Magnus Carlsen Quits Chess Tournament After Refusing to Change Out of Jeans (cnn.com) 139
Magnus Carlsen quit the World Rapid Chess Championship on Friday, reports CNN, "after he refused to change out of the jeans he was wearing..."
"Carlsen, the world champion from 2013 until 2023, allegedly replied, 'I'm out, f*** you,' after being informed that he would not be permitted to continue," reports the Hindustan Times.
The International Chess Federation (or FIDE) "said in a statement that Carlsen breached the tournament's dress code by wearing jeans," reports CNN: As a result, Carlsen would not have been paired for round nine, though he could have returned for the rest of the tournament had he not decided to walk away, per Chess.com. Since he had performed poorly in the earlier rounds, there was little chance that Carlsen could have defended his title regardless....
The standoff became "a matter of principle" for Carlsen, he told chess channel Take Take Take. "I haven't appealed, honestly I'm too old at this point to care too much, if this is what they want to do ... nobody wants to back down, if this is where we are, that's fine by me," he said. "I'll probably head off to somewhere where the weather is a bit nicer than here and that's it." He explained that he had been at a lunch meeting before heading to the tournament's second day and "barely had time to go the room, change, put on a shirt, jacket and honestly I didn't even think about the jeans."
Carlsen was also fined $200, according to the article. He has now also withdrawn from the World Blitz Championship which follows this tournament.
In a statement, the FIDE said their dress code and other regulations "are designed to ensure professionalism and fairness for all participants," and that the federation "remains committed to promoting chess and its values, including respect for the rules that all participants agree to follow."
The group's CEO added "Rules are applicable to all the participants, and it would be unfair towards all players who respected the dress-code, and those who were previously fined." (They added that "We gave Magnus more than enough time to change. But as he had stated himself in his interview — it became a matter of principle for him.")
CNN notes that Carlsen has already won five world rapid and seven world blitz titles in the last 10 years...
"Carlsen, the world champion from 2013 until 2023, allegedly replied, 'I'm out, f*** you,' after being informed that he would not be permitted to continue," reports the Hindustan Times.
The International Chess Federation (or FIDE) "said in a statement that Carlsen breached the tournament's dress code by wearing jeans," reports CNN: As a result, Carlsen would not have been paired for round nine, though he could have returned for the rest of the tournament had he not decided to walk away, per Chess.com. Since he had performed poorly in the earlier rounds, there was little chance that Carlsen could have defended his title regardless....
The standoff became "a matter of principle" for Carlsen, he told chess channel Take Take Take. "I haven't appealed, honestly I'm too old at this point to care too much, if this is what they want to do ... nobody wants to back down, if this is where we are, that's fine by me," he said. "I'll probably head off to somewhere where the weather is a bit nicer than here and that's it." He explained that he had been at a lunch meeting before heading to the tournament's second day and "barely had time to go the room, change, put on a shirt, jacket and honestly I didn't even think about the jeans."
Carlsen was also fined $200, according to the article. He has now also withdrawn from the World Blitz Championship which follows this tournament.
In a statement, the FIDE said their dress code and other regulations "are designed to ensure professionalism and fairness for all participants," and that the federation "remains committed to promoting chess and its values, including respect for the rules that all participants agree to follow."
The group's CEO added "Rules are applicable to all the participants, and it would be unfair towards all players who respected the dress-code, and those who were previously fined." (They added that "We gave Magnus more than enough time to change. But as he had stated himself in his interview — it became a matter of principle for him.")
CNN notes that Carlsen has already won five world rapid and seven world blitz titles in the last 10 years...
I guess he now has a future (Score:4, Funny)
doing Levi's commercials.
Why should I care? (Score:1, Flamebait)
Re: Why should I care? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I'm anti-social and mostly a hermit, but I know enough to dress up to the expected level when out. Has everyone become that disrespectful to each other? wait. don't answer that.
Is there some special dress code (Score:3)
for playing chess?
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
I'm puzzled why posts like yours are being modded down here. It appears someone with mod points has it in for dress codes.
Many events or venues have dress codes: restaurants, soirees, weddings, offices, concert halls (at least for the orchestra.) And these dress codes exist primarily to convey a certain atmosphere of respectability that fits the setting. Whoever controls the event or venue controls how it is displayed to its participants.
These tournament-organizers want to convey such an atmosphere at their
Re: (Score:2)
Is he allowed to be respectable without conforming to their weird definitions?
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
Is he allowed to be respectable without conforming to their weird definitions?
Not if he wants to play.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Curious that such outmoded thinking still exists. You can be an illogical axe murderer or a ceo of a company screwing people out of the healthcare they need and have paid for but the wearing of certain clothes makes all of that go away.
Conversely you might be the most moral person on earth, a source of inspiration for millions but wear the wrong clothing and you will feel the consequences separated from the axe murderer and ceo by their ability to pander to this nonsense.
Something tells me you're doing it w
Re: (Score:2)
To summarize your post, you're saying that the way a person dresses is not an accurate indication of their character.
Yeah, but so what? The story is not about that. It's about a dress code that Magnus Carlsen did not abide.
Per TFS, FIDE itself said the dress code and other rules "are designed to ensure professionalism and fairness for all participants". They want a serious atmosphere at their tournament. You may disagree with whether a dress code achieves that, but it is what FIDE wants and it is their tour
Re: (Score:2)
I get it: you're one of those who disagree that a dress code accomplishes what FIDE is after. Fine. Then start your own chess tournament and let people wear whatever they want.
Re: (Score:2)
And there was a big fuss a few years back over a chess tournament held in Saudi Arabia, where participants were required to dress a certain way.
So why is it that demanding people dress a specific way is somehow ok when it's a completely arbitrary rule made for a chess tournament, but somehow it's not ok when it's a national law based on hundreds of years of religious teachings?
Re: (Score:3)
He's a pro chess player, not a pro stylist. Who even cares what they wear? People perform best in their most comfortable outfits.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
He can read. He had access to a copy of the dress code. He contravened it. No stylist expertise required.
As for "[w]ho even cares what they wear" -- apparently the tournament organizers do. And they're allowed to.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Those are jeans. I don't know who the guys was, but he wasn't Magnus Carlsen. And I'm not just taking his word on what happened in the meeting he just left, or even that this meeting has anything to do with FIDE. Nothing in your two links has any definitive info about this, just comments from viewers.
Re: Is there some special dress code (Score:4, Interesting)
But in case you aren't an idiot, you should know that the video is from the exact same tournament that Magnus Carlsen was expelled from. The arbiters determined that those pants were not jeans.
Those are jeans. I don't know who the guys was
OK so you disagree with the arbiters.
Re: (Score:2)
I repeat: there was nothing in the two links you provided (aside from some viewer comments, which I consider sus) that indicate where these videos even were from.
If Magnus Carlsen got unequal treatment, then why isn't that the headline?
Re: (Score:2)
1) You are ignorant (You don't know what the video is somehow, and you are unable to use a search engine to find a widely spread video).
2) For some reason, you expect headlines to be accurate.
From previous conversations with you, I know you are not stupid, so I conclude here that you are intentionally being obtuse. I have no idea why, maybe you don't like Magnus or something.
Re: (Score:2)
Wow. Tell me that you didn't even read the summary without actually telling me that you didn't read the summary...
He specifically addressed this and it's in the summary.
Re: (Score:2)
Wow. Tell me that you didn't even read the summary without actually telling me that you didn't read the summary...
He specifically addressed this and it's in the summary.
Yes, I know. I did read the summary. It says he rushed back from a lunch meeting and didn't have time to change. It also says that FIDE gave him time to change, but he rejected the offer and quit anyway as a "matter of principle."
Re: (Score:2)
The idea that he wasn't aware of the rules, or that he didn't know what we was doing, is laughable.
Like he plays chess, he's thought through the possibilities and has a strategy and aims.
Re: (Score:2)
The idea that he wasn't aware of the rules, or that he didn't know what we was doing, is laughable.
Like he plays chess, he's thought through the possibilities and has a strategy and aims.
I'm sure he knew what the dress code was. He just didn't care. Or, he just needed an excuse to leave a competition he wasn't winning.
Re: (Score:3)
The dress code is arbitrary and dumb. Jeans are forbidden but khaki pants that look like jeans are acceptable.
Re: (Score:3)
2) The arbiter fined him $200 and asked him to change clothes.
3) He accepted the fine, but asked to be able to play his final game of the day in the same clothes.
4) They said no.
5) He said, Ok, I'm not playing.
They were overly strict, he was over-reactive. Both are in the wrong here.
Re: (Score:2)
Except if one would actually bother to read the dresscode for men rules, it says jeans are ok, but 'torn jeans' aren't. And his jeans weren't torn jeans. So there is something really fishy going on.
From quonset's post below (which quotes the rules):
“Sports sneakers, T-shirts, any kind of jeans, any kind of inappropriate cloth (e.g. torn cloth or cloth with holes, unclean cloth), sport caps, sun glasses” are not accepted.
Re: (Score:2)
for playing chess?
Yes. I came across this article [nytimes.com] from last year where a female player was told to change out of her plaid, canvas Burberry sneakers with white rubber soles. The article says:
The first rule of FIDE’s dress code for the tournament is “dress to impress,” the federation’s website states. The dress code is supposed to promote a “good and positive image of chess” and “shall be strictly enforced,” according to the website.
Generally, sneakers are allowed, but “sports sneakers” are not. The difference between the two is not clearly stated in the dress code.
For women in particular, the following is not allowed: “sport’s sneakers, clacking shoes, any kind of jeans, any kind of inappropriate cloth (e.g. torn cloth or cloth with holes, unclean cloth), sport caps, sun glasses, revealing attire.”
The rules for men are similar. “Sports sneakers, T-shirts, any kind of jeans, any kind of inappropriate cloth (e.g. torn cloth or cloth with holes, unclean cloth), sport caps, sun glasses” are not accepted.
Note the bolded part in the last paragraph. This would be the rule Carlsen violated and, unlike the female player, chose not to change. I haven't found the specific dress code policy, but this [fide.com] says the rules take effect after July of 2022. Under 11.5.3 it states jeans are not allowed at tournaments.
However, this article [thesportsgrail.com] about Carlsen
Re: (Score:2)
Those rules don't say anything about playing naked.
Re: (Score:2)
Those rules don't say anything about playing naked.
"Revealing attire" implicitly covers "no attire" so I'll say yes, they do say something about playing naked. ;-)
Re: (Score:2)
Whats wrong with sun glasses?
I might have a problem if it was held outdoors and sun glasses weren't allowed.
Re: (Score:2)
These old fogeys are pathetic
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
for playing chess?
After extensive research watching the first part of From Russia With Love [imdb.com], I conclude the chess dress code requires men to wear a suit, tie, and to smoke cigarettes. Eyeglasses are strongly encouraged, but not required.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Is there some special dress code (Score:5, Insightful)
why there are women and girls divisions.
Judit Polgar [wikipedia.org] is the highest-rated female player of all time at 2675.
More than 400 men have ratings higher than that.
Without a separate division, women would be completely shut out of top-level tournaments.
The reason for the gender gap is controversial. It may be nature, nurture, institutional sexism, or some combination. But there is certainly a big gap.
Re: Is there some special dress code (Score:2)
Looking at all-time numbers is not that interesting, given that women's condition and acceptance has changed considerably in relatively recent history. Looking at current numbers is more informative. What I say does not invalidate your general point, but it helps to look at data that are most relevant.
Hope the best for him (Score:5, Insightful)
He knows the dress rules, and he apparently got some slack the previous day.
Maybe a break is just what he needs. No disrespect to his talent.
Re:Hope the best for him (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
and he apparently got some slack the previous day.
Well, it sounds like if he got some slacks that would have been OK.
Re: (Score:3)
Love Magnus, but... He seems tired of the game;
His mom unexpectedly died this summer, so that is likely affecting his actions/mood/play.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm guessing not many.
Re: (Score:2)
Chess Needs No Dress Code (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Chess is a game. It's participants are players, not employees. This idea that players need to dress up in jacket and slacks in order to play a game is outright ridiculous. This should be a wake-up call to FIDE. It's requirements are stupid and needless. The problem is that the sort of people who implement these codes of conduct rarely question themselves or change their opinion. FIDE is likely to learn nothing.
Naked chess it is then.
(YouChess PPV Championships 2027 Commercial Ad) ”Wanna really put a fuckin’ on your player in the OTB position? Use Magnus-scented Magnum condoms. Sponsored by the OnlyFans channel Twitch wishes it had; Ch-A$$ TeeVee.”
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Perhaps. I have no skin in the game. But I do note that shogi (Japanese chess) while having no formal dress code generally everyone wears yukata / kimono i.e. traditional dress. There seems to be a kind of fashion associated with igo (Japanese checkers, where Othello came from). And there are apparently dress codes for some other sports like PGA and billiards championships (non-athletic wear, slacks I think). So it depends on the sport. It is not surprising, though probably irrelevant to the play, that a ch
Every sport has its uniform (Score:2)
It's a FIDE event, which meants the game is being played a sporting event, and all sports have their uniform. If someone from the Philadelphia Eagles shows up and tries to play while wearing a coat and tie, that player will be told to either wear a proper uniform or be ejected from the game.
Also... he joined their organization... they didn't join him. If he wants to wear jeans to to a competition, he can start his own club, with blackjack, and hookers.
Re: (Score:2)
My grandad tells an amusing story about this in his army memoir. He was selected for officer training towards the end of WWII, commissioned on New Year's Day 1946, and sent to the British Army of Occupation on the Rhine. As an acting captain, one of his duties was to spend one week of each month hearing courts martial.
The case he relates involved a company sergeant major (CSM) charged with being improperly dressed. The prosecuting officer said that the CSM had been seen chasing
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah so if someone goes in with a fluorescent Hawaiian shirt and clown hair .. that's not going to be distracting? Dress codes exist for a reason.It's not just about finding the best chess player but also doing so in a fair manner.
Re: (Score:3)
Chess is a game. It's participants are players, not employees. This idea that players need to dress up in jacket and slacks in order to play a game is outright ridiculous.
Sports are games too, many have dress codes. It's a matter of professional respect, not player safety equipment.
Re: (Score:2)
Only they are not specifying a uniform, they are just excluding certain forms of dress which they have an arbitrary disliking for.
About the only exclusion that seems remotely sensible is "clacking shoes" as the noise would be distracting.
Sports with a uniform are generally team sports, and the uniform exists to make it easier to identify members of the same team. Many sports also require free and easy movement of the limbs, or additional traction on the playing surface so the attire worn by players reflects
Re:Chess Needs No Dress Code (Score:4, Informative)
You drop dress standards, and then behavioral standards are sure to follow. This really is an argument between the young and naive (hating on dress codes) and the old and wise (who see the value in dress codes).
Re: (Score:2)
"the sort of people who implement these codes of conduct rarely question themselves"
Magnus Carlsen, if he actually had a principle that was affected, could have questioned it and any time *and yet he didn't*. He merely flouted it.
"FIDE is likely to learn nothing."
Magnus Carlsen is likely to learn nothing.
Re: (Score:3)
Whether it is stupid and needless is something that needs to be sorted out before the tournament. Once the rules are in place, it is disrespectful to other players to make exceptions to one player because he is a star.
Re: (Score:2)
Snooker has a dress code, I don't think chess needs it. I think snooker needs it though.
Is snooker any less of a thinky game? Should chess be more snooker? I don't think so, but it looks like a class statement more than for any good reason.
Re: (Score:2)
it looks like a class statement more than for any good reason.
Here in Silicon Valley, when you walk into a meeting, you can find the CEO by looking for the most casually dressed person in the room.
Re: (Score:3)
Are you saying Magnus Carlsen is FIDE CEO?
Re: (Score:2)
Are you saying Magnus Carlsen is FIDE CEO?
No, I think that ShanghaiBill is saying that SillyValley CEOs don't have class.
Re: (Score:2)
The fact is, FIDE had this problem previously in the form of Kasparov, and before that in form of Fischer.
Its the national chess federation of france and its forgotten once again that it should feel privileged that the players of the world recognize it as more than that. This is at a time when the money ($$$$$) is now all online, the largest chess entity in the world is chess.com by a very very very long shot.
FIDE will either facilitate big money events with the bes
Re: Chess Needs No Dress Code (Score:2)
Or you'll find the IT guru.
Re: (Score:2)
Or you'll find the IT guru.
In Silicon Valley, the IT guru is the CEO.
Re: (Score:2)
Or you'll find the IT guru.
In Silicon Valley, the IT guru is the CEO.
So, never been to SV, huh?
Re: (Score:2)
Watching tournaments would be much more entertaining if someone showed up dressed like RMS https://torrentfreak.com/image... [torrentfreak.com] and crushed everyone.
A matter of principle? (Score:1)
So, it's a matter of principle to violate their dress code, that he knew of in advance? Personally, I'm generally not a fan of dress codes, but if one doesn't like them for an event, don't attend. Someone mentioned that he may have gotten some slack about his lack of slacks on another day, but that's not an excuse to continue the behavior once informed. Alternatively, maybe he wasn't doing as well as he liked and this was just a convenient excuse to back out...?
Re: (Score:1)
nonsense, a person can attend "an event" in the broad sense and ignore dress code, and see what happens.
Imagine having a dress code for a board game, pffft. those chess event organizers are full of themselves.
Re: A matter of principle? (Score:1)
The rules are the rules. If you dont like them then dont fucking play. Everywhere has minimum dress codes other than nudist beaches and yours is clearly set at young teenager level with an attitude to match. Grow up.
Re: (Score:2)
you're an idiot. its fucking chess and the FIDE are actually retarded.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm looking forward to how this trend will develop. Maybe at future athletics (track and field) championships, competitors will be required to wear bow ties (not tartan) and spats. Or whatever the organisers choose to impose on them.
Sports events are about the competitors, not the organisers. (Who usually do very nicely out of them).
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I say, go back to the basics. Full nudity.
Re: (Score:2)
Malicious rumors (Score:2)
ludicrous dress code (Score:2)
Lycra is the solution (Score:3)
Re: Lycra is the solution (Score:3)
Or a kilt.
Powdered wigs (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
He "quit"? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
He "quit" after being informed that he would not be permitted to continue. Words have meanings.
He was told he would not be permitted to continue dressed as he was. He chose to quit instead of change his clothes.
Yes, words have meanings. And the manner in which you display them can change the meaning, as you demonstrated.
Was he about to lose again? (Score:2, Informative)
Last time he got beat by a kid he quit, baselessly accused his opponent of cheating, used his influence to get colleagues who shared his financial fortunes to back up his claim, got sued for $100 million, and finally forced to admit he had nothing.
What a cry baby.
Re: Was he about to lose again? (Score:2)
You mean "don't like".
Some misunderstandings here. (Score:2)
He had started badly, 2 1/2 points out of 5 on the first day.
This happened on the second day, I'm not sure how his first game went but then he was told to change - I'm also not sure how long it would have
Re: (Score:2)
Karjakin (Score:2, Informative)
But Carlsen is wearing the wrong pants.
Re: (Score:2)
They proudly support Karjakin despite his constant propaganda for the Russian military
Just curious, how many times has Karjakin wore Russian military propaganda to a FIDE event?
Dress code. (Score:2)
Build a chess robot that wears jeans.
Seems the insanity is setting in... (Score:2)
Although I thought that was basically a myth?
professionalism and fairness for all participants? (Score:2)
Professionalism, maybe, although that sounds more like something served through behavior. But fairness? Exactly how is that served by a dress code?
I suppose a contestant with an OF side hustle might get an unfair advantage by wearing something wildly inappropriate, but jeans?
The governing body has the right to insist on this. I just object to the rationale. "We are stuffy and would prefer to keep it that way" would be more defensible.
Nothing (Score:2)
Steve Jobs⦠(Score:2)
Wore jeans to a black tie event our college held euth him as the guest of hinr when the Mac was first released.
He was the only one to ignore the dress code. Of course, what was anyone else to object?
Dress-up play for gentlemen (Score:3)
Apparently, the important thing in a chess competition is not playing chess. It's being dressed up for photographers.
At this point, they've lost all credibility when they pretend to be serious.
That a cheating device in your 501's (Score:2)
...or are you just happy to see me?
Fucking Chess People (Score:2)
are weird as fuck.
"It's about and/or ensures professionalism"
No, it fucking doesn't. There has been plenty of unprofessional conduct in chess while dressed up all nice.
"It's about respect"
No, it's not. There is no valid argument for that.
"Unfair to the previous people fined"
Then give the money back to them.
I understand a dress code forbidding things like offensive language or whatever, especially if event is being broadcast. But jeans? They're pants. They're covering everything they need to. Show up in carg
Re: (Score:2)
him showing disrespect for the tournament and fellow participants that actually bothered to dress to the requested dress code
Nope. Completely irrelevant.
You are in need of a haircut, do you go to the person in a barber outfit or the one wearing a swimsuit?
I check the ratings and reviews of people who actually got a haircut from them. Not to mention, this isn't even a similar situation. Me using appearance to judge wear I spend money on a service is nowhere close to the same thing as people judging what a player who pays an entry fee to play in a tournament is wearing. What people think of you based on your appearance doesn't matter when it can't have an effect on the outcome.
Dress like a clown, and people will see you as a clown. Image still matters.
Not in a tournament. Image doesn't matter here. Skill does. I don't care if there is a person wearing a loin cloth going up against people in full tuxedos. I don't care if someone comes out in legitimate full blown clown make-up and attire, complete with honking shoes. If it can pass TV broadcasting without needing to be censored, then it's good enough to wear while playing fucking chess. It's not a team sport where they're contractually obligated to wear a uniform. They don't have sponsor contracts like requiring them to wear certain clothes.
Wear what is comfortable to you. If you want to wear a suit and tie, cool. If you want to wear pajamas, cool. If you want to wear jeans and hoodie, also cool. None of it makes a difference on the reason they all are there to begin with - playing chess.
Because clothing . . . (Score:2)
. . . has everything to do with chess?
What stupid fucking rules.
Re: (Score:2)
Chess has nothing on Snooker dress controversies