Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Google Games

Google Stadia Now Free To Anyone With a Gmail Address (polygon.com) 68

Google's video game streaming platform, Stadia, is now free to anyone with a Gmail address, the company announced on Wednesday. To sweeten the deal, Google is also giving new users two months of Stadia Pro -- including access to nine games -- for free. From a report: Existing Stadia Pro subscribers won't be charged for the next two months of the service, Google said. Previously, access to Stadia required purchasing the $129 Google Stadia Premiere Edition, a bundle that includes a Chromecast Ultra, a wireless Stadia Controller, and three months of Stadia Pro, the service that offered free games and video streams up to 4K resolution and 60 frames per second with HDR lighting.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Google Stadia Now Free To Anyone With a Gmail Address

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 08, 2020 @12:32PM (#59921888)

    Free only for users with a credit card (so no kids) and a gmail address for a limited trial period then they bill you $10 a month, and good luck cancelling.

    "something went wrong, please try again later"

  • I mean, I can see this being useful or neat for someone who wants to game but can't afford a PC for some reason, but anything that this would be used for is better used for nVidia Now, which lets you own the game, too.
    • by LiENUS ( 207736 )

      but anything that this would be used for is better used for nVidia Now, which lets you own the game, too.

      Stadia lets you buy games outright too, and unlike geforce now you don't have to pay a monthly fee or be limited to 1 hour play time with a 20 minute queue to get in.

  • by Hadlock ( 143607 ) on Wednesday April 08, 2020 @12:42PM (#59921920) Homepage Journal

    This sounds exactly like what Google product management is going to do to drum up interest as a hail mary, to try and drump up interest in the product, as it's failing, right before they cancel it.
     
    Why even go through the effort of signing up at this point, when it's going to get cancelled in a few weeks? Even learning to navigate the UI is a waste of time at this point.

    • by gweihir ( 88907 )

      Indeed. My take as well.

    • by LiENUS ( 207736 )

      This sounds exactly like what Google product management is going to do to drum up interest as a hail mary, to try and drump up interest in the product, as it's failing, right before they cancel it.

      It's exactly how they said it would be rolled out when they announced it a year ago.

      First founders, then later the free tier.

      • It's exactly how they said it would be rolled out when they announced it a year ago.

        First founders, then later the free tier.

        No, it isn't how they said it'd be. This is a free trial of the Stadia Pro tier, after which you'll be charged the usual $10/month. That's not even close to being the same thing as the free tier.

    • by dissy ( 172727 )

      For anyone interested or wanting to try out streamed games, I'd highly suggest waiting on Microsoft xCloud to go public.

      I've been in their public preview (aka pre-beta) and signed up to see just how bad the expected lag and latency would feel. I was shocked and blown away by just how well it actually works.

      Even went out of my way to try and lag things and couldn't.
      I figured mortal combat would be a great input lag test, yet won my first few matches, and only ended up losing due to my natural suckage at fig

      • by tlhIngan ( 30335 )

        Yes, I signed up for xCloud to try out streaming, expecting it would suck. The first day, it did suck, but not in the way I expected since the lag was there but oddly not. The second day and after that, it was remarkable just how fluid it worked - and I'm not on a low latency connection - have cable (50ms typical RTT) and wifi and all that, and it was like playing locally. (And at 50ms latency, you can detect when things like camera are lagging).

        I don't know what the technology behind it is, but things like

      • by LiENUS ( 207736 )

        On one hand it's hard to do worse than Google did, monthly subscription + full price games.

        The google model isn't monthly subscription + full price games its monthly subscription for 4k/5.1/hdr, a selection of free games every month (just like microsofts business model with xbox games with gold) and discounts. Or just the games outright (buying them with the subscription discount counts for this) and don't pay monthly, you get 1080p and stereo sound without paying monthly.

        • by dissy ( 172727 )

          In my stadia home account, most games have a price tag $60 and up.
          I don't see any options on getting free games, and they seem to have removed the $10 subscription signup from the store front.

          I think it's fair enough to say that if Google doesn't care to keep up with offering what they claim they offer, they shouldn't care if I can't either.

          • by LiENUS ( 207736 )

            In my stadia home account, most games have a price tag $60 and up.

            So the normal price for games?

            I don't see any options on getting free games, and they seem to have removed the $10 subscription signup from the store front.

            Pro is still there, and it still comes with 9 games right now, more coming next month...

  • Oh God, not another fake "free" thing where the real thing you want is the "Premium" version. It's like free parking outside the football stadium.

  • Still have to buy games at full retail price? As well as everything else, that's the final nail that killed any interest I had in it. If it's now free, it's little different from yet another Steam clone except you don't get local copies of the games you have to buy at full price.
    • by brunes69 ( 86786 )

      It's quite different than Steam because you don't need any hardware to run it, everything is streamed so it can run with only a Chromecast, or your phone. As far as I know, Steam has no such offering nor any plan to have one.

      Steam Remote Play requires you to have a gaming PC and thus it is already very limited who it will appeal to.

      Stadia of course has their own issues. The idea that I have to pay a monthly fee *AND* buy the games is ridiculous. They should have adopted a PS Now model where you simply pay t

      • by LiENUS ( 207736 )

        The idea that I have to pay a monthly fee *AND* buy the games is ridiculous.

        I guess its a good thing you don't have to pay the monthly fee, or if you're fine with just the included games you don't have to buy any games? It's more like xbox games with gold than ps now though.

        • by brunes69 ( 86786 )

          Games with gold are not streamed, they are played on your xbox.

          PS Now is streamed, you can play it on anything.

          Seems closer to PS Now to me.

          • by LiENUS ( 207736 )

            Games with gold are not streamed, they are played on your xbox.

            Pricing and functionality are closer to games with gold.

  • by Anonymous Coward

    So I didn't really have any hope for Stadia, and when I found out my project was going to be released for it, I paid it no mind. But I've tried it out from home, and I think there's honestly a good argument to be made for it when doing remote game dev. I don't have to worry about USB forwarding through Remote Desktop or (ugh) Citrix. The frame rate is good. I can play through Chrome, which means it works on Macs and PCs. I can Remote Desktop to my computer at work to edit code and debug (to the Stadia insta

  • It's unclear to me how you actually get this free account. At stadia.com the only option is to buy the Premiere edition. In the app it says iether enter an invite code or buy a package. Maybe I'm dense but how do you get a free account?

  • Not that surprising, the idea was not that good in the first place. Putting an office suite in the cloud is a bit different than putting real-time games there.

  • I don't have, or want to buy, a gaming rig. I read the Ars review [arstechnica.com] and concluded that, if I were to get one of these services it would probably be Nvidia's. Has anyone (besides Ars) tried both?

    • by Hodr ( 219920 )

      I have. Both ran well on my modest connection and hardware (literally a 6 year old chromebook that was $150 new). I probably wouldn't play unreal tournament on it, but for single player role playing or adventure games, racing games, open world, and indie style games it seems to work pretty well.

      I preferred NVIDIA when they were in beta and just about every game in your steam account would work just fine. Now it seems like 1 in 20 games is allowed to be played. NVIDIA by rights should tell the game distrib

      • by LiENUS ( 207736 )

        NVIDIA by rights should tell the game distributers to piss up a rope

        How'd that work out for mp3.com and aereo?

      • Yea, but stupid copyright lawyers behave like: "What!? What do you mean the consumer can play our precious piece of DRM'd crap that they paid full price for, ONLINE! NOOOOO!!!! Stupid fucking goat fuckers.

  • I have a Premier Edition setup and stopped using it. The controllers are just not very good. I mean, they're better than the ones Amazon offers for their FireTV units but that's a pretty low bar. That and I'd encountered more than a few bandwidth related hiccups, this even when using it during likely off-hours (gaming-wise) on a wired network connection with a FIOS uplink.

    Don't know that 'free' will help get over those hurdles.

  • Just another failed app google will eventually cancel;. Thanks, but no thanks - other services better.
  • Streaming individual games are just using a different distribution, which is a inferior experience, for marginal benefit to the consumer. What i think will change the game is to have all you can eat model like Netflix and Spotify. Imagine paying 20 to 25 USD/Euro a month to have access to massive catalog of games. That scares Microsoft, Sony, and Nintendo; not the current Stadia model.
  • As a consumer, I am not a big fan of the subscription model. I like to own my stuff, and be responsible for it. Convenience be damned.
    • by LiENUS ( 207736 )

      If you're opposed to subscription model then stadia is probably the model for you.

      Buy the games you want, and unlike xbox and playstation you don't need to pay for things like online play. No subscription fee needed.

      The subscription is to get access to their "free" games and 4k video.

  • Game streaming has been failing for over a decade.
  • Based on what I've read the service is currently only available if you have the chromecast ultra stick or certain pixel devices.

    Have an android tv? Not an option.
    Have a 1080p chromecast stick? Not an option.

    So... not exactly giving it away to anyone with a gmail address...

    • by LiENUS ( 207736 )

      Works in the browser on any phone, and works on any computer. android tv is on its way.

  • by PPH ( 736903 )

    But you need a Gmail address. So they figure your soul is worth nothing.

  • It's not available to anyone with a gmail or google email address. You have to live in one of the countries where it's available.

  • sure feels like it, reads like a desperate move, but the failure of stadia will reflect on linux as well.

    headlines will read;
    Linux gaming, not even Google could make it into a success.

    • by DeVilla ( 4563 )
      I didn't even know stadia supported Linux. It (streaming video game renal) is still a bad idea. Linux or not.
      • by sad_ ( 7868 )

        I agree with that, not interested in it either.
        was just thinking about the side-consequences of stadia's failure and the how the 'tech press' always spins these things.

Isn't it interesting that the same people who laugh at science fiction listen to weather forecasts and economists? -- Kelvin Throop III

Working...