Heretic II for Linux 63
whoop writes "Loki has up on their page that they are now working on Heretic II by Raven Software. That's number 5, three to go for this year... " That reminds me - I still need to buy Civ:CTP. I'm glad to see Loki doing so well. With any luck, a press release
will be up soon.
Re:Wow. (Score:1)
I haven't tried it yet, but it looks pretty cool.
James
Loki Portal Site! (Score:1)
Windows TM is a registered trademarketer (Score:1)
Sincerely,
Steve Balmier
Microserf
P.S.: Please lowball our profit estimates so we can wow them again and drive the stock price up. I want to buy Micronesia and turn it into a theme park.
Wonder if ... (Score:1)
Since I'm one of those Neilsen Home Shoppers
Re:Civ::CTP windows Vs Linux (Score:1)
Re:Why bother? (Score:1)
kmj
The only reason I keep my ms-dos partition is so I can mount it like the b*tch it is.
Re:Civ:CTP has made it to CompUSA (Score:1)
But they had them piled up in a corner by a doorway, way off to the side. What was really amazing was they had 4 versions of Linux! It was great! Red Hat, Mandrake, Open Linux and S.U.S.E! Now if they could just get those games out of the corner!
Even better... (Score:1)
Another customer overheard me asking for a Linux game and said "Wow! I didn't they were coming out with Linux games! This is great! I run RedHat at home." Then the clerk said "Yeah, me too! It's great!"
Three Linux users in EB in the mall. Now THAT'S success.
---
Put Hemos through English 101!
Linux Not Windows, So It's a Bad Risk. (Score:4)
I know there has been a lot of positive press, but just forget about it because Linux is a rehash of the old Share-ware concept, plus it [Linux] is Unix, a non-standard, fragmented operating system that no one uses and nobody wants that.
Selling Linux will do no good anyway because the product is too unstable and causes blindness in laboratory tests with Mac users.
Businesses will not buy Linux because there is no one to sue. Ignore the fact that anybody who has tried to sue Microsoft has typically ended up bankrupt, and wishing they had attempted something less risky such as using the money to purchase lotto tickets. End users don't want Linux because it is too hard to use, so it's generally a bad investment.
Besides, everyone who competes with Microsoft fails. Linux is just like the OS/2 thing and we all know where that ended up. Billy crushed it like a bug! He's going to do the same thing to these companies, just you wait. Never mind that under-cutting a free product is impossible. Billy will find a way to pay people to take Windows, and still make money.
Linux has failed to make serious inroads into the corporate marketplace. Just forget those fortune 500 companies that IDC [idc.com] surveyed. Forget that Linux had over 200% growth in 1998 [news.com]. Those International Data Corp. guys can't be trusted because they aren't independent like Mindcraft.Moreover, the system lacks the applications - graphics, word processing capabilities, databases - to compete with Microsoft's personal computer business.
People won't develop these applications anyway, because they will pay too much for the development tools.
Don't believe the stuff you read over at freshmeat.net [freshmeat.net]. There's a lot of false Linux propaganda on that site that you can't trust. Also forget you saw Wordperfect, Star Office, The Gimp, Oracle, Informix, DB2, and a million other productivity and mission critical applications, free or proprietary.
You're obviously a Religious Open Source Cult member if you buy any of that stock. Never mind that I'm probably selling most of my Microsoft stock as we speak, and putting it in mutual funds because keeping it is getting too risky.
If you have comments or suggestions about this article, please feel free to flame^H^H^H^H^Hemail me at HERE [mailto].
- greg [mailto],
Re:Why didn't I think of this? (Score:1)
I guess the hardest part would be getting the foot in the door, getting that first company to fork over the source code to you. Then you can prove yourself.
I think it died... (Score:1)
Shame too- GC seemed like a cool strategy game.
Re:Civ::CTP windows Vs Linux (Score:2)
Color me unimpressed. Remember back in 1994 when OS/2 Warp was outselling Windows at retail? When all was said and done, those millions of OS/2 CDs translated into very few permanent OS/2 desktops and servers. I think we're seeing a similar phenomenon with retail Linux CDs.
Here's my theory on what's going on: There a huge base (probably millions) of low level techies and power users out there (think of the legions of Win95 desktop support people!) - people who just like dinking around with computers. The next gigantic Windows upgrade has been delayed for sometime, and there's no real joy in installing DirectX 9 or Service Pack 6. So people's hands start getting itchy and when they hear about this super cool new OS, they just have to go and install it.
But once they get through the Linux install, and surf around a bit with Netscape, and maybe install and run a game or two, interest is going to cool. Fighting with the Exchange or Notes e-mail system at work, too many damn Word documents, and slow graphic performance will eventually push many of these folks back to Windows. When Win2000 gets out the door, it will just be the next latest and greatest thing to fiddle with.
Note that this process is not bad for Linux in any way. People are getting their eyes opened to the free software culture and Unix. Some of the I'll-try-Linux crowd will end up as permanent Linux users (just as with OS/2). Many of these Win95 techies will eventually end up as server admins somewhere. They'll have knowledge of the alternatives and they'll be more open to non-Windows solutions. Plus, RedHat and SuSe get some quick cash to build up the software with.
Just don't make the mistake believing that x boxes of retail Linux sold ~= x Linux desktops. It's a mistake that many OS/2 supporters made, and when it really came down to the line, the user's weren't there for OS/2.
--
Re:Civ:CTP has made it to CompUSA (Score:1)
Someone tried to port Galactic Civilizations... (Score:1)
Hey cool (Score:2)
I'll note that CompUSA has the double-width value-packs for quake1 and quake2 for linux, adding up to a not insignificant amount of shelf space.
It's a JOKE!!! (Score:1)
Come-on people get a life and realize when someon is pulling your leg.
Take a look at this [netcom.com] and SEE.
- greg [mailto]
Re:Civ:CTP has made it to CompUSA (Score:1)
I saw it on the shelf right next to the MS-Win copy of CTP. Made me gape. Then cheer.
---
Re:I propose a different goal (Score:2)
Re:Civ::CTP windows Vs Linux (Score:1)
They also pretty much all know it's free, and prefer buying the RedHat box at 115$ CDN rather than the InfoMagick kit at 40$ or so, because they want the phone support and want to install it on their company's server.
I agree we must not be blindly happy about Linux's growth, and avoid the same failure as OS/2. Although people are already spreading lots of FUD about Windows 2000 (ironic..), and I believe it's time to be confident about Linux. I trust the development model we have right now, rather than the one OS/2 had.
Re:Loki = StarDock of Old (Score:1)
Too bad... Entrepreneur is about the only thing I still boot into that other OS (OS/2) for...
Bye-bye Windows (Score:1)
Now if they only port Elite: Final Frontier to Linux, I'm going to trash my Windows forever.
I propose a different goal (Score:1)
I don't really have a specific title in mind, maybe someone can think of a good one and we can suggest it to Loki.
Re:Civ::CTP windows Vs Linux (Score:2)
Depends what you mean by a Linux Desktop. I've got Solaris 7 x86 installed as one of the 5 OSes on my machine. Occasionally I'll dink with it to to try to teach myself how to do something under Solaris.
Does that mean I have a Solaris desktop? I guess by your definiton it does - but by mine defintion, and by the defintion any company investigating the Solaris x86 market it certainly does not.
(At least I can get my work Notes Mail under Solaris x86, which is more than I can say about Linux. Which reminds me to try setting up wine one of these days.)
I don't know how Microsoft calculates it's marketshare, but a safe bet might be all non-server x86 PCs minus ~5-10%.
--
Re:Bye-bye Windows (Score:1)
Re:I propose a different goal (Score:1)
Re:It's a JOKE!!! (Score:1)
Wow. (Score:1)
Civ:CTP and Loki (Score:1)
Also of note, there's an interview with Loki in the latest copy of Linux Journal.
Re:Wow. (Score:1)
Heretic II is a fairly recent title (well, less than a year old), and uses the Quake II engine.
Are you thinking of Heretic, part one?
Why bother? (Score:2)
They don't need to raise a bunch of money.
----
Weren't supposed to announce (Score:3)
IPO? (Score:1)
Re:Why bother? (Score:1)
Re:Loki = StarDock of Old (Score:1)
Wasn't CodeByDesign [codebydesign.com] porting one of Stardock's titles (Galactic Civilizations?) to Linux? Anyone know what happened to the port? There isn't any information on those pages any more.
Re:Civ:CTP has made it to CompUSA (Score:1)
"Sure, we have CTP"
"Is it for Linux?"
"Umm... Nope."
Was this a new stack? Maybe they got on it here finally.
Why didn't I think of this? (Score:2)
With a few decent libraries and some pretty good coders, it can't be that hard to port games from Windows over to Linux (as evidenced by the fact that Loki's working on number five for the year).
This is a hell of a way to make money; is anyone doing it for the Mac? Look, you don't have to worry about if your game will be a flop or not, you don't really have to deal with major production delays (Romero.. Oh, excuse me), and you don't have to sink that much cash into getting the game out the door.
Instead, you license the hits of other companies and port 'em over to a popular platform. You make money, they make money, and everybody wins (assuming the game companies don't catch on and start porting their hits by themselves).
So, how long until we see Alpha Centauri for Linux, damnit?
----
Re:Why didn't I think of this? (Score:1)
Re:Wow. (Score:1)
My Heretic box sleep in my room and i've to take them from the dust. I hope that the Loki port would be compatible with the old MS product pak.
Re:Civ:CTP has made it to CompUSA (Score:1)
"Me too!"
I saw the same thing at an Electronics Boutique -- in a mall fer goshsakes.
world domination must be just around the corner ;^)
Civ::CTP windows Vs Linux (Score:1)
Re:Civ::CTP windows Vs Linux (Score:1)
Well, yeah. Let us not forget, impending world domination or no, nearly every consumer computer shipped still comes with RedmondWare, and an increasing number of those come with Office apps too. So people don't need to buy those MS CDs, they already have 'em.
How many of those people who buy Linux comment "but I thought this was free!"?
Re:The nice thing about future Loki titles... (Score:1)
So, GO SUSE indeed, but they could stand to go a little quicker. It's not such a problem for long-standing Linux people like me and the MO company, but if they're trying to sell to the more traditional retailers they're gonna find themselves with problems.
Civ CTP is at MicroCenter (Score:2)
I really feel it's important for the Linux community to support products like this. at >$50 it's a drop in the bucket and it will encourage others to release Linux based apps (games as well as other applications) IMHO it will go a long way to legitimize Linux to the general public when they see Linux apps in retail stores.
Re:I propose a different goal (Score:2)
That being said, I realised that I was wrong: Tux: A quest for herring [woodsoup.org] will probably match up properly when it's finished, as the author's aiming for a Mario64-esque game. I personally haven't played it, but it might be what you're looking for, and what's more, it's Free Software!
The nice thing about future Loki titles... (Score:2)
Now, however, with the lessons learned with CTP and the distribution channels established, and the obvious sucess of CTP for Linux (Heck I even saw it in our local Hastings bookstore!), the distribution of future Linux by Loki to mass distributors should be much faster, both in the US and Europe (GO, SUSE!)
"Breaker, this here is the Rubber Duck, and we got ourselves a convoy!"
jf
Re:I propose a different goal (Score:2)
Computers aren't just for games, people. You want games only? Buy a console.
-- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
Re:Why bother? (Score:1)
Just who do you think you are?
kmj
The only reason I keep my ms-dos partition is so I can mount it like the b*tch it is.
LOKI Not Windows. It is a bad risk... (Score:1)
I know there has been a lot of positive press, but just forget about it because Linux is a rehash of the old Share-ware concept, plus it [Linux] is Unix, a non-standard, fragmented operating system that no one uses and nobody wants that.
Selling Linux will do no good anyway because the product is too unstable and causes blindness in laboratory tests with Mac users.
Businesses will not buy Linux because there is no one to sue. Ignore the fact that anybody who has tried to sue Microsoft has typically ended up bankrupt, and wishing they had attempted something less risky such as using the money to purchase lotto tickets. End users don't want Linux because it is too hard to use, so it's generally a bad investment.
Besides, everyone who competes with Microsoft fails. Linux is just like the OS/2 thing and we all know where that ended up. Billy crushed it like a bug! He's going to do the same thing to these companies, just you wait. Never mind that under-cutting a free product is impossible. Billy will find a way to pay people to take Windows, and still make money.
Linux has failed to make serious inroads into the corporate marketplace. Just forget those fortune 500 companies that IDC [idc.com] surveyed. Forget that Linux had over 200% growth in 1998 [news.com]. Those International Data Corp. guys can't be trusted because they aren't independent like Mindcraft.Moreover, the system lacks the applications - graphics, word processing capabilities, databases - to compete with Microsoft's personal computer business.
People won't develop these applications anyway, because they will pay too much for the development tools.
Don't believe the stuff you read over at freshmeat.net [freshmeat.net]. There's a lot of false Linux propaganda on that site that you can't trust. Also forget you saw Wordperfect, Star Office, The Gimp, Oracle, Informix, DB2, and a million other productivity and mission critical applications, free or proprietary.
You're obviously a Religious Open Source Cult member if you buy any of that stock. Never mind that I'm probably selling most of my Microsoft stock as we speak, and putting it in mutual funds because keeping it is getting too risky.
If you have comments or suggestions about this article, please feel free to flame^H^H^H^H^Hemail me at HERE [mailto].
- greg [mailto]
Re:Civ:CTP has made it to CompUSA (Score:1)