Cloud Gaming Service OnLive Unofficially On Linux 206
An anonymous reader writes "Through some clever patching, OnLive community members have found a way to run OnLive on Linux using Wine. While the fix isn't perfect, this is a giant leap for Linux users wanting to play the latest games without the need for Windows. Linux users can now play several high quality games like the new Deus Ex with very few performance issues and on lower end hardware."
DRM (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:DRM (Score:5, Insightful)
It's just a game... it's not like operating systems or office apps where vendor lock-in and lack of freedom to modify the code is actually a problem.
Do you also refuse to watch movies because you don't get the files used in production? Or refuse to listen to a CD unless it also comes with sheet music?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Yeah, after all look at all of those mods that ultimately petered out and disappeared into nothingness. DOTA, Counter-Strike, Day of Defeat, Team Fortress, Alien Swarm, Killing Floor...
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, after all look at all of those mods that ultimately petered out and disappeared into nothingness. DOTA, Counter-Strike, Day of Defeat, Team Fortress, Alien Swarm, Killing Floor...
Now compare those (relatively) few successes to the sheer number of mods that don't make it.
Re: (Score:2)
Natural selection, I suppose?
How many retail games never get out of the gate? There's plenty games that do that end up being just godawful.
Re: (Score:2)
Most game developers have realized that the tiny percentage of people interested in mods have no real impact on game sales for large AAA titles. Like most businesses game studios operate on a stonrg cost benefit model. You show them that a hundred thousand gamers will only buy their game if they are able to mod it and believe you me, we'll see every studio adding mod support.
Are you daft? Off of the top of my head: TF2 and the Man Co store [teamfortress.com] also why they've switched over to a free model. In the past, Counter Strike, Team Fortress, Desert Combat. Look back to Quake and the massive community around that (not simply the core game) and why that was THE engine of it's day sporting gaming leagues and conventions. Modding has a much higher barrier to entry than in the past with 3dmodelling, Animation, High res textures requiring significant talent, software and most importantly skill.
Re:DRM (Score:5, Interesting)
It's just a game... it's not like operating systems or office apps where vendor lock-in and lack of freedom to modify the code is actually a problem.
Tell that to someone who dedicated spare time over 18 months to creating a new aircraft in MS Flight Sim only to have the franchise killed off for the promise of some X-box Windows live experience that may never come to fruition.
Open source matters for everything including gaming.
Re: (Score:3)
Tell that to someone who dedicated spare time over 18 months to creating a new aircraft in MS Flight Sim only to have the franchise killed off for the promise of some X-box Windows live experience that may never come to fruition.
For every game that you can list where you have the opportunity to spend 18 months developing something, there are hundreds of games where you do not. You just play them until you get to the end and then stop.
Besides, does MS Flight Simulator X no longer run? If it does still run, then your 18 months of work can still be used. If that is not good enough, then it has already been pointed out that there is an open source flight sim that you can use, although it appears to have problems running on some systems
Re: (Score:2)
Besides, does MS Flight Simulator X no longer run?
True, it works on Windows 7. But how long will one be able to buy and activate a copy of MS Flight Simulator X?
Re: (Score:2)
That's the point. If MS discontinues their flight simulator, you can still run it. If someone pulls their game off OnLine you can do what?
You simply play one of the other games on the service.
I had a look at the list of OnLive games [wikipedia.org] on Wikipedia, and I already own a lot of the titles on the list through other means. So obviously if you don't want this kind of service then you are not limited to accessing them through OnLive. However, if you are the type of person who just plays multiple games per month and doesn't revisit them after completion then it is a fine service.
It is no different than hiring DVDs rather than buying them.
Re: (Score:2)
And, it runs on Linux.
Technically true, but not on the latest cutting edge distros due to library incompatibilities, and not on pure 64-bit systems, where you need to install an insane amount of 32-bit libraries to get it to run - it would have been nice if they had recompiled it as 64-bit too. This is more of an issue in Linux than in Windows, because Windows comes with the 32-bit Wow64 by default, while most 64-bit linux distros are 64-bit only unless you install all the libraries needed to run 32-bit programs.
Re: (Score:3)
OnLive is a streaming service, and you rent access to their service ( and therefore their game catalogue) to play the games you buy. If the service fails, you lose access to your games. This is the problem I have with Steam, and why I only buy games on their ridiculous 75% off sales. For the rest I buy from Play / Brick and Mortar stores, so even if the point of sale g
Switches off the activation server (Score:2)
so even if the point of sale goes bust, I still have the game to play.
Until the publisher requires activation to play even single-player and switches off the game's activation server without providing a patch.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Moreover, I boycott all games from companies that do things like that. For example, I've got some nice games from Ubisoft (some of them among my favourites) but I stopped buying their games when they did that with Assassin's Creed 2. That's final... there's nothing Ubisoft can do to make me tolerate them again. (like Sony)
Steam, as a service, at least allows offline play, if your internet is down (provided you have already logged in online prior to that happening, and the games are "ready to play" which is
Re: (Score:3)
"Do you also refuse to watch movies because you don't get the files used in production? Or refuse to listen to a CD unless it also comes with sheet music?"
Would be nice if they come with the files, but it's unpractical. But the nice thing about videos and music is that is always have the "source code" available, you can always take the video or song and remix it. That is why we have such a booming culture of remixes on Youtube, despite every effort to kill it; and the fan-dubs and fan-subs of anime shows; a
Re: (Score:2)
But the nice thing about videos and music is that is always have the "source code" available, you can always take the video or song and remix it.
Uh, except for the CC-licensed stuff, we don't get the "source code" to mainstream music and videos.
The "source code" for a song is the individual track recordings and other stuff that gets mixed into the final product. For movies, there are tons of assets that go into making the movie: the dailies, raw audio tracks, CG models, etc., etc., etc.. Otherwise, to do a high-quality derivative of Avatar, such as just a couple of Navi' standing around and telling jokes, you'd need to re-create the very sophist
Re: (Score:2)
. That would be relatively easy if the 'source code' of the movie was released, but is incredibly difficult without it.
No way. Absolutely no way...
And by the way, one frame of a modern 3D scene in a movie takes an hour to render.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm aware of a number of games that have had their source code released. Doom, Quake 3, Freespace 2, Star Control II, Tyrian, I could go on. In each case the release of the source has made these games much easier to play, on any platform. In some cases the opening of the source has enabled the creation of entirely new games.
So I'd have to disagree with your assertion that the lack of code freedom is not a problem with games.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
Re:DRM (Score:4, Insightful)
Holy crap, do you really think a $380 "gaming" PC is going to run current games at an even remotely decent quality? And that $550 prebuilt machine is equally silly. You will not be playing current generation games at a decent speed or decent quality on it.
I really want some of what you're smoking.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Watching you go off on a tangent all while calling me "mr epeen" is really just hilarious. My mediocre core 2 duo machine with 4 gigs of ram and a ~$140 graphics card from a year ago really makes my epeen rage with blood!
I know very well how well games run on less than expensive hardware and have never spent more than $500 myself on my next iteration. But I also don't expect to have a solid framerate at native resolution while playing virtually any newer games (by solid I mean 60 without constant dips) like
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Gee, where can I get one of those $0 PCs? ;-)
So, what you're really saying is:
$50 game purchase
$50 game purchase (?) + $10/mo OnLive subscription (?)
Yeah, I figured as much...
Re: (Score:2)
I interpreted that as the _extra_ amount a high-powered gaming rig would cost, whereas presumably OnLive games would run on a 'regular' system.
[not sure if the $900 number is specifically accurate in that regard, but you get the point.]
One of the things I like about playing older or online games is that I don't need to have a gaming rig
Re: (Score:2)
I have a place locally that sells a decent gaming PC for about $700. How long is that going to last you? 3, maybe 4 years until games outstrip it? So put that down to $175 per year, which is about $15 a month.
So, now your equation looks like this:
PC: $15 a month + $50 per game, and you get to keep what you buy
OnLive: $10 a month + $50 per game, and your purchases evaporate when you quit
I think I'll pay the extra $5 a month, thanks very much. I do think consumers are getting slightly screwed when they're pay
Re: (Score:2)
Whats funny here is under the guise of "why don't you let people do what they want" you're critising him for having an opinion not aligned with yours. :P
Re: (Score:2)
No, he's criticising him for being detached from reality.
Re: (Score:2)
Apart from the mods bit. I just noticed that, and he's being as bad as the OP when he says that. If nobody gave a shit about mods, Counter-Strike would not have been one of the most successful games ever..
Re: (Score:2)
Nobody gives a shit about mods.
What makes you think that? Even if they still buy the games that do not allow for mods, that does not mean that they do not care about mods at all.
Re: (Score:1)
Battle for Wesnoth: 2003, Freeciv: 1996, Nethack: 1987. Sounds like when Mac enthusiasts used to point to Bolo and Marathon as proof that Mac gaming is a real market.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Just because it's a new way of doing things, doesn't mean it's smart.
There's a difference to being a Luddite and carefully evaluating long term availability of your data. That's just common sense saying; "My data is available to engineers I don't know, and cannot screen", "Availability of my data depends on reliable and cost effective internet access", "Availability of my data requires the service I am storing my data to remain in business, and also have a reliable internet connection". Try pricing out fast
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
triple AAA
lol
But seriously, that's bullshit, and you know it.
Dinosaurs who make so-called "AAA titles" don't make Linux games because it costs too much money, one way or another. Management at such places don't want to spend money if they aren't guaranteed a return, which only says how much the bottom line drives everything they do anyway, and good riddance.
Larger companies not yet swallowed by conglomerates have senior devs who may consider Linux and just might have the clout to pull it off, but they can't afford (t
Re: (Score:2)
how much the bottom line drives everything they do anyway, and good riddance.
Yeah, that's how they pay their employees. If you went to work tomorrow and your employer told you he wasn't going to be paying you anymore because he's "tired of focusing on the bottom line," I'm pretty sure you wouldn't respond with "Good riddance!"
Hipsters (Score:2)
Hipsters seem kind of the same way - a zealous obsession with "indie" culture that oddly doesn't seem all that independent-thinking.
(my signature refers to music-specific pragmatism, but I mean that more generally.)
Re: (Score:2)
Your line of thinking about beliefs and bullshit like that is one the main reasons the developers don't make triple AAA releases on Linux.
Here I thought it was because a grand majority of people use windows, and not because a few people that use Linux could be described as arrogant...
You talk about being open and yet act so closed at the same time.
There's a difference between supporting open source and supporting open-mindedness. Not that I'm saying that people who disagree with you are closed-minded (how does that work, by the way?).
Re: (Score:2)
See it from the other point of view. People that will pay for that games anyway, but now could choose the operating system they will run.
Anyway, this is about freedom. That don't ensure to be right, just to be able to choose. Giving more options don't take away the "right" ones, and people that think different from you can pick whatever they prefer, not just what you think they should. And if they choose to be lemmings and
Re: (Score:2)
Do you also watch no movies or listen to no music where the "source" isn't open?
Re: (Score:2)
Until that I rather support indie developers.
They all provide the source code do they? Not all independent developers choose the GPL, but since we're talking about your support, how much money have you sent this year to the authors of GPLed source code that you run? Or do you support it by downloading it and using it only?
Re:DRM (Score:5, Insightful)
There are many great open source games for Linux, like Battle for Wesnoth, Freeciv and Nethack
Wesnoth and Freeciv are all right, at best. Unless of course, you don't like Turn-based or Real-time strategy games. And Nethack? Come on. The game predates Donkey Kong, FFS. You might as well tout the umpteen billion 'Tetris' clones and flash games.
Don't get me wrong. Linux is a great OS for getting real work done and even for day-to-day PC use, but gaming? No way.
I'm with you on the abusive DRM. I loved Torchlight and salivated over the idea of a new Deus Ex game, but I don't and won't install Steam, so I couldn't buy them. But expecting games to be free and open source, you might as well quit gaming altogether, since you're letting idealism set the bar higher than reality will ever reasonably reach.
Re: (Score:2)
No, and for the same reasons. Desura is digital delivery combined with DRM. If I was willing to put up with that crap, I'd get real games off of Steam.
Re: (Score:2)
While I've had plenty of experience with WINE playing some games even better than Windows at times (my brief stint on WoW years back, for example), it also has/had its issues (Diablo 2, e.g.) and that's still just Windows gaming on Linux, as opposed to Linux gaming, and it's sure as hell not the 'open source' gaming that the post I was responding to seems to demand.
Re: (Score:2)
I used to purchase games that had native Linux ports, even though they weren't open source/free. I am still able to play Unreal Tournament 2004 (64 bit even, by using the 64 bit binary provided by one of the patches, and compiling and dropping some libraries in its System directory). Doom 3 (and friends) and Quake 4 to this day still work out of the box for me (at whatever patch levels I'm at that added ALSA support etc. I mean)
So I'd say I've done pretty well with those game titles. It's a shame that thing
Re: (Score:2)
While I agree with the no DRM bits, I'd pay for a good game that runs on Linux in a heart beat. I'd pay for a game built specifically to run on Linux using GPL libraries. I have three simple rules for a Linux game I would buy. 1) No DRM. 2) Doesn't suck. 3) Doesn't require wine. I have purchased a copy of everything Loki released as well as everything Id released that has been ported to run on Linux.
Re: (Score:2)
Silent majority disagrees with you and the parent.
Re: (Score:2)
Agreed. Source code isn't everything in all circumstances. (On the other hand, I do avoid DRM like the plague, or disable it if I can't avoid it.)
Re: (Score:2)
This line of thinking, which sadly a large percentage of Linux users exhibit, is exactly why there are no games on Linux.
Linux users bitch when a game isn't available on Linux. Then, if it is available, they bitch that it isn't free and open source. So basically, they just bitch.
Re: (Score:2)
What's that whooshing noise that just blew over your head?
Re: (Score:2)
I don't know, maybe you not not understanding the concept of "woosh"? Or perhaps the fact that you disagree but have nothing to come back with but this?
DFSG vs. OSD (Score:2)
open source can still be non-free due to licensing restrictions
What's the substantial difference between a "free software" license as defined by the Debian Free Software Guidelines and an "open source" license as defined by the Open Source Definition?
The "GNU" part is important as without it, the Linux kernel would be nothing
Android gets along fine without GNU. But I agree that "GNU/Linux" is useful for distinguishing a GNU system (which typically includes X11-based graphics) from the Android platform.
Mapping from FSF freedoms to OSD criteria (Score:2)
"Free Software" protects your four freedoms (as defined by the FSF). Open source does allow you to see the source, but also permits the use of more restrictive licenses.
In the Open Source Definition [opensource.org], criteria 5 and 6 protect freedom 0 under the Free Software Definition [gnu.org], criterion 2 protects freedom 1, criterion 1 protects freedom 2, and criteria 3, 7, and 8 protect freedom 3.
GNU is way, way more that just a host for X11. In fact I wouldn't be surprised to discover that most GNU installs did not even have X11 installed (there's a lot of severs on the planet).
If GNU is primarily a server operating system, then what's the corresponding desktop operating system called?
Re: (Score:2)
You can't argue with a true believer, you know. Whether their idol is Jesus, Mohammad, some politician, or open source; they've cut themselves off from any reasonable discourse or possibility of change.
Very few performance issues? (Score:5, Informative)
Well I suppose if you ignore:
1) Low resolution/detail. Onlive isn't streaming you a 25mbps 1080p AVCHD signal. They stream a low bitrate 720p signal. What this means is that not only are you dealing with a lower resolution but fine detail gets lost. That's how video compression works: Algorithms are used to simplify things which results in the loss of detail. The more you compress, the more you lose. So you aren't getting the full experience of a "high end system" like they want to pretend. You get something that is mid-low end at best.
2) Large amounts of interface lag. Since all the rendering is done remotely, there is lag on everything, even mouse cursor movements. The amount of lag is cumulative, so not only the lag from your monitor and mouse as you always get, but network as well. Even if you live real near a datacenter, it is going to be non-trivial and any further and it could be rather major. You can learn to adjust, to an extent, but it is amazing how much nicer a no-lag interface feels. If you have a monitor with, say, 30ms of lag, you won't notice it, it is below human perception. But add that to a 60ms network and encoding lag and you will notice.
3) It is 100% network dependent. Your Internet goes out? No games. Have a bandwidth cap? This uses heavily towards that. Someone else downloading something? You can get stuttering and dropouts. You take any problem you've ever had with streaming video and then add to the fact that there is no buffer and that's what you've got.
Now of course this is on top of the fact that you don't get to have the games. They are all "sold" on the service meaning if Onlive ever goes under, you are SOL. It isn't even something like with a DRM or download solution where you could crack it, or they could let you download before they go down for good, Onlive goes down, you are done.
Also it isn't as though you are "running" the games on Linux. You are just streaming the video to Linux. They are running on the Onlive servers.
Really, if you wish to play games a much better idea is to just get yourself a console, or mid-low end graphics card. Pick up a $80-100 graphics card and you'll get quality as good or better than what Onlive pulls, with none of the problems.
It is a service that really doesn't make any sense. Maybe back in the day when you had to have high end hardware to play games but these days not only are consoles a major option, but you don't need much computer to play games. You take a reasonable desktop computer, like a Core 2 and 2+GB of RAM, and toss in a reasonable video card and you can play what you want.
Much better idea than using Onlive.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Lust for reference, you have actually tried it haven't you?
My experience was different. I gave a few demo games a go on a wee lil netbook. Worked a treat. I was very impressed with the graphics quality and lack of lag.
I was ready to slag it off, but it actually worked well. If I could afford it, I'd happily subscribe - cheaper than maintaining a big gaming PC.
Re: (Score:2)
Are there any bullet hell shmups or vs fighters on onlive? If not, why not?
Re: (Score:2)
Your gaming rigs must be really expensive. $15 per month + $60/game builds up really fast IMHO. A game machine doesn't have to cost $2k.
Re: (Score:2)
While the problems you mention exist at present, they are minor problems that can be fairly easily solved in the future. OnLive might be trying to make a proof of concept type thing to get some investment money.
w.r.t resolution .. - You are limiting yourself to standard movie/video compression. There is no reason that they can't develop special compression techniques to preserve details specific to games that get trampled by traditional compression (esp. Text). A simple technique would be to combine multipl
Re: (Score:2)
they are minor problems that can be fairly easily solved in the future.
I like the optimism, but this kind of problem is not something minor that is fairly easily solved. Solving the types of problems mentioned above is award winning genius type stuff.
The basic problem is transmitting more information faster down a restricted pipe. People have been working on these issues for 20 years. Maybe when we one day all have FTTH internet connections we'll have solved this from a technological point of view, but the issues are very bloody complex in software. If you want to squeeze out
Re: (Score:2)
There is only a superficial difference. In multiplayer games network lag means most of your in-game actions are irrelevant until the server acknowledges them. However in most clients can fake server responsiveness by allowing the player to do them anyway and uses some prediction/interpolation to make it seem like the gameplay is smoother than it actually is (e.g. cl_lc cl_lw ex_interp etc commands in counter strike) . Sometimes the server is out of sync and the player state "glitches" back to what the serve
Re: (Score:2)
Really, if you wish to play games a much better idea is to just get yourself a console
And not be able to run indie games on the same box. Or are people already expected to own one box just for indie games and another box just for major-label games?
or mid-low end graphics card.
Provided your primary PC is a desktop PC.
Re: (Score:2)
And not be able to run indie games on the same box
Maybe you haven't been keeping up with the news, but there are TONS of indie games available on consoles now. Xbox Live even has its own indie section [wikipedia.org], where you can find thousands of indie and user-developed titles.
Re: (Score:2)
Xbox Live even has its own indie section
For one thing, PLAYSTATION 3 and Wii do not. Wii still has the same old "secure office" and "industry experience" requirements that it has always had (source: warioworld). I'd look up the PS3 policy, but Sony's developer relations web site has been down for four months.
For another, all Xbox Live Indie Game
Boot Camp (Score:2)
If one has a Mac, for example, this service suddenly opens up dozens of games which the developers would not have released as native any time in the near future.
Macs can run Windows. What difference is there between running a game for Windows on Windows on Boot Camp on a Mac and running a game for Windows on Windows on another company's PC with comparable hardware?
Re: (Score:2)
BootCamp does work well, but let's not forget the $150+ Winbloze license that's required. That's what's keeping me from installing BC on my new MBA. :(
However, if you have the license/KMS/MAK/whatever to make Winbloze function, I do recommend BC to play games if nothing else.
Re: (Score:2)
That's more or less the same argument, and it fails for more or less the same reason. You're still running Windows somewhere, just not on your Mac (or Linux box). It might not even save you money in the long run over buying a copy of Windows.
You mention some other advantages, and I'll give you that, but add to that all the disadvantages GP points out and I can't see it being worthwhile on any platform. I'm with tepples, I'd much rather just install Windows or stick to games that have native ports.
Re: (Score:2)
Every couple years you'll buy a better CPU/Graphics card/etc.
You could get away with every four or five years, and you can buy an entire new gaming machine for ~$500. At 4 years, that's about $10/mo. And it's not like games are the only reason a new desktop would be nice.
As for games... There are some pretty fantastic deals out there. I bought the entire Star Wars: Jedi Knight (or Dark Forces) series for $20 on Steam, and it took an hour or two to download ALL of them. (More like one minute to download Dark Forces -- the thing is only 70 megs or so!)
more importantly, it's not extra money out of my wallet.
It's still money
Re: (Score:2)
I gave it a go just for interest sake and I was pleasantly suprised even though I went in with extreme sketicism. Are all the criticism valid? To a certain degree but onlive achieves about 95% of the goal it claims to achieve and its no where near as bad as the haters claim.
But its nowhere near as good as running a local copy either.
The mouse lag to me was most noticeable when in the main starting screen with the game mode select but it dropped to barely noticable once I actually got into the main game (Pla
Now there's no reason to port games natively (Score:2)
So basically this is the future of gaming. You own nothing, you just rent and there is absolutely no reason to put any work into porting games or at least making them compatible with WINE so long as Onlive or its successors technically work. There is no single player because Onlive is essentially a form of always on DRM. Their servers go down, no gaming for you. At least with WINE there is the possibility of eventually playing a game offline with or without some outside server being involved.
Re: (Score:2)
I have mixed feelings myself.
On the plus. Most of these games I just play once and am done with it. Linux compatibility would be amazing; if you OnLive client works, every game in OnLive works. The negatives are like you said, always on DRM, extra monthly fee, etc.
I can see this being beneficial to linux gamers but personally OnLive is too far from me and I prefer to play my games natively.
Re: (Score:3)
It's probably the future for a few types of games, and will be popular with a segment of the market, but I'd say at the extreme low and high end it won't be popular.
Hand-held, mobile gaming isn't going to have the bandwidth, nor the always-online capability (I want to play Angry Birds on the subway).
At the other end, so long as home hardware (console and PC) can render better content faster than the network can stream good-quality video there will be a market for high-def gaming.
Then there's the extremely l
Cloud = For Suckers (Score:5, Insightful)
Everytime you see something marketed as 'Cloud' based or 'Cloud' anything just mentally remove the word cloud from the product and add "For Suckers (TM)". You'll save yourself a lot of fuss, hassle and confusion.
Re: (Score:2)
I regularly use "cloud stuff" like Google Docs and the Aviary [aviary.com] apps, as well as Dropbox. That means I can access and edit my documents everywhere I can find a barely decent computer with internet connection. As well as download them everytime I need.
So, no. Using the "cloud" has saved me a lot of hassle.
Re: (Score:2)
Um, hate to break it to ya mister, but you're posting comments on the cloud right now. It's better to stick to pen and paper. Then just tape your comment to the monitor.
I think I heard someone behind you! Quick, to the safe room! Initiate destruct sequence before they see your post-it notes!!
Sorry but I'm not posting anything on the "cloud". I'm posting on the Internet. Not the "cloud". Not a "super highway". Not "web 2.0". Just the good old TCP/IP network that's now decades old. The new buzzwords are just immature and insulting. Made up words in general are for cocky 16 year olds who think they've invented everything they just discovered all by themselves.
For those unfamiliar with the service . . . (Score:5, Interesting)
. . . imagine if the Ubisoft always-on DRM were an inherent, unremoveable aspect of the game system rather than just something tacked on to a few individual games after the fact, such that Ubisoft couldn't even begrudgingly neuter it in a patch. Well, Onlive is even worse than that would be.
The game doesn't even run remotely. All you get is streaming video/audio and all the lag you'd expect (including controller lag), which is a recipe for disaster in North America.
Let's say you're lucky enough to have a 30mb/s connection. Why would you want to use it to transfer your game's video instead of, uh, a DVI cable, which is capable of 4 Gb/s? The people who developed DVI apparently understood that that 1920 x 1200 pixels w/ 24 bits/pixels @ 60Hz results in bandwidth well over 3 Gb/s. The people who developed Onlive seem very, very confused (at best).
Some people consider IPS monitors unsuitable for games requiring fast reflexes (i.e. FPSes) due to their double-digit response times. Internet latency is often worse and certainly more unpredictable than LCD monitor response time, and with Onlive it applies to audio and keyboard/controller/etc input too.
Those of us who know anything about bandwidth and compression and (especially) latency can see the enormous technical obstacles facing a service like this, and Onlive has never done anything to explain how they intend to solve them. Instead, they've done everything they can to lock out independent reviewers with NDAs and closed demonstrations. A friend of mine described it as the gaming equivalent of the perpetual motion scam, and IMO that's spot on (except that Onlive would still have the draconian DRM issues even if it worked perfectly)..
BTW, you pay a monthly fee for the service and then you STILL have to "buy" the games (which of course become useless if your subscription lapses, giving them another leash to choke you with). I'm not kidding.
Onlive appears designed from the ground up to benefit the game publishers and fuck the customers, exactly what you'd expect from any DRM system.
Re: (Score:2)
a 30mb/s connection. Why would you want to use it to transfer your game's video instead of, uh, a DVI cable
Or better yet, instead of downloading a torrent of the game in question...
Re: (Score:2)
EFA.
Re: (Score:2)
The game doesn't even run remotely. All you get is streaming video/audio and all the lag you'd expect (including controller lag), which is a recipe for disaster in North America.
But all you need is the client app and a wireless game controller for your Internet enabled HDTV, Blu-Ray player or set top box. Upfront cost $50 to $100.
The significance of lag depends on the game and your style of play. Not everyone has the reflexes for an intense first person shooter. There are other genres which are no less engaging, just paced a little differently.
The rental and subscrption model has been a success for Netflix. There is no good reason to believe it won't be a success for OnLive.
Pricing Model (Score:2)
A lot of the comments on here are pointing out that OnLive is a subscription service. This is not the only pricing plan they have available. Looking at their documentation on "Getting Games in the OnLive Game Service" [onlive.com] you will notice their are multiple avenues to purchase a game.
The subscription service they offer is for a collection of ~80 titles. For most newer titles you purchase a pass to play the game. This allows access to the game for a timed interval (think multiple days like renting) or unlimited p
Re: (Score:2)
And the "full pass" costs exactly the same as buying the game on Steam / in the store and owning it forever, on as many computers as you like, and being able to play it offline, etc.
That's not really a "good" thing. Even at the same price, the service is substandard - you don't get the full effect of the game (latency, moving image compression, etc.) and end up paying more for your broadband because of it (in most countries that have bandwidth limits, etc.). A PC is a one-off cost, and you have to have SO
OnLine can't work - I proved it years ago (Score:2)
It's outrageous that they refused to listen to my detailed objections about the insurmountable barriers to provide such a so-called "service", and surmounted them. How dare they have satisfied customers whose only response to my withering criticism is "LULZ can't talk, having 2 much fun."
I do not understand this! This angers me! Cease your operations immediately, OnLive, or I shall be forced to produce yet more charts and diagrams that provide incontrovertible evidence that those sheeple who believe th
Good Idea (Score:2)
Booting into Windows... (Score:2)
is not that much different from powering on an XBox or Playstation. When I play a game, I'm not also surfing the web or doing word processing, I'm concentrating on killing zombies. If I had an XBox or Playstation, I'd be sitting in front of my TV not my computer, so I'd be in the same boat as when I boot into Windows to play games.
Sure, it'd be nice to have Deus Ex on Linux, but you know what? My game console runs Windows 7, and I have no problem with that.
VNC to game console (Score:2)
I can already VNC to a game console from my Linux boxen. I don't have to pay a monthly fee. I own the game console. I own the game. I can play on line or off. I don't even need to run the VNC client in wine. That being said, I don't know why I would play a game over VNC but there you go.
Re: (Score:2)
But the downside is... you have to run Windows.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Well if this works then you only have to get the OnLive app working to play all the windows games. No messing around in wine needed. ; )
Re: (Score:2)
or don't live in an area where OnLive has installed their servers locally... Yes, everyone is a lier because it works for you. Brilliant logic at work there AC.
Re: (Score:2)
The argument goes both ways, man.
Seems the world is black and white to a majority of people. It either works perfectly or doesn't work at all. Both sides push their views as gospel.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm worried for you too ! How long do you have to come up with a 3 nippled superhero costume? :-P
Re: (Score:2)
We can only hope.
Re: (Score:2)
So why the hate for OnLive
You must be GNU here.
Re: (Score:2)
Netflix doesn't seem to be in danger of moving all movie watching online. You can still go buy the movie. OnLive though seems like a very possible future: games that will never be available in any other form than through OnLive.
In the future, it seems, you never own anything. You only rent and passively consume it, and aren't allowed to touch anything the maker doesn't want you to. When they decide y
Re: (Score:3)
"with a low latency connection"
That's why. Basically, there is no such thing at the moment, especially in certain countries, and OnLive's techniques make the problem worse.
Rather than the display in front of me drawing the results of a (slightly) delayed and INCREDIBLY TINY message from elsewhere, OnLive has to receive your local controller data, draw the results, compress the output in realtime and then ship that image back to you using a relatively-high-bandwidth image.
That doubles latency you would expe