Late Night Gaming Banned In Vietnam 157
R3d M3rcury writes "Vietnam's Ministry of Information and Communication has asked ISPs to block access to on-line games between 10:00PM and 8:00AM. 'The request, made on Wednesday, is another move from the authority to mitigate the side effects of online games. The request follows numerous stiff measures by the ministry to tackle the issue, including cutting internet access to agents at night beginning last September.'"
Is it a virus? Is it an alien parasite? (Score:2, Funny)
What has gotten into governments the world over? Why does everyone think you can censor the internet all of a sudden? (Captcha: fascism. No kidding.)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No, the reason it is cropping up is because the US is doing it. Once a leading country does, everyone else points at them as the example. [techdirt.com]
Re: (Score:2)
The solution is to leave people alone, not ruin something for everyone because of a few idiots. This really doesn't have much to do with non-technical. Even a complete imbecile should be able to see how poor of a 'solution' this is.
Re: (Score:2)
No. A better (but still not perfect). A behavior becomes addictive when it begins to interfere with day-to-day life. I'm a smoker. I do not smoke all the time (I'd be arrested if I lit one up in class or at work). However, it DOES affect my day-to-day life. I gotta stop and buy smokes, I gotta walk out of my way to get to a smoking zone, etc etc.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Well they do own the thing. Here's what defines ownership: one who can apply the most force and physically control it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Is it a virus? Is it an alien parasite? (Score:5, Insightful)
This is how real totalitarianism works. It's not necessarily how real socialism works.
For instance, by US standards, Norway is a socialist country (with high taxes, an extensive welfare state, etc). It's also a parliamentary democracy for intents and purposes. And Norway would never seriously propose that sort of law.
Re: (Score:3)
No but it(norway) would support others. An example would be the lack of freedom of expression in order to protect an individuals feelings, on a perceived issue.
Re:Is it a virus? Is it an alien parasite? (Score:4, Informative)
And Norway would never seriously propose that sort of law.
Are you telling us they don't regulate behaviour, which is what banning late night gaming is? Just because they don't have this particular rule doesn't mean they don't interfere in what ought to be people's own right to decide, which is the real issue. For instance, they have a rule about the composition of boards: you need a certain proportion of women. (Well, of each sex, but you know what that means.)
Re: (Score:2)
affirmative action is used in the states too.
Re: (Score:2)
This is more akin to limiting people to working 48 hours a week max. Some people want to do more but it isn't good for their health. Minimum alcohol prices try to prevent people from drinking too much, high tobacco taxes do the same for smoking. Certain drugs are illegal. European countries are starting to look at high fat foods too.
So the real question is should government be trying to strongly influence people's behaviour for their own good? On a point of principal many people say no because it takes away
Re: (Score:2)
this is how real socialism works
Everybody keeps using that word. I do not think it means what they think it means.
Re: (Score:2)
That was so off topic.
But I'm expecting the Vietnamese to start a revolution on this. Though it's probably easily bypassable.
Oblig. Futurama (Score:1)
DONT! DATE! ROBOTS!
Price Increase (Score:3, Funny)
And in other news - WoW gold follows Crude Oil and jumps 5% over night :s
Damn relentless asian kids and their gaming skills (Score:2)
Re:Damn relentless asian kids and their gaming ski (Score:4, Funny)
I think if you are from the US this is always going to happen. Just a matter of historical accuracy.
Re: (Score:1)
I think if you are from the US this is always going to happen. Just a matter of historical accuracy.
You sound as if you are from France, and we all know how well "vous" did.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm from the US and I'd like to take this opportunity to remind you that France financed the American Revolution.
No late-night gaming on the internet? (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
I got to start hanging out with those kids. Do they know how to party or what?
Unfair to those who are responsible... (Score:5, Insightful)
If you're a hard working individual who works 10+ hours a day in Vietnam, you're losing one of those things that allows you some freedom.... your time on the internet during your own free time. I couldn't get to the site to read the article, but my guess it that the ministry is trying to control what people do on the internet, and maybe they can justify their reasoning, but from my perspective, they are overstepping their boundaries.
Maybe later the website will load and I'll be able to actually read the article.
Re:Unfair to those who are responsible... (Score:4, Funny)
Maybe later the website will load and I'll be able to actually read the article.
Try coming back around 8AM 'Nam time.
Re:Unfair to those who are responsible... (Score:5, Insightful)
I'll be able to actually read the article.
This is slashdot. Reading an article is never required to comment on its content.
Re:Unfair to those who are responsible... (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
this isn't nam, smokey. this is slashdot. there are ru-
ah - scrub that. sorry.
Re:Unfair to those who are responsible... (Score:5, Insightful)
That's about the size of it. It's amazing how threatened so many governments feel by the unrestricted free flow of information.
Of course they can make justifications (i.e. excuses) for it. Every last fascist, authoritarian, power-tripping fevered ego that ever existed has always had one powerful tool: a well-articulated bureaucracy. The tyrant (which may be a person or an organization) intentionally lies and makes excuses for why it's really an act of overwhelming benevolence. Then the more naive people eat it up and become what are known as "useful idiots".
We have those in the 'States too. They're generally the ones who don't study much history. When you point out a recurring pattern and explain why it's not a good thing to support, they call you a tinfoil hat-wearing nutter. They think every instance of an organization acting against our interests requires a pre-arranged back-room type of conspiracy, when really all it requires is a lot of selfishness and apathy. They definitely don't say "here is where you are mistaken, and this is my evidence or my sound reasoning". If hardcore tyranny should come to the USA it will be because they and their "we are somehow special, it can't ever never ever happen here so let's get complacent!" attitude played an instrumental role.
So yes, I am absolutely certain the Vietnamese government will justify (rationalize) their position. That's a prerequisite, a necessary ability they must secure prior to taking an action like this. That is how it has always happened throughout history. Politicians as people generally don't become dictators by openly announcing "hey, I want to be a tyrant, vote for me!" Likewise, governments as organizations don't generally expand their power by saying "we just want to oppress you". It's always for your own good, to protect you from something or another, to deal with some hated enemy, etc.
Re: (Score:2)
That's about the size of it. It's amazing how threatened so many governments feel by the unrestricted free flow of information.
Well, sure, But what has that to do with gaming?
Re:Unfair to those who are responsible... (Score:4)
Re: (Score:2)
The Vietnam government can't legislate what people do online. Their attempts to do so will only push people to VPN services. Since you can get an offshore VPN fast enough to play games for just over $3 per month [bouncee.net], the only thing Vietnamese gamers sacrifice will be a little bit of latency.
You can't control the internet. Someone needs to remind the government of Vietnam that the more you tighten your grip, the more star systems slip through your fingers.
Call yourself a Star Wars nerd?! (Score:2)
You can't control the internet. Someone needs to remind the government of Vietnam that the more you tighten your grip, the more star systems slip through your fingers.
I love how countless nerds-people who ought to know Star Wars *way* better than I do- use that quote in a similar way to you, yet seem to forget its context and what happened immediately following Leia saying it-
Tarkin: Princess Leia, before your execution, I would like you to be my guest at a ceremony that will make this battle station operational. No star system will dare oppose the Emperor now.
Leia: The more you tighten your grip, Tarkin, the more star systems will slip through your fingers.
Re: (Score:2)
Nonetheless, Leia was right. In the wider context, the Death Star itself was destroyed. If they hadn't been so heavy-handed, the Empire would have survived. But they pushed people too far. The Empire caused the rebellion.
Re: (Score:2)
Nonetheless, Leia was right. In the wider context, the Death Star itself was destroyed. If they hadn't been so heavy-handed, the Empire would have survived. But they pushed people too far. The Empire caused the rebellion.
Perhaps so, but nevertheless its oft-omitted context would still take the confidence out of the geeky assertion if this was thought about more.
:-)
Well, that and the fact it's from a totally fictitious film and therefore isn't a legitimate example of how the real world works, regardless of how great it sounds to a bunch of nerds
Only one reply possible for the Minister (Score:1)
BOOM HEADSHOT!
On a more serious note, these guys are deluding themselves; gamers will for sure soon be setting up secure proxy networks and/or TOR stuff that will then come in handy for plenty of other uses that could well upset the Viet government a whole lot more than gaming....
Re:Only one reply possible for the Minister (Score:5, Insightful)
Gaming over TOR? You'd be better off playing Correspondence Chess via snail mail.
Re: (Score:2)
>>>better off playing Correspondence Chess via snail mail.
No-no. Direct dial over the phone line is much faster than snail mail. Heck I used to play Populous over a 2k modem. (No that's not a typo; it really was that slow.) 56k or encrypted TOR is like turbo in comparison and I'd be happy to play over it, if the ISPs go down.
(If you want to play Populous call me - 560-1750 - LOVE that game.)
Re: (Score:2)
I was exaggerating somewhat. If all you like to play is strategy games then it would be fine.
Re: (Score:2)
Several popular MMOs are designed to be used over dial-up connections. I usually run EVE Online via my cell phone tether at about 5KB/s without any issues at all.
Last I heard WoW was using stupid low bandwidth because everything is pretty much clientside.
Re: (Score:2)
But then, the last thing shouldn't stop MMO addicts.
Re: (Score:2)
Useless for games which require skill over strategy though.
Re: (Score:2)
("skill" vs. "strategy"?)
Re: (Score:2)
Skill as in reactions and aiming vs strategy as in player positioning.. it was still possible to be an okay player on Counter-Strike on a 56k modem vs guys on Broadband, but really the only way to win was by being clever about your positioning, and making good use of your headphones and ability to shoot through solid objects :p I've never used TOR, but I'd think it would add at least 50-100ms to your ping
Re: (Score:2)
(and y'know, there's a lot of clickfest in many "strategies" too... even Diablo can be seen as having both aspects
This makes me laugh (Score:2, Insightful)
Banning late-night gaming is pretty silly, but I have to admit, it makes me laugh to think of the WOW players sweating the night out.
World of Warcraft players are ridiculous.
What about early morning gaming? (Score:1)
The only reason I got up early for school was so that I could get a couple of rounds of counter-strike in. It was also easier to get a slot on my favourite servers.
Re: (Score:2)
favourite
You British players are always online early morning when I am up way too late! (Sorry it is a complete inference that you are British)
Anyway the reason some gamers play late night also is due to available bandwidth - playing during peak hours is not as much fun! (I guess the same applies early morning?)
Come on now... (Score:1)
If your government shuts down your MMORPG.... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
I think the idea is more nanny-state than tyrant-state. They're trying to help people, in their own unhelpful way.
Rescheduling (Score:5, Interesting)
School -> Homework -> Games
It will be
School->Games->Homework
Homework refers to anything productive done..
So, rather than spending the end of their day gaming, when you would be tired anyways, spend the time when you are not so tired gaming, and the time when you are tired doing productive stuff.
How is that good??
Re: (Score:2)
Atleast I have the option to move gaming to a lower priority..
My hours are mine (Score:1)
What if I work weird hours and 10PM to 8AM is the only time that I can play because I'm at work or asleep outside of that window?
In that case they would effectively be banning me from playing games online at all.
Re: (Score:3)
One word. (Score:2)
no way in hell you can prevent online gaming. see, an example service :
your-freedom.net is a great proxy that works good with many games, including wow. i had had used it to reduce my ping actually - it halved my ping, since my crappy (then) isp was having huge ping to wow eu servers.
kids will just use such services, free or paid.
If they tried this in Korea (Score:1)
It's for your own good (Score:2, Interesting)
It's funny - there's this typical consensus on Slashdot that the world would be a better place if only The Smart People were in charge and could make the difficult, unpopular decisions that we need to become a true progressive, multicultural society. Instead, time after time we get uneducated dipshits who make random decisions and let things go to hell because there's no direction or overarching plan to ensure a good outcome. A simple faith that things will turn out all right as long as people do whatever
Re:It's for your own good (Score:4, Informative)
What are you talking about? I've lived in Saigon--err, Thành ph H Chí Minh--for the past five years, I know hundreds of students, and I can attest that the party most definitely does _not_ skim off the best and brightest. This notion that a young generation of technocrats is populating the party apparatus is just that--a notion, and a ridiculous one at that. Smart kids with money go overseas for school, smart locals stuck here goto UTech, FTU or National, and no young person with a brain thinks to join the party--at least not in the cities. It might be a little different in the middle of nowhere--Ca Mau or somesuch--but hereabouts, and in Hanoi as well, the party is a dumping ground for risk adverse types looking to grind away at dull jobs for a decade or so, earning $100/month, until they're finally connected enough to begin sitting on committees and learning where the next zoned industrial areas will be--at which point the family cashes in big time.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
So Party members defer instant gratification and instead work towards long-term goals. That's the definition of smart right there.
Then there's the issue of working yourself into a position where you can use your intellect to benefit others which we call altruism. Again, a trait that the smart people share.
Altruism is not correlated positively or negatively with intelligence.
See 'The Ways and Powers of Love: types, factors and techniques of moral Transformation' which summarizes some of the relevant research.
I realize you are likely just a troll, but thought I'd correct your disinformation.
Eh most of slashdot is American (Score:1)
There is indeed a problem and that is that some countries are experiencing a different evolution then others. But no American can ever understand that there are other parts of the world that are not the US. Just doesn't fit their head.
The problem is simple. In the west, we had this kind of thing as well and FAR FAR worse. No gaming after 8? Try being send down the coal mines or to scurry between open machines from the moment you can walk. Our industrial revolution was NOT a great moment in human history. W
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
You just highlighted the real issue. "Smart" people thinking they know what's best for everyone else. In America or is Vietnam it's all the same. Fucking nannies all around. Let me live my life.
Re: (Score:2)
Amen to that. Ironically, it takes a well educated person to string together a list of random facts/preconceptions into a compelling tale about why the world would be better if only we could see the world the same way as them. But the same clever people cannot deign to see the world through someone else's perspective. It always ends up being "don't you get it, you idiots? XYZ is a brilliant plan. I just need some power to implement it. Now bend over..."
Re: (Score:2)
"Smart people" wouldn't try to ban something for everyone because of what a few idiots do. They're not "smart people," they're the average ignorant politicians.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The smart people in society are those best able to make these tough judgments. Who do you trust: smart people or the uneducated? How many problems in America would be solved tomorrow by removing idiots from positions where they influence others?
There will be fewer idiots in the world when said idiots are practised in the skill of judging things for themselves, and suffering the consequences of their own decisions. Which they wont become if immodest geniuses are making all their decisions for them.
Further, I'm not looking forward to being ruled by the self-appointed aristocracy of the nerds.
And nothing will change (Score:2, Interesting)
Vietnamese here. It is just another law that nobody cares about in Vietnam. Remember the law that mandate FOSS usage back in 2008? Nothing has changed since then. Well, maybe the internet shop will have to bribe the local police more, but that is it. Online gaming has bad effect on the youth, that is true to some degree, but people are blaming too many things on it, so the government tries to show that it is doing something. And the fact that they ban it means they failed to control it.
PS: Online FPS in Vie
As always (Score:2)
The government knows best, right? Right?
Re: (Score:2)
Left, actually.
Works as a game balancer too. (Score:2)
Retired people and students can (and do) play 18+ hours a day.
I always wished there was a game I could subscribe to that you could only play 4 hours a day (and maybe less than 100 hours a month to force you to take days off).
Or that they would limit leveling rate, regardless of how many hours you played, you could only pop "x" levels per month.
It would help them with game balance and content creation too. As players' wouldn't be max level 12 hours after the new expansion came out.
Re: (Score:1)
Keep an eye out for free to play games. These two are probably a different genre than you want, but League of Legends has a "first win" bonus, such that with 1-2 hours of play you'll have collected a big bonus and can't collect it again for another day. Bloodline Champions has a bonus pool that triples your earnings until you exhaust it, and that resets daily. It takes about an hour to work through that. You can still play the game afterwards for rewards and fun play, but exhausting that bonus makes for a n
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Hey thanks to you and the other person suggesting things.
I will check them out.
Re: (Score:2)
So we should let professional baseball players participate in high school baseball?
How about little league?
What I said was, I want to find a game which doesn't cater to people who have more time. I had that already in Everquest. Hell, until I went to the dallas fan faire and pointed out to the devs that every major mob spawned at 3pm CST while I was at work and so I'd never even SEEN the mobs up, much less had a shot at them, one group of people who could be off for two hours during the day got everythi
extra bonus (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
It's already installed. It's called the Vietnamese army.
Joe Lieberman and Hillary Clinton will love this. (Score:4, Interesting)
Joe Lieberman and/or Hillary Clinton will clamor for the same in our "free" country next, because they think it's just no fair that these other countries get to wreck their people's computer use while the US citizens have no such interference.
Lieberman's "kill switch" request and the two of them grandstanding over the Grand Theft Auto Hot Coffee mod showed them to be exactly this disgusting and sinister, belonging absolutely nowhere near having domestic powers in the "land of the free."
And those two are just the obvious and outspoken ones...
at least... (Score:1)
besides, how do they intend on dealing with proxies? it all seems kind of pointless considering that anyone can get around it by proxys
Great timing with these news... (Score:1)
I found this news especially amusing because I'm in the middle of organizing and running a 3-day non stop gaming lan-party and some players here haven't slept for more than 36 hours now:) What exactly are those horrific side effects of on-line gaming gaming they are so worried about?
On the other hand. This is a interesting way to get them from gaming on-line, since they're gaming over lan so it's not really on-line gaming is it :) Maybe they should include this in their school curriculum or something.
This!
Re: (Score:2)
>>>US companies wish they could do this to make their employees more productive
They could just turn-off Web access at work. Or maybe replace the blacklist with a whitelist, where only sites permitted by the business (like TI.com or microsoft.com) can be reached. Productivity would skyrocket!
Or maybe that's just me. ;-)
Re: (Score:1)
>>>Not understanding what GP was saying is the part that's maybe just you.
No I understood perfectly anon. coward's point.
MY point was that corporations ALREADY have the power to turn off the web - at work. Productivity would likely double. It makes me wonder why they don't?
Re: (Score:2)
The simple fact is that in a lot of environments there would be a huge exodus, and it would include a lot of people that can easily find work elsewhere but cann
Re: (Score:2)
Not to mention how cutting said access would turn the IT department into a time capsule.
Hope you never run into any novel problems!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I don't waste any more time at work with the internet than I did pre-Internet. And occasionally the Internet helps me get my job done. That's probably pretty common.
Re: (Score:2)
Frequent breaks are necessary for optimal productivity.
Happiness has also been shown to raise productivity to much higher levels, and such blocks reduce it for two reasons; not only will they be less relaxed (a good laugh is extremely effective), as they'll resent their bosses' lack of trust.
A good manager should allow accessing any website, and should set up goals to measure performance. Failure to achieve such goals should be discussed, to discover its reasons.
I live in a country where it's a general meme
Re: (Score:2)
> A good manager should allow accessing any website, and should set up goals to measure performance. Failure to achieve such goals should be discussed, to discover its reasons.
Somehow I don't think most employees would have any problem if goatse was blocked ... :-)
Re: (Score:1)
If the employee is taking a work laptop home (or has a work desktop at their home), I could see a company limiting what that computer is used for. It is, in the eyes on the company, the company's computer. If it is on the employee's personal computer, no such luck.
Re: (Score:2)
Ah, I see. 100%. You should be working every single day possible (never take a day off), never take breaks (and despite of this, be completely focused), and live to work (not live to have fun). If not, you obviously have a sense of entitlement!
Re: (Score:3)
gaming through a VPN is not great, the latency is noticeable.
Re: (Score:2)
This is just an assumption on your part. There is technically little reason for it to be so. In fact, encrypting gaming traffic until it reaches a known good network can have *positive* effects due to overly aggressive "network management".
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
>>>>An entrepreneur might take advantage of this situation and start offering VPN services.
>>
>> There's that invisible hand again. It requires regulations such as these.
"Damn free market. If only I could regulate it out of existence." - Dictator. - This gaming ban is just a case of a bunch of leaders who think it's their job to babysit the citizens (for their own good). This problem also exists in the EU and US, because the road to tyranny is often paved with good intentions.
Re: (Score:2)
~17% of russian roulette players later admitted to regretting it.
Re: (Score:2)
I am pretty sure that there are close to 0% self reported losses in Russian Roulette.
Re: (Score:2)
(It's not an online game, but) the only time I'm allowed to play Dwarf Fortress is after my lady has fallen asleep (or the rare event that I happen to be home when she isn't). She simply hates watching me game on the bigscreen bedroom TV. Oh sure, she can play Lego Indiana Jones all day Sunday, but as soon as I launch Dwarf Fortress or Warzone 2100, suddenly gaming is lame.
Sounds like it's your fault for being a doormat then.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not sure why this is so hard to understand. They are living in a nanny state. Where I live, you can't sell alcohol after 2am. Same thing. The government is just placating a bunch of morally panicked mothers.