data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0bf1/d0bf1a68952c1fc53428660bef21d8070fdf9709" alt="Games Games"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e53c/9e53cc1df483017fbce385d1129fc00923cfa31a" alt="Entertainment Entertainment"
Marvel vs. Capcom 2 Preview 198
Tyler writes, "For all you fighting game nuts, Fighters.net has a preview of Marvel vs. Capcom 2, slated to come out in arcades AND on the Dreamcast this March. They have tons of pictures and a bunch of movies, too. " Excellent - I'm looking forward to this. I've just about played out SoulCalibur. Mindless entertainment is needed sometimes.
cool! (Score:1)
Too bad the dream cast is a piece of shit (Score:1)
Okay... on topic (Score:1)
OK... (Score:1)
The Slashdot I knew back when only the elite could moderate would NEVER have posted something like this. Since when did Slashdot start reporting on Capcom games???!!!
Yes, this is a rant designed to lose me karma so I can moderate again!
P.S. It sux if it isn't Open Source and it doesn't come out on Linux!
Dreamcast, fighting games, etc (Score:2)
The emerging genre of "extreme vehicular antics" is what has me excited most, tho. Crazy Taxi is fantastic; when it comes to mindless destruction based entertainment, nothing beats the kind of game that lets you drive around a beautifully rendered city and wreak utter havoc. The realism that these games have makes it an experience you just have to push that little-punk-snot-nosed-kid-hogging-up-the- Dreamcast-kiosk-at-Electronics-Boutique aside to try for yourself. Yah.
My two cents only, of course.
So much for x86 arcade boxes. (Score:1)
Hadn't iNTEL and Microsoft come out with a set of specifications for arcade games that would be the new thing since they don't even require "forklift upgrades" ( I.e. you can change a CD and have a new game ).
Unfortunately some silly people decided that an Arcade game was too important to allow for downtime, BSODs and memory leaks. So what was that about Ecomerse again ?
Of course these things just add more ways for kids to burn our pockets at the arcade. However Arcades are a necessary evil. Anyone who has ever dumped a nephew in an Arcade so you could go make out with a girl understands the immense public service these bastions of society provide
Re:Too bad the dream cast is a piece of shit (Score:1)
Ah, that was good stuff. More, more comedy. Please keep posting, you are a funny man!
Bryan R.
Actually it's more like $365 (USD) (Score:2)
Now considerig that the starting retail price for the playsation in 1995 when it came out was about $300 USD we must conclude that if could very well retail for that.
What you are not counting on is that people will buy a system for the games that they want. I personally like the Final Fantasy series and will most lkely get a P2 when FFX comes out.
Now here is my question for people why are fightih games such a big deal compared to other genres.
Re:OK... (Score:1)
um (Score:1)
Great, it's another flashy, but derivative fighting game.
Great, it's exactly like the million other fighting games they've released since Street Fighter 2.
Great, they have little preview pictures.
Now come on, how this fall under "stuff that matters?" Are we going to start posting articles every time some game is announced? Especially when it's some mindless lowbrow, more-of-the-same fighting game sequel? I was under the notion that this was a site for news, not another Electronic Gaming Monthly wannabe.
Yeah, but where's the Blue One? (Score:1)
How can a Capcom lineup not include MegaMan?
Cheers,
ZicoKnows@hotmail.com
Re:Actually it's more like $365 (USD) (Score:1)
-Jer
Re:um (Score:2)
Are we going to fucking complain every time the Slashdot staff posts something that THEY think is relevant? Nobody is forcing this content down your throat! If you don't want to read it, DON'T READ IT. Then move on with life!
This is not your website. Start your own website, then you can put up whatever the hell you want. In the interim, don't bitch about what Slashdot puts out. Some people enjoy the subject matter, and could live without your complaints.
-- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
Re:Yeah, but where's the Blue One? (Score:1)
Re:Actually it's more like $365 (USD) (Score:1)
Now here is my question for people why are fightih games such a big deal compared to other genres.
Fighting games in arcades are always the games that pull the hardcore element. They're also incredibly cool two-player games and I always used to love hanging out with strangers playing fighters when we used to have a great arcade here in London (Namco Wonderpark).
Bah (Score:1)
-Legion
RPG recommendations? (Score:2)
I chose to buy and play Final Fantasy VIII and VII because in terms of sheel scalability of the playstation platform and graphics quality there are few better. Generally I like things with a little pizzaz when I play console games because I don't have that overclocked PIII or something. I like rpgs and I like squaresoft because for interesting games with man possibilities I like their offerings.
Are there any other offerings that I should play that anyone would recommend?
Street Fighter III : Double Impact !!! (Score:1)
Check out Capcom's [capcom.com] release information here!! [capcom.com]
Re:um (Score:2)
This is not your website. Start your own website, then you can keep people from posting whatever the hell you want. In the interim, don't bitch about what Slashdot posters put out. Some people agree with their thoughts, and could live without your complaints.
Dreamweaver
It would be better if it had realistic 3D... (Score:1)
Marvel Vs Capcom (Score:1)
hehe
God bless thy cause indeed, brother. (Score:1)
May our victory be swift.
--
This post is released under the Gratuitous Polemic License in the hope that . . . aw, ta hell widdit.
Fighting Games (Score:1)
Er, excuse me? I was a member of the hardcore element when arcades really were at the peak of their popularity (mid '80s) and then there was nary a fighting game to be seen. Give me spaceships any day!
stop bashing slashdot. (Score:1)
Re:Okay... on topic (Score:1)
afraid of trolls are yoU? (Score:1)
---
Re:um (Score:1)
Re:Okay... on topic (Score:1)
Re:Dreamcast, fighting games, etc (Score:1)
That would make buying a Dreamcast worth it. Strangely, the first time I played it, i got the "Class A license", but ever time since, I've only been able to get Class C!
Sega has another game called Emergency Call Ambulance or something similar where you have to drive patients to the hospital before they die. They start out with minor injuries, but every time you hit something, they get worse and your time gets shorter. Hit too many, and... "I don't want to die!" Another great game, but I've only seen it in MayFair Mall, Wisconsin, USA, unfortunately
On second thought, maybe Sega should just stick to making arcade racers with moving cockpits...
Re:Actually it's more like $365 (USD) (Score:1)
Dreamcast is totally unsuitable for this (Score:2)
In fact, I happen to think the Dreamcast controller has NO redeeming features AT ALL, and serves along with the N64 and Atari Jaguar as an example of how NOT to design a control pad. And what is this analog sticklet fad among console companies? I swear, those things'll be the downfall of console gaming.
There, now I've vented that off
MoNsTeR
Re:Dreamcast Rocks (Score:1)
Re:Cool. (Score:1)
Re:um (Score:1)
Re:Dreamcast is totally unsuitable for this (Score:1)
Re:um (Score:1)
Breaking News (Score:1)
Malda(TM) insists this move will have no effect on Slashdot(TM), and that he still has total editorial control(yes, Malda(TM), as a minor employee, is apparently able to dictate terms to his bosses).
Kung Fu Video Games (Score:1)
I don't get these Kung Fu Fighting Games. They don't appeal to me at all. Can someone who does enjoy them please tell me what the appeal is? I may not really understand what you say, but I'm willing to listen.
Moreover, I don't really get excited about any of the games that have come out in the past several years. I used to be all over games like Joust (all-time favorite), Tempest, Space Invaders, Galaga, etc. In fact I would still play quite a few of the old games if I saw them around (especially Joust). I guess I'm just a bitter old man that can't deal with today's video game world.
Re:Dreamcast is totally unsuitable for this (Score:1)
1. Four dedicated "buttons" for direction, where it makes it easy to do combo moves with the direction pad. I abhor pads that have a circular piece of plastic to activate direction -- sometimes when you press an exact direction you get the "in-between" directions (sse, etc)
2. The four individual buttons, plus 2 triggers, I've grown to love on the Playstation pad.
I'm somewhat biased, however, not ever even seen a dreamcast in action. Good? Bad? Ah, I'll stick to playstation for now... unfortunately, I really wanna see Soul Calibur.... ugh...
Re:um (Score:1)
I'll have to agree here. It's my professional opinion that the content should be relevant. Get in the game, Hemos. However, maybe it was worth it to put it there because it's a slow Sunday. But in that case, why not post about Charles Schultz's death (Yes... i know
I think that the games should be left to a site like Thresh's FiringSquad [firingsquad.com] unless its announced for Linux or BSD. Oh wait, nothing comes out for BSD! hahaa, BSD fools. Ok well BSD is good for its stuff, but It won't get GAMES! Chill out everyone, RIP Charles Schultz.
- Mike Roberto
-- roberto@apk.net
--- AOL IM: MicroBerto
If "modern" games don't appeal... (Score:2)
As for why people like them, I guess that it's because you have to put a lot of effort into learning the moves for all the characters, and then you can beat the hell out of your friends and do really cool/difficult things with said characters. Also, they provide more interaction than an RPG--it's just more fun to beat up your friends than beat up the computer.
But really, this looks like more of the same. Ever since Street Fighter 2, it seems like 90% of the games that are released are just the same bloody idea run into the ground over and over again. They change the characters involved, they tweak the controls, they do it in pseudo 3D a la Tekken 3, War Gods, and Virtua Fighter... but the idea's the same and too often the gameplay's repetitive and bloody annoying.
No wonder I end up spending more money on pinball these days.
Controllers (Score:1)
The main flaws I've seen with the DC controllers is not as much the analog thingy, but:
-The triggers are poorly designed from a mechanical standpoint. You have to push them down a long way before anything happens, and they just feel like they're going to break at any moment.
-The fact that there are only six buttons, so no px3 buttons as you said.
-The angle at which a DC controller puts your hands is uncomfortable compared to the psx. It's like this: | | rather than this / \. Get it?
Fact is, if you could improve on the design and ergonomics of the psx controller, Sony would have done it for the psx2. But they didn't. Other than making them black, taht is.
Really? (Score:1)
The lack of buttons doesn't really affect me; being a KoF and Guilty Gear slave. Three buttons for attack always seemed like overkill to me.
As far as the pad, I prefer the Saturn round-style. There are people who say the PSX button/cross pad gives greater control; I say it tends to be more inaccurate with quarter/half circle motions, and gives me blisters a hell of a lot faster.
Re:Dreamcast is totally unsuitable for this (Score:1)
actually, the d-pad on a playstation IS a circular 8-way pad, it just has little strips of plastic that make it look like 4 seperate buttons
Re:Controllers (Score:1)
Also, I totally agree with you on the angle thing. The DC controller puts my wrists at an angle that would be outlawed by OSHA if you tried to use it in the workplace.
Re:Okay... on topic (Score:1)
On the other hand, a badly done game on the DC will have graphics equivalent to a well done game on the PSX. Toy Commander for DC has graphics that are about the same quality as Tony Hawk for the PSX. Which is kinda depressing...
Re:Okay... on topic (Score:1)
Re:Kung Fu Video Games (Score:1)
The key things are:
1) Competition. Most fighting games are pretty ordinary as single player games. The real action is multiplayer. A group of friends that play together regularly (winner stays on) or (adrenalin rush) challenging random players at the arcade is really, really fun.
2) Knowledge. It is critical to pick a game you like (because of how it looks, what it's called, the skimpiness of the female characters outfits, whatever) and _get good at it_. Play it a lot, and learn it properly. Once you have one game down, the basics of timing and strategy are transferable.
3) Strategy. Once you know what you're doing, it's all down to reflexes and strategy. Some games favour reflexes, but any (good) fighting game allows someone with average reflexes (like me) to a beat a 14 year old with no strategy. Range, timing, offence/defence, counterattacking, feints, fakes, all of these things are useful in any decent fighting game.
4) Combos. This is the creative side of fighting games. It just means creating sequences of moves that you know have a good chance of doing big damage to your opponent. Most games allow you to do float combos (where you knock your opponent in the air, then punish them as they "float") which tend to be very enjoyable. Some moves will be very tricky to pull off, so the feeling of managing it in a real fight is satisfying (go look up SPoD somewhere VF is discussed...).
The basic idea -- to me anyway -- of fighting games is to mimic the _strategies_ of a real fight, but modified so that (1) it's not over in a couple of seconds and (2) it looks flashier (all those spinning, jumping kicks that would get you killed on the street can be thoroughly abused in a game!).
Good fighting games: Street Fighter (2D, but tuned to perfection), Virtua Fighter series (VF3tb is latest and greatest).
Bad fighting gamse: Soul Calibur (loads of fun, but collision detection is too dodgy/random), Tekken (same problem, plus too easy).
Give it a try! Dreamcast (which spawned this thread) is currently fighting game console of choice. And the standard joypad is fine... don't listen to the whingers!
For more VF3 ranting, go here [gamefaqs.com]!
gribbly.
Capcom System 2 (CPS2) Emulation and PC Games? (Score:1)
NOTE: There are many of you that see emulation and pure software piracy, and you have a right to feel that way. But please read all of this post before you moderate me into the ground.
Does anyone know how the CPS2 Emulation project is coming along? I can play Capcom System 1 games (up to Street Fighter 2: Turbo Champion Edition) on my PC using Callus and MAME, but everything from Super Street Fighter 2 onward (including this game, Marvel vs. Capcom 2) cannot yet be emulated. I walk into an arcade, look at Puzzle Fighter 2, Marvel vs. Capcom, and Street Fighter Alpha 3, and I just sigh.
Now, maybe I'm a cheap pirate bastard because I'm not buying the games. But it would be a waste of money for me. I don't own a PlayStation, Dreamcast, or Nintendo64. And why should I? My PC is just as good, and it can "grow with me" -- I can upgrade it as time goes by, and still play most of my old games. But a game console becomes obsolete and unsupported after only four years (or less). Furthermore, the only thing you can do with a game console is play games. While some of the modern consoles can browse the Internet and play MP3s, they will never approach the versatility of a computer. On my PC, I can program, use word processors, spreadsheets, databases, tweak my system for better performance, customize it, etc. How much of that can you do with a game system?
Why doesn't Capcom release these games for the PC? The PC clearly has the processing and graphics horsepower needed. Look at the PentiumIII, the AMD Athlon, and the various 3D cards.
It's good to see that some games are being ported (like Final Fantasy 7 and 8), but I'm afraid the games I really want to play will only ever be on the game consoles.
Worse yet, you need to own all the current game consoles to enjoy all of your favourite games. If you own a PlayStation, you can't play Super Smash Bros. or Mario Party. If you own a Nintendo64, you can't play Final Fantasy 7. I find it strange that a world that couldn't tolerate two video formats (VHS and Beta) is perfectly happy with multiple game console platforms with incredible incompatibilities, mostly deliberate.
Does anyone know what the matter with the game industry is? Why do I have to buy what will soon be a $300 doorstop to play Crazy Taxi? Why can't I play it on my PC? Could it be that some game makers, like Capcom, are "in the pocket" of Nintendo or Sony? (i.e. Nintendo or Sony are paying them?)
Re:Really? (Score:1)
Re:Cool. (Score:1)
Re:Capcom System 2 (CPS2) Emulation and PC Games? (Score:1)
Okay, just a few things. One, a good source for information on CPS2 emulation is CPS2 Shock [dhs.org]. Apparently they're still working on the encryption.
Two, MvC2 is NOT, I repeat, NOT, a CPS2 game. MvC was, IIRC (if not, then it was CPS3, but I don;t think so). MvC2 is written for the Sega Naomi board (aka the dreamcast). Therefore it'll be a while before home computers are able to emulate it.
And, maybe it's just because I'm broke, but I rather like that they're coming out on consoles. Look at it this way: most video game consoles simply DONT CRASH. Computers do. A good computer will cost a hell of a lot to keep up to date enough to run these games at resolutions and framerates that they do in arcades and on consoles.
Of course, maybe I'm just saying this because I got my Dreamcast for free. But my PSX and N64 were stolen from me a while ago; I replaced my PSX, but not my 64... because there simply aren't that many good games for the N64.
I take issues with your assertion that consoles like the dreamcast will be $300 doorstops. Sure, it probably will be in about 3 or 4 years (average life of a console), but your computer will need to be upgraded several times in that time, which will cost more than a console.
There's a good reason why more console and arcade games aren't released for the PC... hardware compatibility. These companies can write code, and use a compiler for the arcade board, and even write directly to the hardware, all without worring about how different cards will interact with that, because they only have to consider what's there. There's nothing else. PCs however can have any number of different configurations, and it can interact weirdly.
Hmm, actually I did see my dreamcast crash once... when I was gonna play a game that proudly showed a splash screen that stated "Powered by Windows CE." Interesting.
Re:Dreamcast is totally unsuitable for this (Score:1)
I love the DC pad. The analog and cross pads are very close (though using the cross pad a lot can be awkward), making for a nice combo if secondary actions (ones that won't fit in the limited number of buttons) need to be taken. And the analog pad is used nearly perfectly in most games; I'd much rather use the analog stick in Crazy Taxi than a steering wheel. And the small number of buttons isn't gonna make that much difference; I hear MvC2 is gonna use 4 buttons only, so it shouldn't hurt any here.
Marvel vs. Capcom? (Score:1)
Re:Yeah, but where's the Blue One? (Score:1)
Re:If "modern" games don't appeal... (Score:1)
--
"HORSE."
Re:Kung Fu Video Games (Score:1)
You must be GOOD.
--
"HORSE."
Re:Okay... on topic (Score:1)
On the whole, if you like fighters then the dreamcast is for you. Ditto with sports games. Racing games are good too. But console RPGs are absent right now. Damn.
Puzzle games seem to be coming for it though (and I love puzzle games, yay!).
Re:Erma Bombeck Must Be Destroyed (Score:1)
--
"HORSE."
Re:Actually it's more like $365 (USD) (Score:1)
Of course if I didn't have any friends I wouldn't buy fighters.
I don't see why you hate the FF series; you may as well dislike all console RPGs then. FF is not the worst way of doing things; tell me how it is if you think so. They've had pretty good storylines, and generally have had new systems of magic with each one. Remember, there's a huge difference between computer RPGs and console RPGs, and a similar gap between those and pencil & paper RPGs. I play all of them and like all of them :)
Re:Dreamcast Rocks (Score:1)
Re:Actually it's more like $365 (USD) (Score:1)
I would disagree with you about the Final Fantasy series, except I haven't liked any of the Playstation FFs, and FF8 is really bad with the annoying Junction system. Seems like you spend more time Drawing than fighting!
Anyway, Suikoden destroys all the FFs since 6. I'll have to check out Suikoden 2 some time, but managing your own village sounds cool. Hopefully you can still combine magic with 2 party members...
P.S. Still waiting for Dragon Quest 7 here... WTF is the holdup?!?!?!
Re:ARCAID ROOLZ CONSOLE SUCKZ NINTENDO ROOLZ CAPCO (Score:1)
Boy can't please anybody can I? (Score:1)
Exactly how do I make myself a total looser? I bet that cannot be easily expressed without resorting to physical violence of childish name calling.
Re:RPG recommendations? (Score:1)
Grandia is a pretty fun game, it's got a novel battle system that's better than Star Ocean 2's (another great game) whack-a-lot battle system. Tactics Ogre I liked better than FF Tactics. Wild Arms was pretty cool, even if a few of the puzzles (treasure chest & bookcases, anyone?) were impossible.
Just look at what's out there; I haven't played many truly bad rpgs.
funny... (Score:1)
Re:Marvel vs. Capcom? (Score:1)
Re:Dreamcast is totally unsuitable for this (Score:2)
Don't forget that not all fighters need 6 buttons: Tekken and Soul Calibur have 4 button systems.
Also, a number of 3rd party dreamcast controllers have 6 buttons (two of which replicate the functions of the shoulder triggers) under the right thumb.
Plus, the official Sega arcade stick is the Right Tool if you're fussy about conrollers for fighting games (or, like me, interface your console into a full size arcade cab
Remember, no mainstream console has ever had a standard pad (the one that comes in the box) with "street fighter buttons" - i.e. two rows of three - apart from the Saturn (oh, and the N64, but there are very few competent fighters for the N64). "Mainstream console" does not include the Neo Geo either, since nobody could afford one.
--
Is older better? (Score:1)
Does anyone remember the Star Wars vector game from Atari? That game had excellent playability and the best part was...It was 100% wireframe! I must have spent over $90 playing that when it was pulled out from the back storage room at my local arcade.
You all are probably wondering something along the lines of "Just what is this person trying to get at?" I will respond by saying, "How do you know I am a carbon based life form." And, "Have you given your old Atari 2600 a hug today?"
Re:Kung Fu Video Games (Score:2)
The trick? a fight in tekken 3 does not finish when opponent is out of life, but finishes when opponent is out of life and hits the ground.. keep a knocked-out character in the air long enough.. and woompf.. crash.. never managed to repeat it though..
//rdj
Re:Dreamcast Rocks (Score:1)
Re:Actually it's more like $365 (USD) (Score:1)
Competition drives prices: Remember how the price of PSX dropped like a rock when N64 was introduced? Same thing will most likely happen to DC when P2X hits stores, and to P2X when Nintendo's Dolphin arrives a little later.
(The system that will win will be the one with the most Pokémon games for it - naturally N64. :-P Although IGN have reported that several N64-oriented projects have been cancelled as developers flee the platform for DC and P2X.)
Re:Dreamcast is totally unsuitable for this (Score:1)
Even though I love my Gravis Gamepad Pro for the "button factor", the fact that it just has a circular directional control cheeses me sometimes.
Re:Dreamcast is totally unsuitable for this (Score:1)
Re:Capcom System 2 (CPS2) Emulation and PC Games? (Score:1)
Possibly because PC gamer's traditionally don't buy such games? Do you or anyone you know have either of "Rise of the Robots", "War Gods", "Mortal Kombat 3" or "Primal Rage" (those I remember right now)? I've seen them end up in bargain bins faster than you can say "Kage wins".
Re: dreamcast artical (Score:1)
Dreamcast, Not your Avg Console for $139.00 (Score:2)
If your into sports, or simply beatin the snow out of people, or driving cars off the sides of buildings, the Dreamcast is for you. If you like to run around for hours playing puzzles, well.. get a PC or a playstation. Those aren't games and those aren't what makes a console
But, if you do want a Dreamcast, check this out. http://dreamcast.pimp.org - With 30.00 coupon and 30.00 rebate, its yours for a measly 139.00. Also get all your games and accessories dirt cheap with huge rebates.
Capcom is a great game, and its about time something besides Playstation is talked about here. And like everything else, if you don't care, don't read. But don't ruin my day or this topic because your stubborn enough not to accept other views.
have a good one!
Re:It would be better if it had realistic 3D... (Score:1)
---
Argh, why did they change the button setup? (Score:1)
---
Re:Okay... on topic (Score:1)
I'm just curious because I heard the import gun was locked out on the US Dreamcast and I was wondering if there was a workaround.
Re:Dreamcast Rocks (Score:1)
I noticed this... people forget that the dreamcast renders at higher than 640x480, it does either 800x600 or 1024x768 (I can never remember. Sue me.), and it looks a hell of a lot better connected to a monitor than to a TV. The VGA box is the single best peripheral available for the DC; it ups the viewable resolution a lot, and it makes every game (except Marvel Vs Capcom and SFA3... which dont look that good on a tv'anyway, having been made for a 320x224 arcade monitor) look a lot better than on a normal tv. I'm glad I have one. Though it won't be of much use for the next week or so, as I send my DC off to get modded.
Re:Okay... on topic (Score:1)
I got the USA game and a third-party gun (as there is no first-party light gun), though it's the one from MadKatz, which is licensed by Sega and looks a lot like the Japanese Sega gun. God, if I had to play the game with the control pad I'd go crazy. It sucks a lot.
Re:cool! (Score:1)
Re:Too bad the dream cast is a piece of shit (Score:1)
Re:Okay... on topic (Score:1)
Re:RPG recommendations? (Score:1)
Re:Yeah, but where's the Blue One? (Score:1)
Re:ARCAID ROOLZ CONSOLE SUCKZ NINTENDO ROOLZ CAPCO (Score:1)
QU1T TRY1N6 2 1M1T4T3 M3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
U R ! 31337, L4M3R!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11
:WQ
------ ------ ------
ALL HA1L B1FF, TH3 M05T 31337 D00D!!!!!1
------ ------ ------
ALL HA1L B1FF, TH3 M05T 31337 D00D!!!!!1
Re:ARCAID ROOLZ CONSOLE SUCKZ NINTENDO ROOLZ CAPCO (Score:1)