Duke Nukem Versus Take Two? 64
TimeTrip writes "There's a new column at CNN which offers a great overview of the ongoing problems with the Duke Nukem franchise. The publisher (Take Two) has serious issues with the developer (3D Realms), and vice versa. There's also some good quotes in there, including: 'George Broussard, co-owner of 3D Realms, fired back later that day on the message boards of Shacknews, one of the larger gaming community and news sites, suggesting 'Take Two needs to STFU imo.'"
Hype (Score:5, Funny)
If you don't want hype, don't announce a game and then wait like a decade to release the thing!
Re:Hype (Score:1)
Re:Hype (Score:1)
Re:Hype (Score:1)
Re:Hype (Score:4, Insightful)
Take2 was forced to write off $5.5M because DNF is still nowhere, and they couldn't even show anything at E3 (and I'd bet a good bit of the writeoff is due to that). A statement from Take2's CEO that they just "hope to have something" is a bit harsh, but you write off $5.5M and tell me you don't get pissy.
George's response to this was completely out of line, and frankly shows far more about 3DRealm's lack of professionality than anything else to date -- including the 5 year+ development cycle.
Re:Hype (Score:1)
You go, George! (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:You go, George! (Score:2)
That's my point (Score:2, Insightful)
Bah, who cares anymore? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Bah, who cares anymore? (Score:2)
I don't know anyone who expect it to do anything but be completely horrible. I'm sure it will live up to that expectation, assuming this isn't the final death rasp of 3D Realms right here.
Re:Bah, who cares anymore? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Bah, who cares anymore? (Score:3, Insightful)
According to the article 3dRealms has been at it for 5 years at this point. I'd think they should have something that was ready to show by now if it was likely they had anything.
Re:Bah, who cares anymore? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Bah, who cares anymore? (Score:2)
3DRealms, on the other hand, keeps trumpting about DNF, and how it'll be done when it's done, and it'll be what the fans wanted, and so on and so forth. Meanwhile they're either writing an engine from scratch (making it their 3rd or 4th, depending on how you count) or usin
Re:Bah, who cares anymore? (Score:2)
Re:Bah, who cares anymore? (Score:1)
I could have sworn I started hearing about this game back around '95 or so... Of course, back then, it was more of a re-release of the DukeNukem 3D with bugfixes and enhancements...
Re:Bah, who cares anymore? (Score:1)
At this point (Score:3)
Any actual game could only take a back seat to its status as vaporware.
Re:At this point (Score:2)
Re:At this point (Score:2, Interesting)
BC3k took what, over 10 years to be developed, and caused the death of an innocent Coke vending machine.
Most impressive of all, though, was during this whole time, the developer maintained(!) multiple flamewars on usenet - even AFTER the first game was released by...Take Two.
As many commented, the flamewars provided far more entertainment than the eventual game ever did...
Re:At this point (Score:1)
George Broussard is about to make you his bitch!
Suck it down!
Battle Cruiser 3000? (Score:1)
7 years of development time, 1 vapor ware, and one cocky bastard
I think... (Score:2, Interesting)
It has been about 5 years, and he is the one who can't shut up about the game they have been hyping all these years.
Seriously, I do not read their forums but I sware it seems that the only he has been doing is posting to every known message board and defending himself/his company/game/etc. Someone needs to spend more time running a company and working on this vaporware game then spending most of their time posting PR stuff on gaming sites.
Then there is the f
Re:I think... (Score:2)
That a company decided to end the endless hype and speculation that was actually making things worse? Instead of overpromising and telling us more release dates, they just said "When it's done" and we crucify them? I don't get it. I'm glad that 3DR decided t
Re:I think... (Score:2)
We're all pissed off at 3DR because you're exactly right! They haven't said anything in years! I have no problem if they say the game will be
Re:I think... (Score:2)
It just seems like a waste of time to even give a second thought to DNF. It's not out, so why worry about it. There hasn't been a sequel to Citizen Kane yet. It took George Lucas year
Re:I think... (Score:2)
Artists vs Busniess men (Score:1)
web boards? (Score:3, Insightful)
Who Was Responsible For The Hype? (Score:3, Insightful)
Of course, the aforementioned public has to take responsibility, too. All it takes is an announcement of a game and one or two screenshots for some geeks to immediately declare that "This will be the best game ever!" followed immediately by putting up fan sites full of speculative information. I've seen people complaing about not seeing any game info for a LONG time, but of course if they got any they would complain once again: "Only three screenshots?? We need more than that!"
3DRealms, since going through all the DNF turmoil, has for the most part done the responsible thing: They've shut up about the game. When asked about a release date, they now say "When it's done" and they don't answer any more specific questions than that. If gamers would just let it lie, they might just end up with a pleasant surprise when the game comes out. And, if it doesn't, then maybe the stories about this game will end...which would be a very good thing, indeed.
Re:Who Was Responsible For The Hype? (Score:2)
3DR has kept quiet about the whole DNF thing for the last couple
More delay... (Score:2, Funny)
I think they're probably gonna wait to switch over to the Doom III or HL2 engine.
And then, a while later, the Doom IX or HL8 engine...
This just in.... (Score:2, Informative)
What kind of business people take their fight into the open public? If the publisher or the developer is that bad, word gets around the industry and no one wants to work with them.
By having this war of words in public forums, it really makes both sides look like morons and probably have just committed their companies to death.
Just kill DNF and move on. Try to save your companies and reputation.
Duke Nukem meets Battlecruiser (Score:1)
Re:Duke Nukem meets Battlecruiser (Score:1)
Who cares about them? (Score:1)
I've played Duke since the 1st one was brought out by Apogee (there's a name out of the past, Commander Keen all the way!). The way things are going I might play the first 3 & 3D again just to prove to myself that they existed.
DNF v HL (Score:3, Insightful)
The biggest problem facing DNF is that 3d games have advanced so damn much since Duke Nukem debuted, and I don't mean merely graphically. Obviously Half Life 2 will push that even further. Let's examine Medal of Honor. It's a fun, solid FPS and yet in implementation it doesn't really do anything we'd consider "new" (ala Tron 2.0, or Deus Ex). Still, MoH has so much more in it than anything Duke Nukem that anything even resembling the original DN will be nothing less than outdated. Unreal II, another example of everything done right but not great, showed us that good just isn't "good enough."
Basically, this: Duke Nukem is so fundamentally one dimensioned as a game structure that 3drealms has completely missed the viability of selling their game. I played the crap out of the original DN, but I can't see myself playing DNF with the same character and similar storyline when I have stuff like HL2 and Deus Ex 2 sitting around.
Re:DNF v HL (Score:2)
Duke Nukem Forever could be a good game when/if it comes out, and still make money. Or, it could be an absolutely fantastic disp
Re:DNF v HL (Score:1)
Obviously, your point stands. But HL2 and DoomIII being released is like upping the ante on 3drealms more than they can pay.
Old news - Good news (Score:3, Informative)
Back to the subject at hand, I really wouldn't worry about DNF too much. I talk to the guys over at 3DRealms at least twice a week, (Well, okay, I email them.) and while I make it a point not to bring up DNF, I've gotten good vibes from them recently. I honestly think that we'll see something by Christmas in the form of some announcement and a release early next year. That's just my crazy talk there. Call me goofy (see next post I'm sure) but I wouldn't count out DNF just yet.
It's been longer than 5 years. (Score:2, Informative)
Parallels to Ion Storm (Score:2, Interesting)
They have been wise to keep themselves out of the media. I think they learned something about the meteoric cratering of Ion Storm by letting the media see what a mess the internal workings had become.
I'm
3DR/Brass is probally thinking... (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:3DR/Brass is probally thinking... (Score:1)
Message board insults (Score:1)
I thought it was cool... (Score:1)
Yeah...
public domain (Score:1)
I'm waiting, I'm waiting, for you... (Score:2)
On a semi-related note, I'm no longer interested in FPS action games. The genre is oversaturated and there is nothing new, interesting, or even enjoyable anymore. Sorry, but that's what happens when you get everyone and his mother making, basically, the same game with different graphics. Oooh. Ahh.
Id pushes technology.
VALVe pushes Counter-Strike.
Epic fights with Id and produces crap like Unreal 2 (or was that Legend? I don't care anyway).
and 3dRea
Re:I'm waiting, I'm waiting, for you... (Score:1)
Pop Quiz (Score:2)
A: One (1) - Falcon 4.0. And even that had a number of bugs that had to be worked out post-release. But at least the GAME delivered.
snaf (Score:1)
which isn't S.hut T.he F.uck U.p
It is S.ituation N.ormal, A.ll F.ucked U.p
Which most defiantly applies here to the whole situation.
George's comment should have been 'Don't worry kids, SNAFU at 3DRelms...business as usual!'.
brockout.