On Alleged Anti-Nintendo Sentiment In The Gaming Media 91
Thanks to GamesAreFun for its editorial discussing Nintendo's skewed portrayal in the news media. The writer argues: "I suppose it's just trendy to bash Nintendo right now, even if the arguments for doing it can be easily ripped apart", and goes on to tackle myths on popularity ("..the GameCube has actually never fallen into third place in the overall worldwide market"), a recent half-year financial loss ("old news now... the first loss they've ever reported since going public in 1962"), and temporary suspension of GameCube production ("do they honestly think Sony or Microsoft keep up peak productions at all times?")
Re:leetspeak (Score:1)
Re:leetspeak (Score:5, Insightful)
That's a pity - you missed out on an extremely interesting and informative piece.
The l33tsp34k headlines in the article are little more than a joke. If you look around, there genuinely are people out there saying "N1NtEdN0 R tEh DUM3D LOL" just like that and expecting to be (and somehow actually being) taken seriously, so it's not like the jokey headlines are far from the truth. The article itself contains nothing but genuine facts and figures to debunk the "Nintendo is doomed" myth (currently) often perpetuated by the media and others who are in denial about Nintendo's true situation, and is actually a far better read than the summary here indicates.
It's also the first in a series of editorials, so there will be more worthwhile reading to follow.
Tinfoil time (Score:4, Insightful)
Another article (Score:5, Informative)
"This is hardly the proudest hour for online game media, and it illustrates the need for journalists - even some of those working for large professional sites - to more effectively divide fact from speculation and opinion in their reporting."
Re:Another article (Score:1)
My Opinion (Score:5, Insightful)
as far as i'm concerned, all gaming systems are worthy of at least being tried, any Hardcore gamer would agree that even the worst designed systems can have some of the best quality games, the problem is when joe blow spends his $150-$200 on a system that has his type of games on it, he often falls for the propaganda behind the system and beleives the system he picked is the best. when i bought my PS2 i became a PS2 fanboy, then i bought an X-Box cheap and started realiseing that in some areas the X-Box does exceed the PS2(other than the obvious graphic capability), but in other ares the PS2 exceeds the X-Box. i made the same discovery when i bought my CG and since then started to understand that if you depend on one system you miss out on the offerings of other systems.
now, granted some people can only afford one system and my only advice to them is to buy the system that has a game selection closest to what you enjoy (ie. GC - fun fantasy style games with a some serious gameplay elements, X-Box - Sports gamer heaven and a desent selection of more Adult-aimed games, PS2 - RPGs and racing games primarily, but its a very well rounded in terms of your selection, mostly sue to its Third Party Support)
from where i sit, there is no best or worst game system. its too bad there are few people that have come to this realisation. in the console war, the only winners are the gamers themselves
P.S. sorry if i went off topic a bit, i'm in a bit of a rant mood
Absolutely agreed; choose by genre (Score:2)
Now, I'm the kind of person who still plays NES games from time to time, and can replay some games nearly endlessly, so I don't lack for games to play so much as lack for variety of gameplay (like being in the middle of five RPGs at once...). It makes s
Re:My Opinion (Score:1)
I worked for Sony briefly, an i was disgusted at their attitudes towards their customers and some of the questionable practices they used. The only way I can voice my protest to a corporate entity is with my wallet. So I have. Much the same with XBox, but in that situation its just Microsoft's behaviour in general. Might get a secondhand one to play with using it as a linux media player though.
On the flip side (Score:5, Insightful)
Microsoft has a well developed reputation of being greedy and disheartening. They have no intention of making a profit until 2006 at the earliest. Until then, they just want market share at the expense of quality. I believe it was Seamus Blackley himself that said MS was creating an artificial economy by paying developers exorbitant amounts of cash BEFORE a game's release as incentives to develop. Ever wonder why Xbox games have so many bonuses? You really think they couldn't fit Prince of Persia 2 onto a PS2 or Cube disc? Come on!
Of course, we all remember the early Xbox flash cartoon making fun of Nintendo, don't we?
Sony has other issues, from their artificially high prices to their shoddy equipment to their pompous attitude. Do you know ANYONE with a broken PS2? I think we all do. And it's not just because of the selling rate. If it was, there'd be a lot less PS2s in the shop. Go to Gamestop and ask what the ratio of broken PS2s is to Xbox/Cube consoles.
If I can't appreciate the company, I can't enjoy their product. Now, leave me be while I bid on the Pokemon PT Cruiser with all the proceeds going to the Starlight Foundation.
Re:On the flip side (Score:2, Informative)
Anyway, I have them all, so I'm likely going to hell.
Re:On the flip side (Score:2)
Nintendo are just like every other large multi-national (Sony and Microsoft included). They care solely about profits (a sound tactic for a company). It amazes me how peopl
Re:On the flip side (Score:3, Informative)
No, I personally don't - even then, it doesn't really sound all that bad. I do remember, however, Nintendo threatening retailers not to advertise for the Xbox in the USA prior to the GC and Xbox's release, otherwise they wouldn't get GBAs to sell.
And the price-fixing was already mentioned by others (though I was not clear if this was referring to the case they lost in the USA or one of the many ones in Europe).
And l
Re:On the flip side (Score:2)
And Nintendo does have its faults.
When Hiroshi Yamauchi was first hired, he fired every single employee that was older than him. I recognize their flaws.
Re:On the flip side (Score:2)
And it isn't like this Xbox bonus is really advertised, as it is in games like Burnout2. I really do believe it was just a time/hardware issue - the Xbox runs on just a spiffy (but backwards compatible) hardware version of what the PC version originally ran on (and this was a hard disk game, mind you). Not too hard to emulate at all, compared to the completely different archi
Exceptions (Score:2)
It would have taken some pretty killer apps to give the Game.com any measurable market segment. And this is coming from someone who owned every Game.com item he could find. I just kept hoping one of them wouldn't be awful.
Then again, that could have been Tiger's strategy all along... Genius!
truth (Score:5, Insightful)
ps. "1337" speek and "xtreme" marketing really need to die. If you wern't using "1337" >8 years ago (and to get by filters) shut your damn mouth, you sound, type, and probably act like a 'tard
Re:truth (Score:1, Offtopic)
Re:truth (Score:1, Offtopic)
The bigger problem (Score:1, Interesting)
I see 2 problems with the article:
1. If you're going to be funny with the title, make it a funny article - if not have a serious title and give yourself some street cred.
2. You can quote me all the number games you want, but can you name 10 games that are must owns for every gamecube owner? No, but that is easily done with XBox and PS2. If you can't do that, who gives a shit what the numbers say. I can name hundreds for the Nintendo, Super Nintendo, and Gameboy (both) - the N64 and Gamecube (at least f
Re:The bigger problem (Score:5, Funny)
Yes.
"No, but that is easily done with XBox and PS2."
But I said yes!
"If you can't do that,"
BUT I SAID YES!
"who gives a shit what the numbers say."
I do!
"I can name hundreds for the Nintendo, Super Nintendo, and Gameboy (both) -"
Me too!
"the N64 and Gamecube (at least for me) have been total failures in that area."
For you! But I can name these titles! Please ask me to name them! I'd be soooo happy to name them! I'm beggin' ya, just ask!
Re:The bigger problem (Score:2, Funny)
If you don't include Mario Golf, I will come through your connection and kick your ass!
10 (or more) must have games (Score:4, Informative)
Metroid Prime
Eternal Darkness
Super Smash Brothers Melee
Legend of Zelda: Wind Waker
Viewtiful Joe
Super Monkey Ball
Pikmin
Animal Crossing
Final Fantasy: Crystal Chronicles
Mario Kart Double Dash
Mario Party
Super Mario Sunshine
Mario Golf
F-Zero GX
Rogue Squadron
Ikaruga
Pac-Man vs.
Star Fox Adventures
Wario Ware
Oooops, went over ten, sorry. There are also some games available for multiple systems, or that aren't quite out yet.
Metal Gear Solid: Twin Snakes
Tales of Symphonia
Prince of Persia
Beyond Good and Evil
Resident Evil
Lord of the Rings
Spider-Man
Harvest Moon
Skies of Arcadia
Soul Caliber II
SSX 3
The Simpsons Hit & Run
I'm not even including several cases of multiple games from the same series. (I don't count Mario Kart, Mario Party, etc as being the same series.)
There's probably a lot more than i'm forgetting about, especially in the action and sports genres which i don't play very much.
Re:10 (or more) must have games (Score:2, Interesting)
Don't get me wrong, they have excellent quality control and produce masterpieces like Zelda, but every last game they drop out is not God's Gift to Gamers.
Re:10 (or more) must have games (Score:3, Interesting)
I don't have any idea if i listed "every single game Nintendo has ever made," (though i seriously doubt it) and i don't really care. I listed all the GameCube games i could think of that i consider to be of superior quality. A lot of those are first or second party game
Eople don't (Score:4, Informative)
He didn't... he only listed the good ones, and those are the only ones you've heard of or remember. Simple.
Luigi's Mansion isn't on that list... fun it might have been, but it was basically a tech demo. Offensive that it was full price.
If you want a real stinker, go back to something like Yoshi's Safari, Yoshi's Story, or Paper Mario. Shudder. Some will tell you Paper Mario was pretty good... I don't know if these people are thick in the head or don't know about Super Mario RPG or what.
" Is Nintendo REALLY 100% infallible, that every title they have ever produced is SO great that everyone 'must own' it?"
They aren't infallible, but you know what I never hear about Nintendo? I never hear "The game sucked because it was rushed to market." I don't hear, as I did of Beyond Good and Evil "The game would have been better if the heroine's personality and appearance hadn't been changed at the last second for market reasons."
As far as I can tell, they give their teams as long as it takes to do a new game. If the game isn't working out, they kill it and move on.
That seems to work pretty well, huh?
Further, when soemthing really IS bad, like Yoshi's Story, Nintendo is pretty good at making it disappear. The biggest black eye Nintendo has is the virtual boy... other failures don't come up much.
Re:The bigger problem (Score:2)
Oops, that was 12. My mistake. (Not even counting some of my personal favourites there, P.N. 03, Phantasy Star Online, and Animal Crossing)
How many of the above games are currently exclusive to gamecube? All except one as far as I know (I purposely tried to avoid all-platform titles for this list, though rest a
Re:The bigger problem (Score:2)
If you mean non-Nintendo Cube Exclusives, what about Rogue Leader, Rebel Strike, Viewitful Joe, Product Number 03, Sonic Adventure DX Director's Cut, Sonic Adventure 2 Battle, Metal Gear Solid: Twin Snakes, Mega Man Network Transmission, Phantasy Star Online III: C.A.R.D Revolution, Harvest Moon: A Wonderful Life, F-Zero GX (Sega developed it), Wario World (Treasure, the Ikaruga people).
This also doesn't mention that Hudson (Of Bomberman fame) develops the Mario Party
Re:The bigger problem (Score:2)
Re:The bigger problem (Score:4, Interesting)
And I'm sure my list has massive gaps; these are mostly games that I somehow noticed and then didn't proceed to brand with "meh".
That's...over 10 already, and I'm one of those freaks who has no real interest in Resident Evil.
What I don't get is people saying "X-Box has bazillions of good unique games!!! So much more than the GameCube!!" Umm...what? KotOR and Morrowind are better on the PC from all I've heard; Halo I dismissed above under the "most console shooters are Goldeneye clones" clause. I'm looking at the GameFAQs top 10 of the XBox and seeing nothing but ports/rehashes, actually.
I've said it before, and nobody responded (outside of the predictable "Halo/KotOR r0x0rz" babble) so for my own education and for the general comedic value I'll say it again: Screw ten! Name ONE good XBox game. (I should be careful; if I keep asking this Ninja Gaiden will finally come out...). To be fair I'm not exactly the target audience of the XBox (since first person shooters, sports, and racing aren't my favourite genres these days) but...there must be some game out there...right?
Re:The bigger problem (Score:2)
Re:The bigger problem (Score:1)
The people I see who really mock the GCN are the same people who like to watch wrestling and think hazing is a good idea. Or high school kids.
Let me guess, you think Nethack is a waste of time as well, right?
Re:The bigger problem (Score:4, Insightful)
I'm 28, and am quite happy with my GameCube and PS2. I don't really care much for FPS, and really don't see your logic in apparently claiming that all people over 10 are primarily interested in FPS. The fact that THE must have title for the Xbox is a FPS is perhaps my #2 or #3 reason for being completly underwhelmed by Microsoft's console.
I've played some FPSs at work on PC (Counterstrike, some version of Doom, Battlefield 1942) and i've tried out a few FPSs on consoles, and i can't figure why anyone would ever choose consoles as their FPS vehicle of choice, regardless of how much or how little they were interested in the genre.
As for "most of the games listed as great games for the PS2 and GameCube are available for Dreamcast," care to back that up? Out of the thirty odd games i listed for GameCube earlier in this dicusion, i seriously doubt more than 10% or 20% are available on Dreamcast, which hardly qualifies as "most." In fact the only ones i can think of right now are Skies of Arcadia and Ikuraga, but go ahead, prove me wrong.
Re:The bigger problem (Score:4, Insightful)
Actually, I'd say it's the lack of RPGs more than the lack of FPSs which hurts the older market. As an older gamer myself, I can say that after playing games for 17 years I get bored of the same old repackaged stuff over and over again, and thus I had more or less lost interest in Halo before it came out. Regardless, GameCube does have the multiplatform FPSs (I know people who own Time Spitters 2) so it's just lacking in unique FPSs...as much as any FPS these days is "unique"....
Xbox has several system killers, KOTOR, NHL:2k4,HALO.
KotOR: I already mentioned how from my understanding the PC version is just plain better. Why bother with the XBox version?
NHL:2k4: Multiplatform. Yet another sports game. Umm...how does this make the XBox stand out? I mean there's a reason I didn't include PoP:SoT or BG&E for any of the lists I made.
Halo: my distain for the lack of innovation asside, I'd certainly want to catch up with Half-Life first since that's supposed to be a considerably better FPS.
Despite this the other systems have clung to life
If by "clung to life" you mean "consistently outsell the XBox worldwide" then yes.
And the Dreamcast is a good system, yes, though most of these games aren't DC ports actually. On the GameCube list I made there's...Skies of Arcadia: Legends, though from what I hear the remake is done considerably better than the original. You can count Soul Calibur 2 as well I guess (just because SC1 is supposed to be rather similar). However, a good half of the games I listed are Nintendo-made and thus could never appear on the Dreamcast. From the PS2 list I posted there's...Grandia 2. Again, about four titles I listed for the PS2 are SquarEnix or Sony-made titles, and most of the others are niche RPGs which will likely never be remade for another system.
If you're looking for a system that's nothing but ports/games that were subsequently ported elsewhere it's the XBox. If you have a good PC you can already buy most noteworthy XBox games (Halo, KotOR, Morrowind, PoP:SoT...) well barring the console ports which come from the PS2 mostly (like GTA, and various sports games).
Re:Panzer Dragoon Orta (Score:2)
But further in the article...
I love my xbox more than my gamecube (Score:2)
Seriously, the XBox is not a great platform for games. KOTOR was fun, but I'm not a huge RPG fanatic. Halo -- well, it's nice to see FPS's catching on, and I dug the soundtrack, but its deathmatch sucks pretty hard if you've played Q3A... or hell, even doom2. The other titles are mostly non-exclusive -- or just b
ToeJam & Earl III (Score:2)
After I played through it repeatedly, I sold my X-Box and haven't looked back.
1962? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:1962? (Score:5, Informative)
Playing cards. [ncecbvi.org]
Re:1962? (Score:2)
Actually their first version of Donkey Kong game was a precursor to virtual reality. Those barrels are a bitch to jump over!
Damn it! Know your video game history! (Score:3, Informative)
And don't forget the "love hotels" and taxi services.
Nintendo's been around for much longer than 1962. It's over 100 years old.
Seriously, go read the book "Game Over" to brush up on your Nintendo history. B-)
Re:1962? (Score:1)
Wonder Twin Powers UNITE!! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Wonder Twin Powers UNITE!! (Score:1)
I mean they were the people that owned Sega Master Systems!
My consoles are always missing something... (Score:5, Insightful)
Either way, the Internet would be a much better place if every 12-year-old with a nickname ending in 3 digits and having to do with Dragon Ball Z didn't feel a need to jump on sites like Neowin and respond to any console game-related article with "XBOX RULEZ!" and then attach some shiny smiley face to it.
The advocates for consoles/operating systems do the most damage to them in my mind, more than the actual product. You start wondering if any well-adjusted people actually use the product. Thus I'd have to rate the majority of pro/anti-console sentiment as simply the inane banter that makes the Internet go round. The real question is, why do people keep eating it up?
Another oft-used anti-Nintendo arguement (Score:5, Insightful)
and of course gabe from penny arcade [penny-arcade.com] said it best when referring to wind waker...
"...these guys think that Zelda is a game for kids. Well only KIDS would care that a game looks like it is for kids. It's like when you are 14 and your mom wants to get a picture of you on the merry go round with your little sister but you don't want to get on because it's for kids. Eventually you grow out of that phase and you can appreciate just having fun whether it be on the back of an undulating wooden horse or in front of a cell shaded video game."
It's a completely liberal/conservative media! (Score:5, Insightful)
So it comes as no surprise that there's an article saying there's bias against the Gamecube, when this is probably not true as most of the console gaming press have chosen a Gamecube for their game of the year for the last two or three years. I have no doubt that Microsoft could very well prove anti-Microsoft bias in the media, especially in the beginning of its lifespan. Anyone remember why Halo surprised everyone? It was because the press generally trashed it from E3 onward. No doubt Sony, too, has had its moments, also particularly in the beginning of the PSX or PS2 cycle lifespan.
As my dad used to say when I whined about my little brother getting something I felt I ought to have, "Cry me a river." You'll always be able to find a bias in the press, because the press is as varied as the community it serves. Duh. I could probably find bias in the gaming media against flossing teeth. Which would be kind of gross, but probably true.
If there's a bias in the media, it's because Microsoft is an American company, and knows how to work the American press. Surprise. Sam Altersitz has no problem claiming Japanese sales number in his article, thus opening his table of study to Japan. But I see absolutely no mention of the Japanese press whatsoever, and while I've probably read as much Japanese press as Altersitz, which is to say none, I'm inclined to believe that Microsoft would be highly justified in claiming in that the Japanese press is extremely anti-Microsoft. Why? Because Microsoft has absolutely no idea how to "press" the Japanese. So why is it a shock that Nintendo, which always seems to be off a wavelength in relation to the American press anyway, is worse at convincing particularly the mainstream press that it is "winning" the console war?
Either way, it doesn't matter. I appreciate the amount of thought and time and research that Sam put into the article, but the answer to why the press seems slanted is obvious. It is, but it's also slanted for the Gamecube as much it is against it, it's just so varied that it's easy to say it's for or against anything. And if there is a slant, that slant doesn't take into consideration the Japanese press nor the obvious advantage Microsoft has in home turf.
Re:It's a completely liberal/conservative media! (Score:1)
Yes. The PS2 specifically. Becuase Sony knew the groundswell for the thing was huge, and that they'ed released it at the perfect time to sell through to the extreme other side of the holiday.
.....In March.... ..aaay. Oh. Awesome! I still beat all my friends!
Timmy: Whats this mom?
Mom: Its a reciept, your getting a PS2!
Timmy:Yaaaaa...
Mom:
Timmy:
Granted thats a little extreme, but still.
T
Re:It's a completely liberal/conservative media! (Score:1)
In addition to your comment about Microsoft being able to workin
Re:It's a completely liberal/conservative media! (Score:2)
These quotes are all over the web:
"The numbers are stark. Over 90 percent of reporters vote Democrat. The numbers are even higher among editors and White House correspondents. Democrat faculty outnumber Republicans 9 to 1." - PoliPundant
With 90% voting democrat, it's a wonder that people don't laugh when Howard Dean says such lunacy as you (kinda) quoted. Oh wait.
Re:It's a completely liberal/conservative media! (Score:1)
I've also heard of these "reports" of how "reporters" vote yet have yet to see them or how they are verified.
Even so, that's really not the question to ask. Are the news outlets themselves liberal or conservative? Are corporate giants like GE, 20th Century Fox or Viacom left-leaning? And if you believe they are, how right to the right are you?
Woah. (Score:1)
I don't keep up on the financials of gaming companies, but... I think this "defense" has convinced me that the biased Nintendo articles are maybe not so biased. Nintendo has it's first financial loss since going public 42 years ago? That's pretty serious. The fanboys can compain that it's old news, but it's news that would fund speculation and future plans by investors. If the Nintendo
Re:Woah. (Score:5, Insightful)
Do you even know what CAUSED the loss?
A surprisingly strong yen devalued Nintendo's off-shore accounts, offsetting whatever sales they had with a huge conversion loss. Nintendo has billions (YES, B) in the bank, and I don't mean Yen. When you can generate a quarterly loss through devalued currency, that's not necessarily a bad thing. Look at the Canadian buck. It's surprisingly strong nowadays.
In 2003 alone, Nintendo made $330 million.
Counting combined sales, Pokemon Ruby/Sapphire was the #1 selling title (#2/3 if not, giving the title to the PS2 version of Madden)
Don't assume anything. Nintendo's still doing better than you think.
Re:Woah. (Score:2)
All that means is that Nintendo can survive some financially stupid decisions. But it doesn't mean the stupid decisions are undone. It sounds like Nintendo mismanaged enough of their relationships to have done actual harm to themselves. If I were an investor, I'm not sure I'd be overjoyed to see the cash in the bank sqandered on mistakes that could have been avoided.
Re:Woah. (Score:3, Informative)
Correct, and they actually have survived those decisions in the past as well. The difference the article is trying to paint is that while Microsoft (and for this purpose Sony's game division) have a very loyal, devoted fanbase, neither has actually SURVIVED something like the Virtual boy.
Or The SNES-CD which became the Playstation.
I can't argue against the logic that those numbers are not good to investors. However, non
Re:Woah. (Score:2)
Will that help?
Nintendo, the Apple of video games (Score:5, Insightful)
Produce high quality hardware with excellent design? Check.
Described as "doomed" year after year? Check.
Still have billions in cash reserves? Check.
Not enough software? Check.
Always being trolled by moronic Microsoft fanboys? Check.
It's obvious, Nintendo are the Apple of video games.
Re:Nintendo, the Apple of video games (Score:3, Funny)
As an aside, I guess we can add "Nintendo is dying/dead" alongside the other Slashdot staples-- "Apple is dying", "BSD is dying", etc. o_O
Blah blah blah (Score:4, Informative)
But in the end, does that really matter? Nintendo lost 26 Million. Microsoft is loosing a quarter of a Billion dollars every quarter this thing goes on. And desipte the nay sayers which come out of unholy holes whenever Nintendo's on the board, when its the turn for the Xbox usually the spectacular loss gets a footnote for the entire article. Blah.
And no one's willing to try and touch Sony. I mean, doesn't anyone remember this??? [theregister.co.uk] I know I sure as hell do. And that's when it started.
On of the biggest secrets of the PS2 are Disc read errors [google.com]. Well, it's actually not so big of a secret. When you get buisness offering to fix your game console becuase Sony won't, you've found a pretty significant problem. Granted, the Xbox has the same thing [google.com], but my understanding is that those have been overcome. Sony has denied that this is a problem. How many people have heard they where sued over it [consumeraffairs.com]??
I'm spouting rhetoric now and will stop. My point that negative attention about either Sony or MS rarely gets published on gaming websites stands. These are examples, and I'm pretty sure that given some creative manuvers i can find more, but I need to get back to work.
Re:Blah blah blah (Score:2, Informative)
Really? Tell me how to overcome these problems as my Xbox still has those damned "Dirty Disc Error" messages despite being shipped back to Microsoft four times! MS's fix is to either delete all of my save data or just send it back with a "duh, works good here" note. I even have a movie disc that consistantly locks up my Xbox but works fine on ten other units that I've tested it on including two othe
Re:Blah blah blah (Score:1)
Since there are more PS2's out there it is a more common problem, you see. I hadn't heard of anyone's XBox crapping out in the last year so I'd assumed they'd gotten rid of it. At least they've never -denied- that its broken. They've just not fixed the problem.
Yes yes (Score:3, Insightful)
Everyone calls Nintendo a kiddy company b/c they don't get the games where you blow cops and everyday citizens apart. (Not that there's anything wrong w/ that.) But they make some of the best adventure/platform/plain ol' fun not overly complex games I can think of.
I told my non-gamer friend to get a Gamecube, here's why: He can still get Madden and other EA Sports games, Tony Hawk games, plus the born again classics of Zelda, Metroid, Mario Games. He's played Xbox/PS2 since and says he'd still rather be playing his Gamecube.
Does it really matter? (Score:1)
Re:Does it really matter? (Score:1)