Surgeon Swears Human Head Transplant Isn't a 'Metal Gear Solid' Publicity Stunt 118
Jason Koebler writes: Dr. Sergio Canavero wants to become the first surgeon to perform a human head transplant. But some discerning gamers noticed that a doctor shown in the trailer for Metal Gear Solid V looks almost exactly like Canavero, leading some to speculate that it's all a viral marketing campaign for the upcoming game. Canavero, however, filed a sworn affidavit with Italian police in which he said Konami illegally stole his likeness, and that he has nothing to do with the game.
Dubious (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Dubious (Score:5, Informative)
up,up,down,down,left,right,left,right,b,a
The Start/Select-Start isn't part of the actual code, but rather just get's you into the game. You need to use Select if you want to play 2 player.
Translating from the Italian police declaration... (Score:5, Informative)
He declared on April 20 that he received an email from the UK with a link to the YouTube trailer of the game containing his likeness. He thinks they used a video of him from a TED conference as the basis and retouched it. He subsequently began receiving many harassing phone calls from a UK telephone number. He then says he found an Italian language website about the game with a link to a fraudulent Twitter account in his name (he claims to have no Twitter, Facebook, or other social media accounts).
Re: (Score:2)
Sounds like they took his likeness and transplanted it into the game. Was it just his head?
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Prove it, then. (Score:4, Funny)
Wrong Wrong Wrong (Score:5, Insightful)
It's not a head transplant .. it's a BODY transplant.
Re:Wrong Wrong Wrong (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
The convention is that it's the smaller part which is being transplanted, not the larger.
So technically "head transplant" is accurate, if somewhat misleading for the layperson.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Except the GP is correct ... because the head is your brain, your memory, your identity, and the thing which will control the body.
A head transplant would imply Bob would get a new head and change his body ... except we don't have the ability to transfer the parts of Bob contained in the brain to a new head.
In this case, the head is the single most important part to still being, in some definition of the word, the same person.
It really is a body transplant, since the owner of the original head is still who
Re: (Score:3)
Obligatory Head of Vecna [blindpanic.com] story. They didn't think about the meaning of the location of the brain....
In Spock's Brain, they could have taken Spock's entire head. Or, why not just kidnap Spock? Grab first, then take brain out. Or, or, if they have the technology to remove a brain intact, and reprogram it to serve their purposes, wouldn't that imply the ability to just copy it or make up their own brain? Oh well, that episode is unfixably bad anyway.
Re: (Score:2)
Except you are entirely missing the point. The medical subject is irrelevant when saying what's being transplanted. By convention, what is being transplanted where is determined entirely from the surgeon's point of view, not the subject's. And that convention says that it's the smaller part which is being transplanted to the larger part.
What the functions of the parts being transplanted are, or their relative importance to the subject, is utterly irrelevant in terms of which is the subject and which is the
Re: (Score:1)
I used to think that the brain was the most wonderful organ in my body. Then I realized who was telling me this.
- Emo Philips
Re:Wrong Wrong Wrong (Score:5, Funny)
Let's say we transplant Bob's head onto Steve's body. After the surgery, will Bob say he has a new body, or will Steve say he has a new head? (Hint: don't believe anything Steve says. He's talking through his ass.)
Re: (Score:2)
You're not wrong, but that's not the point I was making.
The determination of what is being transplanted is made from the surgeon's point of view, not the subject's. And from the surgeon's point of view, what's being transplanted is whichever part is smaller
Like if you put your old battery in a new car, you've replaced the battery in your new car. You wouldn't say you've replaced your old battery's car.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
To each their own. Or, in this case, to each the other.
I hope it's a publicity stunt (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:I hope it's a publicity stunt (Score:5, Funny)
In that case, Dr. Mehmet Cengiz Öz will certainly be recommending on his next show as a miracle weight loss technique.
Re: (Score:2)
In that case, Dr. Mehmet Cengiz Öz will certainly be recommending on his next show as a miracle weight loss technique.
I also heard "Dr." Oz will be getting a name transplant.
He'll be replacing "Oz" with either "Quack" or "Fraud". Although my favorite is "Homeopathy-SoldOut-Nut"
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:I hope it's a publicity stunt (Score:5, Insightful)
A body transplant will kill the recipient.
The body is ALREADY DEAD. They are planning to use the body of someone killed by a head injury, most likely a motorcycle accident. The head is from someone that would otherwise die because of problems with multiple organs (heart, lung, liver, etc.). Nobody is going to die that wouldn't be dead anyway.
Opposing it has nothing to do with superstition.
It is either superstition or ignorance.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
A body transplant will kill the recipient.
The body is ALREADY DEAD. They are planning to use the body of someone killed by a head injury, most likely a motorcycle accident. The head is from someone that would otherwise die because of problems with multiple organs (heart, lung, liver, etc.). Nobody is going to die that wouldn't be dead anyway.
Opposing it has nothing to do with superstition.
It is either superstition or ignorance.
The problem is that the body views it as a head transplant, and the immune system attacks and kills the head.
This isn't about superstition, and any ignorance is on your own part. This guy has not demonstrated this technique even on a rat, let alone on any sort of primate, and unless he has some super-secret technique (also never demonstrated) for reconnecting the spinal column it's not going to do anything for the guy getting the body attachment.
This isn't how good medical science is performed. This is "mad
Re: (Score:2)
"Nobody is going to die that wouldn't be dead anyway."
Yes, well, umm... that is a very, very nice neat tautology. I like it! :)
Re: (Score:1)
"Nobody is going to die that wouldn't be dead anyway."
Yes, well, umm... that is a very, very nice neat tautology. I like it! :)
It's not a tautology, because it is not logically guaranteed to be true.
Re: (Score:2)
Everyone's going to die thus everybody is going to _be_ dead anyway.
Re: (Score:1)
Everyone's going to die thus everybody is going to _be_ dead anyway.
Not if they invent immortality first. For it to be a tautology, it would have to be logically guaranteed to be true, not just incredibly likely.
Re: (Score:2)
Why don't they do a double-transplant? Just swap the heads?
Maybe a husband-and-wife combo.
Because then at least one of them would never leave the house.
Re: (Score:1)
and one trying to refuse to make a sandwich.
Re: (Score:1)
Why don't they do a double-transplant? Just swap the heads?
Maybe a husband-and-wife combo.
Doh! I'm sorry Anonymous Coward, I just moderated your comment 'redundant' by accident. (Hand slipped on the trackpad while slurping coffee.). . . its actually pretty damn funny. Not sure exactly why, but it really made me laugh.
Edit: Seems I can revert that by replying as me.
Re: (Score:2)
Because we're not in the habit of wanton experimentation that might kill all of the patients involved. That's why we wait for there to be a case where they're going to die anyway. That way, no matter what happens, doctors have not violated their first oath to do no harm. Worst case, the person dies, just as they would have otherwise.
Re:I hope it's a publicity stunt (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:I hope it's a publicity stunt (Score:4, Insightful)
Or be hailed as the greatest surgeon who ever lived.
There is no middle ground with this one.
Re: (Score:2)
because anyone involved in an actual human head transplant surgery will need to lose their medical licenses and go to prison for a very long time
Since when does an attempt to save a life through transplants equate to losing medical licenses or prison?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
When a patient dies during an operation, even if they accepted the risk and further even if they knew the risks were very high, it doesn't matter. The surgeon is going to be investigated for malpractice.
Horseshit. Despite what you think about ripping off a head and putting it on another body there are experimental and high risk medical procedures performed on almost daily basis, and people die from them quite regularly.
The only thing that's out of the ordinary here is the news coverage because we're actually swapping over an entire body. From a medical point of view it's no different to other new and unproven treatments.
Snake? Snake! (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
It should be a law that you have to be an organ donor in order to legally not wear a helmet while riding a motorcycle.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Or at least have that mean "in the event of head trauma do not treat".
We'll call it a special case of Darwin award.
Re: (Score:1)
it should be legal to sell your organs... that would solve the organ transplant shortage problem.
Re: (Score:2)
And create a new way to exploit the poor and desperate!
Re: (Score:2)
There's bodies flagged for organ harvest. If someone is on the brink of death due to multi-organ failure then swapping a head will keep the mind alive, and if the head dies then you could harvest the body anyway.
The biggest problem is re-innervation
7 doubles around the world and 1+ in video games (Score:1)
Everybody is said to have 7 doubles around the world. Now we will also have to take into account those in video games :-)
Common sense here folks (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
How's that waiting working out for you?
Re: (Score:3)
Re:Common sense here folks (Score:5, Informative)
"paralyzed from the neck down" == "suffocating in minutes", since all respiratory impulses are carried on the somatic spinal nerves controlling the diaphragm and the intercostal muscles. Never mind the fact that severed autonomic nerves means no information from or control of any organs: digestive system shuts down, heart never responds to physiologic need and could spontaneously fibrillate... most organ systems shut down.
Sorry, it's absolutely required to effectively re-fuse the entire spinal cord plus the independent segments of the parasympathetic nervous system (such as the vagus nerve) through the dissection plane. Otherwise, you're just attaching a head to a dying body.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
That's nice. Now you have a head attached to a dying body stuck in an iron lung.
Not to mention that it does nothing for every other organ failing for lack of functional innervation. Which is all of them.
Hell, if you're going to this much trouble, just attach the head directly to artificial life support. More effective, far simpler, and less limited than your preferred solution.
Re: (Score:2)
Christopher Reeve survived for almost 10 years using an automatic ventilator, and others like him have survived much longer.
Re: (Score:1)
The only rational explanation I have is the difference between a surgically severed cord and one that's been mangled.
As a quadriplegic, I'm hoping we learn something about the spinal cord.
As a rational person, I don't expect this patient to survive.
Captcha: funeral. Seriously?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Billions of people go top some kind of church or another. So ...
And at least a few of them genuinely believe in the magical thinking, while most are just there from social peer pressure. But it's still a dire problem.
Re: (Score:2)
It's easier to heal a surgical incision than a blunt trauma generated by your cervical bones crushing your spine.
Re: (Score:2)
It's easier to heal a surgical incision than a blunt trauma generated by your cervical bones crushing your spine.
The problem is that these nerves don't grow back when they're cut. It doesn't matter how they're cut, they just don't grow back.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The problem with your statement is that there's very little data on it and that laymen like yourself have preformed conceptions about what's possible and what's not. Every form of cancer was once upon a time 100% mortal for example and there's still preconceptions about brain cancer and leukemia deathrates remaining based on that.
Re: (Score:2)
It doesn't matter how they're cut, they just don't grow back.
Actually spinal cord nerves can regrow [iflscience.com] with appropriate treatment.
Well teh "surgeon" should explain himself (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Not true... I'd look up the article, but just within the last six months it was reported that a doctor in Europe was able to get a spinal cord to reconnect. It was on a knife wound victim, so a clean cut. They packed it with stem cells harvested from the nasal cavities. It took two years, but the guy has regained both sensation and function.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Sometimes common sense is just wrong, particularly when it comes to predicting the behavior of other people who might not agree with what you consider "common sense". If you check his publications in Google Scholar, this guy's been publishing surgical neuroscience papers in real journals since around 1990. I think he really intends to try this.
Re: (Score:1)
Medicine has yet to repair a spinal cord injury, but there are people out there who believe some doctor's going to perform a head transplant? Really?
Possibly. One of the problems with spinal injuries is scar tissue formation, and another nerve elongation (or lack thereof). But with a head transplant, the surgeon could leave extra spinal cord on one or both pieces, and then reduce to the proper length in whatever manner is best for reattachment.
Of course, I fully expect the patient to be paralyzed from the neck down, followed shortly by death. Most likely death before the new body is attached or consciousness regained. Cryonics seems like a safer gamble.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, yes, really. The reason these claims are showing up right now is because he thinks he's finally cracked exactly that issue. The transplant is intended as a means to test that theory. And he can't do it on typical patients suffering from severed spinal cords due to trauma of some sort, since his idea relies on a very particular way of cutting the spinal cord, apparently.
Re: (Score:2)
What about this?
http://www.bbc.com/news/health... [bbc.com]
They say it was possible since the nick in the cord was clean (also not being 100% through helped I guess). I wonder if a severance of the spinal cord was done with surgical precision if the process here could be used.
Re: (Score:2)
Money makes everything legal. Provided you pay the right people.
Real doctors don't announce surgery 2 years before (Score:2)
Combined with the physical comparison this looks really strange.
I call Public Relations Stunt.
Whoever spread this is an idiot. (Score:2)
I think the character from MGS V: TPP is supposed to be Dr. Pettrovich Madnar [wikia.com]
Given the fact that Snake now gets a bionic arm and Dr. Pettrovich's work was in cybernetics? Yeah.
Some people (Score:2)
Some people will do anything to get ahead!
Only one important question (Score:2)
Who the hell was the donor?
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Abby someone.
Re: (Score:2)
God bless you, anonymous coward. You made me laugh.
Don't tell me (Score:3)
they stole his head.
OK, ok, lame joke. But at least I'm still ahead. Even my my own one.
it's in pubmed, so... (Score:2)