Someone Will Die Playing a Game In Virtual Reality 144
SlappingOysters writes: Grab It has detailed a hands-on session with horror VR title Kitchen — from Resident Evil creator Capcom — and argues how the physical reaction to the experience could lead to death. The site also believes that classifying VR games will be a challenge and many titles could be banned. Virtual Reality has a big year ahead, with the HTC Vive, Oculus Rift and Project Morpheus all set to release, while Microsoft is working on the HoloLens, which the site argues adds a further challenge to traditional gaming.
Classification an Interesting Issue (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
This ride may not be suitable (Score:1)
No news. Adding death warnings to labels on scary things has been an advertising gimmick since at least the 50's.
Re: (Score:2)
What's new? VR will have a new and improved iteration on the epilepsy warning label. But then doing anything is dangerous, if you do it wrong or have a predisposed condition.
I demand that beds have warning labels! Excessive lying in bed can cause a plethora of health conditions, not limited to bone loss and muscle atrophy. /s
Re: (Score:3)
Yeah, the world would be a so much better place if they instead grabbed guns and went on wild killing sprees.
Sadly, people don't do what you want them to do if you take away what they want to do. If you need any proof thereof, take away your child's toy in hopes that he'll instead start learning for school. He won't. If for no other reason, then out of spite.
Re: (Score:2)
In all seriousness: If playing a game with a VR headset on scares you enough that you die, I have to wonder if that's just evolution in action. How weak is your mind if you can't distinguish a game, which you voluntarily decided to play and are (ostensibly) fully cognizan
Re: (Score:2)
Nice troll, but too obvious I'm afraid
Re: Classification an Interesting Issue (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Yes but without Everquest and WoW there'd never be us well-dressed plain-speaking SWTOR-folk who just want to see milk delivered via refrigerated trucks driven by polite well-spoken fellas who all vote Republican once again. Also Star Wars gunslingers are suh-weet!
Re: (Score:2)
I think we will see somebody complain about getting raped by such a game.
Let's not get carried away here. You can always remove the head gear or turn-off the device. Although I can see some complaining anyway.
Re: (Score:2)
And because you can always remove the head gear or turn-off the device, of course actual rape victim simulators will spring up, just like zombie attack simulators have. We know they will, because they alrady do, even in text adventure form. Players will claim it's just a game rendered harmless by the player being in control, and could even have therapeutic use, while naysa
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Long before somebody dies because of playing a VR game, I think we will see somebody complain about getting raped by such a game.
That's already happened. Haven't you played ET for the 2600? Totally raped me.
Good pitch. (Score:2)
Now write the screenplay!
Re: (Score:2)
Long before somebody dies because of playing a VR game, I think we will see somebody complain about getting raped by such a game.
We won't know the specifics of the situation until it actually happens, but I hypothesize that it will involve a very outspoken, left-leaning, college-educated (some strain of sociology, most likely) woman in her early 20s. She will likely be somewhat overweight, but not obese, and otherwise very unremarkable. Because of her obnoxious, self-righteous attitude, her obsession with "social causes", and her average physique, she will attract the attention of very few males. The only ones she will interact with will be weak-willed, soft man-boys she met at her college, who likely exhibit latent homosexuality. As a result, she will be deprived of the typical sexual interaction and pleasure that normal women receive.
This woman will try on a virtual reality headset. She will play a fairly typical game. It may be some form of 3D sudoku, most likely. But the experience will be traumatic to her, for some reason. She will convince herself that she was violated and molested. She will go to the media with her story. She will be on every morning show, talking about her harrowing experience. She will have newspaper columns written about her. Twitter will be on fire. She will have become The First Victim of Virtual Reality Rape.
Too late
Japan released an arcade game [seanbaby.com] that has you rape an ass.
Re: (Score:2)
You really think that is that far-fetched when we have actual proof that guys are being expelled from colleges even after the so-called "victim" is on tape admitting that they are only upset because she thought the one night stand was the beginning of a relationship and he thought it was a one night stand. Rape after the fact is very real so I don't see why this scenario would be any different.
Re: (Score:2)
What do you think the Virtual Reality version of Frogger [wikipedia.org] would be classified as?
Re: (Score:2)
Outgoing Grease Dept. (Score:1)
> Someone may die playing a game
> Some VR games may be banned under some nebulous concept of too much immersion
Ahhh, lawyers. Is there nothing you can't invent ways for corporations to throw money at you over?
Re: (Score:3)
The only reason it's illegal to shoot lawyers on sight is that they make the laws.
Re: (Score:2)
I would have said politicians, but then I remembered that they're pretty much the same people.
Re: (Score:2)
Ted Kennedy died in 2009. Try again.
permaterm (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
'Someone will die playing VR games'. (Score:3, Funny)
This article was brought to you by the makers of quality monitors, that are all you need, and do not cause your brain to melt like goggles do.
Re: (Score:1)
There should be a wavier on birth (Score:5, Interesting)
Something along the lines of "you understand that beyond this point there are real dangers beyond the reasonable or desirable control of society and assume responsible responsibility for your own well being."
I can't believe all the stupid shit that is banned or that people have to be warned about because they're just that stupid. My personal favorite was a waiver I had to sign before using an ice rink. It literally was about absolving the rink from responsibility should I slip on the ice and fall... as well getting my initials next to a statement where they inform me that ice is slippery and they wanted it on record that I had been informed of that.
And that sort of thing is just everywhere.
My big issue with these rating systems is not that they exist. I think ratings are fine. My issue is that some countries take the step that if something gets a bad rating or refuses to be rated... that they presume to BAN whatever it is. That's not acceptable. By all means... slap warning labels on things.
I'd like a universal one that just basically reads "for adults only"... and then I'd put that on everything. Anyone that can't handle it will be assumed to be a child... even if they're 40 years old... and will be asked to go back to the various kiddy pools where they'll be kept safe from the big bad world.
Can a VR game scare the piss out of you? Sure. A survival horror game can do that already without VR. And if you have a heart condition or something then there are already games that can kill you. But it isn't the game killing you... its your fucking heart condition. And if you have one... maybe you should be smart enough to not play a game that is guaranteed to scare a little pee out of you.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, well... pacman and the ghosts scared the shit out of me :( And I won't even mention the Commodore 64 version of Friday the 13th because I've blocked it from my mind. Maybe I should stay away from this VR. :(
Re: (Score:2)
I can't believe all the stupid shit that is banned or that people have to be warned about because they're just that stupid. My personal favorite was a waiver I had to sign before using an ice rink. It literally was about absolving the rink from responsibility should I slip on the ice and fall... as well getting my initials next to a statement where they inform me that ice is slippery and they wanted it on record that I had been informed of that.
This is what the world looks like without single-payer health care. On the other hand, they often don't bother fixing the walks in Australia because there's no motivation. If someone trips and injures themselves they just go to the doctor, and society suffers. On the third hand, we don't bother fixing the walks here in America because fuck you.
Re:There should be a wavier on birth (Score:5, Insightful)
Way to some crazy how insert your fucking politics on healthcare into another situation that doesn't merit it.
You can't even construct a sentence with sanity, kid.
Then you'll love public healthcare!
I would love public health care. What we have now is public health insurance.
Here's the reality chump, the problems with the cost of healthcare in the US are largely due to government regulation.
Bought by insurance companies, that bastion of capitalism.
That people like you consider the previous or current healthcare system to be a free market system is indefensible.
Show me where I said that, kid.
You baffle me, sir... why is your brain not floating in a jar of formaldehyde?
I'm still using mine.
Re: (Score:2)
As to insurance companies... wrong. If that were so then car insurance and home insurance etc would be sky high expensive.
Ah yes, as you continue the argument from ignorance. Car insurance costs you vastly more than it costs to provide it, and a great deal of that is the way the insurance industry manipulates the situation. They total repairable vehicles, for example. And my landlords are paying two grand a year just for fire insurance.
why is uniquely health insurance so expensive?
It isn't.
Of all the organizations that are responsible for the high cost of medical case, health insurance companies are the least to blame.
The more health care costs, the more they can skim off. It's not rocket surgery. They also manipulate the system by preferring to pay for procedures in which they've invested.
You blame the health insurance companies for the high prices. Explain to me please how they conspire to inflate costs when somehow their profits are so low? Where is the money going if THEY are keeping it?
Into priva
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
You realize there are non-profit insurance companies right... and they don't cost the same as the for profit ones.
You're so brainwashed its funny.
A fair number of the blue cross/blue shield providers are non-profit.
They cost the same though.
You've been lied to by your political masters, spud.
Wise up.
As to other insurance companies being inflated in cost... compare the trend line of cost increases with other types of insurance. There's no comparison.
You've sadly bought a conspiracy theory about as stupid as
Re: (Score:2)
... so one example of one insurance company losing its non-profit status means that they are all greedy and driving up costs of insurance?
Never mind taht if you go into a hospital without insurance they charge MORE than if you had insurance.
That implies that the costs are not coming from the insurance companies but rather from the hospitals.
Nearly all the money goes to the hospitals. Have you looked at a hospital bill recently? THAT is what is driving up costs. The hospital bills themselves.
Now why are hosp
Re: (Score:1)
typo... I meant to say they non-profits cost the same as the for profits.
If the cost inflation were simply going to greedy insurance companies that were spending the proceeds on hookers and cocaine then you'd see big differences in insurance rates between the companies. Instead, they're very consistent... profit... non-profit... they all cost about the same.
Your theory would mean they could charge less and just choose to charge more. Any for profit insurance company could gain market share in that environme
Re: (Score:2)
I'll do that in the future if that helps.
As to humanity... I suggested he was from a different planet to be more specific. I'm sure there are "people" of a kind somewhere else... you know with tentacles and acid blood... :D
As to anger... no... I'm not angry... i'm all smiles, pal. :D
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
Of course (Score:1)
If you die in the matrix, you die in real life.
Re: (Score:2)
Nothing like advertising: "Someone actually died from playing this game, causing it to be banned in 12 states" to ensure it'll be the top ranking game for months to come.
It could be true. In which case - don't play VR games on rooftops or in traffic. Or get a life.
Some inveterate gamers are not social outcasts. I know someone who met one.[/sarcasm]
So stupid... (Score:1)
...and the extreme speed of trains will of course also kill you.
Re: (Score:2)
People die playing 'regular' games because they forget to eat etc.
That's why the sandwich [wikipedia.org] was invented (just like Columbus discovered North America and Cook discovered Australia).
Obligatory .hack//SIGN reference (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
.hack? How old-hat.
It's Sword Art Online references nowadays.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Oh. You're welcome. Of course it remains to be seen if you still thank me later. Lots of people didn't like the second part of the first series because of the change in setting, or the second series (Sword Art Online II) because then it becomes about guns.
Re: (Score:3)
This is exactly the kind of fearmongering clickbait that the Slashdot of old was not subject to and its editors didn't fall for. If I would want to read crap like this I'd visit Kotaku, Gawker or Polygon.
You're not from around here are you? That, or your memories are damaged - 'cause ten years ago we did get this sort of bullshit ('course we didn't call it click-bait then - just spam).
Re: (Score:2)
Dear coward, there are 15 stories listed on /. these days, there were 10 then (no need to reach for your calculator - that's 50% more). Compare apples with oranges much?
The 15 stories in your first link include how many that use drama and rhetoric to direct readers to advertising driven sites that have merely reposted stories from elsewhere? Or do you consider a "story" about the fucking muppets something that wouldn't get rightfully slammed as clickbait spam if it was run today - you muppet.
Today's storie
Yes and... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
What a crock!!! (Score:2)
Not new (Score:3)
Horror movies used to have these warnings, and like this one, they were nothing but marketing.
Here's a poster from an old William Castle horror flick where they promise to insure you for $1000 against death by fright.
https://mattmulcahey.wordpress... [wordpress.com]
And you know what? I bet at some point someone died of natural causes by watching a movie, just as someone will die of natural causes from watching a VR game. Nobody's going to "die of fright" from playing a CAPCOM horror game.
Also, in popular culture a "ban" is almost always a great way to promote sales. CAPCOM's just trying to sell some video games with a more sophisticated, up-to-date version of, "If you have heart disease or are weak of constitution, you should DEFINITELY NOT see this film!".
Re: (Score:1)
"just as someone will die of natural causes from watching a VR game"
And how are you going to be sure they died of a heart attack due to fright and now due to an diet of excessive pizza, chips, and Redbull?
Re: (Score:2)
That's my point. Any FUD you hear about the "dangers of VR" is nothing but marketing to the gamers, who as a whole, are not a particularly bright bunch.
Re: (Score:2)
I bet I'm not the only one who thinks, upon seeing the seizure warning at the beginning of video games, "Oh, this gonna be good".
Re: (Score:2)
Plus, the seizure lawsuit didn't really hurt the popularity (or profitability) of Pokemon. I wonder if the lawsuit didn't in fact make the game more popular among a certain sector of gamers.
Can someone ship such games to our 'allies'? (Score:3)
In the war on ISIS, we've been on the losing end b'cos the Iraqi cowards have fled leaving US given weapons to ISIS, who are even better armed than before, despite the loss of their ability to sell Syrian oil.
So how about this idea - instead of our weaponry, sell or give such VR games to the Iraqis (and Syrians) on the newer frontlines. They will flee, leaving those toys in the hands of ISIS. ISIS volunteers will play those games just out of curiousity or b'cos they want to, and drop dead! In fact, w/ some luck, such success could even spread to other Islamic groups, such as Hamas, Hizbullah, Islamic Jihad, al Qaeda, et al
Sword Art Online (Score:2)
To paraphrase South Park... [wikipedia.org] "Anime did it!" [imdb.com]
Someone will everything (Score:2)
If can be done, someone will do it, no matter how brilliant or stupid it is.
They have some catching up to do. (Score:2)
Umm, yeah? (Score:2)
This is not to say that highly immersive simulations are riskless; I'd personally want to be either sitting down, or in a decent sized room with no sharp-edge furniture and ideally a cushy carpet if I were going to play some VR h
new system needed (Score:2)
we would just need to have a new rating system... the systems we have are retarded. esrb is a bunch of assholes who just shake down companies for money.
John Carmack had a similar response reviewing Drea (Score:1)
Considering the number of deaths at internet cafes (Score:2)
I wouldn't be surprised if someone did something stupid and died.
Does this concern anyone else? (Score:5, Insightful)
I remember buying Grand Theft Auto 5 the day of its release and jumping right in. I loved all of the features and the advancement of the game. The story was great, but it felt shorter than the previous games especially San Andreas.
I went online and saw some people mentioning all of the mini games. "Go buy in game stock! Go do Yoga/tennis/pimp out your car/go do multiplayer."
Multiplayer! Awesome, just what I needed. However, GTA 5 multiplayer has so many stupid rules. You're telling me if i steal someone's car and blow it up it'll cost me money to replace it? The last kicker was the cost of property. $1.5 million for houses. Your mission payouts are only $1000 a pop too.
What's the point in grinding for all of this pointless crap in a video game when i can do all of this outside in the real world and grind for real? VR offers more of the same. So you spend 500 hours playing mini games in some VR Los Santos. What do you really have to show for it?
TL;DR: young guy realized that real life is the ultimate video game and went outside.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm still pretty i
useful? (Score:2)
>I'm building useful skills,
useful???
The overwhelming majority of the population gets through their entire lives without finding jumping out of a perfectly good airplane "useful" . . . :)
hawk
Re: (Score:2)
Re:useful? (Score:4, Funny)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D._B._Cooper [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Gemini Game (Score:2)
Deaths are inevitable (Score:2)
Human Centipede-ish hype? (Score:2)
To me this sounds like the not uncommon hype that seems to follow the release of indifferent 'horror' movies. Like the one called something like 'The Human Centipede', which was supposed to be the most incredibly extreme horro movie ever. Only, it turned out to be a flop, hardly worth a shrug, something that could have been thought up by a couple of teen-agers and filmed on a smartphone.
I don't know, maybe I've grown too critical with age - I've stopped having night-mares because I tend to wake up and think
People Die (Score:2)
Actually, the question is going to be whether VR kills more people, or saves more people, or has no statistical effect. People die at fairly predictable rates, so if you have a given number of people you can assume that a certain number of them will drop dead if you let them sit around long enough. But wait, the kind of people who go to any particular event will skew the results considerably; the death rate at Burning Man is below the national average in spite of it being more dangerous conditions than aver
Meh (Score:2)
Someone will die NOT playing a game in virtual reality, too. Let's classify and regulate reality, too.
Nanny state, much? (Score:2)
Seizure problems with video games have been a thing since video games have been a thing. I can rember a friend's stepdad in the 80's having seizure issues with video games. Did that make him stop? No, he still loved playing. He made a choice to do it.
Do we ban every form of entertainment that has flashy lights because there are some people that just can't resist? Or do we make sure that products with this are still labeled correctly? Maybe we should even fund research into seizures and curing the problem?
One of the most tired plot devices (Score:2)
"If you die in the game (or a dream), you die in real life" is one of the most tired plot devices in fiction. It's on my short list of things that will make me stop reading a book, along with "hero loses their powers" and "best friend becomes worst enemy".
1983 movie Brainstorm similar theme (Score:2)
It was about full brain recording and playback, kind of a super VR that Mark Zuckerberg talked about this week. (plot of many scifi stories)
In the movie someone dies during a recording session. Then it becomes a tug of war for the recording between police who are investigating a suspicious death and scientists who want to see if there is life after death.
Plus there is an ironic twist that the lead actress dies of a drowning "accident" during the filming. But some peopl
Re: (Score:3)
640k ought to be enough for anyone.
There is no evidence that anyone wants one of these new fangled mouse pointing devices.
Updates (Score:2)
I just hope that automatic updates (water and food, for example) are provided.
Re: (Score:2)
I think that's still pretty far in the future. We don't really understand the brain enough to do that.
And even if we did there are legal, health and general safety issues that need to be explored beforehand.
Re: (Score:1)
Sorry for the bad news, VR is a niche and will never take off as a mainstream thing in gaming
It's a niche market currently. As soon as more goggles (or whatever they'll be called) become available, and especially low cost versions become available, that will change. At that point they will be able to be used for more than just gaming. Who wouldn't want to be able to carry around their own movie screen? I'm sure some sort of WiFi (HDMI wireless or something) screen sharing won't be too far behind at that point either.
History is full of people saying things will fail that are now commonplace
Re: (Score:2)
Errr... wtf is a "homeless carriage"? (honestly, I've never heard of that term)
Re: (Score:1)
Errr... wtf is a "homeless carriage"? (honestly, I've never heard of that term)
It's the name of the folder that my spell check program is installed in. ;-)
Re: (Score:2)
Is that all?! That's a bit of a letdown.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Hello ? Smartphone, tablet, laptop, portable DVD players, ...
I don't like wearing glasses. But what I really don't like is wearing bulky glasses. I'm pretty sure I'm not alone in this sentiment.
And the line of vaporware wraps a
Re: (Score:2)
Hello ? Smartphone, tablet, laptop, portable DVD players, ...
I don't like wearing glasses. But what I really don't like is wearing bulky glasses. I'm pretty sure I'm not alone in this sentiment.
And the line of vaporware wraps a few times around the earth.
People don't like bulky glasses like they don't like bulky computers that take up a whole room, bulky mobile phones that take a car battery to run them, bulky laptops that... actually, they seem pretty good at taking these bulky devices people don't like and making them lighter. My new watch is half the bulk of my old one, and has a computer in it that does all sorts of wonderful stuff...
tl;dr version: Complaining that a new tech is 'bulky'? That's going to make the entire technology into vaporware?
Your
Re: (Score:3)