Harry Potter's Zelda-Influenced Philosophy 31
Thanks to C+VG for their interview discussing the newly announced Harry Potter And The Sorceror's Stone with an EA producer, after this heavily rumored PS2/Xbox/GameCube update of the first book was officially announced last week. The game is summarized as having "..some stealth sections, some flying modes, but probably 80 percent of the time there's this sort of arcade adventure, it's almost Zelda-esque. We're not afraid to admit our influences." So unafraid, in fact, that they mention the Zelda series at least 5 times during the interview. There's already been a glut of Harry Potter games, most of which have been significantly different from one another - which ones have you actually enjoyed?
Re:Jordan? Try Goodkind (Score:1)
Re:The fifth book (Score:1, Offtopic)
[nice build] [enjoyable scene] [good build] [great build] [climax] [stick a huge 7-page block of one person talking to explain everything else because the book is already twice as long as the last book and hasnt yet bothered with those "nice build"s for 90% of the story]
if they didnt bother to divide the books by year, it could be better for multiple reasons. The end of year four and the beginning of year five are l
Re:The fifth book (Score:2)
And I think that book 4 sucked. I liked the first 3 books the most.. especially the 2nd, where people were frozen all the time - I could feel the panic pretty well.. book 3 was nice too - maybe because it didn't invo
Re:The fifth book (Score:2)
and you're a twit, book three kicked the ass of two
Re:The fifth book (Score:2, Interesting)
Now, about the "stick":
[nice build] [enjoyable scene] [good build] [great build] [climax] [stick a huge 7-page block of one person talking to explain everything else because the book is already twice as long as the last book and hasnt yet bothered with those "nice build"s for 90% of the story]
What did you mean in "bothered with those nic
Re:The fifth book (Score:3, Interesting)
90% of the book is nice builds about 10% of the story, the rest is a hasty explanation thrown in at the end. Read the 2nd [or 3rd.. not sure..] to last chapter in book 4, it's nothing but one long block of somebody talking under influence of truth-serum for fuck's sake -- it would be cliche if it wasnt so fucking stupid that nobody else has bothered with it.
Hooray for clones! (Score:3, Funny)
Oh well, at least they're cloning something *fun*. Hopefully they do it well...
They need to make Wizzard Chess!! (Score:1)
Re:They need to make Wizzard Chess!! (Score:1)
MMORPG?? (Score:1)
Re:MMORPG?? (Score:1)
Harry Potter (Score:3, Interesting)
She had a bit of trouble with many boss fights and puzzles. The camera was a bit awkward for her. But I've been playing games for 18 years now, so I thought that the game was a bit too easy for me. Regardless, it was still quite fun (even if it can be finished in two or three days of extended play.)
I think that gamers that like 3D platform titles would like it, even if they aren't fans of the series. But the game might be a bit too tough for people that don't normally play games. It could have used a bit more balance, and a bit more work on making the game a bit longer and more in-depth. Unfortunately, it doesn't look like Eurocom will be doing this new game. They had a fabulous multi-platform game engine. Maybe Warthog will get the opportunity to improve upon this engine, assuming that it belongs to EA now.
Re:Harry Potter (Score:2)
Ugh. I couldn't stand it. I couldn't believe that Rawlings would have signed off on it, had she actually played the game.
The camera controls were terrible, and a number of areas were only difficult because of that-- you couldn't line up right for a jump! The levels themselves had nothing to do with Harry Potter, and could have been prepared for any game beforehand; I suspect they were.
The overland area was okay, but walking into a dozen identical classrooms and checking a dozen identical desks each is
As someone who's also played games for multiple (Score:2)
From the best (Score:2)
Re:Who the heck IS Harry Potter? (Score:2)
Congrats on missing them, you'd better keep your location secret so it cannot be traced by t
Re:Who the heck IS Harry Potter? (Score:1)
Chamber of Secrets for GC was fun... (Score:3, Insightful)
This was before I ever played Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time. When we got an n64 a couple months after that, as well as Ocarina, I realized how much the HPCoS game was like Zelda, which is a lot! The game was still fun, but used "plot" devices that were kind of lame at times. It'd sure be nice to be able to go back to play Quiddich and Wizzard Dueling after you'd beat the game, though.
Not really. (Score:2)
Not because EA was ripping off Zelda.
Re:Not really. (Score:2)
Did anyone notice (Score:1)
Warthog?
On a more serious note, I think that making a better game out of the license is a good idea. The Harry Potter fan base is huge. The segment of the population who dislike it are vocal, but they won't likely stop fans from buying or stores from selling.
And... the PC game, at least, was extremely lacking. Great waste of $19.99 in my opinion. Perhaps the 8-year-olds liked it, I don'