

Nintendo's Playstation Settlement Bombshell (or not...updated) 398
Magamo writes "Console Talk has the story on a settlement between Sony and Nintendo over the rights to the "PlayStation" name, which was originally a joint owned copywrite, given to a CD and Cartridge based system to play SNES games. The settlement is for 10% of Sony's proceeds, past and present on the "PlayStation" name, currently amounting to approximately $2.3 billion. Nintendo is allowing Sony to pay it off in installments over the next 20 years. Nintendo currently plans on using the money to create a new game studio comprised of members of some of the biggest in the japanese industry, in order to create titles exclusively for the GameCube. Hmm, my guess is that Sony's next console will be shying away from the PlayStation moniker..." CD: It seems that I might have fallen for a hoax. Doh!
Not copyright (Score:5, Informative)
I think it should be "trademark"...
Re:Not copyright (Score:5, Funny)
Copywrite and Copy2pc (Score:3, Informative)
I'm dating myself, but back in the day, these were the two major copying programs that everyone used to copy IBM PC games/programs, back in the mid-80's. They would break most floppy-disk protection schemes and new versions would be coming out, it seemed every few months that would cover more and more programs and games.
I think it was thanks to the efforts of those two programs that software companies finally gave up on trying to add physical protection mechanisms on the floppies and eventually give up entirely.
Now if only the RIAA and the rest of the music industry would just learn from the mistakes of the past, they would realize that all their stupid protection mechanisms are just a complete waste of time.
Re:Copywrite and Copy2pc (Score:3, Funny)
Doesn't hold a candle to FastHack'em for the C=64!!
Word. One time, I tried to copy Spy Hunter on the C-64 using an early version of FastHake'em and when I loaded the copy up, instead of saying "(c) Midway Games" on the bottom of the screen it said "We Prosecute Pirates". Me and my brother got scared the FBI was gonna show up! (I was 9 years old so don't laugh).
Carl
Well, damn (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Well, damn (Score:2, Insightful)
lmao! (Score:2)
Re:Well, damn (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Well, damn (Score:5, Informative)
I've been wondering if Sony changed the name from Playstation to PSX
No, the PSX moniker came about because the popular Japanese abbreviation for the PSX (puresute) sort of implied "play and throw away"(1). It had *nothing* to do with Nintendo and everything to do with Sony's brand image. Subsequently, they pushed "PSX" in the US as well, because ultimately Sony K.K. in Japan outranks Sony of America, Inc.
(1) The moniker PSX didn't stick in Japan. Not all marketdroid schemes work. *grin*
Re:Well, damn (Score:2)
Re:Well, damn (Score:5, Insightful)
Its a funny reas as are most of the spoof articles but i thought people KNEW it was a hoax at first.
Oh really? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Oh really? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Oh really? (Score:3, Funny)
Something is very wrong when Fuckedcompany features more useful and reliable news than here
Ron
Re:Oh really? (Score:5, Funny)
Oh really? (Score:4, Funny)
Google News and now The Inquirer (http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=6816) have now sourced the article on
It's spreading.
Hrm... (Score:2, Interesting)
That'll cost em..
Re:Hrm... (Score:3, Insightful)
backward compatibility costs nothing (Score:3, Informative)
in every PS2, the "PS1" portion is not even another chip, let along anything they had to work hard for: there was no signal routing on the circuit board, no data passed between the new and the old (gfx proc, new cpu), and I don't even think it usued the memory (might be wrong on the last part, though).
The PS1 portion is but a corner of the I/O processor. (I/O processor handles (duh) I/O - but also sound - so PS1 core pipes the audio directly through.) So pretty much PS1 is running on the "sound card" portion of the PS2, if you will. I highly suspect that they had a lot of chip area left when making the I/O processor (or adding on the entire IP core of PS1 costed minimally) so they just said fsck it let's put that on there.
In desktop terms, this is equivalent to, say, running a Pentium II system using your SCSI card controller. (which, btw, the higher end ones from adaptec actually do use a P2 for the microcontroller)
Contrastingly - while that's not possible for the PS2 to be integrated into a dusty corner of a new-gen console for now - by the time P2 retires, I would not be surprised if they can pull the trick again - or if it proved to be costly then, they will probably just skip it.
Not sure if this is coverable under NDA, as it should be pretty common info via developer kits; but i am posting AC anyhow.
WOW (Score:2, Insightful)
Funny thing is.. (Score:5, Insightful)
It's not like I suddenly stopped finding Metroid fun. Metroid will always be fun. To actually say something that implies you stop enjoying certain things once you get past a set age, well.... I call bullshit.
It's more about losing intrest. (Score:4, Interesting)
People really do grow out of things, but it's not like throwing more blood into a video game is going to make me want to play it more. The only stuff that kind of thing apeals to are 12-15 year old boys.
True, but not what the original poster said. (Score:4, Insightful)
I still enjoy video games a lot. Granted, I don't have nearly as much patience for jumping puzzles as I used to (which could also be linked to the greater numbers of games I own
Here Here! (Score:3, Insightful)
In Video Gaming, anything lighthearted and fun gets labeled "Kids," and anything edgy and violent gets labeled "adults." While an adult movie like What Women Want can be fun, very few adult games retain that sense of lighthearted enjoyment.
Kids games are also in digestably shorter bites, with more intense enjoyment up front, for the little one's attention spans. This is great when you are trying to grab a moment between work and a trip to the grocery store.
That's just my opinion, but I'm not wrong.
-C
Re:It's more about losing intrest. (Score:2)
And I find sometimes a dose of pulp like the Dragon or most of Dark Horse Comics (some gems, some good pulp) enliven my day too.
I'll give you 'overpriced' though. That's what stops me from getting all the 'Lone wolf and cub' series.
More like gained sense of crap detection. (Score:2)
Yeah, I never really looked at the supposed literary greats of the comic world... but there the price diferential is even greater. I could pay $8 for a Gibson (for example) novel that would take me 18 hours to get through, or $3 for a comic that would take 10 minutes if you were lucky...
Re:Funny thing is.. (Score:3, Insightful)
But I, like a lot of the people here, want to occasionally play a game that someone tried to push the envelope with. Game design should be an art, too, and that means grown up storylines occasionally.
Fun is not synonymous with enjoyable. 2001: A Space Odyssey is not a "fun" movie, but I get more enjoyment out of it than any comedy or mindless action film. The latter may be a good way to kill two hours, but you stop thinking about it soon after you see it. A great movie stays with you for a lot longer.
Anyone who's finished Shenmue knows that sizeable chunks of the game aren't very fun. But the lulls make the action scenes more worthwhile.
Look at Ico. The genius of the game wasn't in the gameplay; it was in the characters' movements, the music, the storyline, the atmosphere. I think most children would miss a lot of the beauty, simply because they haven't developed emotionally enough to catch the more subtle touches.
It's not like I suddenly stopped finding Metroid fun. Metroid will always be fun. To actually say something that implies you stop enjoying certain things once you get past a set age, well.... I call bullshit.
I'm not sure if I could have appreciated games like Ico or Shenmue as much if I played it as a child. In the same way, things I enjoyed as a kid (like FPSes) I don't enjoy the same way anymore. Like any other red-blooded American boy, violence thrilled me; now it just depresses me. When I was younger I liked numeric-based CRPGs (Might and Magic, Bard's Tale, etc), but now I wouldn't even start a game with endless, menu-driven combat like that. Life's too short.
So what's so awful about the idea that tastes change as you grow older?
Re:It's not tastes changing.. (Score:3, Interesting)
Nintendo's mistake, I think, is the way they try to twist their franchises rather than making new ones. I really don't understand their thinking sometimes.
It's like, "hmmm..those final fantasy games are popular, let's make our own RPG. Why not use Mario." Why not? How about because he's a freaking plumber in bright red overalls who jumps on mushroom peoples' heads. I mean, come on, we're willing to suspend our belief but not by THAT much.
BTW, I loved Sesame Street as a kid, and can still watch it if a younger relative is. What I hated, even as a kid, was all the Warner Brother cartoons, and I still do. Which is probably the exact opposite of most of the people here...
Um... (Score:2)
In any event, nintendo has been trying to change their demographics for a while, but they havn't been able to.
I bet this is a faek story. (Score:2, Interesting)
Your search - sony playstation nintendo trademark - did not match any documents.
Suggestions:
- Make sure all words are spelled correctly.
- Try different keywords.
- Try more general keywords.
- Try fewer keywords.
Also, you can browse today's headlines on the Google News homepage.
Re:I bet this is a faek story. (Score:5, Funny)
That's bullshit. It does too match a story, "Nintendo's Playstation Settlement Bombshell," posted 5 minutes ago on Sl... dammit.
Re:I bet this is a faek story. (Score:5, Informative)
Re:I bet this is a faek story. (Score:3, Funny)
Time will tell if this story is faek or rela.
Chances are.... (Score:2, Interesting)
So look for the new PS3 in 2003 - 04.
Sorry but (Score:5, Insightful)
Sorry guys, no news here move along, it's bullshit.
Re:Sorry but (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Sorry but (Score:5, Informative)
Management by Delay... (Score:2)
styles for conflicts. I doubt that anyone over
at Sony that caused this problem will take any
fallout from it.
More likely, this conflict slowly progressed where no product manager wanted to take the sales hit for moving away from the protected PlayStation brand. After all, the loss of brand recognition would be felt immediately in the sales figures that measure the success of a product manager and the current settlement is only felt long after those product managers have been promoted.
A good dictator could have fixed this problem before PlayStation was such an entrenched brand.
A one way street? (Score:2)
Re:A one way street? (Score:2)
Sure (Score:5, Insightful)
And as for no news from Nintendo and Sony about this? That's just because they're slow in getting the press release out. Right.
This isn't true. How about doing some small amount of research next time before publishing the article.
This is related to the "Megaton" announcement from Nintendo coming soon. Some sites say it's Capcom being bought by Nintendo, some sites say it's Sony paying Nintendo money for the PS brand, some sites have equally ridiculous stories. All sites are rumours and aren't true (so far), as no announcement has been made.
Re:Sure (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I wonder... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:I wonder... (Score:2)
Famicom was what they called it in Japan. In North America, it was released as the Nintendo Entertainment System (NES). Same unit, same generation, different country (most game consoles are like this, fyi).
The SNES was the Super Nintendo Entertainment System. Hmm.. looks like Playstation/Playstation 2 to me.
N64 was actually called the Nintendo 64. Same name, they just took out the 'entertainment system' bit, and added info about the cpu.
The latest (and greatest).. Nintendo Gamecube. A bit of a change, admitted.
Now, let's compare that to Sega: Master System, Genesis, Saturn, Dreamcast. Hmm.. all different names here.
Atari: 2600/5200/7800. Well, they all share the same part of alpha-numeric (the numeric part), but beyond that they really don't have much in common (yes, I'm aware it's increments of 2600).
Hmm, that leaves Sony. With a whopping 2 consoles, they are the first console company in history to have a sequel named like movies ('2'). Oh wait.. their first machine was the Playstation, then the PSX, then the PSOne.... all within one generation.
Your point again was?
source of the rumour? (Score:5, Informative)
Well, this morning, another rumour was released.
"Nintendo is set to file suit against Sony next week, declaring that the Playstation brand, and all of the profits made by Sony from it's sale, belong to Nintendo. While reading over the original contract between Sony and Nintendo (Sony were to make a CD drive for the Super Nes, entitled the Playstation), a lawyer for Nintendo noticed some key wording which showed that it was Sony's responsibility to make the drive, and that they broke the contract, not Nintendo, like initially believed.
According to sources, Nintendo is almost assured a victory, gaining all the profit's made by Sony off the Playstation since its introduction in 1996. Even if Nintendo do not win outright, they are guaranteed the rights to the Playstation name, and Sony will have to immediatley change the name of their console."
This rumour seems to follow what the Gaming Age staff member said last night. This is very interesting, and if true, it could possibly cripple Sony to the point where they could no longer compete in the console war!
Apparently nintendo had the idea of making the snes a cd-drive and thought of the name "playstation"... as Sony were very high into the cd business (cd-players, walkmans etc.) Nintendo asked them to build the cd-drive code name "playstation" for the snes.
Meanwhile Philips were also in the works of a cd-based console called the CD-i and they asked Nintendo for some help, Nintendo gave them the right to produce four Zelda games on it which they did.
Sony were angry at this because they thought that they were being cheated so they dumped Nintendo and took the idea of the cd-based console aswell as the name "playstation".
Sony and Nintendo's contract was for seven years and guess what? This is their last year as partners according to the contract...
So, as you have read, Nintendo lawyers are suing Sony, blah blah blah...
is dated dec 1, 2002. i can't imagine that in 17 days a lawsuit was filed and settled (particularly given the outrageous amount suggested)...
NEW source of the rumour? (Score:2)
with all them "in soviet russia posts" the propaganda delievery to the front page was only a matter of time.
so is this the new troll sport? Trolling the front page??
Re:NEW source of the rumour? (Score:2)
Sport? It's like shooting ducks in a barrel. It always takes me a while to remember on April 1st that the editors are actually in on the joke for once.
Furthermore, who needs submitters to troll the front page when Michael and Timothy are happy to add flamebait lines to the end of submissions or even make up titles that are incredibly misleading (i.e. the GM corn article).
2.3 billion fishy dollars ? (Score:2)
call for a /. news editor (Score:3, Funny)
WTF? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:WTF? (Score:3, Informative)
- Nintendo and Sony to jointly develop CD Addon for SNES
- Nintendo reannounces its partnership with Phillips - citing 'superior' technology. Though it was probably just a better (cheaper) deal.
- Sony gets pissed. Sony produces many of the proprietary chips inside the SNES, like the audio unit for one.
- Sony shows up at industry trade show with a new console, called Playstation. It has a cartridge slot, which plays SNES games. It has a cd-drive which playes SNES CD games (which never existed). SNES liscencing was Nintendo's, but the tech was Sony's. Sony has Nintendo by the balls.
- Nintendo does some kissing ass, and eventually winds up in some screwy 3-way partnership thing with Sony and Nintendo to jointly develop the 'Playstation', Phillips to be involved in production somehow.
- As you said, Nintendo sees Sega CD and TurboGrafx CD, watches them bomb, drops out, vows to only produce cartridges.
- Sony produces new console, Playstation X (the PSX we all know), Nintendo partners up with SGI for N64
There is a kernel of truth. There is some litigation as to the contract Nintendo had with Sony. Sony may have the trademark, but there's a contract saying that "Playstation" was to be produced for Nintendo. AFAIK, it's still in the hands of the lawyers, and will likely stay there forever.
Re:WTF? (Score:2)
You must be new here... welcome to slashdot where nobody is quite sure exactly what the editors do.
You're wrong. (Score:2)
As far as copyright.gov goes, well.
1) it's not a copyright, it's a trademark.
2) The deal was made in Japan, not the US.
3) Trademark law is a bit diffrent, in that you can start using a term, and trademark it later. As long as you've been 'trading' under that name, you get protection. So even with out legal ownership nintendo could still have a case.
And lets not forget 4) Slashdot is not a bullshit free site.
Anyway, the artical is total crap for reasons other people mentioned, but so is your post. Your history is warped, and so is your understanding of Intelectual Property.
Re:WTF? (Score:2)
disbalief? Oh, I see you are a part of the same Hooked on Phonics program -- the one that gets its graduates jobs at news sites -- as the slashdot editors.
This simply cannot be true (Score:5, Informative)
I would expect Sony's stock price to have plummeted and investors would be made aware (no evidence on Yahoo Biz).
I would expect that Sony's website would mention this issue (here's the press release site for the Playstation http://us.playstation.com/news/PressReleases/ [playstation.com] and Sony's official press release site [sony.com]) Note the lack of this story.
Google turns up no results either.
Don't post stories like this without checking them.
Re:This simply cannot be true (Score:2)
nintendo will write games... (Score:2)
nintendo designed games on the playstation??? ouch.
Somebody just got duped by a fanboy (Score:5, Insightful)
As for the actual announcement, please don't post any more news on it until you see it on nintendo.com
No mention on either site... (Score:3, Funny)
In the words of Kent Brockman: "Do we have a source on this?"
Re:No mention on either site... (Score:2)
Brockman: This just in. A fistfight is in progress in downtown Springfield. Early reports indicate, and this is very preliminary, that one of the fighters is a giant lizard. [inset of Godzilla] Do we have a source on this?
Compliments of www.snpp.com
45 y.o. italian plumber named mario sues Nintendo (Score:5, Funny)
Mario: "It is a complete... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:45 y.o. italian plumber named mario sues Ninten (Score:2, Funny)
Isn't he still in rehab for that shroom habit of his?
Gullible (Score:2, Funny)
adj 1: naive and easily deceived or tricked; "at that early age she
had been gullible and in love" [syn: fleeceable, green]
2: easily tricked because of being too trusting; "gullible
tourists taken in by the shell game"
Re:Gullible (Score:4, Funny)
How the shit did this get here? (Score:5, Informative)
uh? This is an old rumor. Fuck, its damn near ready for snopes. chrisd: Dont just post cause it looks cool, check it out first.
RatBot news coverage (Score:2)
"Oops."
US Patent and Trademark Office (Score:5, Informative)
*sigh* (Score:4, Informative)
I believe you've been hoodwinked. (Score:2)
What? That can't be? (Score:2, Redundant)
(it has a trinary processor
Console talk seems very reputable :) (Score:2)
Warning: Failed opening 'StoryText/story146.html' for inclusion (include_path='') in /home/console2/public_html/News/FullStory.php on line 145
On both mozilla and netscape 4.77. I am all out of browsers since I don't want to fire up VMWare...
I don't believe it (Score:5, Insightful)
please watch your language... (Score:2)
And it's a "copyright"; "copywrite" is something a "copywriter" does.
Hmph (Score:5, Funny)
Another Dupe (Score:5, Funny)
First we get stories that are duped.
Now we are getting duped by stories.
The 'Megaton' announcement thing (Score:3, Interesting)
Nintendo's Playstation Settlement Bombshell (Score:2)
What, you're taking editorial lessons in publishing groundless fanboy bollocks from fat Harry at Aint It
I can't remember. Can companies sue rumourmongers if said rumours drive down their stock price?
"Return Of the Lone Gunmen" (Score:2)
Nice going, chrisd.
Plan something BIG for number three, would ya? If you're going to get booted as a Slashdot "editor" (even with quotes, I can't believe I just juxtaposed those two words...), your final act should be something really monumental.
Seriously, though: Is this, like, the earliest April Fool's joke in history? I mean, past mistakes aside, I never figured you for a dumb guy. Are you really telling us that you read this submission, and you seriously thought it seemed plausible?!?
Otherwise, you should be thankful you posted this at 1238AM. Imagine if you'd posted it mid-morning, and every Slashdotter had run straight to Ameritrade to sell his/her shares in Sony. Imagine what might have happened, at least temporarily, to Sony's stock. (In this climate, a small blip can be interpreted as a relatively large spike...and before you can say "Open Source," stockholders are assuming that "spike" represents information they don't have, and they're scrambling not to be left behind.)
Now imagine what the correspondence from Sony's attorneys might have looked like, when it arrived in your office the next morning. Does the name "PairGain" ring any bells?
crib
Links = Legitimacy? (Score:2)
Has anyone else noticed that, the more hyperlinks a submission includes, the more likely the Slashdot editors are to take it seriously?
If I were to submit a story including links to a commercial real estate firm, eBay, and a picture of the Brooklyn Bridge, would you post my story about how I'm auctioning it off using a zero-feedback profile with a "Buy It Now!" of $19.95?
It looks to me like "Magamo" figured out exactly how to slip one through your blind spot, chrisd. Better work on your tells.
crib
bullshit... (Score:2)
come on guys, april fools is still many months away!
Slashdot Liablity (slightly off topic) (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Slashdot Liablity (slightly off topic) (Score:2, Informative)
Until you can prove a direct correlation between something like a major dip in Sony stock and this story on Slashdot, I don't think Slashdot is liable for anything. Oh my, did I just stick up for the Slashdot editors? Crap. Anyway, you're 100% correct -- the editors should have at least followed the link (when the link is to a page that doesn't exist, don't post the story. end of ... story). Failing that, they should've realized that any legitimate story on this would've at least linked to a more reputable source (cnnfn, yahoo, even msnbc), either without the consoletalk link or along side it.
My prediction is that this will get blamed on the editors seeing the Two Towers today. The movie was so damned long, they were probably half asleep by the time they got back to "work".
Re:Slashdot Liablity (slightly off topic) (Score:4, Informative)
OUCH (Score:3, Insightful)
This case is very interesting though. There was no news about this "Playstation" controversy. Doesn't a company have to run through an agency before it launches a product of a particular name?
Aibo? (Score:2)
Why have Nintendo waited so long? (Score:2, Interesting)
*Obviously this date is incorrect.
To Err Is Human, To Really Screw Up You Need A PC (Score:2)
People don't usually make the same mistake twice -- they make it three times, four time, five times...
So, we'll see a duplicate of this posted?
Even if it is true... (Score:3, Funny)
Um, providing this article were true, why wouldn't they use the name? They just paid 2.3 billion dollars for it.
Re:It doesn't matter (Score:2)
In what language??
Re:ummm.. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:ummm.. (Score:2)
Re:Slashdot top story on News.Google.Com (Score:3, Funny)
However I suppose google's AI code would look for corresponding sources before alerting it's readers to something major like this.
Machine 1 ChrisD 0
Great. (Score:2)
Re:Slashdot top story on News.Google.Com (Score:3, Interesting)
Trillian:
> If for no other reason, it's interesting
> Slashdot is one of the sites Google News searchs.
Yes. Slashdot bills itself as a news site, and it is looked upon as a news site.
Begging the question, as several have already asked: If this story had been posted 11 hours later (mid-morning), and it had caused -- even temporarily -- repercussions for Sony's stock value...what exactly would Slashdot's liability be?
(Or, to ask another way: How soon thereafter would Sony OWN Slashdot?)
crib
Re:Err.. (Score:2)
Re:future for sony's brand (Score:2)
(puts pinky finger to corner of mouth)
BILLIONS!?!?!
Besides, nobody's paying anyone anything. As others have pointed out, while there are elements of truth to the history behind the story, there is no settlement, and as far as I know, no suit.
Re:That was a fast kill..... /. (Score:2)
it failed to open a file, which means the file is gone or not readable. wtf is up with this story? i dont even think they realized it was a joke when they posted it, and the article is gone immediately? pretty lame.
Re:Not slashdotted (Score:3, Insightful)