




Chased Off of YouTube, Leaked 'No Man's Sky' Footage Runs to Pornhub (vice.com) 134
An anonymous reader quotes Vice:I always feel a little dirty when I look at leaked footage of any kind, but rarely so much as when I brought up Pornhub yesterday to check out a video featuring the hyped space exploration game No Man's Sky... I had to go to Pornhub, as this corner of the web was the only place I'd been able to find the footage after it'd been yanked off of DailyMotion, YouTube, and almost every other video hosting site...
The PornHub video shows 21 minutes of footage with awful resolution, and none of it's particularly exciting to watch (which may say something about the game)...
On July 7, when the game was ready to ship, No Man's Sky creator Sean Murray posted on Twitter "I'm so incredibly proud of this tiny team. 4 years of emotions," then addressed the leaked footage on Friday, tweeting "We've spent years filling No Man's Sky with surprises. You've spent years waiting. Please don't spoil it for yourself..." A later Twitter post added "Take a break from reading about it, and picking vids apart. You can experience for yourself so soon."
The PornHub video shows 21 minutes of footage with awful resolution, and none of it's particularly exciting to watch (which may say something about the game)...
On July 7, when the game was ready to ship, No Man's Sky creator Sean Murray posted on Twitter "I'm so incredibly proud of this tiny team. 4 years of emotions," then addressed the leaked footage on Friday, tweeting "We've spent years filling No Man's Sky with surprises. You've spent years waiting. Please don't spoil it for yourself..." A later Twitter post added "Take a break from reading about it, and picking vids apart. You can experience for yourself so soon."
Hooray! (Score:2, Funny)
Now I can participate in subversive activity, check out a cool new game AND watch porn all at once! That's a big time saver.
Re: You know you're old when (Score:1)
It's about jacking off to a video game about space exploration.
Re: (Score:1)
That will be a reliable senility-indicator...
Re: (Score:3)
That article was poorly written. It seems it was just some guy ranting because major video sources wouldn't show his video. And unlike the recent #FairUse movement against You Tubes abusive policies towards handling DMCA takedown requests.
'No Man's Sky' has porn? (Score:5, Funny)
Infinite, procedurally generated porn? Count me in!
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
Infinite, procedurally generated porn? Count me in!
Only time we'll ever see some white or even asian male on black female porn?
I was thinking about throwing around the sexes too but then we'd end up with what sounds like the usual stuff anyway.
Pornography is so very racist. Black men fuck everything, White men fuck white people and asians, asians fuck only asians.
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Addiction. (Score:4, Funny)
Both porn and gaming can be a problem.
It seems to me they both involve mindless repetitive motion. Not that there's anything wrong with that...
Re: (Score:2)
Nature is overrated.
Re: (Score:1)
Nature isn't interested in my unusual length...
The PornHub Link (Score:5, Informative)
No Mans Sky gameplay [pornhub.com]
Re: (Score:2)
I find it funny that Hello Games are saying "Please don't spoil it for yourself" when the video spoils nothing that hasn't already been seen before. I suspect they're more concerned that that most people will find it quite a boring game. It just makes them sound like all the AAA games companies pushing embargo'd games trying to maximize pre-orders and sales in the first few days before word of mouth spreads about how shit their game.
Its obviously not a game for everyone. Fans of instant adrenaline filled a
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
He said he did that the first time and leveled himself into an unplayable corner. How is that any more fun?
Re: (Score:2)
Because possibly there are more than just those two outcomes available?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Fallout 3 is probably the worst example of the series that anyone still actually remembers.
Re: (Score:2)
I searched for the game to check the release date (Aug. 9, FYI), and it sounds like the response from the developer isn't for this particular video. Apparently some people got ahold of "leaked" copies of the game (one person paid $1300 for it on eBay), and they are showing a lot of footage including reaching the center of the galaxy (apparently a major plot point or something). I think the developer is referring to those kinds of spoilers rather than this particular video.
Re: (Score:2)
This is why no game gets money from me until there are:
1) Reviews from non-bought-out and non-agenda driven reviewers. (I'm looking at you, pc-gamer and kotaku.)
2) Actually released for a couple weeks to see how many show stopper bugs, and how reactive the company is to fixing them. (Hey, nothing goes out bug-free anymore, but if the company isnt quick to react to them, thats a very bad sign.)
This is why I only bother with game reviews from Total Biscuit and Jim Sterling. They've paid the dues to make it clear to me they're not bought out. Especially Jim Sterling and Konami (he ends most of his gaming news videos with "Fuck Konami News: all the news fit to make you say fuck Konami".) I'm sure there are other truly independent reviewers, but I doubt anyone affiliated with a game review magazine.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Fucking Misogynists (Score:4, Funny)
No Woman's Sky will be better.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Person always sounded a little awkward. "No One's Sky" sounds a lot better. Just do as Star Trek did, change "no man" to "no one," and you're done.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm a siamese twin you insensitive clod!
(It really is impossible to win.)
WTF? (Score:2)
As per subject
Viral (Score:2)
This really feels like viral advertising. None of it really makes sense to me any other way. From the explanations that are just vague enough to make you say "WTF?" before you go hunting for more info, to the fact that they banning the video, all the way to the person who posted the videos saying
"There are more spoilers than you probably realize with this game," Daymeeuhn wrote in the post. "I'm only a couple hours in, barely touched a few planets, and already I've had many FUCK YEAH moments. On the one hand, I'd love to share those with you, but in the other hand, Sean is right... why not just wait and experience them firsthand? I dunno. The first videos I posted were perfect—they spoiled nothing and just showed a taste."
Huh? There are spoilers here, but we didn't actually post any spoilers? Oh, but I should probably just go experience it firsthand, right? OK, I guess I'll run right out an buy a copy.
Re: (Score:2)
They don't want people to see the game is actually an empty shell, full of broken promises.
Can't have people cancelling their pre-orders.
Developer previously stated numerous times that it would take "hundreds of hours" to reach the "center of the galaxy (he misspoke and said Universe earlier...)".
This guy did it in less than 40.
Oh and he didn't die a single time during those 40 hours. So much for "surviving a harsh universe".
That's just the tip of the iceberg.
But then again, what we are seeing is a Gold edi
Re: (Score:2)
Developer previously stated numerous times that it would take "hundreds of hours" to reach the "center of the galaxy (he misspoke and said Universe earlier...)".
Murray said that for typical players. This guy is by definition not the typical player and quite likely rushed towards the centre to reach the bragging rights of that particular goal, after all finding a planet isn't exactly a unique feat. Thereby skipping most of the discoveries, lore or sheer "it's just an interactive screensaver but damn it's pretty so I don't care" moments.
Mind you, people watch train footage [youtube.com]. I've built the same repetitive, mundane, boring mob farms and whatnots as everyone else in Min
A bit spicier than I thought it would be... (Score:1)
But I watched the whole thing. I found it to be very exciting. Especially when the gameplay reached its climax.
Re: (Score:2)
Are you sure you were watching the right video?
Works of art or entertainment (Score:2)
whose effectiveness relies on the element of secrecy or surprise tend, by design, not to have lasting value.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
This is kinda dumb, but when I first saw Sixth Sense, I immediately went back to watch it again because I was *sure* Bruce Willis spoke with the kid's mom.
Re: (Score:2)
It's kind of like those Garfield comics with Garfield removed
http://garfieldminusgarfield.n... [garfieldmi...rfield.net]
Re: (Score:2)
Sony is also False Flagging No Man Sky videos (Score:3)
MundaneMatt [youtube.com] Just had 2 of his videos false flagged by Sony of all people. Mind you, Sony is merely distributing the PS4 version of the game, so their right to DMCA mere discussion of the game before launch -- especially when it doesn't contain in game footage -- is a bit odd at best.
But yeah, this suppression of pre-release footage is worrying. Combine that with an apparent Review Embargo and, well... I haven't been on the hype train for this one, but I do hope it's good.
Re: (Score:2)
MundaneMatt [youtube.com] Just had 2 of his videos false flagged by Sony of all people. Mind you, Sony is merely distributing the PS4 version of the game, so their right to DMCA mere discussion of the game before launch -- especially when it doesn't contain in game footage -- is a bit odd at best.
But yeah, this suppression of pre-release footage is worrying. Combine that with an apparent Review Embargo and, well... I haven't been on the hype train for this one, but I do hope it's good.
The strong-arm bully tactics strongly suggest that it's not good, otherwise it would be allowed to stand on its own merits and no publicity would be bad publicity, you dolt.
Well no friggin' duh. I'm hoping it turns out not to suck.
Re: (Score:2)
The Hello Games / Sony relationship is a little more complex than a simple distributor connection. Sony are, in effect, publishers of the game, for the playstation version. Hello Games are the publishers for the PC version.
Re: (Score:2)
Sony is more than just distributing the game, they had NMS stands at E3, was it 2 or 3 years in a row?
Sony is responsible for hyping the game as a $60 AAA title when it's just a small indie game.
Re: (Score:2)
Lies (Score:1)
Take a break from reading about it, and picking vids apart. You can experience for yourself so soon.
If that were true, I wouldn't be at Pornhub.
Wait, what were we talking about again?
Makes sense (Score:5, Funny)
I had to go to Pornhub [...] to find the footage after it'd been yanked off
Yes, PornHub is the obvious place to go for yanking off videos.
Re: (Score:2)
If you want a fucking game, try the Leisure Suit Larry series.
Comment removed (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Don't spoil it [for us] - Devs (Score:4, Insightful)
@GrBear
No offense man but pre-ordering games is what got us where we are today with modern game releases.
Half-assed, rushed out the door and full of bugs that get resolved 2-3 Gigabytes worth of patches down the road.
In this day and age, no one should be pre-ordering anything as it simply continues to enable the piss poor behavior
of the game developers who have the " Just release it and we'll patch it later " attitude.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
You spent 3 hours of your life watching someone else play a video game?
Re: (Score:2)
You spent 3 hours of your life watching someone else play a video game?
I was thinking the same thing. That someone could actually watch three hours of somebody else playing a game sounds almost like a glowing endorsement of the game. I doubt that I could watch twenty minutes of somebody else playing games that I actually like.
Re:Don't spoil it [for us] - Devs (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Obligatory Penny Arcade (Score:2)
https://www.penny-arcade.com/c... [penny-arcade.com]
Re: (Score:1)
In the olden days (before my time; I'll get off your lawn shortly) people would have to take turns playing on a console gaming system. You would sit there and watch your sibling or friend play for a while, and then trade off. So yes, watching people play games is normal. And yes, it's harder to watch when it's something you enjoy (and are good at, and you cringe at the mistakes).
Re: (Score:2)
One involves running and hitting things, while the other involves clicking?
Maybe, but a Starcraft tournament with skilled players is a hell of a lot more interesting than soccer/football or golf.
Re: (Score:2)
This reminds me of Starbound which was sort of a Terraria clone but with a scifi theme, when I tried it. There were some interesting elements but on a whole it felt bland. Even with thousands or millions of planets to visit there simply wasn't anything of value on any particular planet to make you want to explore it.
Re: (Score:2)
My two cents -- the amount of "creation" (art, originality, ideas coming from another human mind) in the game is the same whether there are 100 or 100 quintillion planets. Imagine an artist making a fine house music song and then have the computer generate 1000 different remixes of it. The sum of those 1000 is not much more than the single original song.
The second part, exploration and gameplay, changes the state of the game, but the new states are apparently not significantly different. It's like changing
Re: (Score:2)
Yup, there are numerous problems with the design of No Man's Sky. Some find it boring, but the biggest one is that it doesn't bring anything new to the table:
Q. Can you mine the ground and build your own tunnels like you can in Minecraft?
A. No
Q. Are there Player-Owned-Structures like in Eve Online?
A. No
Q. Does it have multiplayer groups like Elite: Dangerous?
A. Technically it has multiplayer but since there is no grouping and no party quests it is kind of pointless play multiplayer. Worse, good luck even
Re: (Score:2)
You talk about bringing new things to the table and then list a bunch of features from other games? I think the major selling points are that the universe and music are procedurally generated, and that you can travel between space and planets without loading.
Re: (Score:2)
> You talk about bringing new things to the table and then list a bunch of features from other games?
The point being that No Man's Sky is a step backwards. It doesn't even have features from other popular games.
It is yet-another-procedural-generated universe. *yawn*
Re: (Score:2)
It's pretty hard to say which direction it is stepping at this point.
I guess it could be worse though, they could have taken the example of Elite: Dangerous and procedurally generated the title also.
TL;DR (Score:2)
I always feel a little dirty [...] brought up Pornhub yesterday [...] yanked off
Sounds like... (Score:2)
...they know their "game" sucks and want people to buy it and be stuck with it.
Any product afraid to be reviewed and/or previewed is GARBAGE to be avoided and actively criticized...
I didn't preorder anyway... (Score:2)
... too many promises, they sounded like Peter Molyneux.
And now they're afraid of a public preview video? That says I was right.
Procedurally generated (Score:1)
I watched studio's earlier demos of the game. The thing about procedurally generated worlds is that after a while they all feel the same.
Re: (Score:2)
I read ahoffer0's earlier comment about the game. The thing about procedurally generated comments is that after a while they all look the same.
Apparently (Score:2)
They *could* take the sky away from you.....
You can't stop the signal, eh Mr. universe?
"No Man's Sky", indeed (Score:2)
DMCA annoyance (Score:1)
To get around this nonsense, Google/Youtube could set up a streaming site outside the US and the legal reach of DMCA. Maybe in some place like Belgium.
--
Help fight continental drift.
Re: Can it be (Score:1)
I say the article publisher simply needs to come clean. They were surfing PornHub for some really kinky wacked out space sex involving a gun and this video game suddenly appeared.
Re: (Score:1)
And that is probably why you posted 10 seconds late. Next time, just do it, and don't waste 9 seconds wiping yourself clean. Then you'll only be 1 second late.