Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
First Person Shooters (Games) PC Games (Games) Software Entertainment Games Linux

QuakeCon Doom III Keynote Panel Discussed 34

Posted by simoniker from the details-and-conversions dept.
Thanks to HomeLanFed for their article reporting highlights from the Doom III keynote panel at QuakeCon, which featured id CEO Todd Hollenshead, lead designer Tim Willits, programmer Robert Duffy and lead animator Fred Nilsson. They discussed how "making a map for Doom III is a lot more of a collaborative effort than in previous Doom games because of the level of detail", and mentioned that "both Linux and Mac OS X versions of Doom III are moving in close development with the PC version... they will have Mac and Linux files available for download when Doom III is released for the PC... An actual Mac retail box for Doom III is a possibility but a Linux retail release is unlikely." They also confirm Doom III for Xbox is being converted by Vicarious Visions and "will be basically the complete experience that PC gamers will get."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

QuakeCon Doom III Keynote Panel Discussed More

QuakeCon Doom III Keynote Panel Discussed

Comments Filter:

  • Free as in beer? (Score:1, Redundant)

    by angryflute ( 206793 )
    Does this mean that the Linux version will be FREE? That would be one incentive to help me switch to Linux permanently.

  • Here's something I don't get (Score:5, Interesting)

    by NerveGas ( 168686 ) on Saturday August 16, 2003 @02:54AM (#6711056)
    Here's a quote:

    The Xbox version of Doom III will be basically the complete experience that PC gamers will get, according to Hollenshead Aside from the limited amount of RAM in the console there are no technical bottlenecks in converting the PC Doom III to work on the Xbox. As reported earlier, Hollenshead said that developer Vicarious Visions is the primary developer behind the Xbox port.

    So... it's going to be the complete experience on the Xbox? You'll get the "complete" experience on something with an outdated CPU, tremendously slow FSB, very limitted memory, and an outdated video card? Sheesh, and all of this time I had heard that you needed fancy new video cards to even enable some of the video features. I guess I wuz lied to! (tongue in cheek)

    steve

    • Re:Here's something I don't get (Score:5, Insightful)

      by edwdig ( 47888 ) on Saturday August 16, 2003 @03:20AM (#6711146)
      You're forgetting, on the Xbox it's running at 640x480, where you'd probably run it at 1024x768 or higher on your PC.

      Also keep in mind you can get a big performance gain by coding for a fixed hardware platform rather than trying to make something that runs on thousands of possible configurations.
    • It'll probably be somewhat scalable like UT2K3. That game is playable on everything from a Geforce 4 MX on up, but is said to be able to bring out the full power of the 9800 pro.

      • Re:Here's something I don't get (Score:1, Informative)

        by Anonymous Coward
        Man.. people are so uninformed. I can play that game with 20+ fps on a Geforce 2 MX and 850 MHZ cpu.

        It seems like EVERYBODY thinks this hardware is useless these days.. but it isn't.
    • Perhaps by 'complete experience' they mean the experience the average spec PC user would get. While the shadows and so on might require a dx9 video card, it will still be runnable on earlier hardware, just with some features disabled. No doubt this would be simiar to the xbox version.

      Complete experience, for a given definition of complete...
    • That's the kind of thing that people no longer expect from software developers - tweaking and optimisation. While the PC mentality has long been "just add more RAM", game programmers are no strangers to fine-tuning their engines. There are a lot of corners that could be cut. It is probably possible to make the complete Doom3 experience run on P2 with 64Mb RAM, but the programmers would have to spend so much time coding that the game would sell for 200$.
      • It's not a matter of tweaking, it's simply that (a) the Xbox doesn't have the hardware capabilities in the graphics chip that are *required* for full Doom3 effects, and (b) software rendering, no matter how tweaked, just won't do it.

        steve
        • I say BS.
          1) You can do any effect in software.
          2) GPU rendering is just as software as the CPU rendering. And you can tweak both.
          • 1) Specialized hardware will run at least an order of magnitude faster than generic hardware. What a 300 MHz GeForce FX will render at 30-60 FPS, a 3 GHz CPU couldn't render at 3 FPS, no matter how much you tweak it. Really.

            2) GPU rendering isn't software at all. The great, overwhelming bulk of the work is all done in hardware on the GPU. Perhaps you should look into GPU design a little bit.

            As for tweaking for an individual platform, id already does that on their games - in the parts of code where
            • 1) You don't have to render an image that looks same as GeForce FX pixel-for-pixel. Even on the PC ATI and GeForce produce pictures that look different. In the same venue you don't need the exact same result on XBox. How much like the Windows version should it look like? It depends on how much you want to spend on development. Guess what, all 3D games starting from Doom had dynamic lightning and realistic shadows. How dynamic and how realistic? It varied. ;) But I am confident that John Carmack can write a

  • Why not one box for all? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Nicolai Haehnle ( 609575 ) on Saturday August 16, 2003 @03:12AM (#6711121)
    From the article:

    Duffy said that both Linux and Max OS X versions of Doom III are moving in close development with the PC version and Hollenshead said that they will have Mac and Linux files available for download when Doom III is released for the PC for people who run those operating systems. An actual Mac retail box for Doom III is a possibility but a Linux retail release is unlikely.


    This thing gets me every single time - why don't they just put the Mac and Linux binaries into the same box as the Windows binaries?
    It's not that difficult to realize that a standalone Linux retail box will likely flop (well, a game like Doom 3 might be the exception to prove the rule). Mac games are a slightly different beast, but a Mac retail box still isn't going to be significantly more successful.

    So why not put everything into a single box? It's been successfully done with UT2003, and everything's there in the case of Doom 3. So what's the problem? I simply don't get it.
    • It would be easier to gather statistics on who's running it on what if you separate the products.
    • i can think of a couple reasons. the fisrt is that it will probably be at least a couple weeks after the game comes out when teh other versions are ready, so that gives them some time after the game is out the door to work on it rather than have to wait for them to get done.

      secondly, and this is a more speculative assumption, is that if it is downloadable, then maybe they don't have to offer tech support for them? I can't imagine the average game tech support guy being too helpfull on a linux question.
    • I would imagine that this would give them an accurate figure on Mac / Win32 / Linux sales figures. Not bad data to have if you want to consider making releases of your games to operating systems other then Win32. If there is not enough interest in a particular platform, it's not a financially viable solution.

  • EULA (Score:1)

    by ChTh ( 453374 )
    So if I use Windows and Linux on my PC and OSX on a PowerBook, can I install and play the game on all of them or must I uninstall before I go to another platform?

    • Re:EULA (Score:2)

      by Sevn ( 12012 )
      Traditionally this has been handled by the serial number mechanism. Sure, go nuts. Install the sucker all over the place. Just don't try to get online and play multiplayer with more than one of them at the same time. In fact, don't try to invite a friend over and let them play against your windows machine from your mac. The serial number will be the same and it will bite you. If you do this online, you might even get your number invalidated.
  • From the article:

    An audience question about having random monsters in Doom III's multiplayer maps made Willits ask if the audience would like to see that feature put in. That drew a loud and positive response which made the id team say that the possibility for that feature just got a lot more likely.

    Although this feature could certainly have some kind of novelty appeal, I hope there is the option to turn it off. The 4 player limit that id have imposed on Doom III indicates that multiplayer maps will be rel

    • But imagine the demon dog guarding a very powerful powerup! hmm yummy.
    • People said the same thing about monsters being included in Warcraft III. Now that I've played that for some time, I can't imagine playing an RTS without it. Not being able to begin the game by rushing as fast as possible to the most powerful item because it's being guarded by difficult monsters makes the game rely more on skill and less on item abuse. I don't know how well the idea will transfer to the FPS genre, but if it's anything like its use in RTS, then I support it.

  • blah (Score:1, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward
    ..both Linux and Mac OS X versions of Doom III are moving in close development with the PC version.

    I'm bored so I'll point out the following:
    s/PC/Win32/
  • huge article on the keynote from id Software on this site:

    http://www.planetquake3.net/modules.php?op=modload &name=Features&file=id_software_keynote [planetquake3.net]
  • "will be basically the complete experience that PC gamers will get."

    Does it mean people will play doom III on Xbox with a mouse?

Slashdot Top Deals

Think of it! With VLSI we can pack 100 ENIACs in 1 sq. cm.!

Close