Monkeys Play Videogames With Their Mind 70
Thanks to IOL/Reuters for their story discussing research on monkeys who control videogames with their thoughts. According to the piece, "Dr Miguel Nicolelis knew he had nailed it when the monkey stopped using her arm to play the computer game. An implanted device had allowed the monkey to control the game using only her thought." The research, to be printed in Public Library Of Science Biology Journal on Monday, is intended to help humans who "have partial or nearly total permanent paralysis."
Humans can do this too (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Humans can do this too (Score:4, Informative)
The real pioneers of this technology are the ones who go to Europe to have electrodes implanted in their brain to participate in artificial vision research that's currently illegal in the US. I am not a fan of animal experimentation, and a human that can verbally describe what they're seeing seems like a more useful way to gather data than trying to infer it from a monkey's behaviour.
In the case of this article, it seems like being able to tell someone "now try moving the robotic arm without moving your real one" is a lot more straightforward than waiting for a monkey to figure it out on their own.
I'm sure there are many people with disabilities (and even some without them) who would be interested in participating in research like this. I know I would, if I became blind or lost the use of a limb. I'm glad that the article mentions that human trials are now beginning.
Re:Humans can do this too (Score:3, Insightful)
Many of the research conditions required by advanced neuropsychology require very direct control over the type of injury that a patient has. Because we're only "starting" to know a great deal about areas of the brain (both human, simian, and avian), we must control very carefully the types of injuries that our test subjects have.
Studies such as these cost tens of thousands of dollars to perform - not because the t
Re:Humans can do this too (Score:2)
INSIGHTFUL
There really ARE people out there on
Re:Humans can do this too (Score:1)
I for one (Score:2, Funny)
Shades of Firefox. (Score:1, Offtopic)
Hmmm. (Score:1)
while (true) {
System.out.println("Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, ");
}
Gah! More tech for "paralyzed people" (Score:5, Funny)
Just once I'd like to hear "results so far lead us to believe that these brain-machine interfaces hold enormous promise for increased programmer productivity."
Re:Gah! More tech for "paralyzed people" (Score:1)
Re:Gah! More tech for "paralyzed people" (Score:2)
Re:Gah! More tech for "paralyzed people" (Score:1, Offtopic)
Re:Gah! More tech for "paralyzed people" (Score:1, Offtopic)
Re:Gah! More tech for "paralyzed people" (Score:2)
Because stating it this way will make you lose your research funding.
The people who decide where to give research funding are pathetic beaurocrats that want to think their job is important. They want to believe that they play a critical role in saving the world. Stroking that ego is how you continue to get research funding for stuff like this.
Re:Gah! More tech for "paralyzed people" (Score:2)
And besides, even with a two or three fold increase in productivity, it's still cheaper for companies to outsource most of their programming tasks anyways.
Re:Gah! More tech for "paralyzed people" (Score:1)
Re:Gah! More tech for "paralyzed people" (Score:1)
Programmer productivity? let's think about TRULY importants stuff. Is there any better reason to develop a brain-machine interface than to allow me to have l33t aiming ski11z in Quake 3? Who wouldn't go through surgety to become the ultimate railgun master?
Re:Gah! More tech for "paralyzed people" (Score:2)
So, what happens to people who go through invasive surgery only to find that their favorite IDE had already gone out of fashion?
Implanting technology for only short-term gain is a very dangerous road to follow. For disabled people, there is much less of a moral problem, when they can have a few years of being less disabled. A programmer might hav
Re:Gah! More tech for "paralyzed people" (Score:2)
Re:Gah! More tech for "paralyzed people" (Score:2)
Because each surgery carries a real risk of death, due to anesthesiology being the black magic of modern medicine (not to mention risk of infection in modern understaffed hospitals). When they actually know what they are doing in the operating room and there are enough nurses to pass around, I'll be less apprehensive about non-essential surgery.
Re:Gah! More tech for "paralyzed people" (Score:2)
Category, etc. (Score:4, Interesting)
Why is this not posted under Science? Just because it uses games as part of the research doesn't mean its all just for entertainment.
Plenty of other brain-computer interface links have been posted under the proper category: Mind-Controlled Wheelchair [slashdot.org], Controlling Robots with the Mind [slashdot.org],Linking Hardware to Wetware [slashdot.org], etc. This article is a continuation of this field's story.
Personally, I think this is one of the coolest areas of research around right now. The ability to, in the near future, help paralyzed people regain mobility and function would indeed be an incredible accomplishment, but that's just the start. This kind of research could help improve humans themselves. Imagine adding new cybernetic body parts, or even new senses (ability to 'see' infrared for example). There are a lot of potential possibilities. Forget the ad-hoc wireless computer networks, this tech could possibly enable something like an ad-hoc human brain network (telepathy anyone?) Seems very very cool and useful.
If this rate of progress keeps up (which seems likely), perhaps Slashdot will need to create a Brain-Computer Interface category.
Re:Category, etc. (Score:2)
They've got nothing on my girlfriend (Score:4, Funny)
Re:They've got nothing on my girlfriend (Score:2)
Controlling the monkeys (Score:2)
That's nice and all, but wouldn't it be more useful to build a device that lets us control monkeys with our thoughts!
After the apocalypse, when apes rule the planet, we'd be glad for such technology.
Two words: (Score:2)
Wrong Story Category? (Score:2)
Should this story be in the Ximian section? And isn't it "Dr Miguel d'incaza"? Also, I didn't know the Ximian monkey was female...
Finally modern gaming has caught up with... (Score:2)
http://videogames.org/html/images/mindlink.gif [videogames.org]
Alex.
I think I was playing against him the other day... (Score:2)
So do these monkeys also have a collective brain? (Score:1)
In recent news.... (Score:1)
just imagine (Score:1)
Power source? (Score:1)
The heat and electricity produced by many monkeys (maybe combined with some form of fusion) could be a valuable resource!
Re:Power source? (Score:1)
I for once would like better the original argument.
PLoS is now online. (Score:1, Interesting)
ObBeKindServers: The actual article is 16 pages of neurobiology captured in a 3.3MB PDF file. Unless this is your field, you may find 13 of the 16 pages a difficult read.
A 28KB synopsis PDF file is much more accessable to those outside the field: Retraining the Brain to Recover Movement [plosbiology.org]. Check it out first.
.. and now its gone .. (Score:1)
Monkeys vs. Humans online (Score:2)
Re:Monkeys vs. Humans online (Score:2)
It will be really interesting to see how Garry Kasparov measures up, playing a round of chess against IBM's Deep Monkey.
Re:Monkeys vs. Humans online (Score:2)
Re:Monkeys vs. Humans online (Score:2)
red dwarf (Score:1)
or maybe not
just like red dwarf (Score:1)
well, kind of.
The NYTimes story and such (Score:2)
While there is great potential for helping people with paralysis there is also potential to use such technology for military purposes. This is a small step in the direction of creating Terminators.
HEY! (Score:1)
Re:dont experiment on it if its perfectly fine (Score:2)
Has it completely evaded you that this procedure is BRAIN surgery which carries a certain risk of death or brain infection?
If a monkey is used, the risk of human death from the procedure's experimental nature is eliminated.
Are you one of those people who thinks animal life is equivalent to human life? Is it just the gimps who are equivalent to a rhesus macac? Maybe you value paralysis victims on the same level as the rhesus macac, but I value the human more.
Let me reite
Re:Dr. Strangelove? Political Assassinations? etc. (Score:1)
Hmm... (Score:2)
Imagine the possibilites for gaming and science... pure virtual reality, etc.
Ghost in the Shell sure comes to my mind.
Backward (Score:1)
What? Oh Ape Escape...
Use a scratch monkey! (Score:2)