Videogame Pirate Gets Long Jail Sentence 92
Thanks to the San Jose Business Journal for its article discussing the sentencing of a notable videogame pirate to 50 months in prison after being found guilty on charges of "copyright infringement and... mail fraud." According to the piece: "[Sean Michael] Breen... admitted that he was a leader in the Internet-based piracy group known as Razor1911. Since the early 1990s, Razor1911 had sought to achieve a reputation in the underground Internet piracy community... as the leading distributor of cracked computer and console game software." A report at GameSpot has further details, noting Razor1911 "...acquired advance copies of [videogame] titles by posing as reviewers for fictitious game magazines and having them shipped to a derelict storefront address in Oakland."
Whoa... (Score:3, Interesting)
Sucks to be 'em. Still, seems kinda harsh - what's Ken Lay getting again?
Re:Whoa... (Score:5, Informative)
"Mr. Breen also admitted that he had illegally used an online customer account of Cisco Systems to order hundreds of thousands of dollars of hardware by falsely posing as one of Cisco's existing customers."
"After receiving the hardware, Mr. Breen sold it on the grey market at a heavy discount off the normal price of the hardware, prosecutors say."
He was stealing real physical property in addition to his software piracy. The fact that it was worth "hundreds of thousands of dollars" made the copyright violations almost superfluous. In light of those violations, the sentence doesn't seem harsh at all.
Re:Whoa... (Score:2)
I doubt it, he's a gamer (Score:5, Funny)
If he were a Linux user, that list would consist of Tuxracer and... err... yeah.
I for one applaud (Score:4, Insightful)
Now the fact that he got caught showed just how dumb he was. Trying to steal hardware like that always leaves too many traces around, and if the company has the money, it will influence law enforcement to do the investigation. I dunno if this will start a "scared straight" program with warezers, or maybe they'll just keep to their little gated communities now. Hopefully a high-profile case of a really prolific pirates will ensure that game companies don't need to go the way of the RIAA, at least not anymore than they have.
Re:...the cracker (Score:5, Insightful)
I hate how people seem to have this sense of entitlement to software. The software company doesn't exist for your benefit, as it shouldn't. Most of it's not essential to live and succeed, and the stuff that is(OS, internet browser, and Office program) all have both closed and open source versions. If you feel that the closed source version is what you want, then go out and buy a copy. If you don't want to pay that much for it, or you just don't plain want it, go with open source. Or create your own. Maybe if you were the one who created content you might be much less supportive of the pirate community.
Re:...the cracker (Score:5, Insightful)
I'd like to agree with the rest of the things you said, though. Except I can't. Because it would make me a terrible hypocrite.
Re:...the cracker (Score:3, Insightful)
What does it matter that Razor distributed games rather than apps? Both require developers to produce. If you do not like the fact that a game is $50+, don't play it until it hits the $20 rack, or $10 rack, or what ever level rack you feel it is worth. But also do not play the game until you have bought it. Otherwise the developers will not
Yahoo Games is Cool (Score:1)
Re:...the cracker (Score:5, Insightful)
Secondly, most applications, such as the ones you mention, have more then enough business customers that every person who needed it for a hobby or curiosity pirated it, they'd barely see a difference in profits.
I also highly doubt OSS will ever fit the need for games anytime in the next 20 to 30 years, especially with the increased demands for higher and higher quality models/textures/other art stuff. You could be the best programmer in the world, have an engine and all the code finished, and not be able to make a good game merely because you lack good artists/modelers/etc willing to contribute to a "free" game.
Re:...the cracker (Score:2, Insightful)
That being said, it would be nice if companys would contribu
Re:...the cracker (Score:2, Informative)
Not to rag on anyone or anyone's work, but frankly I think OSS has a ways to go befo
Re:...the cracker (Score:1, Flamebait)
Re:...the cracker (Score:1)
Case in point: ID released the doom 1 + 2 code (also quake1?) 6-7 years after their release(Copyright law says 2 years but America has it's head so far up it's ass this is saintly by comparison), Siera on the other hand hasn't released any of their orignal adventure games (Wizardrys recently repackaged
Re:...the cracker (Score:1)
Steam may eventually not require a connection to the internet but it's going to most likely discourage a lot of pirates, as even if they managed to seperate any sort of callback or key verifacation, the best you'd get is a LAN only option. I don't know about you but playing online's a big draw for me.
Of course, I'd be likely to buy the HL2
Re:...the cracker (Score:1)
Re:...the cracker (Score:1)
How does this sort of a system work? it's really rather simple. Every key you print for a CD you have listed in a database, when a user enters a key it's checked for a presence in the database, then mapped to that user's account. The account usually requires some f
Re:...the cracker (Score:2, Interesting)
Oh yes, I think everyone would agree that programming a replacement for Photoshop is simple.
This I think is the most ridiculous argument for OSS that I always hear. Not all of us a programmers, especially the ones who need the advanced features of Photoshop. Just because I can look at the source does not mean I can understand it. Oh maybe you mean I should go out and hire a progr
Re:...the cracker (Score:1)
lets take:
Well, if they don't like the program and it's costs, DON'T USE IT! Use (and contribute to) OSS instead. It's like p
Why parent is a moron. (Was Re:...the cracker) (Score:2)
Would you have the same problem if a device were made that you could aim at an SUV and which would make a complete and perfect copy of it at little or no cost to the owner of that SUV?
Of course not. The SUV owner isn't deprived in the slightest.
Now run along...
Re:Why parent is a moron. (Was Re:...the cracker) (Score:3, Insightful)
Yes, because just because it can be physically duplicated for little to no cost doesn't mean it's free.
No, but the company who has to pay designers, engineers, assembly line workers, and so on, is. You're getting the fruits of somebody's labour for free, when they're not giving it away for free. That's theft.
Re:Why parent is a moron. (Was Re:...the cracker) (Score:2)
What about photos of the car? Am I depriving the designers then? What about mental images of the car? How about then? Nobody is deprived if the design can be copied perfectly at no cost whatsoever to the original designers.
Else, how can kit cars be sold?
Re:Why parent is a moron. (Was Re:...the cracker) (Score:2)
The designers are. If they spend 1 million dollars to design a new car, and sell that car for 20,000 dollars a piece, but you steal the plans, you've just stolen 1 million dollars worth of value.
If the designers spend 1 million dollars on design, and give that design away, that's the
Re:Why parent is a moron. (Was Re:...the cracker) (Score:2)
Re:Why parent is a moron. (Was Re:...the cracker) (Score:2)
Because there's also the concept of 'not worth my time to track down.'
Besides, the analog in the computer world would be 'Well, Linux is a copy of UNIX, but doesn't claim to be UNIX, blah blah blah' which is one thing. Creating your own software designed to act like a different piece of software is one thing. Taking somebody else's software is another.
Re:Why parent is a moron. (Was Re:...the cracker) (Score:1)
MOD PARENT DOWN - CLUELESS KARMA WHORE!!! (Score:1, Insightful)
So, you've been modded +5 because you think that piracy is responsible for DRM. Right. Theft is responsible for higher prices in the shops, too. Alright.
But let me tell you something. If piracy and theft would stop to exist there would be...
1) less competition for people who produ
Re:MOD PARENT DOWN - CLUELESS KARMA WHORE!!! (Score:3, Informative)
Oh yeah. The number of
Like it or not, the above poster is right. Piracy IS competition. It's basic economics. One of the forces that keeps prices down and service up is the presence of some black/grey market activity that pepole can go to if they feel it's worth it.
This is especially true for "cultural' goods. (Mostly entertainment. It helps that it's easily copied).
And yes, if there were no theft, prices would be higher an
Re:Too Harsh (Score:2)
Be careful to criticize something without having a replacement handy to refer to.
Re:Too Harsh (Score:3, Interesting)
He'll be missed (Score:1)
I know of many people who have made huge use of his products though.
LAN party I held two weeks ago would have been much more dificult without the Razor hacked version of Steam (For Counter Strike) since we weren't able to keep the internet connection up.
Re:He'll be missed (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:He'll be missed (Score:4, Informative)
Re:He'll be missed (Score:2)
GTRacer
- Nothing better to do
Re:He'll be missed (Score:2)
Hey-y-y...I bet someone could write a good story about mail fraud... It could be a thriller, maybe involving a larger crime so that the fraud doesn't seem important until the VERY END, where it becomes clear that committing mail fraud will get you in big trouble, buddy!
It was called The Untouchables [rottentomatoes.com]
Re:He'll be missed (Score:2)
Don't mind me - just after posting that, I remembered that Capone was convicted for tax fraud.
Re:He'll be missed (Score:2)
Re:He'll be missed (Score:3, Interesting)
What do you need Steam for? The older versions of Half-Life and Counter-strike don't require an Internet connection. Why not just use the pre-steam version? Personally I tried going back to Counter-Strike after a 1 year hiatus playing BF1942 and when I found Steam was the only real way you can play these days I gave up.
Doesn't bother me (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Doesn't bother me (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Doesn't bother me (Score:1)
sounds like a scapegoating (Score:1)
straight-out scapegoating of this guy. I just hope they dont pull a Novell and give some sob the
hardware. I dont think even OJ's lawyers could help here, since they'd be dealing with punks
such as the SIIA.
A few things I'd like to mention (Score:5, Interesting)
Second, this is really nothing to applaud or rejoice over. The arrest of one or two dozen pirates does not even scratch the tip of the iceberg. The authorities know it but they still bust a group or two every couple of years for PR purposes. It does not affect the so-called "warez scene" at all. All game were pirated before this happened and all have continued to be pirated afterwards.
Third. I am very surprised to read that Razor1911 sold copies. To the extent of my knowledge, they are (Because they are still alive and kicking)a veteran and respected group in the warez scene and the one big No-No is the selling of pirated materials. In fact, Razor1911's nfo file (an
And of course, stealing is wrong, I don't condone piracy, don't have sex unprotected, yadda yadda...
Re:A few things I'd like to mention (Score:2, Insightful)
Pretty much the same thing as the drug war. Make a "big" bust every once in a while to make it look like you're doing something, yet the supply is basically unchanged (or at best you cause a minor inconvience.)
Re:A few things I'd like to mention (Score:1)
The government understands that intelligent people crave information. The software industry seems to be continuing to produce and the music industry continues to produce so who needs to step in.
Re:A few things I'd like to mention (Score:3, Interesting)
but yeah.. the arrests made barely a dent.. and those who were/are arrested were/are doing other criminal activities as well usually(ranging from cracking ftp's to be used as 'public ftp's or just plain _stealing_ gigabytes and gigabytes of bandwith from their work).
not that stuff wasn't always copied by somebody when it was possible for practically free(for the copier).. from university textbooks to vhs's cassettes o
Re:A few things I'd like to mention (Score:1)
Re:A few things I'd like to mention (Score:5, Interesting)
That's possibly the worst grammar I've ever seen in a Slashdot post.
I like the way things are now with the piracy game. It's a safe way for kids to rebel against "the man", doesn't usually involve other vices, and is something you can grow out of when you get a job.
For me, software piracy was something I participated in until I was about 22, inertia carrying me past my teens. As a teenager, this was the only way I had at my disposal to get the latest games (back then the latest games were of the "Bolo" and "Rescue Raiders" variety).
As an adult, it actually cost me more in time and money to pirate games than it would have to just drop $40 on what looked the coolest. I had to invest in a CD burner, which was expensive at the time, as well as a Zip drive, and the media they required (also pricey at the time). Not to mention having a family to support meant that I had a lot more to lose than I did at 16. At 16 I was a punk with a chip on my shoulder, and never bothered to cover my tracks. Stupid. Lucky. But anyway, I grew out of it.
Video game companies will rail and demand justice, but the kids will still be given leeway with this vice.
The advanced copy grift was a different matter, though. First, it's a bad con -- that will always get you caught eventually. Second, it's an adult who is deliberately defrauding a company by posing as someone he's not. Screw him. I don't want him representing the software piracy market. He's a bad example. Give me back the whiz kids who buy a game (or shoplift it if circumstances warrant) and defeat the copy protection or write a crack. That's just good fun.
Re: (Score:2)
Good thing he didn't shoot anyone. (Score:2, Interesting)
I'm not claiming he didn't break the law, nor am I suggesting that he shouldn't "do the time". I'm just pointing out inconsistencies in sentencing, and how criminal geeks often get longer terms than murderers. *sigh*
Jailtime? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Jailtime? (Score:2)
No, I don't think it's a stretch. You take me off games for three days (Say, to do a huge project) and I will go fucking nuts. At least I never got the urge to kill somebody in real life, though. That was kind of surprising.
In order to stay on-topic, I agree that a fine is not an appropriate deterrent. But I have to stress even more that it's no
Re:Jailtime? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Jailtime? (Score:1)
Re:Jailtime? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Jailtime? (Score:2)
Don't be silly, that would be far too sensible! Far easier to "bang em up" and be seen to be doing justice....
I really need a cynisism cure...
Re:Jailtime? (Score:2)
That's hilarious. So, you just ignore some of the charges which sent the guy up the river and declare the sentence "WAY too harsh"? It's like declaring a life sentence too harsh for a burglar who kills the homeowner during the burglary because you've decided not to "weigh in on" the murder charge.
Re:Jailtime? (Score:2)
Re:XBox rules!! (Score:1)
Oh no, poor Guybrush! (Score:5, Funny)
What's that you say? A different kind of videogame pirate was jailed, not Guybrush? Oh, my bad, I just read the headline and assumed the worst.
For people who yell RTFM you should the RTFA (Score:5, Informative)
Waitaminute - they SOLD the games? (Score:2, Interesting)
I know that the N.E.T. act makes it a federal crime to even _share_ illegal copies, but still, there's a difference, or at least there should be.
Re:Waitaminute - they SOLD the games? (Score:1)
Maybe you didn't hear enough then. When I read the article I clearly read that in addition to spreading their warez all over Internet they also made a lot of money selling warez.
But the summary also chose not to mention the majority of the 50 months sentence was for carding, ordering over a million doll
And game companies never pirate? (Score:1, Interesting)
*Note, I'm not condoning it, but I think the
Simple hardware con artist and thief. (Score:2)