Interview With Pitfall! Creator, David Crane 201
Bill Kendrick writes "Good Deal Games recently interviewed David Crane, creator of 1982's Game of the Year, 'Pitfall!' (as well as many other titles for the Atari 2600 and other systems). Topics include the 1000s of fan letters Activision received every week, the firing of Bill Gates, and how tennis helped bring Activision together."
Atari 2600 rules! (Score:1)
At least these should still work:
http://www.zophar.net/unix/atari2600.html
Re:Atari 2600 rules! (Score:1)
best $10 I've spent in a long time
Re:Atari 2600 rules! (Score:2)
My favorite game for the platform was Adventure. Not only was it quite possibly the first graphical RPG (admittedly a simple one), it was also the first game I recall with an easter egg in it. Plus, the dragons looked like giant ducks, and there was a bat you couldn't kill that would constantly steal things, including live dragons, and fly around the 'world' with them until it found another item to pick up.
Like Pitfall, it was a game that for all its simplicity would still find itself being played again and again. I miss those sort of games.
Re:Atari 2600 rules! (Score:2)
That fscking bat was a pain in the ass, and it made for hilarious frustration in that game. He'd fly by, carrying a pissed off dragon, and go "oh hey! that's a nice shiney sword you've got there... *YOINK!*" And leave you with aforementioned lizard...
Re:Atari 2600 rules! (Score:3, Interesting)
Well, get the dot... and guess what? NOW you have to CARRY it (remember, it's invisible) to a particular part of the world... near the gold castle, I believe. It was a room with a vertical line for a wall, instead of a solid wall on the side. You need to have a few additional items in that room, so that the vertical wall would kinda flicker some (too many sprites on the screen).
After doing all this, you now carry the dot (I think) THROUGH the wall, and you'll see the name of the author on the screen.
Pretty cool.
Re:Atari 2600 rules! (Score:2)
Re:Atari 2600 rules! (Score:2)
play pitfall online (Score:5, Interesting)
http://www.langleycreations.com/pitfall/
Re:play pitfall online (Score:2)
Re:play pitfall online (Score:2)
This is not some 'oh yea this looks like that game pitfall from the 80s' - no, this is the REAL pitfall that we (at least the ones old enough to remember) played way back when. This is so good.
So according to the article... (Score:3, Funny)
Wow, that's messed up!
Re:So according to the article... (Score:2)
Damn, that's funny! (Score:1)
Somebody mod this thing up...
Re:Damn, that's funny! (Score:2)
Do the people on that channel just repeat other people's jokes or do they make up their own? No wonder I never watch Comedy Central...
-B
It bears mention.... (Score:3, Interesting)
A Boy and His Blob (Score:2, Informative)
Re:A Boy and His Blob (Score:1)
Oh yes, definitely the best David Crane game ever!
For those of us that loved the game, apparently there will be a version for the Gameboy Advance as this was my first google result for the title of the game: Boy and his Blob [nintendo.com]
Re:A Boy and His Blob (Score:1)
One thing that surprised me when I played it a couple years ago on an emulator is how short it really is. There isn't much to it once you know how to use the beans. It seemed much longer when I rented it years ago.
I thought the game was ok (Score:1)
Re:A Boy and His Blob (Score:2)
Bill Gates fired? (Score:1)
Pitfall Flying (Score:1)
Re:Pitfall Flying (Score:1)
out of the 12 games I had about 8 would do something funky
Re:For Fuck's Sake! (Score:2, Funny)
Crane's Law (Score:3, Interesting)
I like the last question, it has a good point!
DC> Quotes are a funny thing - there are as many attributed to me that I didn't say as there are things I said many times that are easily forgotten. The best line I didn't say was, "It's a jungle in there!" referring to Pitfall! But the quote you mention has been referred to as "Crane's Law", and I firmly believe it.
(Snip the part about electric model airplanes)
(For that matter, look at street racers putting Acura VTEC engines in their Honda Civics!)
Re:Crane's Law (Score:1)
Put them in a cricket stump - so you can give the viewers a really cool view. (Oh, you could put them in change rooms, your cheating partner's car, in your tie when travelling through 'confidential' areas? Didn't think of that - but Justic Woods did
3dfx ads (Score:3, Interesting)
[file footage of children running through grassy fields, etc.]
What could we do with a chip that performs a hundred billion operations per second? Why, we could bolster the world's food supply. We could use our chip to genetically engineer juicier fruits. Hardy, mineral-rich vegetables. Tastier greens. And tender, all-white-meat chickens. We could use our technology to feed the world.
But then we thought -- hey, we could use it for games!
[All the food disappears from people's plates, and the camera pans to screenshots of games]
3dfx PC accelerators -- so powerful, it's kinda ricidulous.
And from another:
[File footage of doctors and old people and such]
We have in our possession a chip -- a chip that could revolutionize medicine as we know it. By performing a hundred billion operations a second, this chip could help us heal across continents. We could touch more lives, help people live longer than ever, and give us all more time to cherish the journey's truest rewards.
But then we thought -- hey, let's use it for games!
[The life-support equipment stops working and everyone dies, pan to screenshots of games]
3dfx PC accelerators -- so powerful, it's kinda ridiculous.
[Doctor from the earlier file footage shots says "you know, that game's a little violent for my tastes"]
Re:3dfx ads (Score:2)
Re:3dfx ads (Score:2)
Pitfall! invented modern platform gaming (Score:2)
Pitfall! is what originally got me programming. I remember doing a simplistic platform game in GWBasic using ascii characters. That lead to learning Pascal and C and eventually my career as a Programmer/Analyst.
Activision also deserves kudo's for keeping those programmers/designers from being forgotten. Of course, that lead to the whole rock star image conscious industry that spawned the likes of John Romero.
Whatever happened to that guy anyway?
Re:Pitfall! invented modern platform gaming (Score:2)
Pitfall was Game of the Year in 1982. Super Mario Brothers came out in 1985 according to KLOV [klov.com]. So, it's obviously not a tie.
Re:Pitfall! invented modern platform gaming (Score:2)
Pitfall! came first, but SMB really solidified the genre.
Invented wasn't quite the right word...
Re:Pitfall! invented modern platform gaming (Score:2)
Actually, when it was first released, his name wasn't Mario - he was called Jumpman. Anyway, Super Mario Brothers plays more like Pitfall than it does like DK. But, it probably would be fair to call DK the real father of the platform genre. I can't think of anything earlier off the top of my head (I wish KLOV was searchable by genre and/or year).
Re:Pitfall! invented modern platform gaming (Score:2)
Re:Pitfall! invented modern platform gaming (Score:2)
And "Pac-Land," which certainly preceded Super Mario Bros.
Re:hello there! (Score:1)
South Park (Score:1)
Pitfall Ruined my Brother's Childhood (Score:4, Funny)
Music (Score:2)
Re:Music (Score:1)
Re:Music (Score:2, Funny)
Atari this Atari that.
Commodore!
First person who mentions the Apple ][ recieves a brick.
Re:Music (Score:2)
Re:Music (Score:2)
What a 180 (Score:3, Interesting)
And he later formed a company where he basically does games for corporations in a work-for-hire type situation. His name isn't even mentioned in the "about us" section of his company website. [skyworkstech.com]
Not that I lose any respect for him - I'm no elitist, anti-corporate type. Just figured his name would be on the website...
Re:What a 180 (Score:2)
It is. You have to go through the <grumble>Flash</grumble> version , select "About Us", then select "Principals". It gives little blurbs for Crane, as well as Garry Kitchen, Bill Wentworth, and Alan Miller.
yes it is (Score:2)
Yes it is [skyworkstech.com] and the reason why gaming companies don't promote developers anymore is really simple, you don't want to be dependent on the reputation of one developer for the sale of game, otherwise they will have all the cards come renegotiation time.
Pitfall! (Score:2, Funny)
Hooray! for! Pitfall!
Atari Music Video (Score:5, Interesting)
Anyhow, if you've never seen it, check out this music video [newvenue.com] inspired by various Atari games (including Pitfall!).
Re:Atari Music Video (Score:1)
The Keystone Capers bit had me laughing.
Re:Atari Music Video (Score:1)
More at their site, goldenshower.gs
Pitfall! ][ (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Pitfall! ][ (Score:2)
So yea... Pitfall II actually had some rather interesting additional technology hidden away in that cartridge.
Oh. And the answer to this question continues... including the reference to Bill Gates.
Re:Pitfall! ][ (Score:2)
Gates fired? (Score:1)
I was disappointed... he was fired from an Atari project, not fired from Microsoft (Thought I missed something good over my weekend of
Re:Gates fired? (Score:3, Insightful)
Why do I have the feeling that this article wouldn't have been posted if not for the Bill Gates reference?
"Pitfall was a revolutionary moment in gaming, but the real news here is that something bad happened to Bill Gates before he was rich."
Re:Gates fired? (Score:2)
*snicker* [innocent whistling]
Re:Gates fired? (Score:2)
In one form or another, no matter what happens, Microsoft will be around for a good long time. But as one of the "Linux Zealots," I have to say that this doesn't bother me in the slightest. I've never hated Microsoft for existing. I have hated it for its unwarranted and unprecedented market power and for its ruthless destruction of any innovator who threatens that market power. Even in this, where Microsoft deserves blame, they are not wholly responsible for the fall of the companies whose air supply they choose to cut off. The management at Netscape for example certainly deserves much of the blame. But giving away IE helped.
I'm going to drop this now, because it really is off topic, but I just wanted to let the Microsoft-defensive ACs out there who constantly complain about the "*nix zealots" (I'm a Linux/BSD/Unix zealot, really) that we're not all raving psychotics. Some of us are really quiet, fun-loving psychotics, who just want the freedom to decide what we will do with our computers.
Retrogaming Radio (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Retrogaming Radio (Score:1)
Shane is the Howard Stern of classic gaming radio
Explorer's Club (Score:1)
Re:Explorer's Club (Score:1)
So Atari is to blame... (Score:1)
Then, the poor sod had no choice but to open his own business? One can imagine how the world would be if one single little stupid decision wasn't taken...
Re:So Atari is to blame... (Score:2)
Yeah, computers would only be owned by geeks as opposed to ordinary everyday people. MS did some shitty stuff, but they also made PC's the popular item they are today.
Re:So Atari is to blame... (Score:2)
LEXX
Re:So Atari is to blame... (Score:2)
Re:So Atari is to blame... (Score:2)
No.
GNU/Linux - Never really targeted to mass audience
Apple- They had ample opportunity, but for some reason it didn't work. This probably has to do with typically higher prices of Macs (back then) and the fact that few places carried them.
MS wasn't lucky, they were smart. If Apple had been smart, they'd not have been so restrictive on their hardware. As for GNU/Linux, they'd need somebody like Apple or MS to come around and show them how to make an interface. As it is today, nearly all Linux commands wouldn't survive a spell checker. Heh.
Re:So Atari is to blame... (Score:2)
No, they were/are criminal. Funny how you can get ahead when you cheat. If MS hadn't been around, the entire industry would be different, but still here. Computers were fscking _destined_ to be in the home. I think the Commodore and Atari machines pretty much proved that to begin with.
LEXX
Re:So Atari is to blame... (Score:2)
Yah? And how'd they cheat? By giving consumers what they want? Damn them!
"Computers were fscking _destined_ to be in the home. I think the Commodore and Atari machines pretty much proved that to begin with."
Ouch, bad call. Atari and Commodore *died* long before Windows 3 was out. I know, I used to have an Atari. The ST and the Amiga hung on for a little while, but it didn't last. Nobody was interested. All Atari and Commodore proved was that the market was fragile.
I'll say it again, the people arguing with me are the ppl who hate Microsoft. People sure say strange things in a state like that.
Re:So Atari is to blame... (Score:2)
How do you come to that conclusion? How could MS have possibily gotten in the way?
a.) They still have no idea how to be user friendly. That point's been made before here on
b.) MS made computers lots more popular, and at the same time implanted the idea that they were unstable. If anything, GNU could have swept in and closed that gap. It wasn't ready for that, it still isn't ready for that. MS isn't hindering them, instead they gave them an opportunity.
Sorry, not sold. Frankly, I can't shake the feeling that people can't accept that MS did anything right. I think that's the basis for the arguments with me on this topic.
Re:So Atari is to blame... (Score:2)
I'll have to agree with Nanogater on this one.
Re:So Atari is to blame... (Score:2)
Re:So Atari is to blame... (Score:2)
Re:So Atari is to blame... (Score:1)
Doubtful. You're forgetting that there were several other companies that were creating some damn innovative and easy to use GUIs at the same time MS was struggling with Windows 2 and DOS 3. Pretty much all Gates was was lucky - there were several other people just as hungry, and just as willing to create an easy to use system. Were Gates to not have come around, we'd all be using Ataris, or Amigas, or Macs, or maybe something totally different instead. Microsoft wasn't the savior, or creator, of Personal Computing, they just had the advantage of being branded with IBM, which bought a lot of the professional market. Had IBM dropped the PC, or decided to go with Digital Research instead, things would have been a lot different.
Re:So Atari is to blame... (Score:2)
The geeks would, the average person wouldn't. Apple didn't even have a hot product on their hands until the iMac came out. Too little, way too late. Bill Gates wasn't lucky, he was opportunistic. Windows 95 was successful because people felt like they could use it without needing fear it. It had stability issues, nobody's arguing that, but it did do a lot of fundamental things correctly.
I know, I know, everybody hates MS and all. But they poured tons and tons of research into making sure the user experience was a good one. That's why Windows survives today even though there are technically more sophisticated OS's out there.
If Windows 95 hadn't have happened it is almost certain that the population of PC's would be drastically lower today. Argue with me all you want, it doesn't change the fact that MS's release of 95 was extremely profitable to them. That didn't happen because MS went door to door putting a gun to people's heads to make them buy. No other OS company had a similar boom. If your theory had played out, then MS would have competition like Sony has with Nintendo.
Re:So Atari is to blame... (Score:2)
And here I was thinking that Win95 was successful because it was backwards compatable with the large installed base of win3.1, the success of which was dependant on the large installed base of DOS, which was dependant on the marketing muscle and name-recognition of IBM.
Had IBM not been as successful with the PC, it would've been interesting to see who would've become #1... Apple (Mac), Commodore(Amiga) or Atari (ST series), all of which were technically superior to the original PC and ran user-friendly GUI-based operating systems years before Windows shipped.
Re:So Atari is to blame... (Score:2)
Silly newbie...
Go learn about the Apple ][and its creation of the home computer market.
Learn also about Visicalc and its legitimization of microcomputers for business use. Finally, learn about IBM, Lotus 1-2-3, WordStar and WordPerfect, and how they made PCs ubiquitous in the business world.
In the 1970s and 1980s, Microsoft was just one of a number of purveyors of things technicals -- the OS for the PC and two applications for the Mac. That's it. It was the appearance of Windows 3.0 in 1990 and the migration of their GUI-based Mac applications to the PC market that put them in a monopoly position by the mid 1990s.
And this is when their tactics, always on the grey side relative to their competitors, came to greatly harm the overall computer industry.
Re:So Atari is to blame... (Score:2)
You're just arguing with me because you hate MS, not because you're paying any attention to what I'm saying. Heh.
Re:So Atari is to blame... (Score:2)
Doubtful. They're playing catch-up as it is. They're not exactly breaking new barriers today. I honestly hope that changes.
"Alls microsoft did was make a standard. "
All Microsoft did was single-handedly turn the PC into an easy to use household product. Before Windows 95 came along, a PC owner was either a geek or somebody doing graphic work on a Mac.
Without MS, *Nix probably would never have even attempted to be an OS for the everyday Joe. Right now, they're evolving to dethrone MS.
Re:So Atari is to blame... (Score:2)
Stupid?
Sounds like bill didn't do much work in a whole year. Can't blame the company for firing him, although things might've been a lot different if he worked for some place where they don't care about performance...
Re:So Atari is to blame... (Score:1)
*groan*
Re:So Atari is to blame... (Score:2)
I have a feeling that Bill wasn't planning on delivering the goods. You need to remember that he's less of a programmer than a crack Monopoly player. He knows how to sweet-talk the others into giving him Boardwalk and Park Place for free.
South Park! (Score:1)
Re:South Park! (Score:2)
(The other day I bought the new Hitchicker Guide to the Galaxy DVD and was amused by the 'asteroids'-style effects in one of the scenes... I had forgotten about that!)
Re:South Park! (Score:2)
Yeah. All hand drawn and cel-by-cel animated too.
Loved Piffall and Kaboom! (Score:1)
A friend of mine had bought Pitfall and Megamania when they came out. I remember getting to 114,000 on Pitfall after weeks of effort, taking a picture of the screen and sending it in to Activision to get some kind of badge. Naively I was hoping to get at least something special, but I just got the normal badge, no special mention or anything like that. Hey, I even made my mother find two of my friends in the street, so they could see that I really did it.
I think the memory of reaching 114,000 and playing Megamania until the game froze at a score of all 9's are some of my best memories of the Atari 2600. Thanks David Crane and Activision!
Alright, I'll bite... (Score:2)
What was the text of the plate then? The obvious "PITFALL", or something else? And yes, I've done the obligitory searched with Google, and no reference appears to spell it out, so to speak.
Not a huge deal - but an opportunity for the Karma-hungry.
Ryan Fenton
Ahh, Pitfall... (Score:1)
I remember the TV I would use had the absolute worst red settings. When you'ld play and made Harry run left, it looked as if he had long, red hair that flew in the breeze behind him. Of course, turning around to the right would slap the "hair" into his face. My friends and I would amuse ourselves with that little TV glitch for hours on end.
After the demise of my InTV, Pitfall faded from my scene. Then Super Pitfall came along, and it just had to have the original game hidden in there. Nothing but good memories of a great game came flooding right back. And they say games rot your brain. Horse Hockey! Glad I was alive when this game rolled out. Kids today are too spoiled with their Quake 3 engines and their MMORPGs. Of course, they wouldn't even give it the time of day, given it's outdated graphics and all.
Those kids gotta learn that you can never know where you (or your games) are going if you don't know where you (or your games) came from. Big thanks to David Crane for giving a young me such a fun memory.
Pitfall?? (Score:1)
Argh.. (Score:2)
Anyway, I wonder if David had any involvement in Super Pitfall. I highly doubt it.. but even if he did, who would fess up to that?
David Crane, a celebrity? (Score:2)
Re:David Crane, a celebrity? (Score:2)
Royalties? (Score:2)
?
Did any of you join the club? (Score:2)
I vaguely recall playing Pitfall for hours in an attempt to achieve a certain score, in order to join the Pitfall! club or something.
There was information on the box, or in the packaging, and when you achieved a certain score (assuming you took a photo of your TV) -you could join the elite club. I think it was like 10,000 or 20,000.
I've not played this game in ages, but perhaps someone can help me out with this vague memory.
--
Um..
Inspiration! (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Inspiration! (Score:2)
Re:Linux port to follow (Score:1)
Re:Linux port to follow (Score:2)
Re:Bill Gates: The truth is out there. (Score:2)
Wasn't it DR's (Digital Research) work which he licensed or bought?
Imagine the world today if IBM had sewn up the hardware IP and refused Gates the right to sell copies of DOS under his own company's name. Yeah. Mac's all over the place... or something Open would have come along. Entertaining thought for late on a Monday night.
Re:Bill Gates: The truth is out there. (Score:2)
No, it was QDOS (Quick and Dirty Operating System) which he bought up from some guy in Seattle who by now must feel like the Pete Best of the computer world.
Isn't the story that IBM approached Garry Kildall of DR, but he wasn't available at the time so IBM copped a hump at the idea of someone not wanting to see them and went to young Bill instead.
I still think that if not for Microsoft, computers would still be a very much just for geeks thing. This would have been BAD, and don't you forget it.
Re:Megalomania (Score:2)
(I have it here next to me somewhere... too lazy to pop it in and check)