Cygnus Announces Game Boy Devel Environment 144
GB Fan writes "Cygnus announced today their new development environment for Nintendo's Game Boy Advance that is expected this fall. You can read more about it at GB Station. "
"Gotcha, you snot-necked weenies!" -- Post Bros. Comics
If Windows is so crappy... (Score:1)
Re:This can't be true -- But it is (Score:1)
Here's the ARM press release from Sept 99:
Nintendo uses ARM® processor in next generation Game Boy [arm.com]
Legal questions (Score:1)
Re:There are better "toys" out there than the Game (Score:1)
I've never heard of the Neo Geo Pocket.
All I know about Neo Geo is that the main system bombed because it was way too expensive at the time.
Re:Already exists... (Score:1)
torpor wrote:
If you ask me, the Gameboy platform is a hackers delight... I know I love mine, and the tools I've gotten from the Asian GB Hacker contingency definitely make life more interesting.
Is there a demoscene for the Gameboy?
But slipping... (Score:1)
Re:RAM (Score:1)
No mention of RAM, but I'd take a look at what is available from ARM and assume it is about the same (I'd do it but I'm already late for something.).
Re:Linux for Gameboy? (Score:1)
Ok, so who's gonna be the first to port Linux to the GameBoy? Could this be used as competition for the PalmPilot, maybe a simpler version, or entertainment only, or is it too limited a platform?
ELKS might be an option, but even if only gtk and/or Mozilla were ported, then we'd have something.
Hmmm... (Score:1)
TETRIS
Replace your venerable QUAKE programming aid with TETRIS today!
Re:Gameboy Advance? (Score:1)
Re:Gameboy Advance? (Score:1)
Note that low battery consumption is also a feature of Gameboy Color, since the color LCD screen isn't backlit. This is IMHO a wise design choice, since people usually have other light sources around them, plus reflected light is easier on the eyes than directly emitted light (or so I've heard). If you need to play when there is no light (out in the woods at night, to take your mind off the wolves), there are accessories that provide light.
Re:But slipping... (Score:1)
(NeoGeo had Pacman, but you get that for GBC too, now.)
Re:copyright/sales questions (Score:1)
That's the irony: The GBC has only 32 kibytes of RAM, but the memory on the cartridges is up to 32 Mibytes (megabytes for you old-fashioned geeks) IIRC.
The Atari VCS/2600 cartridges also had more memory, to compensate for the 6 kibytes present... :-)
Re:More to Game Boy Color than Pokemon (Score:1)
Isn't Dragon Warriors Monsters a Pokémon "clone"? Anyway, the GBC has all the markings of a proper retro-gaming architecture: Sufficiently low specs to match the old home computers like the Beeb or Speccy. Already, you can get Bubble Bobble, Spy vs. Spy and Ghosts 'n Goblins for it, for instance.
Re:Already exists... (Score:1)
jez its just an ARM7 (Score:1)
thats whats in the gameboys ARM's threy last a long time on very little batterys alowing the screen to eat alll the batterys
regards
john
a poor student @ bournemouth uni in the UK (a deltic so please dont moan about spelling but the content)
first application (Score:1)
Mmmm, 1,800 arcade games in one...
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Tools that are avalible now (Score:1)
A literary conundrum (Score:1)
As it happens, I have moderator access right now, but until they have a +i for Meshugga, I don't think I'd presume to moderate that post.
Re:Gameboy Advance? (Score:1)
For many reasons.
First of all, the game boy had the best games. The original Super Mario Land, the classic Tetris, and many other games was far better than any of the games for the other systems.
Especially Zelda: Links Awakening rocked when it was released in 1995 and is still one of my favourite games (not only on the GB).
Another reason could be the price. I remember the Atari Lynx as a very expensive system. And compared to todays Game Boy Color it only had 16 (ugly) colors. And then it lagged good games.
Sega also released a handheld color system as far as I remember, but it ate the batteries quite fast and was also expensive. Beside of that, I think it was/did better than the Lynx. Some of the original Master System games was converted to it, as the two systems was nearly identical.
In other words, the game boy has always been the cheapest handheld system with the best games. Only the last four years has been a bit dull in my opinion. I miss the old Final Fantasy RPGs. And Nintendo should really do a sequel to Zelda =)
Re:Gameboy Inferior (Score:1)
But the real reason the other handhelds (like your TurboExpress, and I'm also thinking of my lil'ol Sega GameGear) failed wasn't due to the hardware, because like you said, they all had advanced hardware, advanced for their time.
It was their design!
Your TurboExpress is wide and fat, correct? Like my GameGear? The Gameboy is small. It can fit in most pockets, takes up little space, and it's controls are in the right places, unlike some portables ^_^
Gameboy's lasted for so long because of it's simple design, and because it's always had a hundred million games available for it. I can remember when Nintendo used to release a game, and then release the same game for Gameboy.
So Nintendo's done a few things right. Gameboy and NES were two of them, Super Nintendo...well.
Sure your TurboExpress can eat my bro's old Gameboy, but you'll get cramps ^_^
miyax
Re:Gameboy Advance? (Score:1)
-----------
"You can't shake the Devil's hand and say you're only kidding."
Re:Dolphin (Score:1)
BTW, the console is gettign developed, and a lot of companies already have dev kits. ANd some of the really big companies (Rare) have had them for quite a while now. So don't fret too much : )
Re:Gameboy Inferior (Score:1)
Yes, the vectrex was a beautiful machine. I paid $100 for one, but I still need to get the multicart(all the released games on one cart)
If you want to do more than just games.... (Score:1)
Re:If Windows is so crappy... (Score:1)
True. I stated they captured the game developers, I didn't say when. Anyway, DOS was MS by and large, correct? I mean, DR-DOS and PC-DOS existed, and if the stars were right and you had the right drivers you could play them under OS/2, but by and large when you say DOS you're saying MS-DOS. Kristian
Re:If Windows is so crappy... (Score:1)
Re:Gameboy Advance? (Score:1)
and then they made other good games for it, and the marketing for it has always been pretty good
Any hard data on this? (Score:1)
Re:Any hard data on this? (Score:1)
<sarcasm> No mere mortal could DARE master or even understand the underlying technology. </sarcasm>
The first thing out of Nintendo's hole? (Score:1)
Even if it doesn't send OUT data, they would probably still say that. Nintendo is too old and out of touch with good things like this. Perhaps some day they'll think with their minds, instead of their lawyers.
Re:Gameboy Inferior (Score:1)
The Game Boy was outdated before the first day it went on sale. Had it not gotten such great 3rd party support, the little guy would've died long ago, but it continues to sell because it simply has the games that people want to play.
Re:Gameboy Advance? (Score:1)
Re:Not likely. (Score:1)
Any serious video game player has several consoles - just because a new platform's released, you don't can all your old games. For the majority of people, the software's the issue, not the perceived "purity" of the platform... The "toy" end of the market ain't a problem because (as P.T. Barnum said, in an entirely unrelated context) there's one born every minute. Since the original GB was released in (IIRC) 1988, a generation has grown up. New generation, new Gameboy - it's got a nice ring to it, don't you think <g>
Most importantly Nintendo, like Sony and Sega are in this for the long haul. If it takes them 10 years to sell 100m GBAs then that's fine with them - the revenue stream is in the software so the longer you can keep the platform active in the marketplace, the better.
--
Cheers
Re:There are better "toys" out there than the Game (Score:1)
There are a couple of other cool features... 2AA batteries and the same battery life as the GBC, plus it also has an internal clock, calendar, alarm, and horoscope
Anyway... I like my NGPC better than a GBC.
Re:Gameboy Revival (Score:1)
I looked at the game briefly before she snagged it, and it really reminds me of the old dungeon and dragons type of games, with a touch of zork thrown in.
Needless to say as soon as she gets done, i've got dibs on it.
Re:C:\DOS C:\DOS\RUN \RUN\DOS\RUN (Score:1)
Re:Game Boy Advance (Score:1)
Actully the article says August 2000...
Anyway... the Gameboy has, and will be for a long time to come, the best ever hand-held. Hell, Nintendo still make the best consoles and games.
The PSX is for the pop culture, the N64 is for the console gamer with taste...
Nintendo will be back in 2001 with the Dolphin.... you all just wait [Insert Evil Laugh]
Miyamoto is the REAL god, Linux just writes kernels, not kick ass masterpieces....
That'll do, enough Nintendo related ramblings....
Re:What about an Open Source plug-in for the GB? (Score:1)
Disclaimer: the above is my understanding of Nintendo's position. Just because I understand something does not mean I support it, neither does it mean I am against it.
Re:There are better "toys" out there than the Game (Score:1)
Anyway, the point I was making was that "developer types" are less likely to use the Gameboy, since, as you stated, it's only got "a couple mediocre games." I agree that it's great for just smacking in a cartridge and playing (unless it's that annoying Pokemon game. Sheesh!), but it's not quite advanced enough for older, Linux-using, Perl-programming Geeks. My 8 year old brother loves his, though. Why wouldn't he? He gets to play his games, but by the time he's old enough to program Perl scripts with his eyes tied behind his back, he'll want more. I guarantee it.
[disclaimer]
I wasn't flaming. I agree with your point, and was just trying to clarify the one I was trying to make.
[/disclaimer]
Mike
Linux for GameBoy Advance? (Score:1)
It's the #1 Tetris Platform (Score:1)
Re:C:\DOS C:\DOS\RUN \RUN\DOS\RUN (Score:1)
Dolphin (Score:1)
WE NEED THE DOLPHIN!
Re:Gameboy Advance? (Score:1)
Re:This can't be true (Score:1)
Maybe they'll design a gameboy with a stylus (Score:1)
Re:What about an Open Source plug-in for the GB? (Score:1)
ti_dave
RAM (Score:1)
What is the footprint C standard lib on Cygnus's dev suite? I understand GB/Color has to be mostly programmed assembly because RAM is such a scarse resource.
Thank you for information on this from coders who work with GB.
Corrinne Yu
3D Game Engine Programmer
Re:Tools that are avalible now (Score:1)
Corrinne Yu
3D Game Engine Programmer
Re:Gameboy Advance? (Score:1)
Linux for Gameboy? (Score:1)
GameBoyOS?
Re:Gameboy Advance? (Score:1)
The question remains: why did the gameboy got onto the public market and not Lynx:
1. Size. The Lynx was large, the gameboy was much more portable.
2. Battery life. Since the color display in the Lynx uses alot of amperes, the battery life is quite short.
3. Better games.
4. There is no spoon
Maybe the price also made a role (I can imagine a GB mono being less expensive than a Lynx), but I can't remember any price compares.
Stats (Score:1)
Re:If Windows is so crappy... (Score:1)
Marketing.
That being said, just to stay on topic, the Gameboy remained popular for a different reason. It's competition came along too late to do anything. The GB had far too great a library of games to compete with it. The end result is: like Windows, the technically inferior product has all the good software. And without decent support, technical superiority don't mean jack.
Re:Gameboy Advance? (Score:1)
Someone, quick, sue Nintendo for antitrust! :)
(OT) Announcing Hackboy? (Score:1)
-F
Re:When colour depth surpasses resolution... (Score:1)
When colour depth surpasses resolution... (Score:1)
From the Yeah-But-Can-It-Cook? dept. :)
Re:Technical superiority... (Score:1)
Re:Gameboy Revival (Score:1)
Re:Game Boy Advance (Score:2)
Re:Your link doesn't work! (Score:2)
ROM Burner too... (Score:2)
Note however that these ROM Burners aren't supposed to be sold in the US because of some lawsuit - apparently they were being used to pirate Gameboy ROM's. Lame, but oh well.
s/bunk/bung/ (Score:2)
Sorry, that URL should be:
http://www.bung.com.hk/
Gameboy Advance? (Score:2)
Any ideas why the Gameboy did so much better than the technically better Atari Lynx (which had color like 8 years ago) and all the other handheld machines? It doesn't seem like any handheld has done that well besides the Gameboy.
Re:Gameboy Advance? (Score:2)
Basically, the GB won out for two reasons, despite being the only one with a monochrome screen. Battery life (The big plus of having a mono screen), and size. The Sega Game Gear and the Atari Lynx were just a bit to big... The Game Boy fit in your pocket, even the original one. (Although you had to have a reasonably large pocket.)
The other systems would only have been able to fit in the pockets of pants like those that a friend of mine wears. He can put an entire N64 in his pocket.
Note that these are two of the main reasons that the Palm Pilot destroyed the Newton. The Newton was too big and chewed up batteries too quickly. Apple just tried to make it TOO powerful. (Palm vs. CE is a different story - WinCE just plain sucks.
Re:Gameboy Advance? (Score:2)
2) Good pack-in game, Tetris.
3) Came out when Nintendo was still top of the gaming world. Playstation wasn't around yet, and Sega was just catching on. So the most popular games of the time, Super Mario and Zelda, were only available on the Gameboy.
Ohh ooh, connect your Palm Pilot to the GB (Score:2)
That way, if you were working a long shift on New Years Eve :), and you got bored with the games you have you could connect a modem to your palm pilot, download new freeware GB games, and then power up your GB and away you go ...
Okay, I'm getting carried away this idea ... back to work.
Will Nintendo like this? (Score:2)
Re:SOC/RO -- Gameboys (Score:2)
Consciousness is not what it thinks it is
Thought exists only as an abstraction
Re:Tools that are avalible now (Score:2)
Re:There are better "toys" out there than the Game (Score:2)
The Palms and other PDA's are great for what they do, but for games they just don't compare. Do you really think a kid's gonna save up ~$400 for a Palm V just to get a couple mediocre games?
gameboy screen size (Score:2)
"Suble Mind control? why do html buttons say submit?",
Technical superiority... (Score:2)
The GB also weighed a fraction of the GG, and it was a lot smaller.
The GG/lynx might have had pretter graphics, but they were pretty much usless for what they were intended for. There's more to technical superiority then CPU speed
"Suble Mind control? why do html buttons say submit?",
Re:If Windows is so crappy... (Score:2)
-----------
"You can't shake the Devil's hand and say you're only kidding."
Re:Legal questions (Score:2)
1. You will have access to Nintendo's technical documentation or examples.
2. Anything you develop will be approved by Nintendo.
If you do manage to get hardware docs and hack a game together, you really can't do anything with it except try to find a publisher or distribute it to other people who have hacked hardware. Note that Cygnus is in the development tool business, and they've done custom gcc ports for other platforms as well, including the PlayStation. This has nothing at all to do with enabling home programmers to write games for closed hardware.
Re:There are better "toys" out there than the Game (Score:2)
I've never heard of the Neo Geo Pocket.
OK then. A while ago, I forget when, SNK decided to get into the pocket console business by releasing the Neo Geo Pocket. I don't know much about that; It was 16-bit, but grayscale, though I'm not sure how many shades of it there were. (I think, at least. The existence of monochrome games for the NGPC somewhat supports the existence of this, though I'm not sure and can be wrong)
A few months ago (probably a little longer), they released a better system that had color, the Neo Geo Pocket Color (heh, inventive name, eh?). Anyway, you can buy it at SNK America [snkusa.com] or most stores that sell video games; I know I've seen it at Software Etc, Electronics Botique, K*B Toys, and Wal-Mart.
One of my favorite things about the system is the joystick; it's got a good amount of resistance, not too much and not too little. It's almost like a hatswitch, there's a sort of dimple on top of it that your thumb fits comfortably into. It also clicks when you press any direction, so you can accurately time moves in fighting games.
The LCD is 160x152, and is capable of displaying 146 colors out of a possible pallate of 4096. In the hardware itself, the screen can be extended to deal with 256x256 at once. It has a Toshiba TLCS-900H cpu, 16-bit, and a separate Z80 for sound (which comes out sounding like the GB does). Memory isn't stored in the game cartridges, but on the system itself (which makes me wonder how much memory is on there), which is backed up by a (included) CR2032 battery. It runs for "up to" 40 hours on 2 AA batteries, and my experiences confirm this... as long as the sound is off. Which you might want anyway. The LCD is very clear in light, even dim light; it uses the same reflective LCD technology used in the GBC screen.
One of the more interesting things for it is the link cable to hook up certain games to a Sega Dreamcast. These are King of Fighters R-1, and SNK vs Capcom CFC and MOTM. They unlock secrets in KOF:DM 1999 and the upcoming SNK Vs Capcom for the Dreamcast.
There's not that many titles available for the NGPC; they're all very good though, coming from SNK, Capcom, and Sega. A partial listing:
All of this makes the NGPC my favorite portable, and the best on the market. Sales have been decent, though as might be expected the GBC is selling more hardware and software.
Not likely. (Score:2)
The reason of this is basically because there is something like 30 million gameboys [? correct me if I'm wrong] and converting this many people over would take years and years. Most console upgrades only concern a few million users, and that is done fairly easily.
Upgrading to gameboy advance could be viewed as changing from cd to dvd-audio. It would take years, and people would fight it.
I'm not opposed to a great piece of new hardware, this would be really great if it got released stateside, but the 64dd was also a good idea, and look what happened.
The development tools for linux are pretty cool, but coding for smaller hardware is usually done in assembly due to the ram limitations. Anyone owning a ti-calc will testify that asm is quicker than ti-basic.
Basically all that is going to happen here is either:
a. delays [n64 anyone?]
b. no stateside release [64dd]
c. massive success [gameboy]
I'm rooting for #3, but i'm not getting my hopes up.
copyright/sales questions (Score:2)
I know you are trolling but (Score:2)
There is a GB force feedback/audio speaker amplier/rechargeable battery add-on pack, that provides force feedback directly proportional to audio volume.
Get a Bung Gameboy development system. Code a short simple app that plays audio at high volume. Hook up your gameboy to this peripheral. There you have it.
Corrinne Yu
3D Game Engine Programmer
SOC/RO -- Gameboys (Score:3)
Hell yes, even better: amateur game developers (Score:3)
See this page for more details:
http://www.bung.com.hk/html/2nd_results.htm
Already exists... (Score:3)
Note that they also have a pretty nifty voice recorder accessory for the Gameboy too, which has just recently been hacked to be able to play back movies on the GB Color.
If you ask me, the Gameboy platform is a hackers delight... I know I love mine, and the tools I've gotten from the Asian GB Hacker contingency definitely make life more interesting.
Nothing like having a high-availabilty, cheap portable computing platform that can be fully hacked on. $50 at most Toy stores here in the US, full development kits available online, and life is sweet once you've gotten a ROM burner for it.
My GameBoy hacking facilities have become a veritable sonic screwdriver...
What about an Open Source plug-in for the GB? (Score:3)
Imagine the type of games that would be released if people who could write their own GB games ... I'm sure people could come up with better games that what is currently on the market for GB.
Re:SOC/RO -- Gameboys (Score:3)
Tools that are avalible now (Score:3)
The above SDK also comes with an gameboy Z80(gameboy's Z80 is a little different) assembler, and the debugger that's included in no$gmb is very good.
Not putting Cygnus down at all, I'm sure their tools will be great. But if anyone wants to do gb dev now, there are plenty of free tools avalible now. Including things like map and tile editors.
links:
http://freespace.virgin.net/stephen.blanksby/gbst
http://gbdev.com hosts the GBDK site (down as of this post)
Re:Gameboy Advance? (Score:3)
I think Gameboy is great because it's small, easy to use, has a long battery life, and some great games-and there has been no need to change these features other than minor evolutionary refinements. The screensize grew, the clarity and brightness of the screen improved, it's become even smaller now, and it has even better games available, with faster processor and more memory addressable and the availability of color.
Very similar arguments can be made about the Palm Pilot as well, in terms of why it is a good device where others have failed
-AS
Gameboy Revival (Score:3)
But I am impressed. Gameboy came out before the Super NES, and it has lived through four generations of platforms. Perhaps all the other handhelds were too fancy, too expensive, or too unsupported. Who knows. The death of the GB is nowhere in sight, even as systems like Playstation and N64 are getting replaced by successors. Who would have thought that this little Tetris-plaiying machine would last so long?
"You ever have that feeling where you're not sure if you're dreaming or awake?"
There are better "toys" out there than the GameBoy (Score:3)
Personally, I would much rather have a Palm V, or even better, the decidedly cheaper Handspring Visor, oh hell, I'd even take a CE device, before I had a Gameboy.
I'm not knocking the Gameboy in any sense, but shouldn't development and programming be geared towards a device that's a little more advanced?
Just my 2 cents. Moderate as you please.
Mike
Re:Gameboy Advance? (Score:4)
Well, let me enlighten you to this wonderful piece of hardware:
Nintendorks.com [nintendorks.com] (includes "exclusive" GBA picture
DMGICE [dmgice.com]
IGN Pockets' GBA FAQ [ign.com]
Nintendo's Press Release [nintendo.com]
As for your question as to why it did better, the answer is games. The games on that sytem rock. It has my two favorite games (Tetrix and Super Mario Brothers Deluxe), a ton of cool RPG's and 2D games, and Pokemon is one of the fastest selling and biggest videogames of all time. It's consistantly number 1 and 2 on the weekly sales charts. The GB is far from dead, and since the GBA is going to have backwards compatiblity and bring the possiblility of internet connection to a handheld, it's going to keep on going.
Game Boy Advance (Score:4)
* CPU: Memory embedded 32-bit RISC CPU
* LCD: Reflective TFT Color LCD
* Display Size: 40.8mm x 61.2mm
* Resolution: 240 x 160 pixels
* Size: Approximately Height 80mm / Width 135mm
* Weight: Approximately 140g
* Power Supply: 2 AA Alkaline batteries
* Battery life: 20 hours continuous play
* Maximum colors to be displayed simultaneously: 65,000
Well, because I notice a lot of posters doing this (Score:5)
Please stop making this mistake.
At the risk of being marked redundant, I'm going to tell you all that THIS IS NOT ABOUT THE GAME BOY. This is about the Game Boy Advance, the new 32-bit advanced portable that Nintendo is bringing out late this year. This is an entirely different system; Nintendo is just using their name recognition with the GB to sell it. Please don't get confused. Especially since develpoment kits for the GB have been out for a very long time now.
Thanks for your time (and not moderating me down).