65% of Online Gamers Face Threats, Stalking, Other 'Severe Harassment' (cnet.com) 167
Online gaming may be popular and fun, but it's not without pitfalls. More than 70% of online gamers have experienced some form of harassment, according to a survey released Thursday from the Anti-Defamation League's Center on Technology and Society. From a report: And 65% of players said they've experienced "severe harassment," including physical threats, stalking and sustained harassment. "Online hate causes real harm," ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt said in a release. "Every time someone in an online multiplayer game physically threatens or harasses another player repeatedly because of who they are or what they believe, that experience doesn't just end for that individual when the game is over."
Among online gamers who experience harassment, 53% reported being targeted based on their race, religion, ability, gender, sexual orientation or ethnicity, according to the ADL. Nearly 30% also report being doxed, which means having their contact or other personal information published online. The ADL also said that some gamers reported being exposed to "extremist ideologies and hateful propaganda."
Among online gamers who experience harassment, 53% reported being targeted based on their race, religion, ability, gender, sexual orientation or ethnicity, according to the ADL. Nearly 30% also report being doxed, which means having their contact or other personal information published online. The ADL also said that some gamers reported being exposed to "extremist ideologies and hateful propaganda."
Re: (Score:2)
>guys named Pedro.
But the banana?
How to not be bullied online and have a happy life (Score:1)
1. Turn off the Computer/Console/whatever
2. Go outside.
Comment removed (Score:4, Funny)
Statistics (Score:5, Insightful)
And of that 65% 99.9999999% of the "threats" are from some 12 year old kid who has no means to carry out said threats. The verbal abuse is annoying but anytime you deal with the public it's bound to happen at some point.
Re:Statistics (Score:4, Insightful)
But if a significant portion of those 65% are 12 year old kids themselves, they don't yet have the ability to fully realize that the guy they're talking to can't actually get to them.
Oh, and if he has no means to carry out his threats, how did 30% of them end up doxed? From there it's really just a phone call away from turning into a SWATting instead.
Re: (Score:1)
Why are 12 year olds on the internet playing adult games unsupervised in the first place?
Re: (Score:2)
I often wonder this myself.
Re: (Score:1)
Because parents don't parent anymore. They are not allowed to. Because if they hurt little Johnny's feewings in anyway, it's a visit from CPS for their 'violation'. Repeated violations gets Johnny taken away, and the parents may even have to go live with Bubba for a while.
Of course, this kind of behavior isn't new, and even if parents were allowed to parent, little Johnny would go to a friends house or use his phone at school instead. Like we did back in the day when we were not allowed to play Mor
Re:Statistics (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
I honestly thought, while reading this, you were going to go with "Do you know what a bad idea it was for your parents to have birthed you?"
This is why I am a terrible person and part of why I mute my mic when I play - 1) nobody needs to hear my trash talk and 2) nobody needs to hear a grown man cry when he's lost the match.
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
how did 30% of them end up doxed?
Goes to show what a load of crock that survey is. 30% of 70% have been doxxed, i.e. over 20% of gamers have been doxxed? Yea, right. Just more bullshit from the ADL. They're a political activist group whose business model is to label everything under the sun as hate so they get to play censor.
Re: (Score:1)
No longer you join your Quake server anonymously with only your nickname visible to other players.
All the social gaming crap, which is integrated and advertised for every freaking gaming these days, encourages the users to make themselves visible in their communities and share as much as possible.
Yeah, sure, anyone with half a grasp on how the internet and humanity works may find it obvious that you shouldn't share too much identifying information online.
You don't need to b
Re: (Score:2)
The ADL is full of shit and has been for some time. Trusting their d
"data" is a mistake.
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
A couple points
1)
Being an online gamer and interacting with this audience I can also say this:
* People believe they experience harassment. Arguing with that is trying to argue against a tautology. One can't say someone is "wrong" about believing some given context.
* People are wrong that they are harassed. "Believing" one is harassed and actually being harassed are not the same thing.
I come from a game where being kicked from a group for a poor performance is considered harassment. Quips are
Re:Statistics (Score:5, Informative)
what we once called BANTER.
Found one of the perps.
Re: (Score:1)
Banter could be considered harassment of a kind, but on the scale of severity it's at the bottom and I think most people would agree it's a non-issue (and if it's with your friends, provided they're on board, it can even be positive). Nitpicking over the definitions of words is a distraction; what you should really be asking is whether it's ethical or not. If you're engaged in light-hearted shit-talking with your friends or with other people online who have made it obvious they don't mind, I think most peop
Re: (Score:2)
That happens when you hit the nerve.
Re: Statistics (Score:2)
Just like most of the "bullying" going on in schools is really innocent horseplay, amirite?
Re: (Score:1, Flamebait)
And of that 65% 99.9999999% of the "threats" are from some 12 year old kid who has no means to carry out said threats. The verbal abuse is annoying but anytime you deal with the public it's bound to happen at some point.
Indeed. Further, it's quite silly to say "everyone faces severe X". If everyone faces it, it's norrmal X.
The only time verbal abuse really annoys me is when I can tell someone's trying to tell me something that make be useful in playing the game, but is too wrapped up in flaming to explain it.
Re: (Score:2)
The only time verbal abuse, wait what, I always turn off that little feature in online, unless you type it in the chat window, I do not hear it. I much prefer the chat window of microphones, It slows them down enormously you have to stop gaming to type. I am not sure what happens with that microphone stuff, I started turning that feature off years ago, after having to hear someone crap on about which character makes the best guardian in totally annoying detail, disabled voice from others at that time and ha
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Sticks and stones.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, I find that rather weird and strange. That suggests they're building social networks outside of the games themselves, at which point the gaming itself isn't necessarily relevant.
Anonymity + internet... (Score:2)
https://i1.kym-cdn.com/photos/... [kym-cdn.com]
I'd like to see statistics not only about the 'victims', but about the attackers. How many of the online gamers threathen, stalk or otherwise severely harass other people. I bet we'll see the same numbers.
It is all part of the cesspit entertainment.
ADL is full of shit (Score:4, Insightful)
"The ADL also said that some gamers reported being exposed to "extremist ideologies and hateful propaganda."
Oh no people have ideas ON THE INTERNET.
Don't listen to the ADL.
Re: (Score:1)
Ideas and ideology are not the same thing.
Re: (Score:1)
I just want to add to this: (Score:1)
Coming from a liberal background and with ~30 years experience online:
You will find persecution for your politics, whatever they are, at least once in your life online.
Your favorite non-political activity will have you persecuted by elitist scum either because of a different view on it, or because of inferred politics based on how they play it (go look at pro-Rebel vs pro-Imperial Star Wars fans from the 90s for an example. The modern Star Wars fans may be too intellectually diluted to sample.)
My point is:
Re: (Score:3)
Did you not notice that a number of recent terrorists cited YouTube and even games as the places they were radicalized? This is not really news.
It's not even surprising. Places where young, impressionable people hang out have always been targeted. Used to be youth clubs and around, now it's online. When I was about 15 the Scientologists were doing it around town with surveys and fake "health checks".
Re: (Score:2)
Ashke-what? (Score:2)
Do not forget this is the same bunch of fucktards that accused Rabbis of being Nazis (yeah try to wrap your head around THAT one)
I figured it out long ago. The intercourse-intellectually-disabled people in question misinterpreted four letters in "Ashkenazi Jews" [wikipedia.org] and conflated the term with documented Jewish collaboration with the NSDAP regime [wikipedia.org].
Re: (Score:2)
I'm old, but why on Earth are (Score:2)
" 53% reported being targeted based on their race, religion, ability, gender, sexual orientation or ethnicity" ever known?
I guess gaming sites should have some way of anonymizing users instead of whatever they're doing now.
Most games I've seen have a report button, if the companies don't actually investigate/ban/report to the relevant authorities, they're not doing their job.
Re: I'm old, but why on Earth are (Score:1, Insightful)
They're not being targeted. When some 14 year old who just heard some new swear words and gets killed while spawncamping starts yelling "I'm going to kill all of you nword faggots" that is not hate speech, or threats, or abuse, or harassment.
It's called shit talk, they have no idea that you're gay, black, jewish, etc. So calm the fuck down Nancy.
Re: I'm old, but why on Earth are (Score:1)
Well, in a competitive environment like a game, targeting anyone by "ability" is totally legit.
Learn to play well, you retard.
Re: I'm old, but why on Earth are (Score:5, Insightful)
Which misses the point. Imagine you were actually gay, and people used what you are as an insult, a slur.
Doesn't matter if they know you are gay or not. If they said that to you in the street they would face the consequences. In theory if they do it in an online game they should get banned, it's against the TOS, but it seems that the resources to check voice chat just aren't there.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Hmm, I've done online gaming for decades. Never had anyone target me for harassment for my "race, religion, gender, sexual orientation or ethnicity", probably because I don't tell anyone any of those things.
Though I have heard rumors that some people had a few rude things to say to me about my ability. But that just made me cackle maniacally when I heard about it....;-p
Re: (Score:2)
I got some racist abuse at school. Back then I hadn't even heard of the internet, but these days it's not uncommon for that abuse to continue after school on social media and in online games.
Easier to get away with in games too, no chance of a teacher hearing you say it. Unlike text chat the platform has no easy way to detect it over voice.
Re: (Score:1, Funny)
If I had to guess, I would say it's because they aren't content to just play video games... they feel the need to announce their race, religion, ability, gender, sexual orientation and ethnicity to anyone who will listen.
And, then they pull a Jussie Smollett.
Re: (Score:2)
And then, there are left wing "heroes" like the guy who got Lindsey Shepherd censored:
https://www.thepostmillennial.... [thepostmillennial.com]
Anonymity... (Score:1)
severe harassment (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
No. Go read TFA. 30% are being doxed. That's severe harassment.
Re: (Score:3)
I don't find that estimate credible. Three in ten gamers has their personal offline details shared online?
I can believe three in ten gamers is stupid enough to link their in-game presence to their instatwitface account and then get surprised when people use non-game channels to interact with them but that's hardly fucking doxxing.
Shit, I've been gaming online for 28 years now and the only time I've ever seen someone doxxed was when they told everybody in-game that they'd taken an overdose and were spending
Re: (Score:3)
It's probably because they often play with people they know offline, e.g. at school, who then reveal details about them to other people.
It's not really surprising that school bullying continues online. It's a known issue with social media too.
Re: (Score:1)
I don't find that estimate credible. Three in ten gamers has their personal offline details shared online?
I can believe three in ten gamers is stupid enough to link their in-game presence to their instatwitface account and then get surprised when people use non-game channels to interact with them but that's hardly fucking doxxing.
Shit, I've been gaming online for 28 years now and the only time I've ever seen someone doxxed was when they told everybody in-game that they'd taken an overdose and were spending their last minutes with us. Ten minutes later we'd tracked down which room in which building on which campus they were in, had someone onsite heading there and an ambulance on the way.
Even then we didn't actually know their RL name.
Are you for real? if so, man that's one hell of a story. Could you care to elaborate? I'd love to hear some more
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, it's real - but it's also from the 90s, I can't remember much more than I've already written. The person was at Durham University and did survive.
The ADL (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
They didn't, no. They just pointed out that Pepe the Frog is a symbol often used by Nazis.
Don't give me that "they are't really Nazis, they are just trolling you" bullshit either. We have all seen the photos and videos of guys with massive swastika tattoos mixing in with them. If that's their idea of a joke then fuck those Nazis.
Re: (Score:2)
Nuance simply isn't your strong suit, but you fake it well.
Yes, there are a LOT of people who think Nazis are funny, including: Sarah Silver
Is this like rape? (Score:5, Insightful)
Is this like the false "rape epidemic" study that counted things like unwanted staring in the same category as violent rape at knife point?
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
We call it rape now. Stare rape. Just about every woman has been raped dozens of times. If you are a man, you should feel bad.
Re: (Score:1)
No way, that's how I met my wife, staring at her like a creepy dude until she came over.
Re: (Score:2)
Ah, Stockholmed her did you? Stare Raped her over and over again until she thought she deserved it and came to crave it.
Bet you still say she's beautiful every day just to make her feel like it was HER fault that you despoil her body on a regular basis.
Re: (Score:1)
The one you made up? I doubt it.
Re: (Score:3)
Well, you do get surveys that assume any woman having sex while drunk has been raped:
http://aspiringeconomist.com/i... [aspiringeconomist.com]
You also get activists conflating sexual harassment and rape, using '1 in 5 women are sexually harassed' as signs of a rape epidemic. Then you read the reports and find that sexual harassment includes things like
Inappropriate staring or leering that made you feel intimidated
-- http://swinburne.custhelp.com/... [custhelp.com]
Still, at least the United Nations are taking a proportionate view:
Sexual harassment includes many things...
[..]
- Unwanted [..] leaning over
[..]
- Unwanted sexual looks
[..]
- Referring to an adult as a girl
[..]
- Personal questions about social [..] life
[..]
- Hanging around a person.
[..]
- Standing close
[..]
- Staring at someone
[..]
- Facial expressions
-- https://www.un.org/womenwatch/... [un.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Your blog post notes that the question asked was if women have ended up having unwanted sex because they were plied with alcohol or drugs. Unwanted sex is, by definition, rape. If it's unwanted, they aren't consenting to it. That doesn't seem difficult to understand.
It's interesting that you carefully edited the UN's list. For example, some of the lines you censored are actually:
Personal questions about social or sexual life.
Standing close or brushing up against a person
Facial expressions, winking, throwing kisses, or licking lips
If you read the list it's pretty clear it's pretty clear that they are talking about extreme forms of these behaviours, not merely
Re: (Score:2)
Oh for fucks sake, my editing of the UN document in no way changed the behaviours it states are sexual harassment.
The 'or' means it considers questions about social life sexual harassment, as well as questions about someone's sex life.
Similarly the 'or' means that standing close to a person is deemed sexual harassment, and that facial expressions are.
I did read the list and it's pretty fucking clear that they're completely full of shit and that everybody commits sexual harassment any time they're in public
Re: (Score:2)
Show us a verifiable example of someone being fired or prosecuted for staring at a woman. It's just paranoia.
False allegations do exist, that's true. Just today a guy got 18 years for false allegations in the UK.
Re: (Score:2)
Show us a verifiable example of someone being fired or prosecuted for staring at a woman. It's just paranoia.
No. Do your own fucking research for once.
Also consider that a false accusation of rape or even merely sexual harassment is enough to damage someone's career and home life whether they're fired, prosecuted or not.
I know someone that had a formal complaint made to HR about them because they.. held a door open for the next person along, who happened to be female. Formal complaints at a company are a serious matter, even when they don't lead to someone being fired.
But tell me, did you read the victim impact st
Re: (Score:2)
It's impossible to prove a negative. The onus is on your to prove your claim. Anyway, I did google, no examples were found.
Re: (Score:2)
I didn't make thst fucking claim. You seem to be struggling with basic reading comprehension today, maybe the heat is getting to you.
Stop asking me to provide evidence for claims I haven't made and try actually understanding the points I do make. I'm only trying to help you (and educate anybody misled by you).
Re: (Score:2)
That's my point. It's paranoid BS that hurts men by making them afraid of socialising and forming relationships.
Re: (Score:2)
That case was settled: https://rockbridgereport.acade... [wlu.edu]
Turns out the person accused of saying "regret equals rape" wasn't even in attendance at the event where it was claimed she said it.
"After extensive discovery, the parties acknowledge that Lauren Kozak ⦠discharged her obligations professionally at all times in this matter and did nothing to the prejudice of John Doe, either by her statements or actions. Further, the parties acknowledge that evidence was produced in discovery supporting the
I actually see this as a good thing (Score:3)
These numbers show that the people ruining gaming for everyone are actually a small minority: more to the point, not a population big enough that any company truly "needs" them to survive anymore. Time to bring on the long-overdue crackdown.
Re: (Score:3)
Just do what online poker did years ago - just remove chat functionality other than a few dumbed down emojis.
Re: I actually see this as a good thing (Score:2)
Aww, it sounds like someone needs a nap.
Scared no one will want you around once they know they can survive without you? Have you tried maybe not being a creepy asshole?
Re: I actually see this as a good thing (Score:2)
Ah, I see the problem here; you mistake me for liberal.
Afraid not, buddy boy. I'm just not a dick. I'm the parents who want you to grow up and function, not the cosplayer who called security after you threatened her.
THIS IS WHY WE NEED RULES/LAWS!!! (Score:1)
Just like there are rules & laws against bad behavior in the physical world, there must be rules in virtual world!!!
Internet (WWW) was created for advancement of humanity & NOT for providing safe haven for bullying/abuse/exploitation/manipulation!!!
Part of our socialization (Score:4, Interesting)
Encountering other social tiers. (Score:2)
What I find amazing is that Society as a whole is by now firmly in a space that used to be soley occupied by experts and nerds. Listening to some right-wing USian trump voter ramble on about conspiracy theories for 30+ minutes is fascinating in a bizar sort of way. The 'problem' - if you want to call it that - being that 25 years ago when we started being online he probably wouldn't have had the means or the interest in doing this. These days anybody, no matter the Level of cognitive ability - can grab a su
[MAGA] clan tag (Score:2)
how do they know? (Score:2)
"53% reported being targeted based on their race, religion, ability, gender, sexual orientation or ethnicity"
how the hell are you to know any of these things of people you meet online in a game?
are they using silly names like balba_the_black_muslim_trans_amputee_96?
Who are the 35%? (Score:2)
Seriously? Who has gamed on the internet and not been subject to prepubescent or incel grief? What are they doing that I'm not?