Unreal Tournament 2003 Mac Demo Unleashed 38
An anonymous reader writes "The Unreal Tournament 2003 demo for Mac has been released - see the story at Insidemacgames.com." The demo has 5 maps, requires OS X, and download mirrors, as always, are hard to come by - try 3D Gamers and Fileshack, also here's unofficial BitTorrent link-age
[verified, correct file -Jamie]. It's good to see the Mac community being supported with high-profile titles like this - but what other games would you like to see ported to the Apple-icious platform?
droool (Score:1)
I've got another FPS to play besides tenebrae quake on X. bout time too..
now only if maxis'll get their act together and port me simcity 4000... then I'll be happy.
poo.
Re:droool (Score:1)
yay! (Score:1)
Re:yay! (Score:2)
It is SO choppy.
Anyway, just curious.
Re:yay! (Score:1)
640mb ram
ati radeon 7500/32mb
runs suprisingly well... smooth and all. just kinda hard to play w/ a touchpad...
For the morbidly curious (Score:4, Informative)
secondly, bit torrent does work on a 550 mhz G4 powerbook w/16 MB agp vid card, 512 MB ram. so does UT2003. on OS X 10.2.5 no less.
if you're up for UT2003 slideshow.
Granted, with a minimum system requirement of a 700mhz processor, and a 32 meg video card, the fact that it ran on my system at all is impressive. I get about 0.5FPS by my guess, durring "the action", while I got a decent(?!) 10 or so fps when walking through low poly areas, with everything turned to low, very low, or off.
what does this mean? basically that if you bought your computer in the last 8-12 months, it should meet the minimum sys requirements (mine is closer to 18-20 months old). good luck with this, I guess I'll just have to stick with Quake 1,2,3 and the original UT for now.
p.s. i managed to kill one of the bots on novice skill with the flak cannon! amazing!
p.p.s. shouldn't this be in the apple section, not the games section?
Re:For the morbidly curious (Score:1, Offtopic)
So do I. Slashdot editors, get rid of it! Please!!!
Re:For the morbidly curious (Score:2)
hmm....Mac users always claim that even though the specs appear lower, they are actually a lot faster than PC's. Funny thing is that you have to have an almost new Mac to run this game that I can run just fine on my 1.2 ghz machine that i built 2 years ago for under $700.
Re:For the morbidly curious (Score:3, Interesting)
As for apples older than 12 months old, apple released their 733mhz desktop system in February of 2001 [lowendmac.com]... it just took a while for Apple's laptops to break the 700mhz barrier (for marketing reasons). Granted, that model came with a 16 meg video card, but also a 4x AGP bus, so you can pick up a 32
Re:For the morbidly curious (Score:2)
I've played Warcraft 3 and Medal of Honor and such. It's not that Mac users aren't gamers, they actually just can't play any games. The 3D isn't fast enough, no-ones making the games that we all want (*coughcoughcough*Star Wars: Galaxies) withou
Re:For the morbidly curious (Score:1)
Re:For the morbidly curious (Score:1)
Re:For the morbidly curious (Score:1)
On the other hand.. (Score:1)
I get 60+ fps with everything cranked up. And if I only want to run 600x800 (why would I?) I get 90-100 frames.
But on the other hand...I've been playing the game for months now, and I've got so many to choose from...
What others (Score:1)
Maybe this.
Re:What others (Score:2)
Port this: (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Port this: Here ya go (Score:2)
Re:Port this: (Score:1)
NSMine [epicware.com]
HL2 (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:HL2 (Score:1)
Re:HL2 (Score:1)
Splinter Cell (Score:2)
So since there are plenty of Tom Clancey games ported to the Mac (Ghost Recon, etc), there's no reason why Splinter Cell shouldn't be either.
Re:Splinter Cell (Score:1)
Re:Splinter Cell (Score:2)
Battlefield 1942 (Score:1)
Oh and maybe Halo with tools (yeah, right!)
What the Mac gaming community really needs is another break out title that is Mac first or a concurrent release. Another Marathon would be good.
I'll shut up and get to work.
Re:Battlefield 1942 (Score:1)
My $.02 (Score:1)
Oh, and on a completely unrelated note, why is every single newspost I see about this convinced that there are only 4 maps? There are actually 5: 2 DM (one outdoors (shiiiiny), one indoors), 2 CTF (CTF-Citadel and CTF-Orbital2 or something like that, space-station-esque), and one BR.
Minimum specs... (Score:3, Informative)
One catch to this though.... I have a "non standard" video card for my machine. It's the OEM GeForce 3 card that I stuck in a few months ago to play WarCraft III. As long as you've got a good GPU, you should be golden. It is a fun game once you configure the settings [for some reason the mouse is set to *amazingly* slow and useless by default. Once I changed it to somewhere in the 16+ range, I 0wn3z]
Macs (Score:1)
MAC (Score:1)
You can build/buy a pretty decent PC setup for $1000 or so that will run most/all current games and you do not have to wait 6 months to play a slower version of the same title. There is no reasonable complaint that MAC users can give as to the crappy game support. It was never there in the past, so why would it be there now? It is a dead issue. I think
Re:MAC (Score:1)
The way... (Score:1)
I'm also Lectrick, the guy who originally put up the torrent file, so I like to contribute in general =)
Another quality icculus port (Score:2)