Pokemon Company Says It Intends To Investigate Palworld 47
The Pokemon Company said Thursday it has not granted any permission to "another company," referring to viral new game Palworld-developer Pocketpair, to use Pokemon intellectual property or assets and "intends to investigate and take appropriate measures" against the fast-growing survival game operator. From a report: The statement is Pokemon Company's first acknowledgement of Palworld's fast-growing survival title, which has sold over 8 million copies in less than six days, exceeding the performance of even the most popular AAA titles. But as TechCrunch previously reported, Palworld is also attracting a growing number of fans of Japan's legendary firm over perceived plagiarism and uncanny resemblance. However, its fusion of monster collecting, automation, and survival/crafting mechanics has struck a chord with players nonetheless.
Re:The Pokemon Company? (Score:5, Informative)
It's a company Nintendo set up to deal just with Pokemon content.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Considering what furry porn usually costs I'd be more specific and say to draw BAD furry porn.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
*glances sideways*
Unfortunately the AI for that is not as bad as one would think.
Please don't yiff the A.I. (Score:2)
Unfortunately the AI for that is not as bad as one would think.
That can only mean one thing. There is a sufficiently large and diverse data set that was easy to mine. *shudder*
Re: (Score:2)
You probably can't, given how much nintendo themselves are trying and it is still going strong.
Re: (Score:2)
Just don't buy or play Pokemon if you don't like the franchise?
If you buy this and Pokemon wins a lawsuit you'll just end up lining their pockets anyway.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't see how you could end up in any kind of legal trouble by buying it. It's not your concern how Palworld was developed. If there's any legal issues, it's up to Nintendo to do something about it, and Palworld would be the ones with legal troubles.
Re: (Score:2)
yeah - I don't see how buying a copy could *realistically* land end users/players in legal trouble. Even if there would be some avenue of law that would enable it - you'd have ask from Nintendo's perspective why bother?
One could argue it is like bootleg designer-* stuff where they some times will attempt to recover / destroy even the property that has made it into consumer hands on the premise that the existence of the stuff even in the secondary market harms the brand. However there is a good will angle h
Re: (Score:2)
Presumably you can play it offline; there are dedicated servers, OR you can host yourself, OR you can play single player locally. As long as Steam doesn't send it a kill signal it should be fine.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
This is such a weird take.
If a developer abandons a game you've lost your money. If you don't like a game you've lost your money. If you play a game for a month, have fun, and then grow bored of it ... have you lost your money?
Re: (Score:2)
Yes.
You exchanged money for a good and you no longer have the good. One that you cannot use or resell once the servers are shut down.
If up front you intended to only exchange money for an experience, then maybe go for a subscription service. You can stop paying at any time and leave, and the company can shut down and they can stop offering the service. It's a neat and tidy way to do things. This idea that you have a lifetime* subscription when you buy a game is rip for abuse a business willing to alter the
Re: (Score:2)
What kind of trouble do you expect to get into by buying a game legally for sale on Steam?
Nintendo has said that they are investigating the claims that Palworld infringes on Pokemon IP. They have NOT said that they are suing PocketPair (the developer) for infringing on Pokemon IP.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I will concede that some of the pals are reminiscent of pokemon - but that is also the extent of it. To me this is simply to be expected when making another game in the same genre; with over a thousand pokemon to choose from, inevitably you will end up making something similar, especially if you grew up loving that exact genre.
For comparison, I challenge you to draw a spaceship. It must be a logical design that looks like it would be functional, BUT it must not look like any spaceship yet made in any scienc
Re: (Score:2)
This is absolutely going to come down to some forensic level analysis of the 3d models I bet as that's really the only compelling thing I have seen that might be considered infringement. If they can probably show the foundations were in fact pokemon models then they have something otherwise agree, just a whimpering fart of a case.
This was all decided years and years ago (Score:2)
In the States though they could sue them into pulp, but afaik it's a Japanese company. I remember seeing an article about them having trouble finding a programmer good at shooting mechanics and hiring a guy they found working in a 7-11.
Re: (Score:3)
I won't buy Palworld because I don't want to get involved in any legal troubles by funding it
That's not how copyright laws work.
Not the issue (Score:3)
The bigger problem is mods coming out to put Pokemon characters into Palworld, that's what has Pokemon Company / Nintendo up in arms right now.
Re: (Score:3)
Which is in turn not a problem for Palworld, since they aren't making or distributing the mods.
I saw that Nexusmods preemptively banned any Pokemon mods, smart guys there.
I can honestly say I've never paid for a Pokemon product, the games seem OK as games go but I'm not willing to fund Nintendo's lawsuit happiness.
Re: (Score:2)
The first game, ironically, was the best. If you didn’t play it on GameBoy, Let’s Go Pikachu is the same game but prettier.
After that, Pokemon Go was good, and Legends Arceus was innovative, but literally every other game was an increasingly inferior copy of Red and Blue, and are mostly generally skippable.
Re: (Score:2)
And that particular mod got hit with a Cease & Desist letter within 8 hours of being shown on Youtube.
Meanwhile I put Palworld on my Steam Wishlist about a year ago and completely forgot about it in the meantime. If Nintendo/TPC did not investigate the game that got described by hopeful fans as "Pokemon - With Guns!" then they really dropped the (poke)ball years ago.
Did we see the same press release? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Not at all. "We're going to investigate Palworld" is smartspeak for "Hey guys, I set up a private server. Usual password, see ya there. Bring guns."
Assests (Score:2, Troll)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
PLEASE post a source that is not just "This guy has a hand, and so does THIS guy!"
Re: (Score:1)
If games cant make creatures and monsters that are reminisent of other games the industry would grind to a halt pretty quick.
i've seen so many posts comparing the palworld model to the pokemon one, yes they're similar, but they're deffinitely different enough to say they didnt rip the model then change it.
I'm glad i bought pal world to fund the fight against the litigeous crap heap that is nintendo now
What about Valheim? (Score:2)
This game seems like pokemon met valheim and bred Jormungax and Fenrol who combined for Ragnipok, the LoL of times.
Pokemon doesn't have a monopoly... (Score:2)
..On slavery and cock fighting. Numerous other games have introduced these elements into their games. I remember when World of Warcraft did it back in MOP days over a decade ago.
Simply making a clone of a popular game isn't illegal. If that were the case, we wouldn't even have modern video games at all.
So sorry Nintendo but anyone can make a game where the main protagonist goes around beating up monsters, enslaving them, then finding other players who have beat up monsters and enslaved them, forcing them to
palworld devs are typical techbro stereotype (Score:2)
Low quality all around. (Score:2)
It is not worth all the hype.
Pokémon Company (Score:2)
Looks like your players would have chosen you, but you were very busy telling them what they wanted because you know best!
Now someone arrived with what you should have fucking made in the first place and you don't want them raising the bar by putting out a fun to play game so it's likely that they will get sued out of existence so they can go back to making a bit of money while they sleep, maybe make Pokémon xenon and radium or something simple and iterative.
Pokemon became FIFA long ago. (Score:2)
"Oh look, a roster update. What a compelling reason to buy this game instead of just playing the one I already have. What's that? This one has micro transactions?"
At least Pokemon GO gave people a reason to get off their asses and socialize in my small community where bars and churches used to be the only gathering spots. That was actually cool. Universal appeal across generations and all walks of life.
One would hope Nintendo could see the value in being able to gear Pokemon more toward children, rather tha
Take appropriate action? (Score:2)
game mechanic cannot be copyrighted (Score:2)
To see anotehr example of this : look at DnD 3.5 and Paizo/P