Wizards And Pokemon Face Off Over CCG 28
Thanks to the Seattle Post-Intelligencer for their article discussing a lawsuit filed again The Pokemon Company by Wizards Of The Coast, following Pokemon USA's taking-over of the (formerly?) lucrative WOTC-helmed Pokemon collectible card game franchise. The suit "alleges patent infringement, breach of contract, misappropriation of trade secrets, tortuous interference with a business relationship, unjust enrichment and other claims", and mentions that "at least nine employees" have defected to Pokemon USA, and that "...all of the employees had signed non-disclosure agreements in which they agreed not to reveal confidential information to competitors." MSNBC has more information on this story, and while a WOTC spokesperson "expressed confidence that the issue... would be resolved", Pikachu declined to comment at this time.
Aw (Score:1)
"Pi pika pi pi chu chu pika DIGIMON SUCKS kachu pi."
Nintendo's Long History (Score:3, Interesting)
Nintendo has been making card games, trading cards and board games since 1902, and they've produced them ever since. Tading cards for the American market, Japanese market, the lot.
If you're keen on reading up about this deceptively old company, check [ncecbvi.org] any [world-of-nintendo.com] of these [nintendo.com] out.
Heh (Score:2)
Touche.
WOTC should have never had the rights (Score:5, Interesting)
But in the process, they altered the game rules, took the foils out of every pack(Inspiring more purchases), added coin flips to some attacks, lowered HP, made COUNTLESS COUNTLESS errors in EVERY set, and had a horrible league set up.
Their Pokemon League was just fine, until the Orange Island set. When that came around, they instantly retired all the old badges, giving any player that didn't start at the beginning NO chance to earn them and forcing veterans to start all over again.
This doesn't even dwell on the cost of the cards, or the fact some sets have YET to be released.
WoTC makes me sick.
Re:WOTC should have never had the rights (Score:1)
And naturally Nintendo is not at fault at all for releasing Sapphire and Ruby versions, which did not allow connectivity to the previous versions, forcing players to start all over again. Hell, they did that with Gold/Silver/Crystal, forcing players to star
Re:WOTC should have never had the rights (Score:2)
Somewhere down the line they decided to ban every single old card set, re-release a new set combining the "Best" of those cards and once again screw everyone over.
Of course, I stopped long before then, at the Orange Islands switch, because I wasn't about to pay for a new league fee prematurely.
Re:WOTC should have never had the rights (Score:3, Insightful)
It's a hardware issue here, not software. The older versions were for older hardware that used older link cable protocols (including the physical layer) than the GBA now uses. If they enabled GBA link cable protocols to be backwards-compatible, I can almost guarantee you there wouldn't be multi-boot games (among other nice features) for the GBA.
Besides, for
Re:WOTC should have never had the rights (Score:3, Insightful)
This right here is what has had me turned off to CCGs (and collectible minis) since I first tried M:TG. I don't like the "spend spend spend!" mentality that that makes these companies seem worse than GW in comparison. I want to collect things I have a reasonable chance of getting without having to tithe a percentage of my paycheck for several years. I feel like I'd get more satisfaction playing the lottery.
Aside f
Re:WOTC should have never had the rights (Score:1)
With the online version though, you can play for free (it used to be a one time connectivety fee), but I'm just turned off of MTG right now.
(Aside: I'm really missing strategy game
Re: Aside on (Score:2)
Have you looked at Go? It's easy to learn, allows for handicapping between players, and you can play it online.
However, it does suffer from needing to study to get good. Perhaps if you tried considering studying part of the fun?
To take a look at it, visit Yahoo Games [yahoo.com] and visit the Go boards. (Under Board and Tile games.)
Go is great! (Score:2)
If you are into anime or manga at all, I suggest you check out Hikaru no Go. It is a surprisingly accomplished series, especially considering its silly premise and intended audience of young Japanese boys.
This [xmp.net] is a great site that really helped me learn Go. I also advise you to grab one of the numerous Go playing programs and start with a smaller board for a few weeks. Have fun!
Re: Go is great! (Score:2)
*And* it's getting released in the US! They're going to serialize it in the US edition of Shonen Jump. Haven't heard anything about a graphic novel edition yet, but they're putting just about everything else in Jump into GNs, so it looks good.
Chris Mattern
What lazy reporting (Score:2)
The Pokemon companies are affiliates of Nintendo's parent company in Japan, according to the suit.
What is "according to the suit" doing here? It's an easily verified fact.
Yowza... (Score:3, Funny)
WoTC attacks Nintendo with Lawsuit attack!
It doesn't seem to affect Nintendo very much!
WoTC is confused!
Re:Yowza... (Score:1)
WoTC Best Known for Magic game? (Score:1)
Interesting: is Wizards of the Coast really best known for the Magic card game? What about Dungeons and Dragons?
Re:WoTC Best Known for Magic game? (Score:2)
Re:WoTC Best Known for Magic game? (Score:2)
Yep. D&D is a small-margin game--us RPGers are cheap bastards who balk at $30 books.
Oh, and WotC got bought by a little company you might have heard of, called Hasbro, not too long ago.
In the meantime, if you want to roleplay the world's best fantasy RPG without aiding the corporate takeover of it (or encouraging the very very significant strings attached to their Open Gaming attempt), check out the Free Gaming Association : www.theFGA.
Details are Missing (Score:2)
Reminds me very much of the fiasco of Nintendo vs Atari/Tengen on the Tetris license.