


Discover The DISCover Console 46
Thanks to GameShark.com for their interview with Curtis Kaiser of DISC regarding their forthcoming DISCover "PC game console". Kaiser describes the DISCover as "a game console that plays unmodified PC games. As with a PlayStation or Xbox, you simply drop the disc into the console and play. The difference is the video game consoles can only play games made for their proprietary formats, while the DISCover can play the thousands of available PC titles." Entry-level models will be priced from $299, and the company is trying to tout ease of use as the biggest advantage of buying the DISCover over a normal PC - "...patching scripts will be received through the DISCover network. Patches will automatically be applied to any installed program or they will be applied as part of the installation process."
Entry Level PC? (Score:1)
This could make a great entry level PC -- if scripts are used to manage installation and execution of programs, I can see a huge market for these in various areas where minimal knowledge of computers is needed, such as third world countries, schools, etc.
X-BOX KILLER (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:X-BOX KILLER (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Patent for using a TV instead of a monitor ? (Score:2, Informative)
well this apparently: Home entertainment system for playing software designed for play in home computer
Which in more detail is:
A dedicated apparatus for playing unmodified prerecorded software in a home computer system, and more particularly an apparatus, housed in a home entertainment system chassis, for playing in a home entertainment environment the existing body of interactive multimedia software that has been formatted and published for compatibility with standard
Loopholes? (Score:2)
Re:Loopholes? (Score:2)
A: CD-Rom media
B: a hash derived from the file table of the media
C: a Telivision monitor (not HDTV)
D: something that does not require an external check for installation scripts
And amusingly enough a snippet of the Patent "In addition, the video converter card does not address the user interface problem; namely, a typical personal computer keyboard and mouse are extremely inconvenient, if not totally unworkable, for a home user sitting on a comfortable cou
Re:Patent for using a TV instead of a monitor ? (Score:4, Informative)
I haven't read the entire patent (like most software patents, it's very verbose), but you can look it up here. [uspto.gov]
There's a link on their web site to that patent (bottom of the About [gameconsole.tv] page).
I can guarantee... (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:I can guarantee... (Score:2)
"How Are The Scripts Updated?
Each time a new PC game is launched or about to be launched, your DISCover® enabled console will use an Internet or phone connection to pull down the new script/s. It's a bit like the TiVo® model."
I wonder, however, if they are going to completely require it? will this be enforced in hardware as well?
Re:I can guarantee... (Score:2)
One stream of money they can make is targeted advertising. Think of it, let's say you install Madden 2003 on your DISCover box. Since they know you like football games, they may stream an advertisment to you when you are checking for updates. They could easily send you information about the new NCAA football that is coming out in two weeks, or about the new Tiger Woods game with 14 additional courses. They can build a pretty big demographic dat
Um, I dunno about this... (Score:2, Insightful)
Now, a PS3 that can play PS games as well as PS1-3, now *there* would be an interesting product... maybe an XBox 2?
X-Box Killer? Nah. Phantom Killer? Hm... (Score:2, Interesting)
Sounds like it could swipe a lot of Phantom's market share, and Phantom needs a big market to be profitable.
Personally, I'm all for it. The idea of a market for PC games that don't work on actual PCs is offensive to me on many levels, but the idea that people buying a PC only for gaming should pay less than those buying one as a workstation seems to have a certain mer
I'm actually excited about the Phantom (Score:2)
Re:I'm actually excited about the Phantom (Score:1)
Furthermore, the Phantom's claims are just ludicrious. It was clear from their marketting drivel that they're talking about distributing old PC and/or emulated games (ie. MAME.) Sounds like a good idea, until you stop to think about the copyright issues... Many of those companies don't exist anymore, yet
Interesting... (Score:1)
The specs:
And it's running WinXP.
Re:Interesting... (Score:3, Interesting)
And how are they going to make this money back? They're not making money offa PC game sales, nor are they likely to in the future. I just don't see how this works.
Re:Interesting... (Score:4, Funny)
Perhaps they will forgo the standard plastic casing in favor of a giant gob of epoxy?
Re:Interesting... (Score:2)
Pick any two components in the box and you're up to the cost of the box.
Re:Interesting... (Score:2)
That's the 700 dollar machine (Score:4, Informative)
A Via CPU and motherboard
40 GB hard drive
512 MB Ram
SIS graphics card (http://www.xabre.com/)
A reviewer at E3 commented that "the $299 unit, on display at the show, struggled to run Need for Speed: Hot Pursuit 2. The game, released in 2002, couldn't manage a steady frame-rate, and sometimes dropped to completely unplayable levels, if only for a few seconds."
So no, there would be no point in buying one for parts.
Next-Generation systems need to blow all current systems out of the water. This one appears to struggle to keep up. Sad.
Oops... (Score:1)
My bad then... those were the only specs that they list on their site. I assumed they were for the $300 machine. Guess if it seems too good to be true...
Re:That's the 700 dollar machine (Score:2)
SIS graphics card
It's probably a mini-itx motherboard, bc it has integrated SIS graphics. I'm running on one of those right now. It's very good for office work, internet, and 2D gaming. But if you plan to do anything 3D that's beyond directx6, forget it. Even old games like SimCoaster crawl here! On the other hand, Diablo2 runs fine.
The price is still interesting though if it's a 1 Ghz model. For $299 I could only get the mobo/cpu, the ram and the case. I still had to add a har
I wonder... (Score:1)
Doom 3 coming out soon. Doomed DISCover won't be. (Score:5, Interesting)
XBox? Indrema? Phantom? Pippin? I know there is a necessary threshold of bs when reading press releases, and I know we're supposed to swallow more than this, but the lack of knowledge doesn't bode well.
Besides, that threshold is quickly exceeded.
The Pentium®4, along with today's graphic and audio processors allow for PC games with awesome visual and audio effects.
Here comes that threshold. According to the Gamers.com article, the $300 price tag will get you a Via processor, not the touted intel P4. For a P4, you need to pay $700, or roughly the cost of a P4 system. And there is an even MORE expensive version in the pipeline, with TIVO capability. Do you expect "awesome visual and audio effects" from that $200 Wallmart machine?
There are thousands PC games, far more than video games, in proprietary formats (i.e. PlayStation2 and Xbox). And the best games are made for the PC.
Bad punctuation aside, how many of those games are worth playing? You too can have 9,999 Bust-A-Move clones on your own device! AAA titles are as rare on the PC as they are on the PS2, as they both require large development houses and a large outlay in manpower to create.
Until now serious gamers were required to install and run computer programs on a PC. With DISCover's patented technology, the PC is no longer the only place to play PC games. PC games, with their dazzling graphics and stunning audio, can now be played on a TV hassle free.
They patented video out to a TV? Or did they patent playing games from an installer without actually installing. Did they do anything to deserve a patent on playing PC games on a TV? Commodore 64? TV-Out? XBox? Linux on PS?
As a game console, DISCover® is connected to a TV, not to a computer monitor. To play any one of thousands of PC games on TV, you simply Drop the game in the DISCover® and play.
BTW, standard TVs run at a maximum resolution of 640 x 480 interlaced. Many modern computer games don't even support a resolution that low. In other words, games will not look nearly as good on your TV as they do on a computer monitor.
Picking apart their press releases aside, I fail to see the point of this console. It plays PC games, so it is redundant to anyone who owns a gaming PC. It plays on a television, so graphics will be inferior. What they appear to be trying to do is sell a PC gaming machine to console people by telling them that consoles, in short, suck. That's like trying to gain votes for the democratic party by calling the republicans inferior and stupid, and wondering why people don't feel swayed by your compelling arguments.
But don't let me say it: Let's hear from their own mouths.
Markets: Our market is the digital interactive entertainment market, in particular the $9 billion game markets. Individuals who would enjoy playing PC games on their TV are the specific target in this market. At the low-end of the market are video gamers who would like to move up to PC games (ages 12-25); at the high end of the are PC gamers who would like to move from their computer monitor to their big-screen home-theater (ages 25-45). The middle market is made up of those who would like PC games and other PC entertainment on their TV, as well as having a DVD, DVR and movies on demand.
On the one hand, you have young people who want to play PC games, but who can't afford a PC. Because targeting markets with no money is the right way to launch a product. On the other hand, you have people with money and high-end theater systems, but who haven't discovered their high-tech PC comes standard with an SVideo out port. And finally, you have those people who are swarming out to buy a set-top box, to rent movies-on-demand and to buzzword their buzzword with B.U.Z. and W.R.D. disks.
There are other problems: One
Re:Doom 3 coming out soon. Doomed DISCover won't b (Score:1)
[[applause]]
It's just sad that I had to scroll this far down to see a cogent discussion of the machine and article (I was afraid I was going to have to write one myself).
My suggestion to these people is that, instead of leaping into the hardware area (scary margins/overhead), they should market their fancy-shmancy installation/patching service as a software package. I would imagine that there are a lot of hardcore PC gamers out there (I'm no
Re:Doom 3 coming out soon. Doomed DISCover won't b (Score:2)
Another Grab fo da Money (Score:1)
Isn't one PC game playing console
Grab fo da Money (Score:3, Interesting)
Isn't one PC game playing console [infiniumlabs.com] enough already? This is just a bad idea in SO many ways. For one, PC games have never been plug & play unless they have been heavily modified for the box they run one which makes them propretary whether the submitter/company admits it or not. And sorry fo yas, but the words PC games and console are mutually exlusive, especially when one includes the word "patch", whci in itself implies, crashing, freezing stuttering and other bugs PC games are regularly shipped with. Speaking of PC games, how do these people intend on keeping up with the ever increasing demand games place on their hardware? After all, an Entry Model also implies other models will be availible as well. With better spec undoubtably and the same uneven playing field as a PC provides.
See? Yet another bastard PC gaming child that will crash and burn with the rest of them.
My $0.02 (Score:1)
What's the difference... (Score:1)
Comparison (Score:2)
http://www.gameconsole.tv/demos_pictures.html
Now look at the Cappuccino mini PC at Thinkgeek:
http://www.thinkgeek.com/computing/handhelds/5a
Inovation rules! What a revolutionary design!
Re:Comparison (Score:2)
"this section of the site is under construction, but check out a sketch of the prototype for the first DISCover® enabled game console. Looks a lot like the home page of this Web site
i wonder how they did their prototype, ordered a bunch of them from thinkgeek? and i wonder whats still under construction about the design, the placing of the emblems?
that said, the cappucino is at 1.2ghz $949.99, i'd say they won't be using that for the version with the 3ghz cpu(heat and power i
Re:Comparison (Score:2)
http://www.gameconsole.tv/demos_pictures.html
Now look at the Cappuccino mini PC at Thinkgeek:
http://www.thinkgeek.com/computing/handhelds/5a9 8/
Inovation rules! What a revolutionary design!"Then again, look a few posts above that one...hmm...same two links..innovation strikes again.
Re:As a game developer... (Score:2)
Yeah, it's not all it's cracked up to be. (Score:3, Interesting)
First off, they start off talking about how you can plop any PC title in there and it will play, no problem. A bit slower the first time than others though. So, I ask if they have some sort of special version of install shield and what do they do if a developer uses a really strange in house installer?
Finally, the truth comes out, they have to write a script for each and every game, which means thousands of install scripts, in addition to the patch scripts. It seemed like a small (under 20 ppl) outfit, so I'm pretty sure "Thousands" is theoretical.
As far as how they expect to make their money, the patches and everything will be a subscription service, don't believe them if they say otherwise.
Basically, it comes down to one nutty guy that seems more from marketing than the tech. side of things and a few poor programmer side kicks trying deparately to keep up with his wide and ignorant feature claims.
Did I say this thing is full of shit? It is, really, the more I think about it, the more I remember how upset I was at his obtuse claims of compatibility and performance (when was the last time you had to upgrade the processor/ram in your PS2? when was the last time you had to upgrade your gaming PC?).
This guy is just a dreamer with no grasp of reality. I savor the memory of how red faced and deflated I left him in the basement at E3 after shooting down every response he had to my questions about compatibility, hardware performance, etc.
Anyways, don't buy into the marketese, this product will suck if it ever makes it on the shelf.
However, as another reader mentioned, there could be other great applications for this sort of embedded system with network patching and such, but the XPEmbedded licence pretty much spoils that.
Could you expand on this? (Score:2)
Could you expand on this? I'm not familiar with the limitations of the XPE licence... How would it spoil network patching, etc?
Re:Could you expand on this? (Score:1)
With XPE you can only use it the way Microsoft lets you, I'm sure there's plenty of application Microsoft would be fine with, however, you still have to run your ideas through them. They don't have to give you an XPE license if they don't want to.
Now, if this whole thing was based on Linux, then you could really do whatever you want with it... I wonder, have they gotten together a DirectX sor
WineX... (Score:1)
http://www.transgaming.com/ [transgaming.com]
Humph... it's a sham (Score:1)
Who Cares? (Score:1)
This is, of course, until things go wrong for Discover users
The only way to keep that magic box appeal would be to court developers to make sure to QA on one of thier machines.
Otherwise, when ati decides to release 'el crasho driver that makes 3dmark go as fast