PlayStation 2 Sales Double Following Price Cut 67
Thanks to GamesIndustry.biz for its article discussing significant PlayStation 2 sales increases following the price cut to $149 last month. The piece quantifies: "Data released this week by Sony Computer Entertainment America shows that the console's sales rose by some 216 per cent in the week immediately following the price cut, with an increase of 141 per cent over the full period since the cut", and this means: "The increase in sales will have propelled the PlayStation 2 well past its console rivals, after Sony's platform slipped behind the Xbox in monthly sales for the first time since the launch of the Microsoft console." It's also explained: "The increased sales noted since the price cut have actually pushed year on year sales of the PS2 upwards, with 26 per cent growth on the same period last year - and should hopefully help to slow the overall decline in hardware sales which has hit the USA so far this year."
Price cut or E3? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Price cut or E3? (Score:2)
Re:Price cut or E3? (Score:4, Insightful)
No, and no. They have not announced when XBOX or PC versions will comeout, and I don't want to wait another 8 months like I did with Vice City. B'sides, there are other bargain bin PS2 games I wouldn't mind having.
Re:Price cut or E3? (Score:2)
Re:Price cut or E3? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Price cut or E3? (Score:2)
If you don't have a PS2 but you have an X-box I would save your money and just wait for the Box version. I would be willing to bet a kidney that there will be a port within a year. The last 2 looked a lot nicer on the x-box an
Re:Price cut or E3? (Score:2, Interesting)
I still have an original PS-1 (with the AV outs on the back.) Sure, a glass of water spilled on it, requiring me to find a vendor to sell me a power supply, but that was it. Still plays discs fine.
I also bought a PS2 when I knew that Soul Calibur 2 would be out for it. Now, it's relegated to playing DVDs to my el-cheapo home theatre (old business projector and blackout cloth screen.) Never missed a beat.
I've also got a Sony STR-DE935 receiv
GTA:SA - Pre-purchased & paid in full... (Score:2)
...before any of the initial screenshots were released. I may buy another PS2, insert GTA:SA and weld the tray shut.
TakeTwo Interactive: Your team at R* deserves even more cash bonuses. Keep up the great work.
Yea, I sound like a fan-boy, but there's just something about the recent GTA games (>=GTA3) that I can't let go of. They've become theraputic after a long day at work.
Re:Price cut or E3? (Score:1)
April of this year? (Score:1)
Re:April of this year? (Score:2, Informative)
What do you expect? It's .biz (Score:3, Funny)
Anything from a
Re:April of this year? (Score:2)
. I'm struck dumb at the finesse. Or maybe the dumb of the statement strikes me, one or the other...
-PS
RIAA (Score:1, Insightful)
There's a shocker (Score:1)
Re:There's a shocker (Score:1)
Interesting. (Score:5, Interesting)
I had a teacher once who was very adamant on that point. We don't need pennies, he would say. Pennies are a waste of metal. We need to take pennies out of circulation. Someone would invariably ask about things that cost $19.99. Well, we'd raise their price to $20, fool, he would say. This makes sense to me--and it made sense to him, but I imagine that a lot of people wouldn't be able to handle it. The economy would collapse. A very large segment of the population considers $19.99 to be a hell of a lot cheaper than $20. On the PS2 front, these same people are ecstatic about the gigantic price drop and buy twice as many of the things as they bought before.
This could be a very interesting pricing strategy for video game console manufacturers:
1. Debut the console at a price point of something like $300.
2. Every three to six months thereafter (the timeframe could easily be extended or shortened) drop the price by, say, $10.
3. Laugh as sales nearly double right after doing this.
4. Repeat until console has saturated market.
This reminds of the GameCube thing that happened a while ago. I believe it was last summer that Nintendo had a deal going with the Cube:
Buy a $150 GameCube, and you get a free $50 game.
Well, this was quite a deal, but sales were stagnant. Some months later, the marketing geniuses at the big N decided to adopt a new tactic:
Buy a $100 GameCube, and you don't get anything for free.
Lo and behold, sales shot up. Why? Well, obviously, because now it's fifty dollars cheaper!!! Never mind that you have to buy a game to play the stupid thing, it's just a better deal.
It's interesting to think about this stuff.
How stupid is the average shopper?
Re:Interesting. (Score:5, Insightful)
I'll call bullshit on that. Where's your evidence? Have you taken any surveys to back that up? Furthermore, your assertion that the economy would collapse is simply foolish.
Well, yes, I was indeed exaggerating about the economy's collapsing. And of course I've not really got any numbers to back up my assertions. I will say, though, that I believe people think "within the boundaries of price points." $19.99 is "under" $20, so it's okay, but something that actually costs $20 is not. It's a psychological thing that stores try to exploit by pricing everything one cent below its actual price: you look at the numbers and your mind immediately sees those nines and equates it as something less expensive than $20. Why would stores do it if it had no effect? If anything, they'd save ink by just writing "$20" instead of "$19.99" but, no, they price everything this way. It must work on some level. Probably not on as dramatic a level as I've intimated, but there's something in our subconscious...
Re:Interesting. (Score:2)
Right, but you fail to realize that there must be a reason that companies began using the *.99 marketing. They can't all be doing it because everyone else is doing it, because then where would it have begun? Your argument, if you don't mind my saying so, is somewhat illogical.
Instead of saying things like "How st
Re:Interesting. (Score:5, Interesting)
The *.99 cent pricing strategy was NOT started as a psychological trick. It was first instituted by Macy's, the big department store, to solve a very specific problem.
Scenario 1:
I go in and buy a $5 whoosit, and bring it to the cashier. She rings me up for $5, I hand her a $5 bill, she smiles, and I walk away.
And then she sticks the $5 bill in her pocket.
Scenario 2:
I go in and buy a $4.99 whoosit, and bring it to the casher. She rings me up for $4.99, I hand her a $5 bill, and she has to open the register to make change. Opening the register registers the sale, and she can no longer slip money into her pocket off the books.
So Macy's decided to make $0.01 less on each sale, in exchange for essentially eliminating (this form of) employee theft.
This problem could have been dealt with in other ways. Taxes now solve it; it's very rare that a price at a store like Macy's will fall on a dollar amount. Alternately, you can just convince the customer to always ask for a receipt... I just got back from China, and one of the things that is big over there (maybe required?) is for receipts to have small lottery scratch-offs on them, where you have some chance of winning a dollar or two. The idea is that this gives the customer motivation to ask for the receipt, which means there's always a record of the sale. Although the beneficiary in the government (the record is used to avoid tax fraud), the idea is the same.
Even though everyone thinks that *.99 pricing is a psychological trick, that was not its original purpose. Whether or not it is effective at this adopted purpose is, as far as I know, an open question.
Re:Interesting. (Score:1)
Really interesting story, though, and it sure does make a hell of a lot of sense... I guess that's why so many food court shops in the malls will have the "get a receipt or your meal's on us" signs...
Re:Interesting. (Score:2)
wow... (Score:1)
wow...Just wow!
I can't say much more than that. Do you always turn discussions into political bashing like this? There aren't really any intelligible points to your post. You just attempt to make the grandparent feel bad for his opinions. I know I shouldn't be feeding your troll post, but I want
Re:Interesting. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Interesting. (Score:1)
Re:Interesting. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Interesting. (Score:3, Informative)
We didn't use pennies on post. It was very convenient.
They just priced things normally, and the only time it mattered was with your final total at checkout.
They just rounded the total. So if your total was $15.48, you just paid $15.50. $15.46, and you paid $15.45.
So, there were no pennies really in circulation there. But for some strange reason, the US mint (whoever is in charge of money supply) moved a crapload of Susan B. Anthony dollars, and $2 bill
Re:Interesting. (Score:2)
Re:Interesting. (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Interesting. (Score:3, Interesting)
Every dozen-or-so years, the mint prints up a bunch of $2 bills. The last run was in 1995, and before that, 1976. Before that, something like 1959. Banks and most shops just hate the things because they don't have special drawers for them (typical cash registers have 4 slots: $1, $5, $10 and $20+).
The hard part is finding them. I have one bank that I know of where I can find the things, and whenever I make my
Holland had the same thing (Score:2)
Now we got the euro and the cent is back. Although it is now worth a bit more the amount of hazzle makes me wish t
Re:Interesting. (Score:1)
Re:Interesting. (Score:2)
If we got rid of pennies, I bet that store would lower their price to $19.95, not raise it to $20. The same psychology that applies to selling stuff for 1 cent less would apply to selling stuff for 5 cents less.
Re:Interesting. (Score:2)
That's exactly what happened in Australia. We got rid of our 1c and 2c coins ages ago (maybe 2 decades). Prices went from $xx.99 to $xx.95.
Re:Interesting. (Score:2)
Used games can be had for $20 quite easily. If you look hard enough and are patient enough you can have them for cheaper than that.
Re:Interesting. (Score:3, Insightful)
> drop, and then they cost $150 afterwards.
Actually, no. You can get the PS2 w/ online adapter for $150--those cost $200 before the price cut. I bought my first PS2 myself because of the price cut.
> This reminds of the GameCube thing that happened a while ago. I believe it was last
> summer that Nintendo had a deal going with the Cube:
>
> Buy a $150 GameCube, and you get a free $50 game.
>
> Well, this
Re:Interesting. (Score:2)
So if three people bought the thing when it was $180, that means only six necessarily bought it when it was $150.
How impressive is that? Not very, I think. Every vendor will get a quick increase in sales as soon as they lower the price. The question is whether the increased sales rate will last.
Re:Interesting. (Score:1)
But then again, this is probably a troll.
Re:Interesting. (Score:1)
Is it just me, or is that a little bit...strange? They cost $180 before the price drop, and then they cost $150 afterwards. It's not that much of a difference, is it? Certainly not enough to merit twice as many people rushing out and buying one...what kind of consumer thinks, ooh, I'd always wanted a PS2 but, y'know, they were just thirty dollars too expensive for me? I guess this is the same mentality that wouldn't hesitate to buy something that costs $19.99 but would flinch at anything costing a flat $2
One think I'm curious about (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:One think I'm curious about (Score:1)
So I've had it for about 2.5 years now without any major issues (when I sent it
Re: (Score:2)
Re:One think I'm curious about (Score:2)
This is a good thing. (Score:1)
Slump in hardware sales? (Score:2, Insightful)
Buying a console - you buy the console. Then you go spend your money on a big screen TV, new couch, and
Re:Slump in hardware sales? (Score:2)
Ok so you buy upgrades every year. People don't buy new consoles every year. Usually it's about every 5 years unless you're a gaming enthusiast.
What? You don't have a couch and TV already?
I don't know where you got the idea that console games "last much less in terms of playability" because it most certainly isn't the case.
Re:Slump in hardware sales? (Score:2)
Re:Slump in hardware sales? (Score:1)
Re:Slump in hardware sales? (Score:2)
Dude, you crazy! Pink donuts are the best ones.
Re:Slump in hardware sales? (Score:5, Interesting)
I don't think I've ever purchased a new TV or couch because of my console, but if I did I'd have the benefit of something decent sized to watch films and TV on too, not really a major drawback, I'd certainly rather have a 42" TV than an 18" monitor for my PC.
In terms of games numbers, maybe I would have more games on the PC if that many good games ever came out for the damn thing; and there are plenty of console games with massive longevity that is there for a good reason, as opposed to having to go there in order to prop up the PC gaming industry in the monthly gaps between decent releases.
Consoles help programmers, as they're a much bigger market for them to sell to. The PC hardware market has been up its own arse for so long selling unnecessary incremental upgrades (I'm talking massive 66Mhz rises in CPU speeds, releasing 4 different graphics cards within 10% of each other, Hard drives with 5% more storage than the last model), that it deserves to be in a slump. Finally they're innovating now, I feared we'd be stuck with Megahurtz, PCI and AGP for far too long. Face it, anyone using a PC for mainstream tasks don't need the extra 2Ghz that Intel want to sell them, they're bringing it on themselves.
No surprise (Score:2)
Microsoft drops the price of xbox. Sony drops the price of playstation. Time passes.
Microsoft drops the price of xbox. Who is going to buy a playstation now, knowing that Sony is likely going to drop the price to meet it? Once Sony does the expected, people who were waiting make the purchase.
Hold on... (Score:1, Insightful)
M$ bleeding money (Score:1)
Re:M$ bleeding money (Score:1)