intellectual wanking (Score:5, Interesting)
"Oh well this could maybe hypothetically desensitize people and cause problems, etc, etc." K, but that doesn't fit the actual data that violent crimes in the US have been trending down since around the time that videogames came out. The question shouldn't be "Can we try to find a contrived way that shows that video games might be related to perceptions of violence." The questions should be "Does playing video games make people more prone to act in a violent manner." If the answer is no, then who the fuck cares? There is no reason to be worrying about something if it isn't actually harmful.
As I said, first thing you have to account for in any of these cases is why violent crime has trended down. Just because it has doesn't mean that videogames might not increase violence, but you sure as hell have to account for that fact. You have to show that it would be even lower if video games were not around. You need to show that people who play violent video games are more likely to commit violent crime than those that don't.
Basically, if the only research out there is reaching extremely far to try and show minor differences in brain ERPs, then you've got nothing to go on. While that might be of academic interest, it is nothing to make any policy or law on. Only if games are actually causing more violent behavior, specifically illegal violent behavior (sports are violent but perfectly legal) is there a reason to have concern with regulating them because of it.
Re: (Score:2)
>, specifically illegal violent behavior (sports are violent but perfectly legal) is there a reason to have concern with regulating them because of it.
This is an interesting and much overlooked point. Those who decry video games generally are in praise of sports- even very violent sports like football, wrestling, boxing and martial arts. If seeing fake violence on a screen will make you a more violent person - surely actively trying to beat somebody unconscious must have a much bigger effect - and worse
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
>Martial arts training usually comes with lessons on how to prevent violence. All dojos i know employ a policy where students getting into brawls will get expelled.
So do most gun training. It doesn't stop anybody freaking out over gunclubs does it ?
The people who freak out over video games are not being rational - that's the whole point.
Re: (Score:2)
The problem is video games are unfairly targeted and essentially the scapegoat, when all media is to blame, and regulation should be for all media.
A US Secret Service study on school shootings found these influences:
Violent Movies: 27%
Violent Books: 24%
Violent Video Games: 12%
BOOKS have TWICE the impact of video games and they aren't regulated AT ALL - where's the uproar? the book burnings? the parent outrage?
In the 1990s when violent video game sales were at an all-time high, what was at an all time low?
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
"Oh well this could maybe hypothetically desensitize people and cause problems, etc, etc." K, but that doesn't fit the actual data that violent crimes in the US have been trending down since around the time that videogames came out.
Correlation isn't causation. And violent crime != violent behaviour. Furthermore you would first have to prove that aggressive/violent behaviour incited by consumation of violent video games/media (VVG/M) causes more violent crime before demanding that studies concerned only with increased aggressive/violent behaviour through VVG/M should first explain this correlation of yours.
Re: (Score:2)
True, and the studies I've seen seem to have fatal flaws.
For instance, the comparison study
Focus group 1 plays Wolfenstein 3D
Focus group 2 plays Myst
The findings: focus group 1 is more aggressive and penalizes people longer.
The problem is that Myst is just not an adrenaline producing game - a fair comparison would be, say Myst vs Civilization or some other violent turn based strategy game. I could probably get the exact opposite result by comparing Tetris to Chess. Tetris vs Wolf 3D would h
Re: (Score:1)
Junk science (Score:2)
Doesn't seem so far fetched.
Lots of things that "don't seem so far-fetched" aren't actually true. In this case, while the author cites the 'numerous studies' that support his claim, he didn't cite the 'numerous studies' that don't.
In fact, I could argue the reverse with just as much analytic rigor as the quoted article. By providing a healthy outlet for aggression outside the confines of actual social interaction, people with tendencies toward aggression are able to find a non-destructive release for t
Re: (Score:2)
I'm calling you on this statement. Nigh ever second video game revolves around the player saving the world, people, countries, etc. And I don't mean this in a Machiavellian sense. Often the narrative of the game makes it very clear who the wrongful party is and it's generally not the player. Video games in general take their morals from comic books, World War 2 films, and Revisionist Westerns--violenc
Funniest popup in a while (Score:1, Informative)
"You need Adobe Flash Player 8 (or above) to view the charts. It is a free and lightweight installation from Adobe.com. Please click on Ok to install the same."
(Emphasis mine.)
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
lightweight in more ways than one -- including security and reliability.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
That was a typo, what they meant was "lichtweight".
Reference for "Licht": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Licht [wikipedia.org]
The 29 hours that the opera lasts is about the time it takes to debug a system and get it working again once you've infected your system with Flash Player.
Shouldn't this be under Idle? (Score:2)
n/t
No bitch (Score:1, Interesting)
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
Shut up! Shut the fuck up! Do NOT say that name.
He's like Beetlejuice.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
New media is EVIL!!! (Score:3, Insightful)
Irrational numbers, art about subjects other than god, romantic novels, TV, rock and roll, disco, heavy metal, video nasties, hip hop, raves, computer games......
Isn't this getting a bit old by now?
Re: (Score:2)
I agree that these were all silly - except perhaps the one about disco. I personally am hoping that the 70's never ever come back.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm keeping my platform shoes and Nik-Nik shirts though, just in case.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
There is also a correlation (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Yep. Just remember the science is settled!
Re: (Score:2)
What's this? Illegal's cause global warming now? I knew it!
Blah Blah ...coming over here and bringing their tropical climates with them ......
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Yarr (Score:2)
No, global warming is caused by the decreasing number of pirates.
If that were true, the mass copyright infringement that the old Napster and its progeny represent would have sent Earth into another ice age.
Violence inducing media (Score:4, Insightful)
I would graciously accept the ban of all violent films, games, music and books if they would first pave the way by banning their own hatred and violence inducing holy book.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
For religion to be strong, religionists must ration sex and guide violence.
In strongly religious (= viciously primitive) societies, those who violate sex taboos are punished with violence, sex partners are rationed by the religious hierarchy, and "enemies" are infidels to be attacked.
Re: (Score:1)
Violent games VS Amount of pirates in the world (Score:2, Informative)
Everytime a game like GTA comes out there are less pirates in the world. Graph please!!!
Also, I'm almost sure that every time a violent game comes out, God kills a kitty, but I would also need a graph to be sure.
Re: (Score:2)
LESS pirates? You might want to search news.google.com for "somalia".
Re: (Score:1)
LESS pirates? You might want to search news.google.com for "somalia".
Have you checked the amount of pirate attacks after the publication of each GTA game??
Also, since Pirate attacks are CLEARLY related to global warming, probably GTA releases are related with global warming!!
Re: (Score:1)
There's definitively a statistical correlation between length of copyright and climate. As copyright duration got longer, the climate got hotter.
It's a slow effect, so you don't see clear steps in the pattern. However, if you look at the famous hockey stick curve, you'll notice that the bend of the hockey stick is not too long after the original Berne Convention. That it doesn't match exactly can be attributed to the inherent inertia of the climate. Since then, both duration of copyright successively got lo
How a about a study without a predetermined result (Score:5, Insightful)
One thing that bugs me with all this study non-sense and the counter arguments is that they always have an extremely narrow field of view. It is either "they cause harm" or "they don't influence us at all", both are likely complete non-sense (even when done for humorous purpose as here).
What about general studies that simply discuss how child behaviour has changed over the years in more general terms instead of splitting it into good vs evil? Did video games cause less reading of books? Less watching of TV? Do people visit their friends more often due to the Wii or less often due to XboxLive? Or just how many hours spend kids with video games today compared to 10 or 20 years ago? How much of their allowance goes towards video games? How much power does a kid today use? Do they have a more realistic picture of war or a more twisted one? Did Google Earth improve geography skills and what not.
There are plenty of interesting questions that could be asked, where you could actually get at least some interesting result and people wouldn't all jump into defensive stance for their video games.
Re: (Score:2)
> One thing that bugs me with all this study non-sense and the counter arguments is that they always have an extremely narrow field of view. It is either "they cause harm" or "they don't influence us at all", both are likely complete non-sense (even when done for humorous purpose as here).
The thing that bugs me is people criticizing studies without even bothering to read them. :
How is the following abstract of the study polarized in the manner that you've said?
"Numerous studies have shown that exposure t
Re: (Score:2)
Where is the study that without a doubt shows that there is more violence among gamers then among non-gamers? Unless you have shown that there is an effect it is rather pointless to look for the cause of that yet to be shown effect.
Re: (Score:2)
Once this became a political issue, it became a guarantee that people would take ideological stances. I think you have a great point, but the point of whether we should be looking at the effects of exposure to violence is also worthwhile, so long as it is done scientifically, by a group with no agenda, other than the truth. (And I am naive enough to believe they exist.)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
What about general studies that simply discuss how child behaviour has changed over the years in more general terms instead of splitting it into good vs evil? Did video games cause less reading of books?...
Yeah, from my own experience with video games, I think it's not very likely that they make us more violent or less violent. They might lead to less books and less time watching TV, but I suspect that in all these cases, the most powerful effects are the most subtle. Books, for example, train you to think of reality as something that is encoded in language. TV trained us all to be passive observers in life.
Games train us to look at reality as something which is not immediate. I don't mean temporally imm
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
it's pretty self evident that people nowadays have much larger understanding of the actual results of war and violence than a century ago - and much more "healthy" views on the subject. not many teenage boys dream of the glory of being on the eastern front fighting the evil bolshevik empire.
and of course all culture worth anything affects people in some way, if i
Re: (Score:2)
Furthermore (Score:2)
An increase in game sales led to a decline in piracy, which indirectly contributed to global warming.
Pacman (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
If Pacman had affected us as kids we'd be running around in dark rooms, munching magic pills and listening to repetitive music.
You mean going to raves? Oh wait, we do.
Re: (Score:2)
interesting meta studies on the subject (Score:2)
http://pss.sagepub.com/content/12/5/353 [sagepub.com] (2010) [pdf] [apa.org]
(Searching for a freely available version of this studies might pay off)
This isn't science, it's tabloid trash (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=tongue+in+cheek [lmgtfy.com]
No, the cat does not, in fact, "got my tongue." (Score:1)
Hmmm. An hour of excitement and reinforcement of how awesome you are, or being told you're bad and worthless during the equivalent of an hour-long, mind-numbingly boring cut scene?
Abandoning Archaic Nonsense is Not "Harm" (Score:2)
Escaping from the oppressive influence of religious tradition is not a bad thing.
People no longer feel threatened enough by the dirty old men in robes to suffer through boring church services and unhappy marriages. Good on them.
Re: (Score:2)
This is actually pretty smart social science (Score:1)
This is actually pretty smart social science. If you wanted to, you could gather actual statistics about PC saturation in households and the divorce rate or church attendance, and you could do the same for gaming.
Am I the only person who thinks it could actually be interesting to see what that would look like?
Re: (Score:1, Informative)
Also, tongue-in-cheek means it's satirical or sarcastic.
Further, satire is making a mockery of something with prose by use of irony or sarcasm.
Irony is a way of conveying a meaning opposite to the the literal meaning of the statement.
To convey is to communicate or impart knowledge to another person.
Knowledge is facts gained through study or investigation.
I'm just trying to clarify things here, just like the parent.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Now I'm being sued, it's not fun anymore... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1, Funny)
You're just put out that he corrected your initial impression of TFA.
Re: (Score:2)